Careercow Ben Collins / Benjamin Thomas Collins / @oneunderscore__ - Journo Scum

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I think the real beginning of the end was the Washington Post's coverage of Watergate, making it more attractive to elites who fancied themselves kingmakers.
Absolutely. The local journo jobs got squeezed when big conglomerates bought them and slashed their newsrooms, leaving fewer ways to work your way up the pipe. Instead, the big papers started hiring straight out of the nepo baby Harvard pool, fresh-faced 20somethings that politicians could easily fist like sockpuppets and get them to buy into the government's vision for changing the world. Hard-nosed journalists who have actually worked the beat for years would never beclown themselves as fast and as enthusiastically as the generation raised on Watergate hagiography.

Ben's not wrong that journalism is a dumpster fire on the elite level. Down the line, it's only bad because of what has happened at the top, leaving fewer ways for real people to get a word in.

Ben's problem is that he has neither the clear-eyed understanding of a beat reporter who actually cares about a community nor the cultural nuances of the elite. He did everything he could to mold himself into the apparatchik they wanted. He was just bad at it, and they have no use for someone who hasn't been raised in the social milieu of winks and nods that would have enabled him to know the things he wasn't supposed to say out loud. He failed at being a lowly but honorable member of the working class because he longed to be more and found that he's actually completely useless to both groups. MANY. SUCH. CASES.

In a 🌈 scenario, someone at NBC is trying to right the ship a little, as the NYT did when they realized their reporters were absolutely insane. But I think they just realized he's a liability because he doesn't fit in.
 
So these journalists wanted to be activists and tried to change the professional standards from the inside, failed because they were dogshit as traditional journalists and dogshit as activist journalists, and now they've doompilled and long covid'd themselves into irrelevance. That about right?

If you desire to silence your opponents so earnestly that you spit out the phrase "both sides" like it's a self-evident insult, you should not also back yourself so far into extremist beliefs that those "opponents" constitute 95% of Americans.

You can't have it both ways. You can either put forth unpopular beliefs and accept arguments and criticism, or you can dismiss arguments because your ideas are genuinely agreed upon by most people. There's room for both these things in good journalism. There is not room for people who think that anyone outside of their tiny group of elite hypochondriac gender cultists is a Nazi who must be silenced. Why would there be? How would that attract readership or prestige?
 
This fucking drama queen:
DaleksVsJournoids.png

Timestamp inaccurate because it was sitting in a draft overnight:
fear of a pile-on.png
>innate fear of a pile-on...over the last seven years
So it's not Elon's fault, huh?
:thinking:
(also if anybody needs a BlueSky/bsky invite code, I've got 3)
 
Benny boy here isn't pounding the pavement looking for leads, either. He's just a prolific typist. That is literally all he is. Just go a couple of pages back to see him begging for Elon to reply to him. He's not some intrepid gumshoe banging down the door at Xitter HQ hounding them for answers. And in Current Year, he doesn't have to be compelling or funny or persuasive. He just has to type. And they've put ChatGPT on such a tight leash, when it comes to avoiding wrongspeak and wrongthink, that replacing him with the algorithm is a no-brainer.
Compare to Michael Moore going around literally stalking Roger Smith or ambushing Charlton Heston. Say what you like about him, he's pretty energetic, especially considering he's FAT AS FUCKING HELL.
At least Taylor Lorenz has the nerve to show up at your relatives' homes uninvited.
 
This fucking drama queen:
What is this fag even talking about? Elon Musk hasn't yelled at him. In fact, Elon Musk may be completely unaware of his utterly insignificant existence. Ben just needs to cope with the fact that his entire existence is completely meaningless and the only people even aware of him are annoyed by him, like they would be by an annoying mosquito.
At least Taylor Lorenz has the nerve to show up at your relatives' homes uninvited.
I forgot that this girly man makes even Taylor Lorenz look like a Chad.
 
This fucking drama queen:
DaleksVsJournoids.png
"Some of these people are leaving a site where people are calling for their actual extermination, abetted by the richest guy on Earth."

You think that's bad Ben? I bet every single one of those people is reading those calls for their actual extermination via something abetted by Microsoft, Google or Apple. Keep digging to see how far this conspiracy goes! Follow the money, Ben!
 
