Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 24.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 153 40.4%

  • Total voters
    379
Planning crimes in chat:

--Still--Life--​
This will be my new mail box, it comes in two days
--Still--Life--​
I'll bolt it into the a concrete base
--Still--Life--​
And keep a camera on it so if anyone fucks with it, I'll find them take what need to take
--Still--Life--​
I'm also going to set up traps for package thieves this year. Make their lives suddenly way more fucked up.

1695008204623.png
You have to admit though, that's an awesome mailbox.

What was the talk about American beauty?
Right around the time Nick's descent into depravity became apparent to even the most stubborn of nose guards (myself included) Nick went on several separate spiels about how deep and good a movie American Beauty was. That it spoke to him on a deep throat psychological level and had something to say about manhood in modern society in general. I will also point out that his recent defense of Vito casts his defense of the plot point regarding the MC lusting after an underage girl in a different light.

I assume he's mentioned it again more recently or someone just recently thought about it again, but your only takeaway needs to be that Nick identified with a movie about letting go of inhibitions (which eventually got the male lead killed) and proceeded to let go of his inhibitions only for all of his actions to immediately smack him in the face like an oversized rake.

What's funny is that he still hasn't figured out that this "me me me" mindset is what's causing him so many problems.

Edit: Clarity
 
Fucking with vtubers and their fans is the autistic version of sticking your dick in a hornet's nest.
I did speak to this right in this thread, said that as a sub-set of idol culture Vtuber fans are completely unhinged, the only winning play was to quietly distance themselves and shut the fuck up, but neither of these imbeciles are capable of that.

If anything he should be grateful they only hit his twitter, but who knows, when these autists smell blood in the water they might enter a feeding frenzy and just turn him into mince meat.
 
Last edited:
Did we lose any good content from Nick's house negro?
Perhaps, but here's something to tide you over.

A good many people on this thread were wondering how Drexel would handle the "what if you didn't eat breakfast?" question to test his IQ via a hypothetical. This actually already exists in its own way. Busy with Drexel OP and other responsibilities, so while I do have an extended cut, I will be referring to a post from @Balldo's Gate for convenience (click it to go there and watch the videos).

Drexel describes a situation where women are depopulated and converted into communal sexual property (and a backup for reproduction) while men's sexual needs are met by sexbots and reproduction is handled by an artificial womb.

Someone later asks Drexel when he's going to "give up his daughter to the train". Drexel is confused, Nick thinks its a reference to a Nazi train to a camp, and Raging Golden Eagle is the only one who clues in to the sexual context. The level of confusion is honestly embarrassing to watch considering Nick and Drexel's fixation on innuendo and sexual terminology.

Drexel responds saying he wouldn't give up his daughter because it wouldn't happen within his lifetime (although elsewhere he says it would happen in the next 10-20 years).

Drexel brings it up for the first time at 2:35:00 of this video. I've clipped out 6 minutes of it, there might be more discussion in between the two clips I've made but I don't think so.

Your browser is not able to display this video.

At 4:15:20 a super chatter makes an excellent point by asking Drexel what he thinks about his daughter living in such a society and whether he would offer her up as a "concubine". Drexel ends up brushing it off by saying humanity won't reach that level of technology in their lifetimes.

Your browser is not able to display this video.

TLDR: Drexel struggles enough with his own hypotheticals and would likely need coaching for abstract thought beyond his own sexual fantasies. This helps explain his poor problem-solving skills.

Drexel: In the future, all women should become communal sexual property.

Anon: What about your daughter?

Drexel: What do you mean? She doesn't live in that kind of future.

Anon: Drexel, what if you didn't eat breakfast?

Drexel: What do you mean? I already ate breakfast.
 
What was the talk about American beauty?
Nick identified with a movie about letting go of inhibitions (which eventually got the male lead killed) and proceeded to let go of his inhibitions only for all of his actions to immediately smack him in the face like an oversized rake.

That's a pretty decent summary of Nick's film criticism of AB.

IIRC, Nick spun it as a good thing that Lester/Kevin Spacey character's arc said fuck it, tossing away all his commitments and shedding all society's expectations of a middle-aged middle class man.

Quitting his corporate job. Blackmailing his boss for severance. Standing up to his cold adulterous ball-buster of a wife. Returning to a teenage phase of listening to music, smoking weed and pumping iron in his garage. Taking a fast food job with no responsibility whatsoever.
Regrowing his balls to speak up about domestic choices around the house. Trying to rekindle a spark in a loveless marriage.

