Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

Nick admitted that his subscriber numbers are plunging.

Great summary as always.

Did Nick make any distinction whether the subscriber losses are from YT or Locals or both?

We have tons of evidence of YT subscriber losses as a long-term trend via documentation in this thread and Playboard tracking.

OTOH, the number of ongoing subscribers since the 5k Locals screwjob remains a black box outside of tons of speculation of last year's pre-coom turn annual subscribers not renewing.

The third metric I don't see tracked/discussed are his Rumble followers.

He's certainly had an upward trend since his banning off YT last fall. Before then, he was using Rumble as a lazy neglected mirror, but has amassed a decent subscriber count there between the banning and the exclusive Rumble/Locals deals.

I suppose there's also a very theoretical and optimistic argument that a portion of his YT subscriber losses could be his viewers leaving the YT platform to follow him on Rumble instead.

Edit: For posterity, Nick has 151k Rumble followers as of this post.

 

[Chibitzen]

- Nick repeated story about his grandfather attending Rice University.

Yup, that's money.

NOTE: I'm dying at The Ministry/Good Shepherd NAMING NICK in their response. The stream covered TWO VIDEOS. 1) July's video about fighting Good Shephard and 2) Good Shephard's founder's response. Nick is named at 00:03:36 (I'd embed the GS response to July but Kiwi or Vimeo won't let me).

GS' response was better, imo. Obviously they're going to agree with Rekieta's take because he's presenting from their side.

The presenter (Founder, itc) for ISOM did a decent job of presenting EJ as an overly emotional, i.e. unreasonable, but successful internet personality, using no silly emotional tactics or fireworks. This is the conundrum of being influencers that even people like Nick seem to regularly forget. Online theatrics (where personality is most concerned) only work in a bubble and thus passionate pleas to this effect can only impact a limited audience, for a limited time. To the wider world, it's all easily readable for what it is: an elaborate show. One can have a seemingly unlimited supply of charisma and be quite influential, but they are deathly prone to believing their own hype. Once their little bubbles clash with other little bubble worlds out there in the ether, it's a rude awakening when parts start getting shredded by the gravity of opposing forces. I suppose that's the value of orbiters and shared audiences, is that one can insulate at least somewhat through a loosely unified ecosystem of creative codependence.

Whatever the case, court systems operate well outside of the influence of all this (as it should) and the law could care less about the plight of Twitter wars and subscriber counts. Thank fuck.

A silver lining: if EJ decides to let go the ISOM name, then those editions may very well be worth a pretty penny in the future (for current owners). I don't see it happening, but it's a thought. The legal system can be very unpredictable.

 

[Geared Chris]

Now that my brain has cleared from getting that post up, if anyone wants to clip Rumble 4:03:30-4:07:20, it's very funny.

Nick gets out a sword to stab himself.

Did Nick make any distinction whether the subscriber losses are from YT or Locals or both?

Nah, he said it laughingly but this is often where he admits truths. EVS asked him what his sub numbers were. He quoted YT's and said they were declining rapidly.

This seems like Kayla inserting her ideas into the show. If he wants to talk men's fashion, I would have thought he would have brought in Andrew or Fish-eyed Mr. Drexel. Both would have opinions (not good ones of course) at least.

I doubt it. I think it's more about him being gay. I say this unironically. The cliche of gay men and classier women having the same tastes regarding male grooming and dress is hardly new.

Oh, and Nick loves to shop. He has said he gets annoyed bc Kayla gets tired. This was in the context of him trying on a $300+ blazer somewhere at Mall of America.

Also, Kayla dresses like trash. I'm still in recovery over her bedazzled white boots in Vegas.

 

[anionfarflung]

That "Pull up" clip from EVS is more likely because Eric July told Vito to "pull up", the same reason EJ had the code "PULLUP" or whatever for a discount on his books.

