Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[AnOminous]

Dick also got hot and bothered at the same tweet:

Us siding with Eric July is not the own he thinks it is. If the supposedly most racist site on the Internet other than Stormfront is siding with a nigger over you, maybe you're the baddie.

 

[Sam Losco]

Noseberg is talking about gassing dogs

Why is he dragging Ralph into this?

have a good time.

Channeling Wings of Redemption.

Re: the shaking, reminded me of a roommate I had back in the day. Alcoholic and a tattoo artist. He was forced into rehab and afterwards had problems tattooing people because of his hand shakes. So he started shotgunning a beer before to steady his hand. Nick is 100% an alcoholic. Chemical dependence.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

I could be wrong that's what he's referring to though. I dunno if swatting Fatrick away (pun not intended) is really what you could call "profitable." Not in the financial sense, anyways. It's certainly never not funny though.

For the record, the term "profitable" was my paraphrasing Null.

His exact verbiage on the clip was closer to

"[Nick] did something for me..."

" [Nick] suggested something to me that has paid off enormously..."

So the Robert Barnes referral could possibly fit.

It would be sweet irony though, since Josh simultaneously shits on Nick for his Ty Beard referral in this very same segment.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

The other possibility is that Nick helped with the "Mountain Jew" (wtf is that? someone school me) who was suing Null. Null said he sent Nick the case. Aug. 21, 2020 appearance, timestamp 2:23:15. She (the mountain Jew) had sued Null several times and Null wanted advice on how to get her named as a vexatious litigant.

Is it not Melinda Scott? The woman whose photo of her and her husband got shown to Drex but Nulls face was shopped on the husband and he called it soft eyes?

 

[AnOminous]

It is pathetic to think you’re clever because you learned how to avoid saying “I have no idea” and/or “I am certainly wrong” by playing cheap word games you pretend are profound or you think make you appear so.

Even law school has apparently abandoned the Socratic method lately. It is a tragedy because it weeded out retards like Nick.

He seemed too stunned by how dishonest and disingenuous Nick was being and I think belatedly realized that Nick was only pretending to be anywhere near neutral.

Most NORMAL people would be. People are not used to dealing with absolute cows like Nick. They are shocked by the rampant faggotry when they actually do encounter such a person.

Rekieta is a greasy lying cocksucker, and his cope is that of a greasy lying cocksucker. Rekieta is upset at Null because Null won't memory hole Hedonism II. Cry more.

But like he's totally autistic because he remembers things I've said, like literal total autism man, just ignore him and don't look behind the curtain, because like autism, man!

 

[make_it_so]

Does our super smart internet lawyer guy seriously not understand the simple concept that when you ship multiple of the same items to the same customer, your cost of shipping per unit goes down since it's all going out in one package?

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Drunkard couldn't comprehend that Eric July was saying customers would pay less than $17.50, but that the operating cost for shipping would still be $17.50. Notice how once it's Nick failing to understand someone else, it's their fault for failing to properly answer the question? However you'll hear for years how Null can't understand Nick and that's Null's fault. Funny how the common denominator on both of these "misunderstandings" is Nick. He can't understand others, others can't understand him, but every time it's the other party who's at fault? Sure, Nick.

I understand Nick's legal point somewhat: 'Don't say things that could be misconstrued and cause legal trouble'. It is sound advice. Do not cause problems because the law is not a machine with predictable outcomes. Nick is giving good GENERAL advice.

HOWEVER, Nick fails to apply the same perspective of logic on Twitter... or X... or whatever... when commenting on (I do not say 'defending') Riley's actions and responding to how he would handle the situation. He applies SPECIFIC knowledge of the parties to construct a fact pattern then proceeds comment on that. He does the same with Eric in his stream discussion.

This is NOT wrong or malicious--it is what lawyers do in consultation/education versus litigation/practice--, but pretending that he does not shape the narrative of the specific fact pattern when it suits him and hide behind the vauguery of the general case is where the rot lies.

 

[Burd Turglar]

I'll catch the recap on Tuesday. I don't have thr patience to watch Nick anymore. After his so drunk he has to one eye to read shit stream, I'm done with his shit. Enjoy dying in poverty, you scum fuck.

 

[AnOminous]

I understand Nick's legal point somewhat: 'Don't say things that could be misconstrued and cause legal trouble'.

A really good one would be don't be so drunk off your ass that you randomly accuse people of performing acts of child molestation, like saying "he totally sucks little boys' dicks" with absolutely no basis in fact for it. And if you do get that drunk and wake up the next morning and realize you committed such a phenomenal act of retardation, fucking APOLOGIZE and RETRACT it.

