The Ethics of Sex with Trans-Identified Females - or Why Porking Pooners is Potentially Problematic

Is it ethical?

  • Yes, they want to be heckin' validated and treated like gay men. This is mutually beneficial.

    Votes: 401 30.0%
  • No, deceit is wrong.

    Votes: 643 48.1%
  • All ethics are spooks. All that matters is penis feels good.

    Votes: 294 22.0%

  • Total voters
    1,338
I don't hate men, and I certainly don't hate you personally. (Your avatar is a little scary though.)

I get that you may not be consciously trying to scare women into submission when you joke about rape. But it's kind of like joking amongst your Gentile friends about sending Jews to the gas chambers. Any Jews present will be on notice from there on out that if they're having problems with anti-Semitism, you are NOT the person to ask for help.
I'm not responsible for the subjective interpretations of people who don't want to understand the "why." If they want to ask for clairification, I'll give it, but if they think I'm using it as a cudjel to beat them accidentally or otherwise, It's not me who has the problem. They do, and I suggest they fix it. The trauma or ignorance of others is not my burden to carry. Besides, I don't think women are that weak.

Also, like

Look man, do you know where you are? You're asking me if I have jewish friends and espousing feminist literature. Are you fucking with me right now?

I'll be back I'm going to get Starbucks.

Edit: I lied I got McDonalds, I'm not a fucking Kennedy I don't have money for that kind of shit
 
Last edited:
I don't hate men, and I certainly don't hate you personally. (Your avatar is a little scary though.)

I get that you may not be consciously trying to scare women into submission when you joke about rape. But it's kind of like joking amongst your Gentile friends about sending Jews to the gas chambers. Any Jews present will be on notice from there on out that if they're having problems with anti-Semitism, you are NOT the person to ask for help. It also suggests that if one of your bros was accused of rape, you'd take his side of it and disbelieve the accusations from the start. And since some men do rape, those men would take you for an ally.
Maybe you should just let people joke about whatever they want
Aside from that
Your definitely among friends for sure
 
I'm not responsible for the subjective interpretations of people who don't want to understand the "why." If they want to ask for clairification, I'll give it, but if they think I'm using it as a cudjel to beat them accidentally or otherwise, It's not me who has the problem. They do, and I suggest they fix it. The trauma or ignorance of others is not my burden to carry. Besides, I don't think women are that weak.

Also, like

Look man, do you know where you are? You're asking me if I have jewish friends and espousing feminist literature. Are you

I'm not responsible for the subjective interpretations of people who don't want to understand the "why." If they want to ask for clairification, I'll give it, but if they think I'm using it as a cudjel to beat them accidentally or otherwise, It's not me who has the problem. They do, and I suggest they fix it. The trauma or ignorance of others is not my burden to carry. Besides, I don't think women are that weak.

Also, like

Look man, do you know where you are? You're asking me if I have jewish friends and espousing feminist literature. Are you fucking with me right now?

I'll be back I'm going to get Starbucks.
Based ahh response 🔥🔥🔥
 
I don't hate men, and I certainly don't hate you personally. (Your avatar is a little scary though.)

I get that you may not be consciously trying to scare women into submission when you joke about rape. But it's kind of like joking amongst your Gentile friends about sending Jews to the gas chambers. Any Jews present will be on notice from there on out that if they're having problems with anti-Semitism, you are NOT the person to ask for help. It also suggests that if one of your bros was accused of rape, you'd take his side of it and disbelieve the accusations from the start. And since some men do rape, those men would take you for an ally.
Yeah but when I go down to the synagogue and make Holocaust jokes, I get run off. Where am I supposed to make those jokes?
 
Hahaha and I'm a "stochastic terrorist" for it too, right? Rape means whatever Feminism wants it to mean. It's a convenient omni-lie.
You're not a stochastic terrorist, you're a frustrated gay man who hates women.
Feminism didn't hurt you. The patriarchy did. The patriarchy, and specifically your religion, has you in a bind. And you're mad and frustrated and you're taking it out on women like me. Who have nice lives and don't need to hate anyone.
Thats why you're so wrong. Feminists say everything is rape and anything or anyone opposed to their corrective measures is a rape apologist. They even took Sargons non-threat of rape (the assurance that he wouldn't) and said it was a threat. Sad. Maybe you're just in a Fear-minist cult.
It's not an "assurance that he wouldn't", it's a threat phrased in the negative. It was given apropos of nothing and stank of sour grapes. If I were to snarl at you "I wouldn't even BEAT YOU TO DEATH" on Twitter to get attention from a fanbase of thousands, would you feel assured of my peaceful intentions?
I could go on about this, but just go read what I wrote about it in 2016. It's still correct and I can save some time.
Oh yeah? What's sabotaging birth control so woman can get a money slave for twenty years. Is that a pussy move?
Oh yeah? That's whataboutery. Stay on topic and quit moving the goal posts, you sad faggot.