You're right, but I think Nick knows the other meaning by now and it makes him uncomfortable. Maybe I'm wrong about that though.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

That muddies the waters quite a bit. Regardless, even if they're both registered charities and associated with the larger ISOM organization, these are not the entities suing Eric July. If I'm wrong then I'd love to be shown how, but I can't find evidence this ISOM is a charity itself.

I will have to look, but the trademark holder, Good Shepherd, might be registered as a non-profit and be the 'charity'.

How is that an own though? How is that anything other than him being a whiny little dishonest bitch?

We're right about Hedonism II (at least insofar as he went), and nobody on the Farms, to my knowledge, claimed that Montagraph is a child molester. At most there there was some random people speculating he could be a pedo, but that's largely subsided as its been increasingly exposed that Monty is the target of a vicious troll campaign and the evidence that Monty is a pedo is scant to non-existent.

Nick is a retard. Him crying and lying about Null is retarded.

Because if Kiwi is wrong about ONE thing, how many OTHER things are they wrong about? A trip to Hedonism and drastic personality change, perhaps???

Simple as a setup for a Gentic Fallacy.

- Promised to read EVS's comic. Claims to have reviewed it on his LOCALS yet has not yet read it. (???????)

He 'reviewed' the look of it and the merchandise that came with it. He showed that off and made (IMO) inane and innocuous commentary on them without opening anything.

OTOH, the number of ongoing subscribers since the 5k Locals screwjob remains a black box outside of tons of speculation of last year's pre-coom turn annual subscribers not renewing.

I can help somewhat with this. He had about 180 people watching one of his post-show streams some weeks prior to now. LOCALS does not let you watch an exclusive stream if you are not a subscriber, so that sets a floor. After the stream ends, the view count for the video starts at 0, and every time someone clicks on the video, it goes up by 1. Not much help there.

Unfortunately, LOCALS is a fairly opaque black box unless you have co-creator or moderator status in the community.

EDIT:

Also, ig you look at the community sign-up page, it cites the number of total paying and non-paying members alike.

 

[Captain Manning]

We have tons of evidence of YT subscriber losses as a long-term trend via documentation in this thread and Playboard tracking.

More importantly, we have evidence of an acceleration of sub loss. It appears to have started somebody after he drunkenly went off on Eric July, which I'm sure Nick will claim is entirely coincidental.

Pre July drunk rant:

Post July drunk rant:

Red arrow is 7 hour drunk stream. You will note the now smaller gap in time between a loss of yet another 1,000 subs.

Based on current projections of approximately 700 subs lost per week, he should be down to 463k sometime early next week.

Again, I've often said this isn't the most catastrophic sub loss I've ever seen (not by a longshot) but he is floundering. He better hope Rumble offers him a good deal, because I don't think he'll be getting that gold play button anytime soon.

I suppose there's also a very theoretical and optimistic argument that a portion of his YT subscriber losses could be his viewers leaving the YT platform to follow him on Rumble instead.

Why unsub though? That's an affirmative act that has negative connotations for Nick. If you wanted to just switch over to Rumble, just switch over to Rumble. Hit the stupid bell if you don't want the YT notifications of him streaming anymore.

 

[Harm]

I will have to look, but the trademark holder, Good Shepherd, might be registered as a non-profit and be the 'charity'.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/330469882

Found it, the addresses match up. It's registered as of 1996.

EDIT: While looking for that registry, I found two other "Good Shepherd Ministries" who are claiming to be registered non-profits who came up in searches as well, one in Tennessee founded in 2017 and one in Dayton, Ohio which opened in 2001.

 

[Chibitzen]

July doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed. I will agree on that. Several people here have advised him to cool his nigga tits. He's also been advised to not try and sue Dick or Vito, because they're looking to make him the next Maddox. There's unfortunately a non-zero chance he'll ignore that salient advice at some point too.

That said, everybody going after him is a real piece of work. Absolute vile scum. Rekieta included.

In the end, it's probably difficult to feel too bad for anybody in all this, but if I had to pick the least unlikable person, it would probably still be July. If only because I don't think there would even be an issue here but for Dick looking to start shit and cash in on it.

