Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 Maintenace complete. Database is on a new RAID. Everything should load faster. Will optimize more over time.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 71 10.7%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 94 14.2%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 208 31.4%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 174 26.2%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 65 9.8%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.7%

  • Total voters
    663
If Drexel wants to talk to me one on one on live I would probably be OK with that but I'm not sure what the point would be.
The problem is that anything Drexel adds to the narrative will put him at odds with what he said before. I encountered the same thing when making the megapost. Drexel is a liar no matter what, so yeah, what's the point? All we would have is the latest variation on his narrative. Also, Drexel has the following established ways of dealing with critics:

1. He will ask about your browser history, claim you look at porn regardless, which will exonerate him somehow or at least mean you cannot judge his degenerate behavior.

2. He would tell you to show your face, but since you've shown your face, will instead challenge you to say these things to his face (in person), and if you decline he will call you a coward.

3. He will claim you are jealous of him in some capacity (usually a sexual one).

Basically, Drexel will try to shift the focus off of himself and onto you. Unsure if Drexel is capable of understanding (or even accepting) anyone's perspective except his own. He is quite dedicated to his worldview. If any of this doesn't sound like fun to you, don't do it.
 
Last edited:
Ralph updates regarding Rekieta for those who don't watch his stream:

Ralph had some problems with cashing out Rumble Rants (their version of superchats) this week. He urged people to use other methods because they weren't paying him out. He had contacted Rumble and said Rekieta was providing assistance. He said he talked to Rekieta and IIRC said Nick gave him a contact at Rumble. He said he was considering switching to Kick if he issue wasn't fixed.

Today, Ralph said he got an email from Rumble rectifying the issue. He credited name-dropping Rekieta (at Rekieta's suggestion) for getting the issue resolved. He said he was happy to stay on Rumble because he prefers it to Kick (he's ate some Kick suspensions in the past).

He got a super chat making fun of Rekieta and Ralph shut it down right away. He said that he regrets the situation very much and has nothing bad to say about Nick or his wife, and is deeply grateful to Rekieta for accepting his apology and helping him with his Rumble issue.

Nick feels like he owes his career to dick, his policy of "ThEY aLwAyS GoOd tO mE" leads to incidents where his morals is thrown to the side for people like dick & ralph but raged against when it was someone from kickvic. You can acknowledge your friends done retarded shit, but it's also gay for spectators to boycott their e-daddy if he doesn't disavow people. Him saying dick & vito aren't pedos is fucking retarded because vito admitted to being one, comedy has some truth to the bit and why would anyone joke about being a pedo or being a "pedophile advocate" which both dick and vito done.
That's part of it.

The other part of it is the parasocial element. Nick owes his career from covering Dick's lawsuit, but the reason why he made videos covering it in the first place is that he is a Dick Masterson fan. And not even just a casual fan either, the guy is his e-daddy. He believes the LA playboy comedian image and it seems like he wants to live it too.
 
That's a really unfortunately shaped piece of jerky Nick had:
Looks like Jack Murphy Jerky.
If Drexel wants to talk to me one on one on live I would probably be OK with that but I'm not sure what the point would be.
Unless you can monetize it don't bother. No point in subjecting yourself to more of his bix nood low IQ muh dik logic.
Drexel: "I fit all women's 6's (top 1%)"

Banging vapid LA sluts is really all he thinks about. Dude's going to alienate his daughter, get abused in a nursing home, and die alone. Assuming one of the women he's seduced don't poison him out of jealousy.
I believe it was discovered here that the house he lives in is actually his mother's house.
 
I believe it was discovered here that the house he lives in is actually his mother's house.
I fully expect Drexel to trot out the canard that Null lives in his mother's basement in Florida, like all the "mainstream" news stories have falsely claimed. Dude has lived in eastern Europe for years now and Null made a pretty solid point that Florida doesn't really even have basements due to the high water table.

This will be fun.
 
The problem is that anything Drexel adds to the narrative will put him at odds with what he said before. I encountered the same thing when making the megapost. Drexel is a liar no matter what, so yeah, what's the point? All we would have is the latest variation on his narrative. Also, Drexel has the following established ways of dealing with critics:

1. He will ask about your browser history, claim you look at porn regardless, which will exonerate him somehow or at least mean you cannot judge his degenerate behavior.