But I do recall that Nick also explicitly made the point that the universe punished Spacey swiftly and harshly the second he went too far with his liberation by creeping on an underaged Mena Suvari.

So, Nick's interprets Spacey's character as an enlightened, brave, liberated hero and supports all his hedonistic, heterodox and self-serving actions up until the point of going "too far". So Nick recognizes that there is a cosmic justice force that is supposed to keep the libertines in check.

He simply seems to have lost all perspective on where this line in the sand is personally. Or has completely shifted the goalposts hoping that karma won't notice.

As an aside, it becomes harder to separate the art from the artist re: Spacey present day and assess the film dispassionately.
 
Highlights:
- Filled with self-pity and references to Rekieta,
We can see why flaggot Nick and lil Copealot get along so well.
IMG_7173.jpeg
Drexel: What do you mean? She doesn't live in that kind of future.
His response is even dumber than that:

Drexel: In the future, all women should become communal sexual property.

Anon: What about your daughter?

Drexel: But she’s not in the future…


IMG_7166.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Fucking with vtubers and their fans is the autistic version of sticking your dick in a hornet's nest.
I'd rather dox myself and piss off Kiwi Farms than vtubers.
Reminder also that Nick also had this Patrick-esque banger of a Tweet to hydropx denying he ever was concerned about having potentially exposed his penis while streaming naked from his hot tub. If you go back to where he streamed from his Nashville Airbnb just last week, he explicitly says he's naked in the hot tub.
If you told me this was actually Tomlinson, I'd believe it. I even heard it in Tomlinson's faggy voice. Ever notice even Nick's voice is different now? He talks like a fag. He literally whines.

Maybe it's the Balldo squeezing his yarbles.
 
Fuckin' same bro, some people just need to stay away from it.
That is why the “I can’t have a drinking problem because lots of other people drink way more than I do” argument is so pathetic. Some people cannot drink ANY amount safely.

When you get hit by a train, it ain’t the caboose that kills you.
 
Fucking with vtubers and their fans is the autistic version of sticking your dick in a hornet's nest.
I don't like vtubers or their fans but, in this case, Pippa literally did nothing wrong. She declined to go on Rekieta's show, and just kept on doing her own thing.

Meanwhile, Rekieta and Coomalot were positively seething over the fact the bitch anime rabbit had the absolute audacity to turn them down. It takes a lot to seem more pathetic than the average vtuber fan, but Nick and Coomy managed to do it.

Anyone who says that Warski is lying needs to come up with a reason for why Ralph made very similar statements before the Hedonism stuff was revealed (see this) and even though he hates Warski more than he ever hated Rekieta, let alone Rekieta's wife.
Okay, I'll be devil's advocate.

Because at the time he particularly hated Rekieta? Remember that he lost his shit at Rekieta because Nick laughed at the shart heard 'round the world.

I think you might be just assuming Ralph hates Warski more than anybody. It's really kinda difficult to quantify the relative values of Ralph's ragepigging. He's got paper thin-skin, and it takes very little to set him off.

Why would Ralph make up a story that made Warski look good instead of saying that she was in his lap instead?
Because it makes Kayla look bad and therefore, by extension, Nick? He was all about shitting all over Nick's wife. That's why what's happening now with Rekieta mending fences with Ralph is so utterly pathetic. He's a slave to Dick Masterson. Both this and the shit with Vito prove it.

That said, I'm not sure people have an issue with the lap story. It's what Andy said the other day that's at issue.

Let's be clear, I have NO idea the veracity of any of this. Maybe it's all real, maybe it's all fake, maybe there was some sort of misunderstanding...

But what I do know is that I'm super confused by the number of people running into the Nick Rekieta thread, in 2023, and saying "CONSIDER THE SOURCE! WARSKI IS UNTRUSTWORTHY!"
Well, I wouldn't exactly call him trustworthy.

Look, I think the issue here is not that Kayla is an innocent angel. She's got... issues. For sure. Several people here have pointed out they'll buy that she flirted with him in one way or another. However, I think what you seem to be downplaying is that Warski's story has taken us into the realm of full on sexual assault. The problems here are the "witnesses" are all dogshit, there's no actual non-testimonial evidence (pics, videos, etc.), and the Kino Casino is all about over-the-top drama for superchats.