July is certainly brilliant to have gotten to where he is today, so I don't think his intelligence is the obstacle. The issue, again, is he believes too much in his own hype (and they all do) and this impacts his ability to use proper judgement. I didn't agree his debate with Rekieta went as well as others may have calculated. We have a little lot more information than average on Rekieta's weasel tactics and can see through these matters easily. The point for Nick probably wasn't to "win" the debate, but for some reason EJ thought he could win against an actual verbal vomit salesman. I digress.

Nick is fantastic at verbally grifting his way on stream by injecting manipulative nonsense into the conversation and keeping the subject ensconced in a defensive projection of his making. In writing, he's much more transparent and comes off an overly insecure twat. Muddy the waters, however, with intense lecturing over Creator to Creator etiquette and extract blood, and this will create enough bottom feeders to keep the illusion of superiority. Essentially, EJ gave him more relevance than he actually deserved, as entertaining as it was as to watch unfold.

 

[IRC Moron]

My conspiracy is that Rekieta is getting drunk on purpose and lying about what happens the next day to cover up his tracks and tell the court that he just gets drunk and forgets things the next day. He lied about what Null said, He lied about what Eric said. And he lied about Montagraf.

Nick can never admit he's wrong. Never. It's simply not in his nature.

He absolutely cannot be wrong, and he cannot lie. In his mind he is perfect, and can do no wrong. He is a narcissist, and a transparent one at that. with all the poor manipulation attempts, and fake fence sitting you would think he is a televangelist.

 

[Captain Manning]

As an addendum to my previous analysis post, and to be fair and balanced, Rippa is also taking a hit to his sub count, but it's about a third of the rate of Rekieta. However, it's too soon to know how his response to ISOM (the ministery) is gonna affect him. It might hurt him further.

Rekieta Law:

YoungRippa59:

In ye old days, Socialblade used to track each individual sub, but then Youtube changed how they report sub counts and now it's done in 1,000 sub blocks with annoying delays in reporting. As a result of all this, Socialblade is less useful than it once was. The live sub counter used to be fun. Now it's completely fucking useless.

You wanna guess who on Youtube is objectively benefiting from all this gay bullshit though?

Spoiler: Guess, and then click to see if you're right...

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

You wanna guess who on Youtube is objectively benefiting from all this gay bullshit though?

Still not monetized I don't think.

 

[Spaded Dave]

New Elissa clip. Any defense other than "Truth" is pretty much gone in its entirety. Already was, but he really wants to make sure that it is nuked for good.

 

[Harm]

"I don't know what else to say about it..."

Let's start with WHAT makes you believe it's true? What is the most damning of the "lots of evidence" to be seen?

 

[Captain Manning]

Still not monetized I don't think.

Probably not.

What's really funny that the two chucklefucks sardined into the L.A. mansion crackshack are putting up sub rates barely better than Elissa.

I guess you can (reluctantly) say that Dick is also benefiting from all this crap, but it's funny that they're putting in so much effort and this is all they have to show for it. Elissa is just clipping stuff. It's not exactly high effort. The two fags have to get in front of a camera and TRY to be entertaining.

My saying this is not meant to be taken as an insult to @elb either. She's doing the Lord's work. But I think it's utterly embarrassing if you're Dick.

I will never understand anyone who unironically watches Dick these days. From what I understand, people who regularly post in the Dick thread barely want to do it when farming for milk.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

I used to lead a Christian men's group through my church and one of our goals was how modern Christian men are supposed to navigate the current culture in America to help bring younger men into the faith. I was speaking about how the idols of our younger generations have changed compared to what ours where when we were younger. I bring up streamers and the impact they're having on the youth and many of these streamers actively advocate to hate Christians and to hate what we believe in. None of these men (of various ages) had any idea who people like Hasan Piker, Vaush, Destiny, etc even are and were amazed by how influential they are. I told them that these are the types of people we're competing against and we're losing hard, because we simply don't engage in this culture, don't know it exists, and powerless to combat it unless we learn about it.

