David Steel / LazerPig / Ricewynd / Malquistion - Pathological Liar, Reddit Historian, Femboy Thirster, and Vore Connoisseur

I can understand that, I really can, but they take it too far. And there's other problems. Remember when the heeb running BRC told the New York Times he fully understood the importance and weight of the image of St. Michael stepping on Satan, as he was given a St. Michael Medal by his Catholic squad mates, but then decided not to release that product because his glowie friends at Langley told him white supremacists made memes about it?
Never heard of that but can believe itand this is from a guy who called a mormon a mountain jew(great name btw), because, he got outshot fuck ooperators
 
Last edited:
Never heard of that but can believe itand this is from a guy who called a mormon a mountain jew(great name btw), because he got outshot fuck ooperators
Whole article. It's mostly the founders trying to distance themselves from anyone that supported them early, because they're a real business now. They don't need vets, they have the good shoppers at Dicks who associate them with vets.

Screenshot 2023-09-25 at 13-12-50 Can the Black Rifle Coffee Company Become the Starbucks of t...png
That about sums it up. He could do something he clearly understands is extremely important to not just his fellow veterans, but his own team mates, to the point they offered him a medal to protect him. I can not stress enough how much St. Michael is venerated among Catholics, especially soldiers. But some glowie told him about George Flyod memes. He could have just said "That image is tradition dating back over 600 years. It would be disrespectful to say memes are more important." Instead he shut it down and made sure to tell the NYT for Good Boy Points. Cool, Hafer. Good to know where we rank in your priorities. Glorifying SF was a fucking mistake.

Also I may be showing my age but the Swiss are Mountain Jews, not Mormons.
 
Last edited:
Whole article. It's mostly the founders trying to distance themselves from anyone that supported them early, because they're a real business now. They don't need vets, they have the good shoppers at Dicks who associate them with vets.

That about sums it up. He could do something he clearly understands is extremely important to not just his fellow veterans, but his own team mates, to the point they offered him a medal to protect him. I can not stress enough how much St. Michael is venerated among Catholics, especially soldiers. But some glowie told him about George Flyod memes. He could have just said "That image is tradition dating back over 600 years. It would be disrespectful to say memes are more important." Instead he shut it down and made sure to tell the NYT for Good Boy Points. Cool, Hafer. Good to know where we rank in your priorities. Glorifying SF was a fucking mistake.

Also I may be showing my age but the Swiss are Mountain Jews, not Mormons.
If I recall correctly, Hafer refused to pay the bail of Kyle Rittenhouse despite many on the right clamoring for him to do it. He's like the GOP, conserving only the bottom line.
 
It's only a matter of time until he gets drunk enough. Weird we're waiting on a NATO psyop to end for an obvious sex pervert to get exposed.
NAFO are retarded attack dogs, so I personally doubt anyone could expose him without being drowned out by screams of "Ruzzian Bot!" or any other term they like to use. Its the same sort of thing as rabid fanbases for other youtubers, except these ones openly support war crimes.
I mean NAFO's not doing too hot rn, especially with them condoning warcrimes. Hell, even normies are starting to go against the war.
While NAFO is quickly using up any and all good will, they still have a big presence on most of the main stream web, plenty of groups are wildly disliked and still continue to exist on the internet.
*cough* Trannies *cough*
 
While NAFO is quickly using up any and all good will, they still have a big presence on most of the main stream web, plenty of groups are wildly disliked and still continue to exist on the internet.
*cough* Trannies *cough*
That may be true but eventually they will end or fall into obscurity.

I can't say when but I came up with a theory on how it will happen.

Some big shot in NAFO circles will get into a polarizing controversy that will cause the movement to split into two or more bickering factions, for lack of a better term.

The factions will continue to fight amongst themselves until the controversy dies down.

This wouldn't be the end of NAFO but will cause it to be a shadow of it's former self.
 
The funniest thing is people sperging over tank specifications when those tanks get blown up by artillery shells and missiles no problem no matter what year they're made, who made them, or what they're made out of.
People who get into internet slap fights over armored fighting vehicles really do seem to overlook how ATGMs, artillery shelling, minefields, and other non tank threats can hinder or destroy armor on the battlefield. With the proliferation of cheap drones the range of threats has only grown.

It's always been retarded to try to reduce the comparison of AFVs to one on one in a vacuum but the internet has certainly lowered the bar for entry there.
 
