Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%

  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%

  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%

  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%

  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%

  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%

  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%
  • Total voters
    2,240
Acerthorn's released a 1 hour 46 minute pay-walled video, "I'm friendless by choice and family-less by choice, and here's why"
He has a preview here.
In the preview he says
I am family-less by choice, I disowned my family years ago... I am also friendless by choice, it's not that I can't make friends, it's that I actively don't want to have any friends... Of course don't get any ideas about simply reposting the video even if you plan on criticizing it.
Click to expand...
It's obvious he releases these pay-walled videos in an attempt to manufacture copyright infringement claims.

The same day Acerthorn posted a video saying he has no friends, he asked for movie recommendations he and his "new long-distance girlfriend" could watch.
Link (a)
I'm looking for a romance movie that I can watch with my new long-distance girlfriend over Discord, as our first date together.

Following criteria:
  • Available for free on Amazon Prime, as that's the only movie subscription service I have.
  • Realistic chemistry between the MCs. None of that "creepy stalker who I've already said no to shows up in my lawn with a boom box over his head, so instead of calling the cops, I actually fall for him" bullshit.
  • Preferably not a romcom. The romance should be taken seriously.
Any suggestions?
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, ️ronic and TurboNAS
He's desperate for his family to take him back and make friends to support him if he has to release a near 2 hour long video coping with the fact he's all alone because he's such a hateable, punchable human being. I could watch an 80's action movie during that time.
MongolianMongoose said:
The same day Acerthorn posted a video saying he has no friends, he asked for movie recommendations he and his "new long-distance girlfriend" could watch.
Link (a)
Click to expand...
Has he thought about watching Bros with his tranny "girlfriend"?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TurboNAS
MongolianMongoose said:
Acerthorn's released a 1 hour 46 minute pay-walled video, "I'm friendless by choice and family-less by choice, and here's why"
He has a preview here.
In the preview he says

It's obvious he releases these pay-walled videos in an attempt to manufacture copyright infringement claims.
Click to expand...
His final words in the video are threatening to sue people. What a nutcase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaladinBoo and DiggieSmalls
Polano appeal:
IMG_0522.jpegCorpos asked for more time. New deadline (already approved) to file their brief is 09/27/2023
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe, TurboNAS, Vecr and 2 others




You know stabbins, for someone who is willing to go such great lengths to fuck people over for actual fair use, just ripping this video's audio
and using it wholesale with no commentary makes you look like a moron (which you are)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: PaladinBoo, Anonymus Fluhre, DiggieSmalls and 1 other person
kcbbq said:
Wait, something happened in the legal world in less than 30 minutes? That just seems unpossible.
Click to expand...
It was most likely a function the clerk of court could approve rather than having to route it to the judge. So yeah they will read it and then say yes. It usually happens on first requests for more time or when both sides agree with an extension of time.
 
Stabbins's paralegal advice be like:
- "Your best bet is to file a Motion to Dismiss for insufficient service of process. You can find lawyers for cheap on Fiverr" (a);
- "If you go on fiverr and look for an LSR attorney, they can draft a pro se motion to dismiss for you pretty cheaply" (a) as a response to a question "how expensive lawyers are?".
MongolianMongoose said:
See that cut on his face. He asked a strange question on Reddit that could be related.
[Serious] People who were wrongfully committed over fake allegations of self-harm, what's your story? (archive)
Click to expand...
Why do reddit jannies keep removing his (a) totaly serious posts (a)? Man just wants to know about penis inspection days (a).


Sweeter and Savoury said:
While we have no evidence that he's a closet pedofile I wouldn't be surprised in the future to find out he is.
Click to expand...
In one of the videos French confessed that he been diddled by a priest when Leo was a choir boy. Nonces often got diddled in their childhood, so I would not be surprised either.

P.S. An older find (a) for a response I think I forgot to post:
Comandante Marcos said:
Fucking LOL, harassing the cops in a shithole small town in Arkansas
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Pedophobe, TurboNAS and 1 other person
Adr1anD said:
In one of the videos French confessed that he been diddled by a priest when Leo was a choir boy. Nonces often got diddled in their childhood, so I would not be surprised either.
Click to expand...
This is how you end up an intellectual property lawyer. It is their only means of reproduction since they never have sex with women.
 
  • Informative
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, Pedophobe, RodgerDodger and 3 others
Attached Entry #69 in Stebbins v. Google LLC, 3:23-cv-00322
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

Acerthorn compares himself to an abused girlfriend and Google's lawyers to her abusive boyfriend.
This is the epitome of a toxic and abusive relationship, and the Defendants are the abusers.
15. Most of their 4-page opposition consists of the Defendant doing little more than venting,
with such lines as “The bulk of the so-called 'complaint' (85 paragraphs) is dedicated to
(misguided) legal arguments over why Plaintiff believes the at-issue channel icon is not fair use”
(emphasis in original) and “Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave is another example of the 'blatant
gamesmanship' and 'efforts to manipulate the litigation process' that warrant declaring him a
vexatious litigant in this District.”
16. However, it is clear that they simply find fault with everything I do, simply because they
don't like me personally. It's like an abusive relationship, and the Defendant here is the abusive
boyfriend. Nothing I (the victim of the abuse) say or do is ever good enough. Everything is
wrong in their eyes.
17. Even cases that don't concern them are still considered frivolous in their eyes. For
example, in Dkt. 63, p. 7, lines 22-25, they complain about a defamation lawsuit I have filed,
claiming that I am suing this man for “fairly criticizing” me, when in fact, the defendant in that
case made absolutely false statements about me, which I can prove to be false. They don't want
me to even so much as have my day in court, not because they have objective evidence that my
allegations are false, but simply because, par to the course for an abusive relationship, I can't do
anything right in their eyes.
Click to expand...

