David Steel / LazerPig / Ricewynd / Malquistion - Pathological Liar, Reddit Historian, Femboy Thirster, and Vore Connoisseur

American and British "losses" were the same thing. Germans wouldn't count a tank as "lost" even if it was combat ineffective but not technically "destroyed".

Its sorta like casualty in the NATO definition:
In relation to personnel, any person who is lost to his organization by reason of being declared dead, wounded, diseased, detained, captured or missing.
So, bullet through the head, casualty, drop an ammo crate on your toe, casualty, shrapnel in your ass but you can keep fighting, not a casualty, etc.
 
the Soviets suffered greater losses of AFVs on the Eastern Front than the Germans, but that's because 1. the Germans attacked first, and chewed their way through a sizable number of light or obsolete tanks like the T-26, T-28, and BT-series during the first two years of the war, and 2. the Soviets produced more AFV's than the Germans overall period. 45,000 lost out of over 50,000 produced is pretty wretched, but it also tells a very important story: the Soviets were able to churn out over 50,000 examples of this all-around heavily armed and well armored tank of all variants. Compare that to the Panther which, while definitely more technologically sophisticated, only reached 6000 total produced. Even the legendary Tiger, which could kill the T-34 at distance before it even had a chance to engage, only reached less than 1400 produced. Oh, and the Germans had to split these between two fronts.

Also, for all the technological sophistication and superiority of the Panther...the majority of them broke down and had to be withdrawn from combat during their initial debut at Kursk. Meanwhile those "unreliabe" T-34s were able scurry across the battlefield and rip and tear the Panzerwaffe
It also doesn't account for Germans being the defenders. If you got a anti tank cannon conceled in a bush, chances are you'll knock out quite a few trying to storm into a city before they notice you. Playing defense like the Germans often were had its advantages, namely kill count
 
Oh. Oh lawdView attachment 5344128
.... is what I thought happened, except LaserNig just took another guy's work, didn't bother verifying it, and shat it on YouTube, because he's actually retarded. Just scanning it, there are parts copied word for word. Actual plagrism. Theft even.
Holy shit this bastard is literally just copy-pasting decade old blogger posts.... that lazy MF-er. No wonder he NEVER posts sources, it's because his sources are shit he just steals and the regurgitates for cash and grooming material.
To add onto this, Lazerswine also made a video on Pentagon Wars couple months after a furry tank youtuber called Spookton did (yes I know but he isnt anywhere egregious as Lazerlard). Will check how copied or not it is. Remember, it caused a little bit of stir back in the day.
Furry on furry violence. Except afaik Spookston isn't mentally retarded.
American and British "losses" were the same thing. Germans wouldn't count a tank as "lost" even if it was combat ineffective but not technically "destroyed".
I think Germany marked a tank as "Destroyed" when it was physically impossible to repair aka a very large bomb hit it or the ammunition exploded.
 
It also doesn't account for Germans being the defenders. If you got a anti tank cannon conceled in a bush, chances are you'll knock out quite a few trying to storm into a city before they notice you. Playing defense like the Germans often were had its advantages, namely kill count
Germans also outshot the Soviets artillery-wise until damn near the end of the war. For every ton of artillery ordinance the Soviets expended at Kursk, the Germans spent like two and a half times that. And Kursk was a battle the Soviets won.

Arty doesn't kill a lot of tanks in and of itself, but it's pure hell on supporting vehicles and infantry, without which tanks are largely useless and likely to be abandoned.


Holy shit this bastard is literally just copy-pasting decade old blogger posts.... that lazy MF-er. No wonder he NEVER posts sources, it's because his sources are shit he just steals and the regurgitates for cash and grooming material.
He did actually post sources for the video; the problem is, he took the sources straight from the blog without attributing, or as far as I can tell, reading them. Two of them are photobooks published by plastic model companies, two are in a language he doesn't speak, and the rest involve technical details he can't be bothered to understand.
 
Last edited:
Germans also outshot the Soviets artillery-wise until damn near the end of the war. For every ton of artillery ordinance the Soviets expended at Kursk, the Germans spent like two and a half times that. And Kursk was a battle the Soviets won.

