Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
I'm playing catch up but did this dude rule have the gall to claim he grew up in poverty? The same man whos maternal grandfather has a foundation with $15 million dollars and has a hospital wing named after him?

More than a hospital wing. They gave an $18 million dollar contribution in one shot to build a whole "heart hospital" in 2010 in east texas.
 
I’d like to point out that the entire reason Riley went to stalk Eric is because Riley was promoting pirate copies of Eric’s comic along with Vito and some other idiots, and Eric got them temp-banned from Twitter over copyright infringement.

So Riley decided to stalk a man in person because he stopped them from trying to fuck with his business.

But Riley’s fully within their rights, everyone.
 
Is this the actual account of TiC?
Yes

091E5F5C-B361-4462-B609-C0C66B0EB83B.jpeg
 
Last edited:
On a cold and gray Houston mornin'
A poor little Rackets is born
In the ghetto (In the ghetto)
And his mama cries...

'Cause if there's one thing that she don't need
It's an oppositional defiant sneed
In the ghetto (In the ghetto)

People, don't you understand
The Rackets needs a helping hand
Or he'll grow to be an angry lolcow some day
Take a look at the kiwi, we ain't too blind to see
Or do we simply archive, and laugh along the way?

Well, the world turns
And a hungry Rackets with a big shining nose
Streams from his seat and puts on a show
In the ghetto (In the ghetto)
And his hunger burns

So he starts to roam Twitter at night
And he learns how to grift
And he learns how to spite
In the ghetto (In the ghetto)

Then one night in desperation
Rackets breaks away
He buys a balldo, crashes a car
Tries to run, but he don't get far
And his mama cries...

As the farms gathers 'round a drunk lolcow man
Face down on the stream with a balldo in his hand
In the ghetto (In the ghetto)
 
Rekieta doesn't need to be dragged back in, because he never left. He issued a "sorry if my tone offended you" non-apology, later deleting the stream, but the rest of his Twitter activity has mostly been arguing on Twitter about the controversy.

Riley was in the replies of a tweet posted by Dick Masterson. Neither one of them tagged Rekieta. How is this dragging Nick in? Rekieta is seeking out the drama himself. At least on Twitter.
Fair point. For some reason I thought Riley went out of his way to tag Rekieta in.

Like I said, it doesn't matter if he walks back into this entirely of his own volition or is enticed in. He's fucked in the head and is susceptible to both scenarios. This whole July thing is only gonna accelerate his downward spiral.

The only question is whether Nick has the self-discipline to limit this to Twitter replies and keep the seethe away from his streaming. And, on that front, I agree that there probably will be private pressure there to get him to stream about the issue some more, because ultimately Nick streaming about this delivers eyes and dollars to Dick.
Agreed.

I'm playing catch up but did this dude rule have the gall to claim he grew up in poverty? The same man whos maternal grandfather has a foundation with $15 million dollars and has a hospital wing named after him?
The same. Thanks to @Strix454, we also found out his father worked for Cray Research at one point. You know how THOSE bastards were. They were renowned for only hiring high school dropouts and paying minimum wage. That was the sacrifice needed in order to make The Last Starfighter. Poor Nick had to walk barefoot to school, uphill, in the snow only to have his Transformer toy taken away from him. Truly it was a hard knock life.

Fortunately he preserved and grew into the amazing specimen you see before you today: Drunkenly yelling racial slurs at some black comic book guy on Rumble for multiple hours.
 
More than a hospital wing. They gave an $18 million dollar contribution in one shot to build a whole "heart hospital" in 2010 in east texas.
I didn't know they were that loaded. Nicks grandparents are giving away entire hospital wings, but letting their grandchildren ride the poverty bus to thug academy?
Give me a fucking break. :story:
 
Nick's entire premise is that Eric has a "list." AFAIK, that has yet to be proven. I thought Nerdrotic was the one with the list (as @Mister Dongs seemed to confirm some pages back).

Is he shooting Eric when he should be shooting at Gary, or is he just outright delusional? Is Nick even ON Gary's list? I mean, he was all scheduled to go play DnD with Jeremy and the other G+G people (did that even happen, BTW?).

Eric's "list" might be just as simple as "people I don't like and want to have nothing to do with" Which is actually fine. That's hardly a nefarious list. AnCaps are supposedly all about freedom of association and non-aggression, which doesn't entail mandatory association with people you think are fuckwits.

