Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

[TVB]

They think the goblins are offensive Jewish caricatures #soprogressive

No wonder goblins control Hollywood, the banks and the majority of black people

 

[RonRiot]

lol
View attachment 5357311


View attachment 5357313
So how many points does that star in Gringotts Bank have?

Rowling never designed the movie sets. Based set designers were clearly on to her subtext though!
The only description of goblins in the book that could possibly said to be a Jewish stereotype is ‘swarthy.’ They’re not described as having big noses or loving gold. It’s typically racist projection on behalf of the woke. Goblins guarding treasure is hardly a unique fantasy trope. I listened to the first audiobook to see what all the fuss was about, and actually enjoyed it. Thanks for the recommendation, troons.

 

[AltisticRight]

They’re not described as having big noses or loving gold.

They're just trying to throw everything at the wall to see if anything sticks. Some troon also suggested that the troll in female's bathroom encounter was transphobic, that's how desperate they were.

(Also, did they just assume the troll's gender? That's kind of bigoted.)

 

[DoubleD]

One less reason to go to London Comic Con, I guess?

The convention's organisers just cancelled a panel about the Harry Potter and the Cursed Child play after an LGBT charity raised "concerns".

The charity, Switchboard LGBT, will have its own Pride Lounge booth at London Comic Con, which they describe as a quiet space for LGBTQ+ people and allies to "connect" and "recharge during the event".

This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.

How Pink News readers reacted to this story:

 

[TVB]

The charity, Switchboard LGBT, will have its own Pride Lounge booth at London Comic Con, which they describe as a quiet space for LGBTQ+ people and allies to "connect" and "recharge during the event".

From Pink News:
(23/Sep/2023)
Archive, Link to original

Another reason to hate the bri"ish and the gay shit. Kill all the gays and the faggots

 

[AnOminous]

They think the goblins are offensive Jewish caricatures #soprogressive

>see orcs
>mindless brutal monsters who do nothing but violence and rape
>must be BLACK PEOPLE
>see goblins
>servile international bankers
>must be JEWS
>but you're the racists and anti-semites!

No wonder goblins control Hollywood, the banks and the majority of black people

Goddammit Carlos.

 

[Whereismymind]

Rowling's next Strike novel will be released next week, can we expect a new tranny meltdown about some (not so) hidden transphobia? According to the summary it's about a cult, so that already sounds promising. I already forgot what made them cry about the last book and when I did a quick google search, I found the following quote: " J.K. Rowling's new book, The Ink Black Heart, features a storyline about creator who was doxxed by her own fandom over content viewers found transphobic and racist." Which is not even remotely what happened in the book, so I'm looking forward to what they will make up this time.

But of course! For starters, the new novel is bigoted and ableist. It features a mission to save someone's autistic son from a cult, so I guess it hits a little too close to home for a lot of troons, being autists in a gender cult.


x


x


x


x


x

Pink News published a review of the novel by an 'NB'. As you can imagine, it's mainly a list of complaints about transphobia and other problematic content in the novel. archive

A non-binary person reviewed the new JK Rowling book. They had a lot to say​

Sep 28 Written by Maggie Baska

JK Rowling’s latest book contains fatphobia, ablest slurs and is hooked on a thinly-veiled metaphor for trans people and allies.

If you thought JK Rowling’s previous book in her Cormoran Strike series was an unsubtle nod to anti-trans bigotry, the latest instalment really said: “Hold my beer.”

