Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 126 37.2%

  • Total voters
    339

So at the end of today's MATI Rekieta v. Eric July segment, Null mentions that he has some reservations of going whole hog alog on Nick because Rekieta once gave him a nugget of advice that turned out to be quite profitable.

Any ideas what it could've been?
In another segment, in another MATI episode, he phrased it as Nick connecting him with somebody.

It might be a referral by Nick to Robert Barnes. Null did hire Barnes for a while to (successfully) deal with another one of Patrick Tomlinson's bullshit lawsuits.

I could be wrong that's what he's referring to though. I dunno if swatting Fatrick away (pun not intended) is really what you could call "profitable." Not in the financial sense, anyways. It's certainly never not funny though.

I also found this message about the futility of DMing Rekieta:

yt_dm.png
Perception Check should sign up for the Farms like @Kalea did, if she hasn't already. I always liked her. She has a good head on her shoulders.
 
Beware the man who insists that others cannot understand or grasp his concepts, but will never elaborate about what there is to be understood. Null "doesn't understand social interactions," yet you'll never hear how or why the interaction between humans was misunderstood and what there is to be understood. Conveying information with words is as simple as it gets with speech. It takes extra effort to escape the matter at hand and divert it into a meta-analysis of the very misunderstanding which has been ongoing for seemingly months. "Alas, if only he could understand..." Underneath is the refusal to accept someone can disagree with validity, usually with some lip service being paid to how being able to disagree is perfectly fine by him. However, you must first earn the right to disagree by first comprehending his human interactions.

tl;dr: Oh brother, this guy stinks.
 
Opinions outside of the KF seems to be mixed with some thinking Eric still didn't come out good even if Nick looks bad too. Still, I think the only cards flipping here are either neutral-to-nick and pro-nick. There are retards on the pro-nick but I'm pretty sure some have flipped on this. Nick won nothing here long term.

Honestly though, at this point, Nick is so toxic, anyone who still associates with him is a huge a fucking dumbass. Dick's dick is so deep inside Nick's ass and Dick is such a loose canon that associating with Nick makes you a potential target for Dick to fuck with. And he WILL target you if he sees the opportunity and Nick WILL back Dick up if you have an issue with it. Nick doesn't even have anything to give you back for this risk. His 10k youtube live viewer is gone. All he has left are spectre like fans. People who masturbate to the word "legality" like the people who masturbate to the word "facts and logic"...and they're all retarded.
 
What on earth are the Nick riders talking about?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230929-220404.png
    Screenshot_20230929-220404.png
    353.5 KB · Views: 42
The most irritating thing about Nick (other than that nasally, octave-jumping soprano speaking voice he’s got) is not that he is “lawyer-y”; it’s that he’s bad at it.

He doesn’t fail to make a clear statement because he’s so nuanced and clever; he fails to do so because he doesn’t have an answer.

Personal opinions don’t require parsing when you have the fucking facts of a situation.

It’s not “thinking like a lawyer” to be unable to assemble information in your head sufficiently to form a coherent response, and it’s not showing any quality courtroom chops to badger a guest. It is pathetic to think you’re clever because you learned how to avoid saying “I have no idea” and/or “I am certainly wrong” by playing cheap word games you pretend are profound or you think make you appear so.

Ghastly that so many adult humans think his leaping leprechaun act is actual intellect or lawyerin’. Parlor tricks, and not even good ones.
Rekieta's debate "tactics" are a stupid person's perception of how a smart lawyer argues.

I'm not sure if it's an act either. We've heard the story about when Nick was still representing clients and turned up at Schneider's office for a chat when he was opposing counsel. It wouldn't surprise me if Nick thought he was being clever by engaging in these extremely weird interactions in a professional context and that's why Schneider was unwilling to even so much as talk to him while Nick was pro se years later.

Opinions outside of the KF seems to be mixed with some thinking Eric still didn't come out good even if Nick looks bad too. Still, I think the only cards flipping here are either neutral-to-nick and pro-nick. There are retards on the pro-nick but I'm pretty sure some have flipped on this. Nick won nothing here long term.