You've done phenomenal work on the Hedonism II stuff, but I don't think we're quite there yet here with this particular accusation. Maybe we will be someday, but not ATM.

Given the gravity of the accusation, and out of an abundance of caution, I'm just gonna assume Warski is a stuttering cokehead until somebody can demonstrate otherwise.
 
That is why the “I can’t have a drinking problem because lots of other people drink way more than I do” argument is so pathetic.
This is what they say, but should you suggest they go even a week without touching booze then they'll treat you like you're crazy. They don't realize it's that inability to refrain from alcohol that's the real issue. It's about the psychological experiences you undergo while you're "drinking less than others."

To any non-alcoholic, if they find out their latest sip of alcohol was their last then they'd be largely unchanged. If Nick found out he suddenly cannot drink anymore, he'd lose it or immediately replace with another self-destructive vice.
 
They don't realize it's that inability to refrain from alcohol that's the real issue.
I think you meant to type that inability to refrain from alcohol is NOT the real issue (for many alcoholics). Many alkies can white-knuckle it for extended periods of time. Not all alcoholics drink daily. Those who will say they are “just” binge drinkers mean they don’t want to drink at all if they can’t get wasted. (If you’ve ever had a friend berate you for not wanting to do shots with them on a weeknight, thus “ruining” their plan to get plastered, you know the type.)

I had a friend in college who decided to go cold turkey for one semester to prove he didn’t have a drinking problem. He managed to make it through dry, but said “By the end of the three months I knew I had a problem because all I did for that time was fantasize about what my first night back would be like — what I’d drink, who I’d be with, where we’d go, etc.” A lot of people aren’t daily drinkers and can still relate to that.

Unfortunately Nick will have to suffer a lot more before he realizes that living like a frat tard in his 30s isn’t cool or badass. Maybe it will be when one of his kids asks him why he always stinks of liquor when he drives them to school in the morning or maybe it will be when he drives them to school while still drunk and kills them. Who knows? Nick gets to decide how bad it gets, and he’s still asking for God to prove it to him and make his life much worse before he’ll even consider the possibility that alcohol is not helping his life.
 
I think you meant to type that inability to refrain from alcohol is NOT the real issue (for many alcoholics). Many alkies can white-knuckle it for extended periods of time. Not all alcoholics drink daily. Those who will say they are “just” binge drinkers mean they don’t want to drink at all if they can’t get wasted. (If you’ve ever had a friend berate you for not wanting to do shots with them on a weeknight, thus “ruining” their plan to get plastered, you know the type.)

I had a friend in college who decided to go cold turkey for one semester to prove he didn’t have a drinking problem. He managed to make it through dry, but said “By the end of the three months I knew I had a problem because all I did for that time was fantasize about what my first night back would be like — what I’d drink, who I’d be with, where we’d go, etc.” A lot of people aren’t daily drinkers and can still relate to that.

Unfortunately Nick will have to suffer a lot more before he realizes that living like a frat tard in his 30s isn’t cool or badass. Maybe it will be when one of his kids asks him why he always stinks of liquor when he drives them to school in the morning or maybe it will be when he drives them to school while still drunk and kills them. Who knows? Nick gets to decide how bad it gets, and he’s still asking for God to prove it to him and make his life much worse before he’ll even consider the possibility that alcohol is not helping his life.
It reminds me of a tale I heard about Rush Limbaugh where he said that he knew he was an alcoholic when his entire day built up to having that one drink.
 
His response is even dumber than that:

Drexel: In the future, all women should become communal sexual property.

Anon: What about your daughter?

Drexel: But she’s not in the future…


IMG_7166.jpeg
lol this reminds me I found another clip of Drexel I thought was mildly amusing


This was during that PPP stream just after Drexel was informed Zoom was a pedophile but I thought it was too perfect not to set it to his grooming story.
 
Because Racket's trustworthiness has literally nothing to do with whether something Warski claims is true or not. Gotta make sure you don't fall into the trap of "I don't like this guy so every bad thing said about him ever is true".
That doesn't address the fact that the rumors predate Warski saying anything about it and also predate the rise of the swinger narrative after the Locals thirstposting resulted in people tracking back and the Hedonism II room being discovered.