The Running Grave is the seventh novel in the author’s thriller-mystery series, named after its main character, which she writes under her very public pseudonym Robert Galbraith.
The previous story, The Ink Black Heart, looked at how a public figure was “cancelled” for being anti-trans. It didn’t take a great pair of detectives to figure out the novel was a case of art imitating life as Rowling herself has complained about being doxxed and threatened for her views on the lives of trans people.
And there’s much more of that in her latest title.
The new book follows sleuthing duo Strike and Robin Ellacott as they help a father worried because his autistic son has joined a religious cult, which touts itself as being inclusive but shames and targets anyone who attempts to speak out against it.
It is almost openly mimetic of JK Rowling’s experience as it paints people like her, who are just worried about “vulnerable” folks, as victims of a relentless group that is ostensibly based on equality, diversity and inclusion.
The father in the novel is described as the “patron of several charities” concerning education and child welfare, who has a “reputation for intelligence and integrity”.
It reads blithely like Rowling describing herself because she founded children’s charity Lumos, and she has positioned herself as a champion of women’s rights and child protection.
It’s decided that Robin will go undercover to infiltrate the cult, posing as a new recruit. To attract the attention of recruiters, she dyes her hair blue and says her wedding was called off.
It’s a not-so-subtle nod to how conservatives have associated people who have blue hair with gender-non-conformity and self-expression. There’s even a meme, which has been reclaimed by LGBTQ+ people online, mocking those with “blue hair and pronouns” – aka trans people and their allies.
The details of the cult are horrible, with members forced to do manual labour, starved, subjected to physical punishment and sexually exploited by higher-level cultists and leaders.
But it’d be remiss if we didn’t extrapolate the beliefs of this “dangerous cult” and the events in The Running Grave, to see how they truly mirror Rowling’s public downfall as a result of her controversial statements.
First off, many right-wing pundits pushed harmful grooming claims about trans people and lambasted the LGBTQ+ community more broadly for allegedly attacking individuals for sharing anti-trans beliefs.
For example, Tucker Carlson and online group Libs of TikTok described the LGBTQ+ community as an “extremely poisonous cult [that] brainwashes” people.
Kathleen Stock, who resigned from her role at the University of Sussex after students called to have her sacked over her trans-exclusionary views, has written at length in newspapers and spoken on TV about being villainised by trans people and allies.

Elements in The Running Grave smack of anti-trans ideology​

In the cult, members are required to have sex with one another. As a result, a lesbian is forced against her will to sleep with men. Later in the book, a gay man refuses to go to bed with a woman.
Robin, who has established herself in the cult by this point, sees nothing wrong with this, but another cult member scoffs at her for thinking “there’s such a thing as ‘gay’”.
The cult member then says “bodies don’t matter”, only the “spirit” matters, and it’s against the cult’s beliefs to think people aren’t “good enough to sleep with”.
Anti-trans people have claimed to speak for women when they rile against the trans community, alleging that lesbians are being “erased” by transgender people.
Both myths have been debunked, but the fact remains that such narratives still permeate conversations when transgender issues are brought up.
The book also takes clear aim at “social justice warriors” and left-wing people because the cult is concerned about homelessness, addiction, climate change and social deprivation.
It believes that these are “ills generated by a capitalist, materialistic” society before deriding the “materialist trappings of property, weddings and the so-called nuclear family”.

A door-stopper of a novel, clocking in at more than 900 pages​

Protagonist Strike is unpleasant but somehow a magnet to women. In several chapters, he bemoans the fact that he’s on a joyless weight-loss journey but also deals with a host of female characters who lust after him while he juggles his feelings for Robin.
The book’s treatment of women is questionable at best. It genuinely feels as if JK Rowling has taken on the persona of a male author trying his hardest to write female characters.
One woman is described as a power-hungry seductress who “took a used condom out of the bin” to try to get pregnant by the man she was having an affair with – I kid you not.
In another chapter, Strike wonders if a different woman is gay – before asking himself if that’s “offensive” – because she goes to the gym, is nearly as “broad across the back as the man nearest her” and doesn’t return the interest of a flirtatious man.
That isn’t even the first or only time that the “is this offensive?” thought process comes up during the enormous 900-plus pages it takes to tell this story.
Across the book several characters who are neurodivergent are described as being a “bit simple” or outright called the ‘r’ slur – although the use of this word is also debated among characters in the book
Robin questions if one of the higher-level members is biracial because he is tall, and the Chinese men she was “used to seeing in Chinatown” were “generally much shorter”.
Oh, and then there is fatshaming. Unattractive women are nonchalantly described as chubby or fat, and Strike mentions weight loss before delving into his own perceived attractiveness and/or attraction to others.
There could be a decent narrative in The Running Grave, but under JK Rowling’s leadership, the few glimpses of a basic but good story are covered up by a flawed veil of troublesome themes, unpleasant characters and page upon page of unneeded exposition.

