Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Swole McPole]

It wouldn't surprise me if he did land a job being the "foreigner piggu" for some high price firm that just needed that for their clients.

If this were the case though, wouldn't the firm be able to get you a visa? Certainly, if a high priced UK law firm needed that kind of high level foreign expertise, they'd have no problem getting somebody a visa for as long as they needed them to do the work -- on the basis that there was nobody in the UK with that skill set.

And law firms generally have the knowledge of the immigration system and the contacts to make that happen fairly smoothly.

I can see that somebody with a maritime law background could be desirable in that context. That seems like a much more plausible area for getting work. But I'm betting most people getting those posts make the initial application/contacts from their own country and then move over when they've got the gig sorted out. I think it'd be infinitely harder to just show up in a strange country that you don't know and have never been to before, and try and land a consulting gig like that.

But perhaps Mindset already had a pal working for a Korean firm when he bolted and fled the country, so he could put the arm on his former coke buddy to put in the good word on his behalf?

The thread actually looked into this months ago. You can go back and search for it. It is possible. There is a provision for it in S. Korean law in which you'd be attached to a S. Korea law firm, but wouldn't actually be regarded as a S. Korean lawyer.

Yeah, this just illustrates my point that if he did have such a gig, he wouldn't have needed to run to Vietnam because his visa expired. I'll accept that it's possible. I'm not convinced it's true for Mindset though.

This is the statement from the charity after Dick started prodding. They confirm that July donated cash within minutes of calling them about the partnership and continued to do so on an ongoing basis as books were sold.

The very least that Rekieta and Diddler Dick Masterson can do here is to match Eric July's donations to Comic Books for Kids. They're all too happy to grift off somebody else's charitable donations, not so keen to match those donations themselves -- because they're all utter scumbags.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

He is not going to comment on the rightness or wrongness of either side, but he was goijg to be correcting factual inaccuracies and responding to other people coming at him

EJ Twitter stans about to get some midnight calls from the shower.

I'm also curious if he left Korea or go ran out of Korea; because you don't downgrade unless something's going on, and Thailand is a downgrade to Korea.

Mindset talked on one of his streams about a year ago that his overarching life plan is a vagabond lifestyle where he stays in a country long enough to gain residency, then hopping to his next destination to do the same.

Essentially to collect residencies like Pokémon. So that he had tons of "options" at the end of the day.

So who knows if his move to Thailand was voluntary or not if he got Korean residency.

Of course, much like Nick, his word at face value can't be trusted because he hasn't publicly addressed personally being on the lam from his Florida creditors.

The best he can hope for is to crash with minimal damage to the passengers and let the investigators sweep through the wreckage to find what exactly caused the catastrophe.

FAA Incident Report: Final verdict - Whiskey in the fuel tank.

 

[2lolis1cup]

If this were the case though, wouldn't the firm be able to get you a visa? Certainly, if a high priced UK law firm needed that kind of high level foreign expertise, they'd have no problem getting somebody a visa for as long as they needed them to do the work -- on the basis that there was nobody in the UK with that skill set.

And law firms generally have the knowledge of the immigration system and the contacts to make that happen fairly smoothly.

I can see that somebody with a maritime law background could be desirable in that context. That seems like a much more plausible area for getting work. But I'm betting most people getting those posts make the initial application/contacts from their own country and then move over when they've got the gig sorted out. I think it'd be infinitely harder to just show up in a strange country that you don't know and have never been to before, and try and land a consulting gig like that.

But perhaps Mindset already had a pal working for a Korean firm when he bolted and fled the country, so he could put the arm on his former coke buddy to put in the good word on his behalf?


Yeah, this just illustrates my point that if he did have such a gig, he wouldn't have needed to run to Vietnam because his visa expired. I'll accept that it's possible. I'm not convinced it's true for Mindset though.



The very least that Rekieta and Diddler Dick Masterson can do here is to match Eric July's donations to Comic Books for Kids. They're all too happy to grift off somebody else's charitable donations, not so keen to match those donations themselves -- because they're all utter scumbags.

