Acerthorn asked Judge to change her mind. Best part:Stebbins v. Google is DISMISSED
Stebbins declared a vexatious litigant
Entry #71 (Attached)
His future copyright claims will be pre-screened by a Judge.
He deserves to be labeled as a vexatious litigant in all districts at once. Easiest way to defang him.
No. The court never said that he couldn't have recorded because it is against the law, only adding that as an additional point to highlight how unethical and impermissible it is to do so under the court's own caselaw (prior decisions).
Doesn't this make it easier to prevent him from going after other Youtubers though. Youtubers are his main targets now.
>Filed 09/01/23
He sniffed the black mold and dust on his walls and that gave him enough energy to spend all night writing this
When you've got that resident evil 7 grind set.
He'll find some way to get arround it enevitibly, I gaurentee it since this is the guy who sues people over anything he gets assblasted over.Stebbins v. Google is DISMISSED
Stebbins declared a vexatious litigant
Entry #71 (Attached)
His future copyright claims will be pre-screened by a Judge.
It makes it much easier. He's technically supposed to include this order in all filings and all in forma pauperis requests. If he fails to its an easy motion to dismiss by the Victim/Defendant. Once one Federal Circuit so brutally tags you as a Vexatious Litigant, most other courts will take it under consideration and act accordingly. They will waffle regarding state or local vexatious status (like we saw here). But Acertards slapdown is remarkably broad for such things.
*turkey sounds*
How do you know this? I'd like to read more about it. The DMCA claim/strike system on Youtube is an automated process, at least in part, so I'm wondering how that would work.
You have to provide contact details when making a takedown request, I'm guessing they just filter for his name/email and flag it for manual review.
Part of the automation allows them to flag certain accounts or claiments for human legal department review. We saw them do it with Alex Mauer for example. Guaranteed Acertard is on the "everything goes to legal" algorithm now. He's really pissed off Googles Lawyers.