And, let's be real here, the overwhelming majority of "Christian Influencers" are cringy as fuck.

 

[Peace Through Power]

New Elissa clip. Any defense other than "Truth" is pretty much gone in its entirety. Already was, but he really wants to make sure that it is nuked for good.


View attachment 5411033

He believes IT is so true, that he is not willing to say what IT is

 

[ReverendVerse]

As an addendum to my previous analysis post, and to be fair and balanced, Rippa is also taking a hit to his sub count, but it's about a third of the rate of Rekieta. However, it's too soon to know how his response to ISOM (the ministery) is gonna affect him. It might hurt him further.

Out of curiosity, I went to playboard and his current super chat revenue is down to 2020 levels. During his peak in late 2020 through to late 2022, he could easily pull at least 1.5k per stream, sometimes even 3k. This weren't even his trial streams, but his night shows.

I hope he was smart with the Rittenhouse and Depp money, because the well is drying up. Still, trial streams always made more cash. You would think Nick would be looking for any trial to grift off of as often as he can. If I was bringing in 3k to 6k a day, my wife would be doing everything in her power to guarantee that I had the time to do those streams.

And, let's be real here, the overwhelming majority of "Christian Influencers" are cringy as fuck.

Yes. As the Bible says, be in the world, but not of the world, and modern "Christian Influencers" are terrible at it. They are literally unable to engage with audiences they want to reach out to. They just cater to people who are already Christian; they simply can't relate to people that engage in stuff like YouTube or Twitch streamers. Perfect example is contemporary Christian music. It's terrible. Granted, there are forces at work that wouldn't dare let an openly Christian artist rise to the ranks of Taylor Swift or Lady Gaga, but that's assuming people of that caliber of talent are making Christian music. They're not. The rare ones with talent (like Lauren Daigle), what do they do? They make music that appeals to Christians and just earn a living off that niche instead of using their talents to make music that non-Christians and Christians alike can appreciate and use the platform their celebrity provides them for outreach. Amy Grant was the closest Christians got to that in the 90's.

EDIT: At one point, I thought Nick would be that guy. Family man, Christian, but not a perfect one, because none of us are (and this is the issue with a lot of Christian influencers, they feel they need to be one to be any authority, which is simply not true), but his moral foundation was based on it, and was willing to speak about it openly. He was relatable to your average conservative Christian crowd. Then it just went downhill from there.

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

I hope he was smart with the Rittenhouse and Depp money

You know he wasn't. 70k painting, 90k Mustang, how much was the SUV? 120k?

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Ask and you shall receive. My favorite part personally is when he says calling someone a pedophile and accusing them of sexual acts with children "can't" be defamatory.

Second favorite part: "Thanks for not killing yourself" *immediately picks up a glass of alcohol*


View attachment 5408846

"Nothing has been provided to me that in wrong."

Yeah man, let's see how that holds up in court.

"Your honor, the plaintiff hasn't produced a single shred of evidence he has never had a little boy's cock in his mouth, therefore my client cannot be defaming the plaintiff, because the plaintiff's inability to prove a negative is proof he did, in fact, suck those little boy cocks."

This is madness. This is insane. This man is digging deeper and faster than Aaron Eckhart in The Core (2003).

 

[Geared Chris]

New Elissa clip. Any defense other than "Truth" is pretty much gone in its entirety. Already was, but he really wants to make sure that it is nuked for good.

View attachment 5411033

I will never understand this total retardation.

Like, SpadedDave, you are a devious murdering witch, obviously! You poison people with your online zinger brews! I have PROOF because you have bats and a full moon behind your head. That decolorization of your complexion makes it so. Also, someone once told me that you are a witch. Wait, lots of people behind a keyboard told me you've murdered! This makes it fact! WORSE, you've DEFAMED David Spade! Did you murder him too? Also, you live in Illinois because someone saw you there. They reported it to me. Tis fact.