Honestly though, at this point, Nick is so toxic, anyone who still associates with him is a huge a fucking dumbass. Dick's dick is so deep inside Nick's ass and Dick is such a loose canon that associating with Nick makes you a potential target for Dick to fuck with. And he WILL target you if he sees the opportunity and Nick WILL back Dick up if you have an issue with it. Nick doesn't even have anything to give you back for this risk. His 10k youtube live viewer is gone. All he has left are spectre like fans. People who masturbate to the word "legality" like the people who masturbate to the word "facts and logic"...and they're all retarded.
Nick looked like a dishonest and disingenuous prick but he looked like that all because of himself; Eric didn't acquit himself exceptionally well and missed the chance to bring up personal foibles. He seemed too stunned by how dishonest and disingenuous Nick was being and I think belatedly realized that Nick was only pretending to be anywhere near neutral. Eric July also looked composed while Nick was literally shaking and constantly making exaggerated reactions and at points looked like he was on the verge of a breakdown. As someone else here said, if you were looking at the body language with the audio muted, you likely would have thought that Rekieta was the one being pressed on facts and not the other way around.

Long term, Rekieta is fucked. Eric July is very well connected in the pop culture circles Nick wants to draw from and most of them are probably going to pick July instead. Let's get real as well, these people can all click on Rekieta's streams and see everything that this thread is seeing.
 
'Hasn't had a fair summary of me in a year" aka when it was found out he went to Hedonism II. Guess Null was supposed to lock his thread for discussing that and mention that swinging is healthy.

Looks like we got a followup on that tweet as well. Same ole' same ole' cope by Rekieta.
View attachment 5372551
It's just those evil Kiwifarmers manipulating Josh again :(
I would like to point out... if I may... that on last Tuesday's MATI, Null brought up that there some gay shit going on with Turkey Tom. He mentioned this because people basically implied he'd be guntguarding Tom if he didn't.

Null did indeed go over the drama, but then pulled an Uno reverse card by pointing out the particular drama seems stupid, smells like a gay op, and the people that were haranguing him into mentioning on it stream are stupid niggerfaggots.

Obviously, I'm paraphrasing here, but the point is this: Null is not a afraid of his userbase. He says what he thinks.

Rekieta is a greasy lying cocksucker, and his cope is that of a greasy lying cocksucker. Rekieta is upset at Null because Null won't memory hole Hedonism II. Cry more.
 
Nick...Pull your fucking head out of your ass. Stop drinking so much, stop picking fights with people who're on the same side of the culture war you are, and for the love of god stop being a faggot. Someone invent a time machine and go back to 2019 and give Nick an alcohol allergy instead of a heat allergy.

How embarassing.
 
Just under 3 hours after you commented.
97342974013.png
This faggot goes on lectures about "good writing" to his chat, pretending to himself be a "writer" (despite never having written anything), discussing his credentials in LiTeRaTuRe, but doesn't know where to put the fucking commas in his sentences.

[He doesn't understand human interaction] and [it's the most obvious thing in the world]. Two independent clauses. Add in a comma you homophile, or drop the "and" for a semicolon, or use a goddamn period like a normal person, or just rephrase it so it isn't a run-on--it would take one word: It's the most obvious thing in the world that Josh doesn't understand human interaction.

See how easy that was? You'd think someone who lectures his chat on grammar would know better.

This is supremely autistic and MATI, but all of Nick's "I'm a writer bros" rambling pisses me off. He isn't a writer, and to the extent that he can write, it's usually poorly. He constantly makes grammar errors, on Twitter and on Locals and also during his shows. Which is fine--it doesn't really matter. But it does if you're going to pretend to have mastery of English all the time!
 
Last edited:
Opinions outside of the KF seems to be mixed with some thinking Eric still didn't come out good even if Nick looks bad too. Still, I think the only cards flipping here are either neutral-to-nick and pro-nick. There are retards on the pro-nick but I'm pretty sure some have flipped on this. Nick won nothing here long term.
i dont get this at all. if nicks opponents argument is that he is dishonest and he spends 2 hours being dishonest then he just made his opponents argument for them.

edit: i take this back. its not surprising. i actually remember looking through the comments on the stream. i had to remind myself these are the people who are left. after all the stuff thats happening these are the people who stayed.
 
Oh man, I can't believe how not upset Rekieta is, it's clearly all just a goof and a gaff to him.

I'm also curious how much of Nick's "burning through all of his old stances at record speed" will just end up being blamed, by Nick or his fans, on his "ODD". Is it that every time someone points out he's a massive hypocrite he has to oppose his old values to the nth degree? I didn't think ODD caused you to completely 180 on beliefs that you claim are core to you as a person, but what do I know? I'm not a psychologist after all. Guess I'll just trust a lawyer to be 100% honest with me, no matter how many times he says to "never trust a lawyer".
 
They were kind of like "I got no beef with you" and parted while talking through their teeth. Kind of felt like they didn't want to feud anymore but were still pissed off.
it felt more like eric finally realized what he was dealing with. their faces gave away their thoughts.

nick: -smirking- dick will love this! he will be showing this video on his show for months! i might even get to call in!
eric: -teeth clenched- this guys full of shit
 
So what are the "several" charity organizations he's been on the board for?