The funniest thing is people sperging over tank specifications when those tanks get blown up by artillery shells and missiles no problem no matter what year they're made, who made them, or what they're made out of.
Well when your tank or APC gets hit by a fuckoff 155/152mm shell looking like this:
1091.png
Fired by this Msta-S:
AlabinoTraining0904-34.jpg
The guys in the tank get fucking scrambled, tracks go flying, optics get damaged, etc. LP and NAFO fags again scree "muh composite armor" which ok... would apply if it wasn't a big bomb blowing up on the side of the tank and just rocking your shit instead of trying to penetrate.

Also I may be showing my age but the Swiss are Mountain Jews, not Mormons.
Feel like I had my Mormon thunder stolen ngl
That may be true but eventually they will end or fall into obscurity.

I can't say when but I came up with a theory on how it will happen.

Some big shot in NAFO circles will get into a polarizing controversy that will cause the movement to split into two or more bickering factions, for lack of a better term.

The factions will continue to fight amongst themselves until the controversy dies down.

This wouldn't be the end of NAFO but will cause it to be a shadow of it's former self.
With how faggy the NAFO crowd and LP is, seems likely enough that they'll eat their own eventually.
 
People who get into internet slap fights over armored fighting vehicles really do seem to overlook how ATGMs, artillery shelling, minefields, and other non tank threats can hinder or destroy armor on the battlefield. With the proliferation of cheap drones the range of threats has only grown.

It's always been retarded to try to reduce the comparison of AFVs to one on one in a vacuum but the internet has certainly lowered the bar for entry there.
There is definitely a good argument for wanting to have the best tank possible for your needs and your doctrine. After all, even if they can't defend properly against certain threats, the tank still remains a vital part of a modern military.

The problem is that these people treat it less as "what's the best vehicle for this nation's budget and requirements?", with nuanced arguments that take the entire armed forces and required infrastructure into consideration, and more "my dad tank can beat up destroy your dad tank". Honestly, I partially blame it on Desert Storm. That operation was so fucking one-sided that it reinforced this stupid idea ingrained in people's minds and passed through generations since WWII that massive tank-on-tank battles are the norm and that one tank design can completely roflstomp another in the same generation.

Well when your tank or APC gets hit by a fuckoff 155/152mm shell looking like this:
View attachment 5363225
Fired by this Msta-S:
View attachment 5363227
The guys in the tank get fucking scrambled, tracks go flying, optics get damaged, etc. LP and NAFO fags again scree "muh composite armor" which ok... would apply if it wasn't a big bomb blowing up on the side of the tank and just rocking your shit instead of trying to penetrate.
See also, the destroyed Challenger 2.

News flash, kids: tanks are not invulnerable. They are going to be taken out. War is hell and nobody anywhere near the battlefield is spared.
 
See also, the destroyed Challenger 2.
I keep forgetting to bring this up, but in 2006 a Challenger 2's front armor was pened by an RPG-29. Another one ate a IED in 2007. Both incidents resulted in crew casualties. The British government lied about how the driver of the first tank lost his foot for 6 months.
In the August attack, which occurred during an operation to arrest a leading insurgent in the town of al-Amarah, in southern Iraq, the Challenger was damaged when a Russian-made rocket-propelled grenade, known as an RPG-29, defeated the ERA and penetrated the driver's cabin.
 
I keep forgetting to bring this up, but in 2006 a Challenger 2's front armor was pened by an RPG-29. Another one ate a IED in 2007. Both incidents resulted in crew casualties. The British government lied about how the driver of the first tank lost his foot for 6 months.
That reminds of an abrams that got taken out by an IED that that was a bunch of 155mm shells duck taped together I think only a 1 crew member died.
 
problem is that these people treat it less as "what's the best vehicle for this nation's budget and requirements?", with nuanced arguments that take the entire armed forces and required infrastructure into consideration, and more "my dad tank can beat up destroy your dad tank". Honestly, I partially blame it on Desert Storm. That operation was so fucking one-sided that it reinforced this stupid idea ingrained in people's minds and passed through generations since WWII that massive tank-on-tank battles are the norm and that one tank design can completely roflstomp another in the same generation.
Most people don't get shit like this. A lot of countries just can't afford a fully kitted Abrams tank. BUT...those old modernized T-62's over there, with a decent 115mm smoothbore gun that have (albeit old) thermals? Fuck yeah, that fits Country A's budget, and is basically equal to its neighbors. Fits the budget and requirements. Everything else is overkill, and/or can be handled by ATGM teams and aircraft.