Arty doesn't kill a lot of tanks in and of itself, but it's pure hell on supporting vehicles and infantry, without which tanks are largely useless and likely to be abandoned.



He did actually post sources for the video; the problem is, he took the sources straight from the blog without attributing, or as far as I can tell, reading them. Two of them are photobooks published by plastic model companies, two are in a language he doesn't speak, and the rest involve technical details he can't be bothered to understand.
What an absolute hack.

Okay so I quickly skimmed over the photonswine and Spookston video on Pentagon Wars and James G. Burton. Lazerlard's video is essentially the same as Spookston video but rewritten enough that it's quite difficult to accuse him of plagiarism.

It also has a ton of filler and fluff that turned Spookston's 10 minute video into a 30 minute video. Some lines and jokes seem to be ripped off nearly verbatim. Lazerswine's sources that he flashes onto the screen seems to be the same as what Spookston has listed.

Of course there's going to be only so many sources to cite but the way Lazernig wrote the narrative, tone, sources, time frame, and some very similar jokes and lines. It very much comes across as him copying which shouldn't be a surprised given what we know.

I'll go into more detail later.

Also Chieftain also made a video on Pentagon Wars but that was after. I haven't watched it but it seems like it's trying to push back at the circle jerk a bit.

Spookston video: https://youtu.be/gmuVYVREGgE?si=odONjARsXxJiglQb

Lazernig video
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yep, knew this was coming the day he mentioned the forum in his video.
He didnt even have a thread, he was mentioned in the Ukraine war megathread, but he knew about it soon after and felt the need to call it out in a video.
It's really just a matter of time with popular people who show the kind of behaviour.

Also the Ukraine war thread is larpy and gay, so he's among equals.
 
Germans also outshot the Soviets artillery-wise until damn near the end of the war. For every ton of artillery ordinance the Soviets expended at Kursk, the Germans spent like two and a half times that. And Kursk was a battle the Soviets won.

Arty doesn't kill a lot of tanks in and of itself, but it's pure hell on supporting vehicles and infantry, without which tanks are largely useless and likely to be abandoned.
It's clear what the Germans focused on when you look at the numbers; area denial. Hard to move your tanks and trucks when the area looks like the moon
Okay so I quickly skimmed over the photonswine and Spookston video on Pentagon Wars and James G. Burton. Lazerlard's video is essentially the same as Spookston video but rewritten enough that it's quite difficult to accuse him of plagiarism.

It also has a ton of filler and fluff that turned Spookston's 10 minute video into a 30 minute video. Some lines and jokes seem to be ripped off nearly verbatim. Lazerswine's sources that he flashes onto the screen seems to be the same as what Spookston has listed.

Of course there's going to be only so many sources to cite but the way Lazernig wrote the narrative, tone, sources, time frame, and some very similar jokes and lines. It very much comes across as him copying which shouldn't be a surprised given what we know.

I'll go into more detail later.

Also Chieftain also made a video on Pentagon Wars but that was after. I haven't watched it but it seems like it's trying to push back at the circle jerk a bit.

Spookston video: https://youtu.be/gmuVYVREGgE?si=odONjARsXxJiglQb

Lazernig video

Spookston actually did 2 videos on the M2 Bradley. One on Pentagon Wars, and one on the M2 itself. Even combined, it's still far less than Laserhog's videos while giving far more info. Is he a furry and a war thunder player? Yes. But I'll give him this much, he gets to the fucking point. It's much clearer what happened because the man READS THE DAMN ARMY REPORTS. If anything, his very drawl boring tone helps you pay attention because he actually speaks clearly. Pig bulks out his videos to sound smart, a main complaint of mine.

Also Chieftain did a video after LP's where he does a walk thru of the prototypes, discussing what the movie, in all its exaggeration, got RIGHT.

 
Yep, knew this was coming the day he mentioned the forum in his video.
He didnt even have a thread, he was mentioned in the Ukraine war megathread, but he knew about it soon after and felt the need to call it out in a video.
It's really just a matter of time with popular people who show the kind of behaviour.