2. He would tell you to show your face, but since you've shown your face, will instead challenge you to say these things to his face (in person), and if you decline he will call you a coward.

3. He will claim you are jealous of him in some capacity (usually a sexual one).

Basically, Drexel will try to shift the focus off of himself and onto you. Unsure if Drexel is capable of understanding (if not accepting) anyone's perspective except his own. He is quite dedicated to his worldview. If any of this doesn't sound like fun to you, don't do it.
The point of talking to Drexel is that he will act like a nig while saying that he's the whitest mocha-man who has ever lived. More specifically, there is no adequate answer to the groomer story. All he can really do is lie, change the subject, or rage quit. it'd be funny, and I think Null would handle it well because he doesn't get shook about stuff.

The real value would be that it would 1) put something out there that will almost certainly look horrible for Drex and Nick that Nick will almost defiantly be unable to resist fucking up worse by trying to get the last word on and 2) probably be pretty damning for anyone who's on the fence.
 
You really don't want to start going down the rabbit hole of the "technical" definition of a pedophile and what prepubescent means because I promise you the stench will get on you and start sticking to you if you continue to engage in this kind of rhetoric. Anyone who wants to bang a 13/14 year old is a pedophile and needs to be handled accordingly. Trying to distinguish between MAP and Pedophile, and even to an extent using their softening term of "MAP", is also ill advised. That's just my take though.
You are one 100% correct. I get people wanna say a 20 year old and 17 year old are not om the same level or how a pedo will loss interest in thier target as they mature. But it's a pointless debate. The only people who should have concern about AOC are people under the age of 20.

People nicks age yelling about it are weird.
 
Conversing with Drexel about the things his said himself on video, is pointless. You could have the video playing in his face while having a professor of literature explain to him what the word grooming in this context means, on top of a million women telling him that it’s wrong and all it would amount to is “Ahhh sheeeeittt you is wrong, oook ook Muh Dddiiiiiiicccccckkkk!”
 
Just jumping in as I catch up on the present chimpout:
View attachment 5309129
It's good to know this little bitch reacts poorly to his full name. Does it make you think of what daddy would call you before he beat your ass with a belt, Drexel? Or did daddy do more than just beat you, the majority of child molestations and all that.

Assuming daddy was even in the picture, I recall Nick saying Drexel was "like a son" to Nick's parents.
I'd be ashamed of that Street Sharks ass name too. What was he named after, a fucking Beyblade?
 
If Drexel wants to talk to me one on one on live I would probably be OK with that but I'm not sure what the point would be.
He is using you as a distraction from the Eric July situation, they know you have less avenues to defend yourself and public perception is on his side amongst the twitterati for him and his orbiters to attack you with impunity (wouldn’t put it past them to have gotten you banned preemptively). Just ignore it and watch them burn out from a safe distance. You have nothing to gain by allowing yourself to be used as fodder for twitter clout by pedos, groomers and deviants.. It’s not a coincidence that Nick, Dick, Vito and Drexel have all been so desperate to drag you in to their shitstorm.
 
It was the thesis of Max Karson's video essay about how he wanted to fuck the blonde girl.

I'm so disappointed in him
But are you surprised we're here now?

Karson is friends with Vito, who is friends with Masterson, who is friends with Nick. It's clear to me how we got here. This is a classic case of clique loyalty overriding logic.

Conversing with Drexel about the things his said himself on video, is pointless. You could have the video playing in his face while having a professor of literature explain to him what the word grooming in this context means, on top of a million women telling him that it’s wrong and all it would amount to is “Ahhh sheeeeittt you is wrong, oook ook Muh Dddiiiiiiicccccckkkk!”
I'd actually have some amount respect for Drexel if he actually shamed by that story. Plenty of people have done stupid shit in the past.

We were discussing earlier about whether it's relevant whether this event happened ages ago, or just the other day. To me the bigger issue is not the amount of time that has passed, but how he perceives the whole thing. He seems proud of it. He brought the whole thing up BECAUSE he's proud of that conquest.