 

[Dan tease in fur know]

Does our super smart internet lawyer guy seriously not understand the simple concept that when you ship multiple of the same items to the same customer, your cost of shipping per unit goes down since it it's all going out in one package?

maybe if he ever got around to the locals gift he promised he might have a firmer grasp on shipping expenses.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

Does our super smart internet lawyer guy seriously not understand the simple concept that when you ship multiple of the same items to the same customer, your cost of shipping per unit goes down since it it's all going out in one package?

I remember when dick bitched about this too..

Is economies of scale just not a concept that people are not aware of? I thought at least everyone at least knows of the concept, but maybe not the exact term for it. Thats baffling.

 

[AnOminous]

Note, if you remember previous years Nick, look at current year Nick.

Literally so drunk he can't even keep his eyes open.

Is economies of scale just not a concept that people are not aware of?

Nick has lived such a silver spoon life since he was born that things that normal people have dealt with all their lives are beyond his comprehension.

 

[RedMage]

I believe this is was what started Nick and Eric coming together to stream last night. Eric lays out his issue with Nick much more clearly than he did last night, though, perhaps it's because of how Nick was was carrying on with the conversation with some gaslighting.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Does our super smart internet lawyer guy seriously not understand the simple concept that when you ship multiple of the same items to the same customer, your cost of shipping per unit goes down since it's all going out in one package?

I remember when dick bitched about this too..

Is economies of scale just not a concept that people are not aware of? I thought at least everyone at least knows of the concept, but maybe not the exact term for it. Thats baffling.

It is ammunition that people who dislike you can use against you. Nick is giving solid generic advice to not arm your enemies if they choose to launch a salvo of character attacks, but he is failing to clearly articulate that the underlying basis of any such complaint is and would be frivolous at the same time.

Interestingly, this is counterpoised to his handling of own legal fiasco. He ignored his own advice to not say something outrageous, but now has NO issue illustrating all the ways in which the frivolities of Montegraph's case abound.

 

[make_it_so]

Interestingly, this is counterpoised to his handling of own legal fiasco. He ignored his own advice to not say something outrageous, but now has NO issue illustrating all the ways in which the frivolities of Montegraph's case abound.

Forgive me as I'm not fully well-versed in Nick's recent lore, but how in the fuck did Nick manage to get into legal trouble with Montegraph of all people? Isn't he that methed-out/mentally ill homeless-looking motherfucker that uploaded those insane YouTube videos a few years ago attacking Nick and Mr. Metokur (calling them the "Sweaty Sausages")?

 

[ProfDongs]

Its really strange that the "real" Nick as he is now comes across as dishonest slime, yet the fucking Lawyer seemed like someone with honesty and integrity.

 

[make_it_so]

Its really strange that the "real" Nick as he is now comes across as dishonest slime, yet the fucking Lawyer seemed like someone with honesty and integrity.

A lot of people were initially really drawn in to Nick (myself included) because he seemed to be a professional legal expert who was taking a stand for people that were getting unjustifiably crushed and publicly ruined under the insane zeitgeist of Current Year (Vic Mignona, Johnny Depp, Kyle Rittenhouse) while also giving a very entertaining and informative streaming environment. But as Josh pointed out in his stream, Nick only did all that for fucking money and YouTube algo hits, it seems.

 

[Maude Snew]

It is ammunition that people who dislike you can use against you. Nick is giving solid generic advice to not arm your enemies if they choose to launch a salvo of character attacks, but he is failing to clearly articulate that the underlying basis of any such complaint is and would be frivolous at the same time.

Nick Rekieta gave me legal advice in a dumpster behind an Arby's in 1998.

 

[Bepis]

Forgive me as I'm not fully well-versed in Nick's recent lore, but how in the fuck did Nick manage to get into legal trouble with Montegraph of all people? Isn't he that methed-out/mentally ill homeless-looking motherfucker that uploaded those insane YouTube videos a few years ago attacking Nick and Mr. Metokur (calling them the "Sweaty Sausages")?

He repeatedly accused Monty of being a a pedo, making pedo snuff movies, sucking child penises, etc during a stream. He also directly challenged Monty to sue him for it.

 

[Dan tease in fur know]

i am confused. yesterday and todays stream are the only ones i have ever seen live of nick. from all the clips i have seen i was under the impression he was a bigger streamer.

yesterday - 2.4k viewers
today - 1.8 k viewers - 1 hour in

was he always a relatively small streamer? has his numbers dropped that much? i saw clips of him covering the rittenhouse trial and just assumed his numbers where significantly higher. especially given the way he brags about them on twitter.