ANYWAY, assuming women do this with any frequency (and I am very skeptical of that), it is akin to shooting themselves in the foot. Congrats, you get to have a baby on your own, which you have to care for, the FOB wants nothing to do with you, and your only recourse is to go to court to squeeze him for child support, which may take months or years to actually receive. Wow. I'm sure women do this all the time. NOT!
 
Joined Aug 2, 2021, you need to calm the fuck down, nigga go outside or get your gf to give you a sad beej
The girlfriend is probably the problem. We need to rehabilitate this man, this woman has infected his brain with quasi-mentally handicapped woman-think. He's talking about the patriarchy like that's even a thing outside of a theocratic institution, like black humour is some subconcious rape threat specifically meant to keep women afraid. This nigger has glowing worms in his brain and as God as my witness, I will save him from this raging cunt that's run roughshod over his life.
 
Funny how it's TTD until the TERF sees a pooner who's only a step or two more far gone than she is. Then it's time to coddle instead of roundhouse kick the tranny into the concrete
I've been curious about that as well, over the last decade there's been a rising movement to keep trans-women out of female spaces.
On my side there's no one trying to kick pooners or dykes out of mens bathrooms because who gives a shit, drunk women have always been busting through into the men's room to use the stalls and prove a point that no one gives a shit about.

I'm starting to think that the pooners are the unintentional powerplay here. You see how women protect them, imagine how they will shield them when they're the diversity CEO! This is not just nonsense, there's a theory about this that I just made up, so...

Ok, hear me out, it might sound wacky and outlandish but: I'm pretty drunk right now and I have to work tomorrow so maybe I'll get back to this subject. I hope @Stan understands.
 
Lmao at all the scrotes ITT who think dick can fix a bitch with 5 mental illnesses who is currently pooning out.
No one wants to fix them, moron, just use them for the casual sex they're happy to offer.
It's not an "assurance that he wouldn't", it's a threat phrased in the negative. It was given apropos of nothing and stank of sour grapes. If I were to snarl at you "I wouldn't even BEAT YOU TO DEATH" on Twitter to get attention from a fanbase of thousands, would you feel assured of my peaceful intentions?
I could go on about this, but just go read what I wrote about it in 2016. It's still correct and I can save some time.
I wouldn't even rape you.
He's talking about the patriarchy like that's even a thing outside of a theocratic institution,
Her name is Margaret Pless. She linked her article above. She's an AWFL and a true believer and priestess in the rape fear cult of Feminism.
 
The girlfriend is probably the problem. We need to rehabilitate this man, this woman has infected his brain with quasi-mentally handicapped woman-think. He's talking about the patriarchy like that's even a thing outside of a theocratic institution, like black humour is some subconcious rape threat specifically meant to keep women afraid. This nigger has glowing worms in his brain and as God as my witness, I will save him from this raging cunt that's run roughshod over his life.
Based ahh response 🤯🤯🤯
 
? what do you mean by that?
I think "radical" feminists are just rape victims who decided to be militant lesbians instead of cutting off their tits.
I have certain feminist sympathies and generally want to protect women from undue external harm but I hate femcels with just as much passion as I hate incels.
If you hate half of our species, you are a broken human and need to be removed from society, regardless of sex.

An unsolicited essay on why radical feminism is nonsense:
The very idea of a "radical" feminist is inherently paradoxical. In order for a woman to have any sort of dominance or equality with men, law and order are necessary because within every man is a wild primate being suppressed by law/morality. Wild primates rape and kill. The male is inherently stronger and will dominate the female on a macroscopic scale. This is natural law, it is clearly reflected in animals. Law and order is held together by men, wielding violence against men who commit evil. If you suspend law and order or try to wield it against the people who are holding it together, then anarchy will reign. In an anarchic situation, men will rape and kill as they will. Any goal of feminism that supercedes the natural order of our species is doomed to fail. If it were to succeed, on a long enough timeline, radical feminism would inherently result in wide spread suffering for women before the natural order takes hold again. The only solution to the valid concerns of feminists is to increase the spread of proper morality in men AND women through the traditional family unit. Be nice to women. Be nice to men. Be nice, or else 🔫
 
Her name is Margaret Pless. She linked her article above. She's an AWFL and a true believer and priestess in the rape fear cult of Feminism.
So this is just a woman? Nevermind you're not save-able, Margie. You've just got woman brain I can't do fuck all with that. Go torture your boyfriend, I hope in 5 years when he's finally done with your shit he throws a chair at you and leaves.

Edit: What does this person look like because I occasionally enjoy difficult endeavors.
 
Last edited:
Back