2023-09-23 - Nitasha Tiku: conversationMedia request for comment from The Washington Post

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tell me the photographer wasn't trying to tell the truth about these filthy, disgusting troons.

The only person who did his job in this pathetic hit piece was the photographer. The text has all the lies they wanted told, but the pictures tell the entire truth about these repulsive perverts.
 
"We're going to need you to wear your grandma's shower curtain."
View attachment 5314085
You better stop or Philip is going to beat you up.
1561490237360160769_3.jpg
 
Last edited:
The Comments section is actually on fire now, with people coming out swinging for the Farms in public Hundreds of responses and slap fights. I don't think the washington post has had this much comment engagement in half a decade. They did not even bother to turn it off this time and its on fucking fire.


These mad lads are connecting to a Glowie website and posting under their real names.

@Null you have lit the beacons.

View attachment 5314120

View attachment 5314121

View attachment 5314122
Yeah, but are we in Mulan or Lord of the Rings?
 
Weird ask, but can we get threadlinks for these for people who stumble upon these posts later and don't know what you guys are talking about?
I'm referring to Nick Bates. One of the first threads I read in it's entirety.

He actually has three threads: first thread, second thread, and third thread. Read them all to get the full story.
 
I appreciate the irony that people attacking this website have regularly broken the law by DDOSing it and will never be held accountable. Maybe that’s why they operate in “cells”.

I also appreciate the irony that this website is decried as illegal for Doxing while journalists have literally published personal information in national news outlets which led directly to a volume of harassment beyond what they even pretend has originated from here,
 
Last edited:
I think the more important question is if null has actual defamation for change, with recoverable damages.

Unlike Thwomp Face Fong, Jeff Bezos, being the sole owner of this rag, actually has assets and money that make a defamation lawsuit recoverable.

It may be time to bring the court into this. Just not in the way these idiots want
 
I think the more important question is if null has actual defamation for change, with recoverable damages.

Unlike Thwomp Face Fong, Jeff Bezos, being the sole owner of this rag, actually has assets and money that make a defamation lawsuit recoverable.

It may be time to bring the court into this. Just not in the way these idiots want
The article is too carefully worded
 
Note: we fight against this. Pedophiles fight FOR this.
View attachment 5314070
His smell must be ungodly...I do not know how she could stand to be that close to somebody who never showered, had rotten teeth, or even wiped his ass.

They hate us for the harsh truths and disgusting people that the Farms exposes.
 
Winning in court has nothing to do with facts and logic and everything to do with who can keep the case going the longest by having the most money.
While this is normally true, I think the kiwifarms is in a unique legal position.

For starters the issue at hand is not unknown to the Federal Courts. The Kiwifarms has precedential rulings in its favor in not one, but TWO federal circuits. The 4th and 10th. Thanks to Melinda Scott and Greer respectively.

Which means it is not going into this cold. Even better, as a formal LLC of West Virginia, the Kiwifarms is under the jurisdiction of the 4th circuit. Do you know who else is subject to the 4th circuit?

The Washington Post. because their comput3r servers are in Fairfax County. This means Lolcow LLC, being a West Virginia company has grounds to sue the Washington Post, a Virginia company in their common Federal district by diversity jurisdiction.

Big Stone Gap. The 4th circuit western district of Virginia. It's poetry. It rhymes.
 
These people seem to be incapable of understanding the difference between cataloging spazouts and information these cows knowingly and willingly put within easy reach, and intimidation and hacking attempts which have been verified to be perpetuated by these so-called victims. Funny how they cry about "the law" and in the same breath violate actual laws with legitimate harassment. Wanna know how to not get a thread here, or have yours die? Stop being a fucking freak on the top of the surface web. Pointing and laughing at your extremely public behavior is not illegal. You trying to snatch someone's address with a phishing email and spamming their employer with calls because you disagree with content they posted online under an anonymous handle, is
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back