It is easier to be a "consultant" which is what Legal Vices is. Mindset (D'adesky) said a while back he was one as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Legal_Consultant

Once you have been qualified by a certain international bar association than moving is quite easy. His family has many connections with international business so it is likely he was already in it before he fled to Korea.

 

[Telemeter]

I am trying to sum up the totality of the "Eric July stole from a charity" shit that Dick keeps saying. Is there ANY DETAIL WHATSOEVER I am missing from this synopsis?


Please, someone make it make sense.

Dick is just being obtuse and contrarian.

The thing is when these campaigns launch the books don't exist yet, how many books you should print depends on the sales. The idea with this charity tier is to offer a not yet produced product to be delivered to the charity at cost.

It's something some Comics Gate people came up with some time ago, so it's not novel, July just incorporated it into his funding campaign.

Honestly I think its mostly done to help boost sales numbers to help the campaign succeed on volume, as a higher printing run has a lower production cost per unit due to economy of scale, plus there's probably some tax benefits too.

Still, the people who benefit from these charity runs do end up getting a very rare, low run comic book, and some of the CG stuff go for twice their original price up to hundreds of dollars in the secondary market, and they get it for free,

So you could say there is some benefits to the producer, but its hardly a one sided exchange or fraud.

 

[200MB]

He was selling them for $17.50 which was at cost for the labor involved for packing and shipping a single book to the charity. If you bought more, the cost went down because they/he could just grab, say 5 if you order 5, in one go and ship them together.
He said the AVERAGE cost people were paying was around $13. Idiots like Juju can't do math and think that means if someone paid $17.50, Eric was profiting the difference. If the average was around $13 then that means some people were also paying less than that due to the bulk discount. Since, you know, that's how averaging working.

That's all it is, a bulk discount. Apparently bulk discounts = fraud in the minds of people like Juju, Vito, Riley and Nick.

So what was Nicks "average costs" sperging about? It sounded like he was saying the IRS could come after someone just for misspeaking or something? Even if that is true, if you're not committing fraud, wouldn't it be very easy to clear up? Eric said this was all already public and his books are on the up and up.

The whole thing really seemed to me like Nick was screaming and shitting himself because he thought Eric had done something illegal.

 

[Captain Manning]

When will Rekieta finally call out the fan accounts in his chat from the Vic era? The Toye Remote account, the Shane's Shoe Snack account, the Monica Rials Black Bull account. He had no issues with fan accounts when they were not going AT him.

Rekieta is guilty of supporting and even reading the chats of these despicable and terrible creations known as "fan accounts" and he needs to answer for his crimes.

I know you're joking, but I don't think he should call out any of those accounts from the Kic Vic era, or people going against July.

What he should have done, if he really hates drama now (*snort*) was keep his stupid whore mouth shut and stay out of this whole thing. That way he wouldn't be put in a position of having to call out anything. Basically what Andrew just said (and I'm somewhat shocked he said it). Andrew is making hay out of no trespassing signs, but that's a hastily assembled second-line defense, and I think he knows it. Rekieta, and not July, necessitated that by making this a purely hypothetical legal issue that he could attempt to "own" July on and earn Dick's cummies. The only way Rekieta could have really won this was to not have played in the first place. But, ya know... glug glug glug.

The whole thing really seemed to me like Nick was screaming and shitting himself because he thought Eric had done something illegal.

Yeah, because Dick is pushing that narrative hard. He and Vito have been doing it for months now.

I hate to sound like a broken record but... if the shoe fits.

 

[DumDum Did Nothing Wrong]

how the fuck does he have the time in the day to cry this much about people on twitter with 6 kids?

by avoiding his family to reee into the void known as twitter.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

He sold it for $35 when? When it first went for sale? So it was half off for the charity?

Strap in, I will try to explain from start:

Eric offers an option to donate a comic to a charity at half the price. The price is paid by Eric's fans.



Dick discovers the charity campaign and thinks that is WAY too much for what Eric paid to have them produced. After that, someone with the e-mail Abtuse Knome contacts the charity asking if they got the comics. This is brought up on Dicks podcast amd Dick later reaches out to the charity who allegedly said they would 'rather have money' becuase they have a lot of comic stock. Some people think Dick was both people or had a minion contact the charity.