Of course though, Nick hates even that, because look what happened when Pippa exercised the option to ghost them and just do her own thing. He and Coomalot are still salty AF.
We should all remember, only Nick can be discerning as to what is proper streamer to streamer etiquette and he's discerned he never breaks up with anyone. It's a slippery way to avoid accountability for one's behavior because only he is the victim in a breakup. So of course when the dead relationships pile up and begin to rot, suddenly it's people who dare to have lists of "other people" they can't tolerate (because that's a thing) are actually secret villains plotting against his the community.

Eric is merely a convenient pinata for his general rage in the moment.

Edit: Btw if by Gary you mean Nerdrotic, they hosted Nick's cancelled Youtuber panel together which had merged in with FNT's at AM. And they both had booths in the very underwhelming affair that was YT Corner.

Edit:

I didn't know they were that loaded. Nicks grandparents are giving away entire hospital wings, but letting their grandchildren ride the poverty bus to thug academy?
Give me a fucking break. :story:
Yes it's literally a comedy at this point.
 
Last edited:
So... the the hashing in DMs is no longer the Case?
View attachment 5379825
Seems I was right. They've already "hashed it out."

Here's something interesting:
  1. "I already spoke to Rekieta" - On Twitter, he said he'd do this later, so he's contradicting himself.
  2. "We'll speak again when heads cool." - He's returned to the "narrative" he set up beforehand.

This tells me everything. They already had whatever counts for their conversation and won't be having another later unless its in 10-20 years. They are done. In all likelihood he saw the realllly bad clips after he posted to Twitter - when the folks who thought he was ignorant to what was said blasted him with a million "NIGGER" clips. This probably made him push up the time to talk to Nick, and it probably was less of a "talk" and more of a "Dude, I'm gonna publicly squelch this, but don't ever talk to me again"

Eric's better for it anyway. One glance at this clip tells you that Nick is trying to hand Eric rope to hang himself with.
He said that those people who bought a bundle of books for charity got discount. So, the individual paid less than $175, if they bought 10 books for charity. He also said that his company also has donated money directly to charity
View attachment 5379678

He does that in this video too, he's trying to gotcha, but he doesn't realise that he is the dumb one
When Eric answers smartly and correctly with... well, the truth, Nick pulls the slimiest fucking tactic I've ever seen:

"Well because 'I trust you' doesn't mean everybody on earth is required to trust you"

So let me get this straight: Eric does nothing wrong. He does exactly as promised. Dax, some random belligerent asshole shows up and starts screaming "muh charity" to the point where he - and I cannot stress this enough - He maliciously tries to ruin Eric's multi-million dollar, ground-up business by roping those charities into what could become ruinous legal drama and unearned negative press that negatively impacts future charitable and profitable endeavors. (Dax later goes on to admit he really doesn't even care about the charity or what it's statements that they were happy with the agreement and Eric went above and beyond with extra donated money). On top of this, Dax and his posse also try to bait out lawsuits with other companies to force legal action against Eric.

What the actual FUCK, Nick? Who gives a shit what Dax or his posse of smelly assholes thinks? When they're doing everything they can to ruin a man for the crime of making a comic company? Nobody cares that they don't trust him. They don't have to, Everyone cares that Dax blatantly is using duplicitous and illegal means to bankrupt Rippaverse.

This proves it: Nick WAS trying to hang Eric with legal rope for Dax. "I didn't want to ask this" is a blatant fucking lie.

  • Hey asshole, if you don't want to start asking legally sensitive questions, try NOT DRINKING before or during an interview with legally sensitive topics.
  • Oh, and try not making that shit sound like some campy scripted faggotry you'd hear in a soap opera, you dickhole.

Not only did he want to ask it, he tried to kneecap Eric's answer into something short and divorced from context to "prove" some form of intent. He was attempting a "yes or no only" gotchya, like he's in court - itself a disgusting tactic since there will never be a "yes/no/objection: relevance" cross-examination with the charity who's already confirmed Eric's story. Nick is doing all of this, leveraging his presumed legal expertise and authority over Eric, a person he claims is a "friend," a person he claims is receiving bad legal counsel and is this "uninformed" on his very-public-show knowing this will give potentially damning legal bits to Dax and his orbiters. Tell me he's not acting as some unspoken pro-bono lawyer for Dax. Fucking tell me he isn't.

We've seen how Nick handles sensitive legal topics, what did he used to say to the randoms in his superchats? "Email or DM me, and we'll talk." Why? Because he knows it's legally sensitive, and you generally don't want people speaking too much, potentially damaging their case out in public when they can be identified. So then, why get socially lubricated and then put your friend with a multi-million dollar start-up on the hot seat? Nick has two conflicting opinions on how to handle legally sensitive topics. When he's friendly/amicable with the person it's "in private" When he's being bitchy and trying to ruin them it's on his show, complete with invasive questioning and cringy "WHY DID YOU MAKE ME DO THIS!!?" theatrics.