He provided a link to a 44 minute call he had with Google's lawyer.
Is this phone call copyrightable? I'm hesitant to upload a local copy. I'll include transcripts for the parts I think are worth discussing.

11:55 He asks Google for the personal information of anyone listed in the suggested channels page of YouTube troll "Acerthorn the True Acerthorn."
Acerthorn: Also everybody listed in that's channel's Acerthorn's arch-nemesis section that, you mentioned that as being what's so transformative, so the channels, the analytics, and the contact information for all of those people.

Lawyer: Okay, uh. I don't know that I agree that the contact information for all those people would necessarily be relevant here.
Click to expand...

13:55 Acerthorn acts like a child and literally tells the defense they're pulling accusations "out of your butts."
Acerthorn: I want to force you to admit. I want you to force you to actually show the evidence that says that I'm acting solely out of a desire to silence criticism about me because it seems like you just pull that out of your butts. So I'm looking, I'm anxious to get you to actually show the proof.

Lawyer: I really don't appreciate the assertion that we've "pulled anything out of our butts." Now I frankly don't think that kind of language is helpful to a cooperative conversation here, so I hope we can avoid those kind of accusations.
Click to expand...

18:15 Acerthorn gets mad at the lawyer for "cutting him off" and is upset the lawyer hasn't 👏 listed 👏 every 👏 possible 👏 defense.
Acerthon: There is one more thing. You've been cutting me off every time I tried to bring it up. Aside from fair use and the claim that I'm just trying to silence online criticism about me, ARE. THERE. ANY. OTHER. DEFENSES. THAT. I NEED. TO KNOW. ABOUT!?
Click to expand...

21:15 Lawyer says the judge may rule for or against the pending motion for dismissal. Acerthorn thinks by acknowledging this possibility the lawyer is admitting that Acerthon has made a non-frivolous case that cannot be dismissed.
Acerthorn: You aren't exactly 100% certain that the motion dismiss is going to be granted which just goes to show that you admit that it's not beyond doubt that I can prove no set of facts that would entitle me to relief which means the motion to dismiss should be denied.

Lawyer: [...] I don't think any person involved in the litigation can speak with absolute certainty about what a judge might do with respect to any given motion. Recognizing that the motion could or could not be granted is certainly no admission. The no "set of facts" standard you keep articulating is not the "plea standard" that was disposed of long ago.
Click to expand...
The lawyer rejects any insinuation that Acerthon has a legitimate case. Acerthorn ignores this and, in the attached document, presents this portion of the call thinking it's a big win.
9. In fact, the Defense counsel has even admitted that they do not believe it is a foregone
conclusion that this case will in fact be dismissed, which in turn means that my legal arguments
are not frivolous. They even admitted to as much during our 26(f) conference on March 30,
2023. See https://youtu.be/_SE9GHiDAco at timestamp 23:33 – 24:16, defense counsel outright
admits that he does not know what the ruling will be on the motion to dismiss. There are plenty
of other instances during this call when the defense counsel admits to this, if the Court wishes to
listen to the whole thing; this is just one timestamp I was able to find in a pinch.

10. In other words, by their own admission, there is in fact grounds upon which reasonable
minds may differ regarding whether it is fair use. Therefore, by their own admission, it cannot
not meet the legal definition of “frivolous.”
Click to expand...

43:05 Acerthorn brings up his old criminal charge and calls the prosecutor in that case a "corrupt shit-head." The call ends shortly after this outburst.
Acerthorn: Let me tell you a little story about something. Years ago I was charged with a crime and I wasn't convicted, but there's a little thing that happened during the case. There was basically a domestic violence agency in my area that had some relevant documents in their file, that were relevant to my case. And the prosecuting attorney was like "I'll get those documents for you" and so my public defender was just like "Okay, no need for me to actually subpoena anything." and so she just sat back and waited for those documents so those documents never came because the prosecutor was just a corrupt shit-head and he just gave us the runaround.

Lawyer: Understood. I'm sorry to hear about that experience. That's not what we're trying to do here.
Click to expand...

44:25 The ending
Lawyer: I very much appreciate you taking the time to chat today.
Acerthorn: Uh this wasn't just a chat, this wasn't small-talk. This was business.
Lawyer: [laughs] That's correct. I very much appreciate you taking the time to talk business
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, Mind Goblins, Coo Coo Bird and 12 others
This shit above is like when you have your custom created character in a game's cutscene and the other characters are acting normal. It's such a stark contrast to see this schizo interacting with normal humans(Well lawyers but still...).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, Essay2414778 and TurboNAS
Acertard submitted the call into the court record. Its a public record now. An insanely stupid public record. But it is what it is. I can't imagine the Judge responding well to hearing that? T
Anonymus Fluhre said:
This case does exist.
There are problems with this though as described in the article.
Click to expand...
This doesn't apply. Acertard filed the recording in a Federal Court Case. It's a public record now.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Essay2414778, Vecr, Useful_Mistake and 2 others
Holy shit Stabbins is quite the Assburger isn't he? I give props to Jermey Austin for putting up with all Stabbins passive/agreesive shit flinging while maintaining a 100% professional demeanor.

The dude Stabbins has zero social skills. He should be the textbook case for Assburgers. Maybe after he dies he can donate that peanut of a brain to science for study.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: yydszmiteg2
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back