That is yet another sign of the tank sperg: they dont see synergy between the forces. Say your tanks just cant cut it. Your helicopters that youve invested a ton in with Hellfire or TOW missiles can, while the tanks provide a distraction in the meantime. You can make a lot of 2nd hand equipment work for you with good strategy and tactics.
See also, the destroyed Challenger 2.

News flash, kids: tanks are not invulnerable. They are going to be taken out. War is hell and nobody anywhere near the battlefield is spared.
No shit. For many people that only watch movies, they think they need a tank to kill a tank. Not so. That's the most efficient way, but not the only way. Hit it with enough HE, and it'll be in no condition to fight. Blanket the land with smoke, and it can't shoot you. The autocannons on a IFV can still damage tracks, gun barrels, and optics. You just need to stop it from killing you, not nessicarily burn it down (though a 152mm shell will)
No wonder the Brits added that chonky front armor plate Red Effect was talking about.
Yeah, the RPG-29 is nasty to say the least, tandem warhead and all that
 
bail of Kyle Rittenhouse
That I can forgive. They kinda just got thrown into the situation when Kyle wore their shirt on his first release. If it was my business I'd immediately go hands off and keep my head down if I just woke up in the morning thrown into that.
Possibly the worst idea the Navy's ever had.
Mormon thunder stolen ngl
You can be Space Jews. Alternately you can make a caffeine free version of Mountain Holler and call it Mormon Thunder.
 
If I recall correctly, Hafer refused to pay the bail of Kyle Rittenhouse despite many on the right clamoring for him to do it. He's like the GOP, conserving only the bottom line.
IIRC he wasn't asked to chip in bail money, but he refused to even support Kyle as it became clear he smoked a couple of Anarcho-Commies.
 
That I can forgive. They kinda just got thrown into the situation when Kyle wore their shirt on his first release. If it was my business I'd immediately go hands off and keep my head down if I just woke up in the morning thrown into that.
I can understand that but they built their brand on being pro-2nd amendment so it does make it seem like a betrayal of sorts. Especially since Rittenhouse shot the guys in self-defense.

IIRC he wasn't asked to chip in bail money, but he refused to even support Kyle as it became clear he smoked a couple of Anarcho-Commies.
Interesting, makes you think.
 
Interesting, makes you think.
They got a taste of acceptance into the 'in crowd' and money abandoned standing for anything. Many such cases. They're SEALs and CIA glowies so they were probably always like that, but my theory is if you want to subvert someone disruptive, you don't buy them off, you invite them to parties and tempt them with status.
 
Well when your tank or APC gets hit by a fuckoff 155/152mm shell looking like this:
View attachment 5363225
People ignore that's how the soviets killed German tigers and panthers, a big slab of 152mm would knock the turret out of alignment and create so much spalling the tank would be a meat milkshake inside if the ammo somehow didn't explode due to the shock.

Same thing in the battle of Berlin, flaktowers with 128mm flattened is-2 rushing towards the Reichstag until they ran out of ammo.


About the T-14 spergout, it's pretty simple, it's currently not needed.
A T-72, T-90, T-80 are perfectly fine to take out early leopard 2s, M1s without uranium armor or Slovakian T-55s, they don't even use the newest ammo types simply because it's not fucking needed despite spookston and lazerpig raging about how the Russians are dumb.

Same thing happened with the Koreans, the K2 lingered for decades until showing up to mass production back in the mid 2010s, you simply don't need the most expensive mass produced tank when your likely enemy is fielding T-62s and you have thousands of M1 Abrams clones.
The K2 is designed to replace the Korean army m48s and m60s still in service, no the k1s and certainly not in a 1-1 basis.


Anyway, since back to the main discussion, what will be the NAFO/Lazerpig meltdown once either Ukraine halts the counter offensive or Europe drops sending equipment to them?
 
Anyway, since back to the main discussion, what will be the NAFO/Lazerpig meltdown once either Ukraine halts the counter offensive or Europe drops sending equipment to them?
Well, going from the latest cope dropped by the powers that be, the offensive is actually going great and is about to break through any day now, but the Russians actually managing to by and large hold onto their positions is in reality a massive Russian disinformation op to convince the world that the counter-offensive has failed.

So expect LazerFag and his harem of milsperg anime femboys to drop this talking point in one of their upcoming podcasts, when they're not wasted on alcohol and telling dick jokes to each other.
 
Back