Great BlueSky, way to preview the fuck out of that tweet (archive)
View attachment 5380978View attachment 5380983
View attachment 5381010
There is also an article (archive) with more whining about Elon Musk, but at the moment I am finding it more amusing that Ben would rather quit journoidism than find a decent backdrop here. Even Keffals is better at this.
Journalisming is so hard, why don't you guys just come find me and tell me all the answers? Pls? I'm so tired. 😖
 
I despise when journalists do this. I hate it when they write something with the full expectation that you are just as involved in their groups/terminally online as them, and would know, inherently, what they are talking about and agree on their position. What is this "this", that Musk did to Twitter?

He does the same fucking thing here. Look:
000170.png
What on earth are you talking about? His monetization policies? Checkmarks? ADL stuff? 'Free Speech' stuff? I mean, dear God, we can't read your mind.

So, okay, what is this big clue he found? An article (written on April 1st) from 2022 (from Revolver News which mainstream media hates). No, I am not joking.
000172.png
000171.png

So, why does this matter? Well, this journalist asserts that this article was texted to Musk (his video doesn't actually show that) 10 days before he bought the company and...Actually, I'm not sure where he is going with this. I guess he thinks that it radicalized him or something, idk.
000173.png
000174.png

The journo then proceeds to hire a "very authoritative sounding British guy" to read the texts.
000175.png

So, now we get to the "meat" of the video. He asserts that revolver news is run by a former Trump speechwritter (can't find any evidence on that), and then says that it is important to find out who sent the article to Musk predicting what would happen after he takes over, because...Orange man bad? Oh, and Nazis, I guess.
000176.png
000177.png
000179.png
000180.png
000181.png
000182.png

He then states his colleague and he spent 9 months trying and failing to dox the sender of the message. Points for honesty, I guess?
000183.png
000184.png
000185.png

He then calls people who have an unredacted version of Musk's texts from the Twitter lawsuit to give him those docs. He subtly threatens them by saying "we know who you are"
000186.png
000187.png
000188.png
000189.png

Tldr: I'm actually not sure what the fuck is the point here. He wants to know who sent Musk a text message with some alleged quotations from an April 1st Revolver article, and it's important to find out who did it, because...idk, he never explains, but he mentions Nazis and Trump, so that's something? I'm not also sure why he considers the article itself so important.
 
I would say this is some schizo conspiracy theory tier, but then it would have a complete theory not whatever the fuck this is.

The main point here, even if you assume everything Ben is saying is correct (which is a big ask): So what? What the fuck does it matter someone send Musk a article explaining why him buying Twitter could be a good thing? This is literally just someone encouraging him to go through with a business. There is literally nothing illegal, imoral or shady about this. It is no different than any number of people trying to get their views heard.
 
I would say this is some schizo conspiracy theory tier, but then it would have a complete theory not whatever the fuck this is.

The main point here, even if you assume everything Ben is saying is correct (which is a big ask): So what? What the fuck does it matter someone send Musk a article explaining why him buying Twitter could be a good thing? This is literally just someone encouraging him to go through with a business. There is literally nothing illegal, imoral or shady about this. It is no different than any number of people trying to get their views heard.
Ben's just jealous that the mystery person has Elon's ear. Despite over a year of stomping around and furiously screaming about him as loudly as possible, Ben can't seem to get Elon to even be aware of his pitiful existence.
 
Ben's just jealous that the mystery person has Elon's ear. Despite over a year of stomping around and furiously screaming about him as loudly as possible, Ben can't seem to get Elon to even be aware of his pitiful existence.
It's telling how many journalists' "journalism" has become gossiping and malding about the competition. Brian Stelter spent much of his time on CNN seething with envy about Tucker Carlson's better ratings.
 
Listening to him barrel through each sentence without a single connection between them was really disorienting. This dude's entire career is communication and he can't articulate an idea or explain a train of thought for the life of him.
It's just a generic Gish gallop. It's harder to refute absolute bullshit than it is to spew it, so throw out as many fallacious arguments and lies as you can, then declare victory when the opponent doesn't refute every single one.
 
Back