Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

More like post-feminist woke progressives. Because Bill Maher, Ben Stiller, Henry Winkler, Bill Shatner and Bibi Netanyahu are not part of the problem.

I'm assuming you are being facetious.

stiller.jpg
 
Female enables are a thing, and half of the pedophile cases have an active woman In it who either suppress the child or provide the child herself.
In the most damning child exploitation case known as daisy destruction a woman was not only involved but actively participated in it.
The weird part to me is that in a bid to completely remove accountability, the women in those cases are usually touted as a victim as well. They were brainwashed by the man who was pulling the strings. You see that in all number of cases, whether it's a couple murdering their best friend by burning him alive for his wallet, or a woman colluding with her lover to murder her husband and then posing in pornographic photos with his corpse. It doesn't make a very good case for women to claim they're susceptible to war crime-level debauchery just because they have a bad boyfriend.
 
Maybe the secret to getting a gf is to literally ask out every woman you see, who you find attractive, in public till one says yes.
I thought I was supposed to sue them until they gave in and had sex with me. I followed every tip and trick of this dating advice manual, and I thought it was starting to work! Now you're telling me there's another way??
 
yez0w4o5qt941.png

Thoughts on these lists fellas ? I'd like to get the man hate thread's participants' thoughts for the films on the right if I wasn't threadbanned.

My immediate reaction to this was:
  • Why the hell is point break on both lists lmao
  • I love how half the films on "Men will never understand core" are about sex and relationships
 
View attachment 5358610

Thoughts on these lists fellas ? I'd like to get the man hate thread's participants' thoughts for the films on the right if I wasn't threadbanned.
Mostly dumb, I don't understand "her" or "drive" myself tbqh

Why is American Psycho on the 'men will never understand' side?

I love how half the films on "Men will never understand core" are about sex and relationships
And the men's side is mostly war/survival stories. Methinks it betrays the sex's natural roles.
 
Why is American Psycho on the 'men will never understand' side?
If I had to make a guess it’s because it’s about extreme vanity and self delusion. Bateman is a literal serial killer who openly admits to murder yet none of his rich wall street friends care or notice because everyone is so self absorbed.

And that’s something women understand better ?
 
View attachment 5358610

Thoughts on these lists fellas ? I'd like to get the man hate thread's participants' thoughts for the films on the right if I wasn't threadbanned.

My immediate reaction to this was:
  • Why the hell is point break on both lists lmao
  • I love how half the films on "Men will never understand core" are about sex and relationships
Falling down is a great movie
 
View attachment 5358610

Thoughts on these lists fellas ? I'd like to get the man hate thread's participants' thoughts for the films on the right if I wasn't threadbanned.

My immediate reaction to this was:
  • Why the hell is point break on both lists lmao
  • I love how half the films on "Men will never understand core" are about sex and relationships
I'm an uncultured swine, I haven't seen 99% of these.

But I do remember that a teacher showed us Dead Poets Society in class once and none of the boys paid attention. The only ones actually watching were the girls, so for decades I've thought of it as a chick flick.
 
View attachment 5358610

Thoughts on these lists fellas ? I'd like to get the man hate thread's participants' thoughts for the films on the right if I wasn't threadbanned.

My immediate reaction to this was:
  • Why the hell is point break on both lists lmao
  • I love how half the films on "Men will never understand core" are about sex and relationships
-Woman side trends towards more indie/arthouse cred
-men side trends towards period piece crowd pleasers

Both sides lack movies with any real warm family emotion maybe this is because familial love tends to bridge the gap and would keep a movie from being too far to either side but we certainly aren't seeing the ups and downs of a father son relationship with movies like A Bronx Tale or the perils of fraternal rivlary like in Big Night. Both sides also trend towards melancholic with no real 'Chickensoup for the Soul'. Broadly speaking this is like the list of a depressed first year film student who maybe appreciates aspects of film but doesn't truly love it. I don't know what would be the woman equivalent of this? Maybe it also says something that I have to go back to the mid 90s to think of a movie that portays a positive family dynamic.
 
I'm assuming you are being facetious.

I mean these people have no global significance, outside of Bibi, who is the leader of a small country.

Jewish people do not control the West. The limousine Left and, to a lesser extent, Left fascists are the ones who have a disproportionate and malicious influence on global culture. These people are united by a high aptitude for thievery, scheming, hypocrisy and greed. Many of them are anti-Semites.

What difference does it make if the guy who created "Zooolander" talks to the leader of Ukraine? Do you really think the people who created superheroes in the 1930s-1950s wanted them to be raped?

You should go visit a college city or live in DC for a few years. Then you can personally meet some of the people who spit on us and want to manage us like cattle. HINT: They don't go to Temple.
 