Drexel is one of those guys who's got to think he was a muthafuckin G through all phases of his life. He's one of those people who can never be wrong. It's what makes him insufferable.
 


On the topic of pedophilia, I'm only two minutes in and I already have to call something out. I am on my phone so I can't archive.

Nick is retconning Cuties pretty hard here. Granted, I haven't seen the thing so I'm basing my opinion entirely on the marketing. But I think that's fair.

"Cuties is a poor attempt to show child exploitation and the problem with cuties is not the attempt or the intent. The problem with cuties is that they ended up exploiting children in the name of not exploiting children."

No, Nick. This was not some heroic attempt to call out the exploitation of children that resulted in an oopsie. It was utter glorification of the exploitation of children to the point where I, someone who barely reacted to BME Pain Olympics viral video, have to this day never even finished the trailer because it disgusted me so much. The posters promoting the movie had little girls twerking in pop star poses. The fact that Nick is trying to rewrite this to be a failed attempt at heroically calling out child exploitation...I genuinely have no words for it. He is defending cuties as much as someone can without outright defending it and it's baffling even at this point in his downfall.
I really wonder if Dick has something on Nick. Who goes to the lengths of white knighting cuties to protect an internet associate? Or does Nick really see Dick as his internet dad? That would be some weapons-grade irony.

Also he goes in on comics gate. I guess some of them cancelled on his Nashville show because of Dick.

THE SPIRAL CONTINUES.

Edit: It sounds like even if solid proof comes out that Dick and Vito sent the email directly, all they'll get is a harsh finger wag from Nick. What would it take for him to cut ties with Dick? A single mention of energii_king?
 
Last edited:
From the way drexel talked, i get the impression that his mom is exactly like the black women he constantly hates on and his dad is buck broken shell of a man. Wasnt the tourism company that his family had under her name? Kf posted it here.

A long while back, I found and posted a full bio of Drexel's mother. Its archived here.

In short, she has a graduate degree in "Urban and Regional Studies". From there, she was essentially the classic Minnesota government welfare spending grifter. She had a series of jobs associated with housing poor people with different government agencies in the city of Minneapolis and at other levels of regional government. She got early retirement because that is another part of how these sorts of jobs work in Minnesota.

She was so committed to black people, "urban housing" and the struggle that she raised her kids including little Drexel in the nearly all white then far-out newish suburb of Lakeville MN where NIck also lived.

I've never found much about his father. I could guess some things about him, but I'm not going to.

I can't conclusively prove it, but generally the evidence points to Drexel still living in his parents old house (they mostly live in Las Vegas now). If its paid for, HE didn't pay for it.

I've always tended to think of Drexel as a guy who was raised far away from black people and doesn't quite understand how to relate to them. Especially black women. An overly strong mother and an absent father (if that is true) could multiply his problems.
 
Nick says his our wife bring him down to poverty? But he said that our wife is very hesitant on spending money and always asks for permission on even stuff that costs only 50 bux?

I think this is nick lying, considering we know how HE spends his money.
UH OH, this sounds like someone might be having financial problems!

Surely not Nicholas Rekieta tough, after all, what's a self-inflicted lawsuit handled by an incredibly expensive lawyer, two pricy cars, a lavish permanent-vacation lifestyle, 5 kids and their caretakers, an incredible amount of (relatively) high quality alcohol, a collection of exquisite dada-kitsch art pieces valued (at sale) at five figures and an assortment of mind altering substances, what, pray tell, would this cost to a middling youtuber with a thoroughly stagnating and shrinking audience and contracts as renewable as fossil fuels?

Nothing, absolutely nothing, or as close to nothing as you could possibly get, positively a low proportion of his earnings, just a moderate amount, most of his social media expert earnings really.

And the best part of being Nicholas Rekieta and living the finest life? your law degree will come be extremely handy as you save multiple hundred dollars by doing your own paperwork to file for bankruptcy, now this is what you could call doing "just fine", isn't it faggots and incel prudes?