At some point after, Eric steps up to defend himself and the 17.50 number by saying it actually cost less because people bought more than 1 at a time. The charity also puts out a statement that they are happy with the donation. At some point the 13 dollar figure as an avergae comes out.

To this, Dick calls FRAUD because 'Where ate the 4 dollars going?' Eric tries to explain that he donated the difference to the charity because 17.50 was just w guess up front for costs to ship a single book. Dick does not believe this and insists the number is still overinflated.

 

[Maude Snew]

Look here, look, listen, incel prude. Nick S Tomlinson could make it all make sense if only you listened to his plights and sucked him his penis. It's nawwwt troooo.

 

[SteelPlatedHeart]

It’s easier to just say “Dax is making up shit about charity fraud so Eric’s business suffers somehow.” That’s all it really comes down to.

 

[Mr. Manchester]

Strap in, I will try to explain from start:

Eric offers an option to donate a comic to a charity at half the price. The price is paid by Eric's fans.

View attachment 5382762

Dick discovers the charity campaign and thinks that is WAY too much for what Eric paid to have them produced. After that, someone with the e-mail Abtuse Knome contacts the charity asking if they got the comics. This is brought up on Dicks podcast amd Dick later reaches out to the charity who allegedly said they would 'rather have money' becuase they have a lot of comic stock. Some people think Dick was both people or had a minion contact the charity.

At some point after, Eric steps up to defend himself and the 17.50 number by saying it actually cost less because people bought more than 1 at a time. The charity also puts out a statement that they are happy with the donation. At some point the 13 dollar figure as an avergae comes out.

To this, Dick calls FRAUD because 'Where ate the 4 dollars going?' Eric tries to explain that he donated the difference to the charity because 17.50 was just w guess up front for costs to ship a single book. Dick does not believe this and insists the number is still overinflated.

So Eric donates books to charity, Juju spergs out, the charity says it's fine and that they appreciate Eric's donation, Juju continues to sperg about fraud.

1. When has Diddler Dax ever done anything for charity? Ever?
2. It's funny that Nick likes to to call people autistic when Juju is the one rocking in his chair and screeching over a small difference in numbers.

These people are worthless.

 

[Captain Manning]

It’s easier to just say “Dax is making up shit about charity fraud so Eric’s business suffers somehow.” That’s all it really comes down to.

I agree.

It's basically the same thing Nick did with July. The whole thing is vested in so much hypothetical supposition it's borderline retarded.

When has Diddler Dax ever done anything for charity? Ever?

He makes us laugh at him. He's very charitable there. Unfortunately, Lolcow LLC. is not a registered 501(c)3, so Null can't give him a tax receipt. Sucks to be Dick.

 

[God's strongest milkman]

I'm not sure I'm willing to accuse Nick rekeita of child neglect just because he's an attention seeking money grubbing faggot who spends all his free time saying stupid shit on Twitter for money. He's a con-man, and a cuckold and a faggot and a liar and a bitch, but this doesn't necessarily mean he's an abusive or neglectful parent and that's not the sort of thing I'm comfortable throwing at someone with no good basis.

Although if in some years drex ends up dating one of them I'm calling him a pimp and advocating for his execution.

 

[SteelPlatedHeart]

I'm not sure I'm willing to accuse Nick rekeita of child neglect just because he's an attention seeking money grubbing faggot who spends all his free time saying stupid shit on Twitter for money. He's a con-man, and a cuckold and a faggot and a liar and a bitch, but this doesn't necessarily mean he's an abusive or neglectful parent and that's not the sort of thing I'm comfortable throwing at someone with no good basis.

Although if in some years drex ends up dating one of them I'm calling him a pimp and advocating for his execution.

Non-practicing parent.

 

[Geared Chris]

Fucking Christ! Don't any of these lawtube people actually practice law?

Most do. PotentiallyCriminal, NatalieLawyerChick, Law&Lumber, LawyerYouKnow, Runkle, DaniAhnDirect, DUIGuy, HoegLaw, TheLeadAttorney, LawTalkWithMike, Barnes, Andrea Burkhart, MLSLaw, LegalVices.