I can name one. Nick Rekieta was listed as a director for the Louis And Peaches Owen Family Foundation in its 2019 990. That was the foundation formed by his wealthy grandparents. Though he's not on the list for 2022.

Are there any else?


Disagree to the first sentence, and to the rest, can't it be both?
He has mentioned it before, but he also mentioned early during COVID-mania that he had stepped down from those positions to focus on the show.

I don't know if I can make it through the Rekieta/July VOD because the way Rekietas is handling this is so goddam infuriating. He keeps reverting back into a legal mindset (but he's never been a law channel, guys!) even after they both agree that Eric July isn't talking in that sense.
Nick is trying to bring the fight to friendly terrain, and Eric did an inconsistent job of calling him on the 'colloquial' versus the 'legal' technicalities.

Nick punches down by lording over his opponents his expertise in law. As I recall, only Kurt ever really had it out with him on a legal opinion and refused to compromise, because AUTISM.
I would respect CGoody a lot more if he did it for free but that dumb fuck actually pays for superchats to get Nick's attention. You know he pays for Locals as well and do you think if he shows up to a thing Nick does he gets in for free?

It's like all the fucking Reddit jannies who keep buying gold and their dumbass avatars on top of providing value for the company. They're barely even human.
LOCALS moderators get free access to the community where they are a moderator.

Jew Joe was giving out the status to people who claimed they could not pay for his own community.
Perception was a long term, big time pay pig. Loosing someone like that has gotta hurt.
She is one of many. Nick used to have an intelligent, but socio-politically disillusioned set of 20-30 somethings who rejected much of the Leninist-Marxist political outlook and pervasion of culture among his fanbase. Then there were the nerds and spergs, but they just added spice. Now it is just the dregs...
 
So at the end of today's MATI Rekieta v. Eric July segment, Null mentions that he has some reservations of going whole hog alog on Nick because Rekieta once gave him a nugget of advice that turned out to be quite profitable.

Any ideas what it could've been?
It's a great question.
In another segment, in another MATI episode, he phrased it as Nick connecting him with somebody.

It might be a referral by Nick to Robert Barnes. Null did hire Barnes for a while to (successfully) deal with another one of Patrick Tomlinson's bullshit lawsuits.
Good guess. I just skimmed through Null's last 3 appearances on Nick's show for an answer. Occam's Razor would dictate that it would have been hinted at.

The other possibility is that Nick helped with the "Mountain Jew" (wtf is that? someone school me) who was suing Null. Null said he sent Nick the case. Aug. 21, 2020 appearance, timestamp 2:23:15. She (the mountain Jew) had sued Null several times and Null wanted advice on how to get her named as a vexatious litigant.

Other mentions that could be clues:
Sept. 30, 2021: Lots of talk about Ralph, someone (Ralph? Vickers?) went to the FBI when his info was doxxed on Kiwi. I'm sure Nick had thoughts on how to handle the feds.
Aug. 27, 2022: Keffals talk when the creature was Josh's problem (site was down), Ralph and Keffals had met up under some anti-Kiwi premise, MTG was swatted and blamed Kiwi - lots of PR issues.
 
Drunkard couldn't comprehend that Eric July was saying customers would pay less than $17.50, but that the operating cost for shipping would still be $17.50. Notice how once it's Nick failing to understand someone else, it's their fault for failing to properly answer the question? However you'll hear for years how Null can't understand Nick and that's Null's fault. Funny how the common denominator on both of these "misunderstandings" is Nick. He can't understand others, others can't understand him, but every time it's the other party who's at fault? Sure, Nick.
 
I'm also curious how much of Nick's "burning through all of his old stances at record speed" will just end up being blamed, by Nick or his fans, on his "ODD".
No, it'll be even more dishonest than that.

He'll claim he never held the stance in the first place and people are "projecting." Then when somebody provides evidence he did in fact hold the stance, he'll conveniently ignore it and go do another coomstream with Coomalot (or something equally gay).

That's basically the heart of what Perception Check was saying there. And she's abso-fucking-lutely right. He, and a his sycophantic fans, try to gaslight people in believing they didn't see or hear what they actually saw and heard. I've experienced it too from him back when I considered myself a fan. It's fucking aggravating.

She is one of many. Nick used to have an intelligent, but socio-politically disillusioned set of 20-30 somethings who rejected much of the Leninist-Marxist political outlook and pervasion of culture among his fanbase. Then there were the nerds and spergs, but they just added spice. Now it is just the dregs...
Amen.
 
Back