View attachment 5358610

Thoughts on these lists fellas ? I'd like to get the man hate thread's participants' thoughts for the films on the right if I wasn't threadbanned.
I have not seen 90% of these films so I think I'm ultimately in the Uncultured Swine Core category
If I had to make a guess it’s because it’s about extreme vanity and self delusion. Bateman is a literal serial killer who openly admits to murder yet none of his rich wall street friends care or notice because everyone is so self absorbed.
American Psycho the book was written by a (closeted at the time) gay man where the book is simultaneously used to criticize American consumerism and as a way for the author to work through his drug addiction and self loathing of his gayness.

American Psycho the movie is directed by a women who focused the film on the absurd levels of shallow toxic masculinity that Patrick and his "friends" display.

In either work, Patrick is suppose to come off as a shallow, uninteresting, one-dimensional psychopath who can barely function in his gold-plattered life. In order to cope with being a callous bastard in paradise, he turns to extreme violence as a self serving act that he thinks makes him unique in a world of faceless suits. However the ultimate point is such a life style is just as devoid of meaning and impact as the rest of the non-murderous wallstreet rats.

Despite Patrick Bateman being an unequivocally weak-willed, terrible, sadistic, buffoonish, empty, trust-fund baby of a character, too many men have found ways to idolize him as some kind of strong alpha male role model despite both works featuring him showing exactly the opposite.
 
Last edited:
If I had to make a guess it’s because it’s about extreme vanity and self delusion. Bateman is a literal serial killer who openly admits to murder yet none of his rich wall street friends care or notice because everyone is so self absorbed.
So basically, this list is arguing that Patrick Bateman is a woman?

checks out
too many men have found ways to idolize him as some kind of strong alpha male role model
I've never met a single dude who thinks that. Patrick Bateman is a worthless, uselless piece of shit.
 
I have not seen 90% of these films so I think I'm ultimately in the Uncultured Swine Core category

American Psycho the book was written by a (closeted at the time) gay man where the book is simultaneously used to criticize American consumerism and a way for the author to work through his drug addiction and self loathing of his gayness.

American Psycho the movie is directed by a women who focused the film on the absurd levels of shallow toxic masculinity that Patrick and his "friends" display.

In either work, Patrick is suppose to come off as a shallow, uninteresting, one-dimensional psychopath who can barely function in his gold-plattered life. In order to cope with being a callous bastard in paradise, he turns to extreme violence as a self serving act that he thinks makes him unique in a world of faceless suits. However the ultimate point is such a life style is just as devoid of meaning and impact as the rest of the non-murderous wallstreet rats.

Despite Patrick Bateman being an unequivocally weak-willed, terrible, sadistic, buffoonish, empty, trust-fund baby of a character, too many men have found ways to idolize him as some kind of strong alpha male role model despite both works featuring him showing exactly the opposite.
Is the violence in American Psycho real? As in, in the story, does the character Patrick Bateman really commit all those heinous acts? Are they in his head? Is it vague and up to interpretation?

I read the novel a long time ago and I remember how Patrick completely unravels near the end, which puts everything into question and the violence works as some sort of metaphor. On the other hand, the fact that he does all those things and no one seems to notice/care fits perfectly into the satire of the novel.

I haven't seen the film so I don't know how the adaptation treats it.
 
I've never met a single dude who thinks that. Patrick Bateman is a worthless, uselless piece of shit.
I've unfortunately met several. I find it difficult to understand how anyone can view Bateman in a positive light when at his very best he is a useless wallstreet VP who spends his office hours drawing childish torture fantasies while high off coke. While spending his off hours with other useless VP's going clubbing and eating at high end restaurants. How can anyone relate to a character who's entire personality is based solely on the brands he wears and the expensive things he owns.
Is the violence in American Psycho real? As in, in the story, does the character Patrick Bateman really commit all those heinous acts? Are they in his head? Is it vague and up to interpretation?

I read the novel a long time ago and I remember how Patrick completely unravels near the end, which puts everything into question and the violence works as some sort of metaphor. On the other hand, the fact that he does all those things and no one seems to notice/care fits perfectly into the satire of the novel.

I haven't seen the film so I don't know how the adaptation treats it.
The violence is totally up for interception but whether its real or not doesn't actually impact just how shitty Patrick as a character is portrayed. If its fake, than Patrick represents the idea that plenty of seemingly inconsequential and invisible people are walking around with highly elaborate violent fantasies. If its real than Patrick represents the total callousness of American capitalism where every suit is just as psychopathic as the last and a multiple homicide investigation isn't worth the forgetful clean up of an extremely high valued New York apartment. Regardless of whether the violence was real or imaginary, Patrick manages to exhibit some of the worst character tributes known to mankind and I think the inherent character study was more important to the author/director than the defined events of the story.
 
Last edited:
Back