Bigger ones don't for obvious reasons: Nick, Emily D Baker, Viva Frei

(Bytes, GoodLawgic &UncivilLaw seem to be non-working YouTube underachievers for various reasons, but at least they're trying.)

Non-practicing parent.

Nope.

l throw shade but, if anything, it's the opposite on this issue. He's parenting a 6th child: his wife... which is likely breaking him.

He's at every soccer game, every parents' meeting, every bible camp, every LegoLand, and that stupid slide place. He's taught their Sunday school (a role from which he was dismissed - I'm trying to get to the bottom of that - it seems YT related based on his comments), and teaches the Constitution to the teens at the co-op.

When his kids come on stream he hugs and kisses - they actively look for him. When his teen son entered during a LOCALS stream a few months back he calmed his voice immediately and shut off the screen.

Edit: Typos & clarity.

 

[TheLastJoestar]

Eric's problem is also your problem because Eric and you both seem to assume that Nick was operating in good faith and not continually redirecting the conversation back to a contrived hypothetical where Eric or his employee(s) look bad.

That said, upon rereading your post in more detail, you're right that Eric should have forcibly redirected the conversation to the broader perspective rather than argue over the nitty-gritty of imagined situations that didn't even happen. The problem is that Eric assumed that Nick was hoping to give him a reasonably fair hearing rather than set him up for gotchas to make him look bad.

Nick is a lawyer. Lawyers latch onto single lines of questioning and bad ones tend not to let go.
Eric is not (Watch his videos to see him struggle to quickly string thoughts together when unscripted).

This doesn't lend itself well to real-time debating. Which is what makes the whole thing insidious. You have to know how to catch verbal traps, red herrings, contradictions, strawmen, reductive reasoning and any other fallacy a conniving lawyer may throw at you in real time. You also have to avoid getting caught on semantics. As we saw with Nick talking, he was dead-set on a scenario where Eric is holding a gun and shooting a guy for "a prank." When it's more than clear Eric is asking "No, if he got caught and escalated, then what?" And beyond that lies the pivotal question, if one desperate degenerate is willing to do it, even if he's "harmless," what's to stop somebody who isn't?

This is why Eric's video after the conversation was more structured to include these crucial what-ifs. Which is something he must consider as a business owner. Eric's correct. It's not "Just a joke" and Nick knows this. He's just arguing in bad faith.

 

[TheKillingWords]

Just because it's charity? And what authority does he stake that on? Is it in the statute? Case law?

Because Dick "believes" something was nefarious. He's literally basing this on "trust me bro".

 

[SteelPlatedHeart]

Most do. PotentiallyCriminal, NatalieLawyerChick, Law&Lumber, LawyerYouKnow, Runkle, DaniAhnDirect, DUIGuy, HoegLaw, TheLeadAttorney, LawTalkWithMike, Barnes, Andrea Burkhart, MLSLaw, LegalVices.

Bigger ones don't for obvious reasons: Nick, Emily D Baker, Viva Frei

(Bytes, GoodLawgic &UncivilLaw seem to be non-working YouTube underachievers for various reasons, but at least they're trying.)

Nope.

l throw shade but, if anything, it's the opposite on this issue. He's parenting a 6th child: his wife... which is likely breaking him.

He's at every soccer game, every parents' meeting, every bible camp, every LegoLand, and that stupid slide place. He's taught their Sunday school (a role from which he was dismissed - I'm trying to get to the bottom of that - it seems YT related based on his comments), and teaches the Constitution to the teens at the co-op.

When his kids come on stream he hugs and kisses - they actively look for him. When his teen son entered during a LOCALS stream a few months back he calmed his voice immediately and shut off the screen.

Edit: Typos & clarity

I’m sure he’s a fine parent, I was just making the joke.

 

[AnOminous]

He's a con-man, and a cuckold and a faggot and a liar and a bitch, but this doesn't necessarily mean he's an abusive or neglectful parent and that's not the sort of thing I'm comfortable throwing at someone with no good basis.

Recently he was on stream drunk off his ass complaining he had to drive his kids somewhere in five hours, and he was still drinking until the very end. No way he was sober in five hours. Driving drunk with your kids in the car is abuse.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

Confused why nick went after Camelot on his rant against Eric.