- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
(Gobbling intensifies)
My favorite paragraph so far is:
14. The Court denied me leave to amend the complaint without giving any reason. This, however, has already been held by the Supreme Court to constitute an abuse of discretion, per se. See Foman v. Davis, 371 US 178, 182 (1962):
…
15. The closest the Court has come to giving a reason why leave to amend should not be given is because “Briefing for Defendant’s motion to dismiss ... has completed. If Defendant1 is given leave to amend, the motion practice would simply restart, with resources thus spent wasted.”
—- looks like the court did give a reason for not allowing amendment. Thanks for documenting it in your motion. That’s some galaxy brained reasoning right there.
Better still is the exhibit Stebbins attached showing the Google attorney telling him to pull the other exhibit because Stebbins didn’t redact the attorney’s personal cell number but made certain to clean up his own number. Haha our boy is a pro at ticking people off.
My favorite paragraph so far is:
14. The Court denied me leave to amend the complaint without giving any reason. This, however, has already been held by the Supreme Court to constitute an abuse of discretion, per se. See Foman v. Davis, 371 US 178, 182 (1962):
…
15. The closest the Court has come to giving a reason why leave to amend should not be given is because “Briefing for Defendant’s motion to dismiss ... has completed. If Defendant1 is given leave to amend, the motion practice would simply restart, with resources thus spent wasted.”
—- looks like the court did give a reason for not allowing amendment. Thanks for documenting it in your motion. That’s some galaxy brained reasoning right there.
Better still is the exhibit Stebbins attached showing the Google attorney telling him to pull the other exhibit because Stebbins didn’t redact the attorney’s personal cell number but made certain to clean up his own number. Haha our boy is a pro at ticking people off.