Also the Ukraine war thread is larpy and gay, so he's among equals.
Which video did Lazerpig mention the Farms in?
 
What an absolute hack.
Come to think of it, when he spit that pissbaby reply to his thread on /r/badhistory, he accused the OP of relying on "secondary sources." The source the OP was using was one of the sources LP claimed as his own (an article in Slavic Military Studies, and actually a pretty decent read). I wonder if he ever even glanced at it.
 
Which was really stupid by him.
Yes, his T-34 video got some attention (both good and bad) but baiting the farms was not smart.
The releveance that he just copy and pasted his T34 video from an old blogpost says something about him.
Rule #16 of the internet, never bait the Farms, or 4chan, basically any forum that's dedicated to shitposting/lolcowry. You'll regret it later.

Come to think of it, when he spit that pissbaby reply to his thread on /r/badhistory, he accused the OP of relying on "secondary sources." The source the OP was using was one of the sources LP claimed as his own (an article in Slavic Military Studies, and actually a pretty decent read). I wonder if he ever even glanced at it.
Knowing LP, he probably didn't even glance it in the first place because of his fragile ego.
 
Good odds he's aware of this thread but will never actually read it for the same reason. He'll be getting everything secondhand from his Discord dick-riders.
Possibly, he's too cowardly to confront us directly.

Some new Twitter shit dropped. Thoughts?
1695069424513.png

https://twitter.com/PigLazer/status/1703688869407752200 (A)

1695069578067.png

https://twitter.com/PigLazer/status/1703784612609036786 (A)
 
He's just commenting on war developments, nothing really out of the ordinary. On the first tweet in particular, North Korean gear sent to Russia has a horrible reputation for accuracy and reliability, even in Russian telegram channels.

As for the second one, it's pixellated because it's still a military facility. Not that the pig would have thought of that.
 
At the moment there's no evidence the Russians will be receiving anything more sophisticated from North Korea than artillery shells outside of some excited sperging on Russian Telegram groups, so LazerPig and this other lady commenting on the "North Korean HIMARS" seems rather pointless aside from the typical "Russians suck/Russians are going to murder civilians!!!" political hackery.

Also, the original tweet he's quoting mentions North Korea providing 155mm caliber shells. That's just plain wrong - Russia, North Korea, and other former Soviet bloc countries do not use 155mm caliber ammunition, but 152mm caliber. Bit of a nitpick, but it bugged me nonetheless.
 
1695081919678.png
Found this. Amusing how he refuses to acknowledge any criticism. Though to be honest Red farting in the mic makes for a more compelling argument than anything Lazernig has said.
What a fucking thin-skinned little cunt.

"I refuse to take the whole thing seriously." If you don't take the whole thing seriously, then why did you make an hour long video and then a half-hour long response video in the first place?
 
Gonna try and make it through the Mike Sparks of the Future video, out of a sense of obligation.

It is now ten minutes later and that was a complete waste of time. It's LazerFaggot being drunk with another anime boy while they 'hilariously' design a bad IFV based on Spark's ideas. Is it really 'Sparkian'? No. Does it show any actual understanding of military equipment/tactics beyond knowing the names of cannons and autocannons? No. Am I gonna watch it for nitpicky examples? No. Unnecessary gay sex in the design? YES

But he does claim he's met Mike Sparks. Well, not "met" but talked to. Well, was in a Skype call with. Implies, never claims, but implies Sparks called him a Jew rat for half and hour than discussed his technical ideas. That sounds like a much more interesting video, it'd be the most watched video he has by far. Wonder why that never happened and he forgot to mention it until he could use it to impress a young man and the only evidence he has is one of Spark's FB streams.

Edit: He's in the OP but I don't believe mentioned by name. Today's lucky anime boy to be woo'd by an alcoholic pig is Falcon's Fighter Tales! Congratulations, young man on your acceptance to the Lazu Piggu harem expanded universe!
Screenshot 2023-09-18 at 20-57-54 Falcon's Fighter Tales.png
 
Last edited:
Back