Isn't it just really convenient that if Nick gives Dax ammo in the context of his internet show instead of sliding Eric's private DMs to him on the down low, Nick can have plausible deniability that he's not legally helping Dax while also providing cover for the massive conflict of interest involved here as well?

This goes without hyperbole, Nick should be disbarred.

Nobody, much less Eric should ever associate with him again. All Nick had to do after his sperg fit to prove an iota of good will was to shut the fuck up. But that's why they're lolcows - they can't. I pray Eric breaks the cycle, keeps his mouth shut, and ruins Dick's entire posse.

I wanted to stay lurking in this thread. Paying attention, though keeping distance and my mouth shut but this is just fucking ridiculous.
 
NOW WAIT A MINUTE TIC! I don't know about anyone else, but telling people to call the charity that Nick is on the board for sounds pretty cow-touchy to me. But didn't you say you weren't banned for that?

I don't know man, seems like you might have a pattern of doing things to specifically fuck with the real lives of the e-celebs discussed on the site. I wasn't around when he was still posting, but I can easily believe that he was banned for exactly fucking with Nick (or someone else) outside the Farms. It seems like excising this cretin was inevitable and for the good of Kiwis everywhere.
 
yeah this is retard speak. The Westboro Baptist Church "god hates fags" people are all on the bar still.
I really don't care about the racist rant. I care about the ethics of what Nick is doing.

The TL;DR of all that is that by all accounts, it appears Nick is trying to bolster a legal case for Dax while being non-transparent and swearing otherwise. Would that not constitute some form of legal ethics taboo? I mean I'm no lawyer, but that seems like it crosses a few lines.
 
Nick's entire premise is that Eric has a "list." AFAIK, that has yet to be proven. I thought Nerdrotic was the one with the list (as @Mister Dongs seemed to confirm some pages back).

Is he shooting Eric when he should be shooting at Gary, or is he just outright delusional? Is Nick even ON Gary's list? I mean, he was all scheduled to go play DnD with Jeremy and the other G+G people (did that even happen, BTW?).

Eric's "list" might be just as simple as "people I don't like and want to have nothing to do with" Which is actually fine. That's hardly a nefarious list. AnCaps are supposedly all about freedom of association and non-aggression, which doesn't entail mandatory association with people you think are fuckwits.

Of course though, Nick hates even that, because look what happened when Pippa exercised the option to ghost them and just do her own thing. He and Coomalot are still salty AF.

Eric returned to twitter to reiterate that he doesn't have a blacklist. Not that there is no blacklist. He likes to be precise with his words about things like that. Personally, I suspect Rekieta is well familiar with a list of verboten youtubers among the culture war youtuber set. It just was never a problem for him until his behavior and associations were leading towards him being added on it.
 

Guys does this change your stance on Eric vs Nosezilla?
Eric July supposedly loves da gays. Nick goes to gay bars, asks his locals their opinion on using poppers and gets shirtless on stream with other dudes which is very gay.

I guess that makes their dispute gay on gay crime. But Nick is still more gay due to his voice I think.
 
The TL;DR of all that is that by all accounts, it appears Nick is trying to bolster a legal case for Dax while being non-transparent and swearing otherwise. Would that not constitute some form of legal ethics taboo?
Probably not. How is he engaged in the practice of law? He's just a drunk faggot yelling on the Internet at that point. Is he in an attorney-client relationship with Masterson that he's not disclosing? It's unlikely he'd ever be in a position where he could represent Masterson. Nick is licensed in Minnesota. Dick is in Cali. Eric is in Texas.

We've learned from Weebwars that the Minnesota OPLR does not give a flying fuck about his streaming career. Nor are they really supposed to. They are interested in what he's formally doing as a lawyer. Which, BTW, seems to be precisely jack shit. He's ABSOLUTELY non-practicing. LOL.

Null's example of the Phelps family is a more extreme example, but that also fits. They're shitty people, but they play by the rules when there's actually a formal game.


Guys does this change your stance on Eric vs Nosezilla?
No. Is it supposed to?

I mean, it certainly doesn't seem to have any bearing on nose disingenuously defending Riley in the current kerfuffle.

I realize there's people here and elsewhere who dislike Rippa for other reasons, and that's fine. I largely stay out of that, because I don't care.
 

Guys does this change your stance on Eric vs Nosezilla?
My only problem with Nick is he's disingenuous and dishonest. I dont care at all about that monkey or his shitty comic. The whole shooting Riley shit was some dumb internet tough guy bullshit and should never have been taken seriously and the law is unimportant.
 
Back