 

[Ewan McGregor]

I love how they retconned the whole of Harry Potter that you'd think it was written by Andrew Anglin on a coke sprint.

The woman cannot even breath without being a literal nazi even though for over a decade she was the poster child of obnoxious liberal twitter douche.

That explains while King is such a rabid, overzealous woke peddler. If he ever strayed out of the straight path the immense shit he would get wouldn't just be from the internet and media, but within his own household.

That's a problem J. K.K.K. Rowling doesn't have. Female privilege, guys.

 

[Elysian]

I love how they retconned the whole of Harry Potter that you'd think it was written by Andrew Anglin on a coke sprint.

The woman cannot even breath without being a literal nazi even though for over a decade she was the poster child of obnoxious liberal twitter douche.

That explains while King is such a rabid, overzealous woke peddler. If he ever strayed out of the straight path the immense shit he would get wouldn't just be from the internet and media, but within his own household.

That's a problem J. K.K.K. Rowling doesn't have. Female privilege, guys.

I think King would have an easier time with doing wrongthink tbh. When men do something troons dislike they're all "I'm so disappointed in you... do better" while when women do it they're like "I will kill you and rape your corpse you transphobic cunt".

 

[Ewan McGregor]

I think King would have an easier time with doing wrongthink tbh. When men do something troons dislike they're all "I'm so disappointed in you... do better" while when women do it they're like "I will kill you and rape your corpse you transphobic cunt".

Interesting point.

Yet, Kings oeuvre would stand in a much worse position than Rowling's when subjected to woke revisionism.

Considering his body of work, I'm pretty sure he's got a huge troon fanbase. I dunno if there would ever be a King Derangement Syndrome, that would depend on what statements KIng would do.

In the hypothetical he made the exact statements Rowling did, they might not be as verbally vicious and murderous but they wouldn't be easy on him.

However, your comment made me think on our very own Null and the treatment he received and I'd tend to agree with you. For somebody with Null's reputation (i.e. alt right adjacent) all the woke and liberal usual suspects adopted an odd academic treatment.

More "Null poses an existential threat to our kind due to his involvement in the coordination of stochastic terrorism and the aggressive aggression of the marginalized few tantamonting to the oppession of the masses from a neo-Trotskyite praxis" than "Null, you fucking fascist, we are going to rape your mother and kill your dog and enjoy dismembering your fat body" as they favour dispensing to female critics.

That said, they did threaten Null and his mum in a way they never got to do to Rowling in a way that actually matters.

My point is: They may be verbally softer on male opponents, that might be true. But they know they can go all in on a (white) male in a manner they cannot with a (white) female without raising eyebrows.

 

[Pickman's Modeling Agency]

Thank you for reminding me. Grabbed the newest audio book. Kiss my entire ass, Twitter Troons.

 

[Elysian]

My point is: They may be verbally softer on male opponents, that might be true. But they know they can go all in on a (white) male in a manner they cannot with a (white) female without raising eyebrows.

I think that was less because of Rowling's gender and more because Rowling is a successful billionaire with plenty of fuck you money to go around and a literal castle while Null is some guy running an obscure gossip forum from a Serbian commieblock. I'm sure that if they could call in bomb threats in Rowling's name and show up to her place of residence to threaten her with knives they'd totally do it, but her critics can't get past her security and she can get legendary tier lawyers to send intimidating cease-and-desist letters whenever a critic gets too spicy.