Yet fear not, Nicholas Rekieta has hatched a cunning plan to escape the possibility of having to niggardly live the remainder of his life (yet remain living like a nigger), and this plan I will reveal to you :

He will ask his daddy for money, surely after torching that bridge as if it were a wicker man during Beltane the man will bail out his beloved son.
1. Technical point to some in the thread: Based on the evidence we know, Drex is not a pedo. As per DSM-5: That's for those aged 16+ who are attracted to prepubescent children. By all accounts, Drex's girlfriend's daughter was age 13-14 and almost certainly not prepubescent. Drex is simply a disgusting textbook groomer and probably a MAP.
Technical point to you: Jump headfirst into a woodchipper.
 
Last edited:
I really wonder if Dick has something on Nick. Who goes to the lengths of white knighting cuties to protect an internet associate? Or does Nick really see Dick as his internet dad? That would be some weapons-grade irony.
It's the latter. He's been a fan of Dick since before he started his TY channel.

I don't think Dick "has anything" on Nick, but I could be wrong. I know there were some stories about how LR acted at one of the Road Rages. One of which was a bizarre claim she fucked Warski. IIRC, a lot of that came from the likes of CRP, who I don't trust as far as I can throw him. CRP has been assmad about Nick ever since Nick told him his draft manuscript of Whilshire Blvd. wasn't very good.
 
UH OH, this sounds like someone might be having financial problems!

Surely not Nicholas Rekieta tough, after all, what's a self-inflicted lawsuit handled by an incredibly expensive lawyer, two pricy cars, a lavish permanent-vacation lifestyle, 5 kids and their caretakers, an incredible amount of (relatively) high quality alcohol, a collection of exquisite dada-kitsch art pieces valued (at sale) at five figures and an assortment of mind altering substances, what, pray tell, would this cost to a middling youtuber with a thoroughly stagnating and shrinking audience and contracts as renewable as fossil fuels?

Nothing, absolutely nothing, or as close to nothing as you could possibly get, positively a low proportion of his earnings, just a moderate amount, most of social media expert earnings really.

And the best part of being Nicholas Rekieta and living the finest life? your law degree will come be extremely handy as you save multiple hundred dollars by doing your own paperwork to file for bankruptcy, now this is what you could call doing "just fine", isn't it faggots and incel prudes?

Yet fear not, Nicholas Rekieta has hatched a cunning plan to escape the possibility of having to niggardly live the remainder of his life (yet remain living like a nigger), and this plan I will reveal to you :

He will ask his daddy for money, surely after torching that bridge as if it were a wicker man during Beltane the man will bail out his beloved son.

Technical point to you: Jump headfirst into a woodchipper.
 
like many of you said, Rekieta seems to be doing whatever it takes to get on the better better side of Dick Masterson, they were always friendly, but still, the amount of times Masterson has been on his show lately is unheard of, out of nowhere Rekieta did a complete 180 on Vito, no only on the unforgivable pedo shit (now saying it was all jokes and if you don't like it you obviously hate free speech), but he also conveniently ignores and justifies Vito's and Masterson's attempt to deplatform and mess with other peoples jobs, the big one was Vito directly tagging youtube to ban Nerdrotics because they had Alex Jones, Rekieta gave Vito a platform to say "I was only tagging because it was curious and wanted youtube to know, totally not to get them banned guys", and more recently the Eric July stuff, Rekieta keeps repeating the "I don't believe they sent the mails, so they are innocent" COMPLETELY IGNORING the very very recent twitter posts from both Vito AND Dick tagging the church, retweeting other people saying that there is obviously a confusion with the names and that something should be done.
And now the cherry on top, Rekieta is actually mending the bridge with Ralph (because obviously he needs to do it to be friendly with Masterson) which is extra funny, because Ralph has said the worst shit imaginable not only of Rekieta, but his wife, his kids, and specially DREXEL, the very person Nick is going to war with Null for.

Basically, the most humilliated party on all this is not the farms, not masterson's, not even Rekieta, but Rekieta's family, that now have to live with degeneracy, allowing an actual pedophile into their circle and meet ups, and now Nick being buddy buddy again with the man that dragged his wife's name through the mud. shit, no wonder his wife spends the day so drugged up she can't even do house chores.
 
Back