- Joined
- Jan 22, 2020
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are a 100% effective cure.and neither of them actually treat anything
thanks for the advice, educated psychiatrist!
> Comparing an actually life threatening condition to tranny delusions and/or fetishes.yeah, people with treatable cancer should also come to terms with their condition and die instead of treating it
theres no bullying involved if you stealth lol
They treat society from the disease of having to listen to more of your self absorbed ramblings about muh body dysphorianeither of them actually treat anything
Aight, then we should proceed with isolation from the healthy populace and ideally - lead therapy which absolutely does work.For trannies the evidence is that no form of psychotherapy works
talk to us once you’ve replaced the Y chromosome in every single cell your body with an X.
Just...that wouldnt change anything visible about me
you cannot seriously believe there are thousands of different trannies mentioned in the srs thread
I mean would people really have objected for him spending like a decade in prison? That does seem more around the kind of punishment he deserved. 2 years in and out of prison for sexual assault of the elderly is still a pretty repulsive crime all things considered.Not really. Considering they probably lacked the evidence to prove actual rape, and Barb was probably not cooperating, the worst they could convict him of is consensual incest, which while repellent is not that serious of a crime. He spent about as much time in jail as some toothless hillbilly would have for shagging his sister.
As you are British or whatever I am assuming you don't know that the law is different in every state?I mean would people really have objected for him spending like a decade in prison? That does seem more around the kind of punishment he deserved. 2 years in and out of prison for sexual assault of the elderly is still a pretty repulsive crime all things considered.
Of course I know that but like how different is it?As you are British or whatever I am assuming you don't know that the law is different in every state?
It's not uncommon for Chris to drop off the face of the internet for long, yeah he might like the attention, but what he likes even more is playing videogames, that's what his life is devoted to. He now has videogames and possibly a True and Honest girlfriend, which is why he was on the internet on the first place as a public figure. Now that he possibly has a partner and quite of a bit of tugboat money, he doesn't need the internet half as much. I'd wager that he'd only come back to posting if he needed money.The only thing that seems to have happened differently this time around is that the little faggot seems to be avoiding his legends of True and Honest fans online.
I wonder why that is.
Of course I know that but like how different is it?
Imagine that each state is like it’s own country, with its own constitution and government, because that’s literally how it is. Californians have Jack shit in common with Alabamians except being held together by the feds. States are autonomous and the laws can very greatly.Of course I know that but like how different is it?
How greatly? I know of blue and red states obviously but are the penalties for certain crimes much much more severe for stupid shit more in conservative or libtard states? Which are more anal retentive about rape crimes in this case? Which state would have had charged Chris with the most time?laws can very greatly.
Say someone 21 and older had sex with a 16 year old. Depending on the state and what that state law dictates it can either be a felony even if both parties claim consent or it can considered iffy but it's within the law provided there aren't any subsequent articles to the consent laws that render it illegal. (Ex in NJ a 16 year old cannot consent with anyone over 18 if the adult is an authority figure like a teacher or counselor and of course theres states that still have anti sodomy laws. Many red states claim they need to keep them to avoid sexual explotation of minors)How greatly? I know of blue and red states obviously but are the penalties for certain crimes much much more severe for stupid shit more in conservative or libtard states? Which are more anal retentive about rape crimes in this case? Which state would have had charged Chris with the most time?
Ninja’dSay someone 21 and older had sex with a 16 year old. Depending on the state and what that state law dictates it can either be a felony even if both parties claim consent or it can considered iffy but it's within the law provided there aren't any subsequent articles to the consent laws that render it illegal. (Ex in NJ a 16 year old cannot consent with anyone over 18 if the adult is an authority figure like a teacher or counselor and of course theres states that still have anti sodomy laws. Many red states claim they need to keep them to avoid sexual explotation of minors)
As for the question? Well Chris committed his crime in Virginia, a southern state but one trying to get people to stop stereotyping them as a state of inbred sibling fuckers. Which is why they could have slapped him with a ten year sentence plus sor which really is as harsh as they could have done to him. They only failed to so because of so many factors, heilburg using the autism deferral, barb being old and uncooperative and saying nothing or refusing a rape kit that sort of thing.
Depends. Conservative states are generally more restrictive when it comes to sex crimes, but not always. WV for example, is a conservative southern state (just under the Mason-Dixon Line), but bestiality is legal. As far as incest is concerned, it’s legal only in NJ and RI, both more liberal leaning, but this reflects little on politics because most states have steep penalties for incest…at least depending on the age, relationship, and intent of the parties involved.How greatly? I know of blue and red states obviously but are the penalties for certain crimes much much more severe for stupid shit more in conservative or libtard states? Which are more anal retentive about rape crimes in this case? Which state would have had charged Chris with the most time?
Pardon the off topic legal sperging but there's a reason nj was considered America's lolcow state for so long till Ohio and Florida tool the title. Incest is only a crime when someone's below 18 and even then if it's between 5th cousins then it's exempt you'd expect that to be a Florida or Alabama law not a new jersey one. He'll for a brief time back in 79 they almost lowered the age of consent to 13 no joke. It was only stopped because the governor st the time refused to sign it and the DA got in the bill put on indefinite hold ever since.only in NJ
Generally even states that say "have kids before you're old enough to drink (but be married first!) Will look down on older male younger female relationships. And depending on just how left leaning and liberal a state is may have a similar sentiment but for the retarded reasons of that kinda relationship being "oppressive heteronormitivity." While saying being against a young person and older adult of the same sexes is is "homophobic" and "oppressive."What constitutes rape can be different from one state to the next, while everyone agrees that forcible penetration is definitely rape, you might get more time depending on what and who is being penetrated.