 

[Ewan McGregor]

I think that was less because of Rowling's gender and more because Rowling is a successful billionaire with plenty of fuck you money to go around and a literal castle while Null is some guy running an obscure gossip forum from a Serbian commieblock. I'm sure that if they could call in bomb threats in Rowling's name and show up to her place of residence to threaten her with knives they'd totally do it, but her critics can't get past her security and she can get legendary tier lawyers to send intimidating cease-and-desist letters whenever a critic gets too spicy.

Of course, you're right, but there's something more for the phenomenon we're describing here.

Troons are dumb coomers, but, more often than not, they try to present themselves as intellectuals and avant-garde. They see themselves typically as quite sophisticated.

Their lifestyle really doesn't stand, they're hypocrites and more often than not they aren't as intelligent as they think they are. They usually can get away with shit with confusing queer and feminism bullshit, which are ideas that, despite what you might think, are not very mainstream.

But when they are challenged on those, they know they don't have the resources to sustain an argument because ultimately they don't stand on the ground of reality so they are only left with the option of cancellation.

If the challenger is a (white) man, laying the moral justification for it is sourced in a big body of work that vilifies (white) men so they can just do so while looking high and mighty.

If the challenger is a (white) woman they are deprived of this intellectual baggage. They can latch on anti-white rhetoric to target (white) women as they've done by aping the "Karen" meme but ultimately a woman, white or not, is as much of a sacred cow as they are and that should force them to thread carefully.

However, this circumstance enrages them as they cannot bully them while getting good optics so they go nuclear because, at the moment, they still get the support of the woke arbiters. That's why they're so unhinged against women.

The fact that they're typically (white) men attacking the sort of (white) woman that represent something they could never be, or worse, that is contrary to what they seem to believe a woman is, or should be (that is, a dumb slut bimbo) just adds insult to injury.

 

[AN/ALR56]

King has a orgy scene in that clown book of his involving 9 year olds fucking and sucking eachother off in a sewer.
It will be hilarious to see his downfall when the troons inevitable turn on his old coke fueled ass.

 

[Ewan McGregor]

King has a orgy scene in that clown book of his involving 9 year olds fucking and sucking eachother off in a sewer.
It will be hilarious to see his downfall when the troons inevitable turn on his old coke fueled ass.

He has a similar scene in Salem's Lot

 

[Lone Star]

King has a orgy scene in that clown book of his involving 9 year olds fucking and sucking eachother off in a sewer.
It will be hilarious to see his downfall when the troons inevitable turn on his old coke fueled ass.

They've already been subdued by his "I was on crack!" excuse. Because apparently being on crack makes you write sex scenes with kids.

 

[Ewan McGregor]

They've already been subdued by his "I was on crack!" excuse. Because apparently being on crack makes you write sex scenes with kids.

Child abuse is an obsession of his and a common theme through his works. Apparently due to his own fucked up childhood.

 

[Vyse Inglebard]

King has a orgy scene in that clown book of his involving 9 year olds fucking and sucking eachother off in a sewer.
It will be hilarious to see his downfall when the troons inevitable turn on his old coke fueled ass.

>implying that isn't the exact thing troons are into
Troons reproduce by molesting children, remember.

 

[ASeabear8952]

But of course! For starters, the new novel is bigoted and ableist. It features a mission to save someone's autistic son from a cult, so I guess it hits a little too close to home for a lot of troons, being autists in a gender cult.


x


x


x


x


x

Pink News published a review of the novel by an 'NB'. As you can imagine, it's mainly a list of complaints about transphobia and other problematic content in the novel. archive

How can one woman be this based???

 

[Lone Star]

Child abuse is an obsession of his and a common theme through his works. Apparently due to his own fucked up childhood.

He also despises small towns and just assumes everyone in them is secretly evil and also racist.