Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

Dong Gone Phing Phong Phooey [*gong sound*]'
Apologies for consent-accidenting my own childhood and probably others:

Dong Gone Phooey, No.1 ugly Troon,
Dong Gone Phooey, bigger than a mafia goon,
He's got style, a manly style and a DDOS that won't stop,
When his AGP got rough, he wasn't tough, he just gave his cock the chop!
Dong Gone Phooey, No.1 ugly Troon,
Dong Gone Phooey, bigger than a mafia goon,
(musical break) (gong)
Dong Gone Phooey! Horrific!
 
Well... as expected, Liz Fong-Jones bided his time for awhile, and now he's trying to get the Honeycomb page restored.

, Kiwi Farms has a (libelous) Wikipedia page. That's gotta chap his ass.
Old post but now he's also in the kiwi farms Wikipedia page arguing about how that mother Jones article (that I believe was the one that sent null a list of 100 questions to answer a day before publishing) is a valid source for the 3 forum kill counts when one of the cattle stirs and realizes news outlets are pulling shit out their ass citing each other. Archive
sock puppet.png
 
"An asian woman with a cube-like head, glasses, and masculine face breaking a small branch off of a tree in chinese art style"

"An asian woman with a cube-like head, glasses, and masculine face breaking a small branch off of a tree in chinese art style. The woman has purple lipstick and is about 30 years old. There's a speech bubble that says "observability""
Brilliant. Do you take requests? I’d like to see one Mao propaganda style, with a slogan about the one child policy or consent accidents are counter revolutionary.
 
Old post but now he's also in the kiwi farms Wikipedia page arguing about how that mother Jones article (that I believe was the one that sent null a list of 100 questions to answer a day before publishing) is a valid source for the 3 forum kill counts when one of the cattle stirs and realizes news outlets are pulling shit out their ass citing each other. Archive
View attachment 5417711
It's remarkable how stupid these people are. The proper sourcing would be of the people's deaths at the time something the articles don't even bother to confirm let alone establish any evidence connecting them and their deaths to the forum other than the fact they had threads. Which, it should be noted, is something any website, forum or article about the person before their death also shares. Chloe Sagal and the still alive byuu at the very least had other coverage. And byuu in his false suicide message specifically named others as the source of his harassment.

If I write an article that says that Liz Fong-Jones raped someone because he ate some of Patirck S. Tomlinson's Negro pepperoni that doesn't inherently make it true. Especially if you go back to the sourcing at the time and it all says that Liz Fong-Jones raped someone because he's a block-headed rapist. To establish the Negro pepperoni claim later you would have to provide additional evidence not just claim a different motive. Citing just my article does not make any claim inherent in the article true and worth citing. This is one of the reasons you aren't supposed to cite encyclopedias btw, going to their actual source brings you closer to the original claim not someone else's uncited claim of a claim.

edit: Actually, if I got an article published on any satisfactory source for Wikipedia claiming that byuu did not die (the superior argument under any journalistic standards since no typical sources have proven that he has died just one person claimed it) and that Kiwi Farms has not killed anyone, it would be an equally valid source to all the ones they currently source for this claim. How do you deny one source over the others under the arguments they're making? You can't without attempting to discredit one source simply on that which it published. This is a circular argument.
 
Last edited:
Brilliant. Do you take requests? I’d like to see one Mao propaganda style, with a slogan about the one child policy or consent accidents are counter revolutionary.
I'm having a really difficult time getting a response with your suggestions. It blocks a lot of shit. It wouldn't allow me to tell it to look like a poster or say anything about "child policy."
1697445111201.png
 
I'm having a really difficult time getting a response with your suggestions. It blocks a lot of shit. It wouldn't allow me to tell it to look like a poster or say anything about "child policy."
View attachment 5418241
Still, turned out pretty well. Think you could get it done in that red-and-gold stencil style?
 
I'm having a really difficult time getting a response with your suggestions. It blocks a lot of shit. It wouldn't allow me to tell it to look like a poster or say anything about "child policy."
View attachment 5418241
Looks like cover art for a riot grrl album and "Consent Accident" sounds like a title an artist in this genre would come up with.
 
Back