Whether the things Warski is saying are true or not is ultimately immaterial. They aren't new, and even with those rumors being around for a very long time they aren't discussed much. The reason for that is there is so much out there linking Rekieta to weird sex shit that hanging one's hat on what Ralph, Warski, or CRP have said isn't required.

However, the underlying context means that "Warski untrustworthy" isn't anywhere near a good argument on its own, just like "Rekieta untrustworthy" isn't a good argument in isolation about anything either.

This is a good point, and you can also add in CRP's allegations too. Now, it is possible this is a telephone game of stupidity. CRP makes allegation, Ralph holds it in his revenge book, then Warski... I guess repeats it, even if it's about him? If it was fiction, that would be weird. None of those three like each other now, but they were ok back at say Knoxville.
And then PPP says immediately afterwards that Warski told him and Surfer about it privately and swore them to secrecy. Which lines up with Ralph's characterization of the situation being that Warski was bragging about what happened while also being afraid that Rekieta hated him because of it.

Because it makes Kayla look bad and therefore, by extension, Nick? He was all about shitting all over Nick's wife. That's why what's happening now with Rekieta mending fences with Ralph is so utterly pathetic. He's a slave to Dick Masterson. Both this and the shit with Vito prove it.
My point is not that Ralph wouldn't be willing to make up the story. Of course he would. My point is that if he were to make up such a story, I'd expect it would be Ralph who was the one who was being flirted with and not Andy Warski.

Look, I think the issue here is not that Kayla is an innocent angel. She's got... issues. For sure. Several people here have pointed out they'll buy that she flirted with him in one way or another. However, I think what you seem to be downplaying is that Warski's story has taken us into the realm of full on sexual assault. The problems here are the "witnesses" are all dogshit, there's no actual non-testimonial evidence (pics, videos, etc.), and the Kino Casino is all about over-the-top drama for superchats.
I don't see a lot of daylight between Ralph and Warski's stories. In context, the "sexual assault" thing was clearly a bit. The initial clip that was posted here appears to be ripped from Kinochet's Tweet about the situation, which emphasized that because it's the kind of narrative he loves to run with. I had watched the whole segment and knew that's not all that was said, which was why I posted a longer clip where Warski explicitly denied that what happened constituted sexual assault and saying "No, I liked it". And even that isn't exhaustive about all was said, but that clip was already almost 4 minutes.

You've done phenomenal work on the Hedonism II stuff, but I don't think we're quite there yet here with this particular accusation. Maybe we will be someday, but not ATM.
It will never be known what really happened because all we will ever have is differing he-said she-said of people who were probably on way too much drugs and alcohol and Warski, Ralph, CRP, and Rekieta are all unreliable even when sober. Maybe it's all fake, maybe it's real, and there's definitely a middle ground where there was some kind of misunderstanding. It doesn't really matter though.
 
Speaking of backtracking, Divinity found a historical clip of Nick commenting on pedo accusations and defamation. The clip may have been posted on this thread before but I had not seen it. The notable parts are from 0:40-2:02.

It is also worth noting that this former Rekieta orbiter has turned into a vocal detractor. She's been streaming with Nova on Rumble to tiny audiences and appears to be getting some source material from the farms... which is fair game. Here's an example. LAWSUIT UPDATE - REKIETA, SMOLLETT, BRAND, READ, KOHBERGER (I wouldn't recommend watching. It's pretty boring.)
 
Odds on the balldo brigade (nick, dick, vito, drex, cecil, camelot) blaming it on KF?
Who gives a fuck.
IIRC Kurt quit his government patent reviewer job to try YT for a year.

His year trial must surely be up by now.
Big mistake. Kurt has a personality for print.
living like a frat tard in his 30s isn’t cool or badass.
40's. He's in his 40's.

Awful lot of Kayla guarding in this thread. Weird.
 
Screenshot 2023-09-18 at 18-59-57 TheRealDrex on X.png

Drex seems obsessed with state fairs. Every other thing he tweets is about state fair. But then I realized something... Here's an excerpt of him explaining himself about the groomer allegation.
Simple: My good friend's daughter (teen at the time) and I were always cool... NO, I never groomed or ever said 1 word of a sexual nature around her (she learned of my exploits through others) She eventually goes to college and dated a simp. I innocently met up with them at her behest at the state fair and then he exposed his simp nature to me, a non simp
Are state fairs actually his hunting ground? Buy some turkey leg, sit down and do some...people watching. :story:
 
Back