Congrats,
@Kiwiballs you're just so potently retarded and autistic that I have to use your posts to ramble about more things I hate regarding men. Let's start with this section:
I mean look, that fucking autistic borderline sociopath who told you that after you came running to him for help needs to get slapped silly.
Guys usually have a type and rape is rarely about looks anyway which that retard was too much a moron to understand that.
But let's talk serious.
Emphasis mine. Already starting off on great foot, thinking that scoring ez points dunking on a troglodyte Y-haver totally doesn't make you look like a sociopath (at best) or severe autist (at worst) as you transition from General Disarray's fucked up story to the
real problem we aren't talking about in the man-hating thread: Sometimes women talk about each other behind their backs! How awful and equivalent!
If this was meant to be a joke, it's a bad joke because you're too much of an autist to make it work. Let's move on to this reply you had to Big Miss Steak.
So here we have an example of "unhealthy communication" which you re-define as healthy in your own mind. I gave praise to the intent to create beauty and called it a science turned art. You make up your own reality and then argue on it as if it was a fact. This is why men don't argue with women, or women like you or when you're in the mood you're in, what ever the case. There's no winning because there's nothing to win. There are actually no facts to debate.
Instead of explaining how Steak is "making up her own reality"*, you condescend to the point that it's clear you're more interested in scoring good-boy points from males hate-reading this thread than having an honest-to-god discussion between equals. You waltz into the man-hate thread begging for a debate, then go "women, amirite guys?" at the first lengthy response you get only to then
wonder why all of the thread regulars want you to leave or kill yourself when Dyn gets by unscathed. Autistic.
*I also disagreed with her implication that a substantial subset of women don't use their looks to value themselves and that "looks" for many of those women specifically translates to "attractiveness to men". However, unlike you, I DO think that Steak's right when she says the vast majority of people who do rate a woman's value mostly on looks are men. Even
you were quickest to praise the great lengths that women go through with regards to makeup than literally anything else. Interesting that you later admit you think it's all for a "
game where almost all of you are losing a little bit of your sanity", so you have qualms with the one thing you tried praise. Praising and deriding the same trait you think applies to all women is so quintessentially male. I'd give it a chef's kiss if I didn't want to strangle men like you so much.
I've seen enough interviews and podcasts where strong, honest women admit this is a problem.
And then you show your ass here that you get your takes on what women "really" think via podcasts and interviews. However, you go on to say
here that you're totes for real not unfamiliar with actual relationships. Which is it? 1) You're familiar with relationships and are too autistic to realize why women are so seemingly mysterious and aggravating specifically to you or 2) You've based your hate off of maybe a handful of interactions with real women and use these interviews and podcasts to fill the gap and further justify your assessment that women are totally catty bitches and are just as bad men.
Either way you're an autist and I'll take care to spell out here that I'm not interested in an actual discussion with you. I just wanna talk about what makes your posts so aggravating because they're pretty uniquely male and I hate that about them. Hope that helps
Whatever Lurker is, it's funny they gets mad when someone points out they may be too dumb to realize on what side of the DMZ people are actually standing. This is kinda a problem if Null wants real women here and not caricatures.
I am continually amazed at the number of men who look at this thread and seriously suggest a substantial number of the regulars are somehow male actually. Does the concept of misandry really break their brains that much?
It's shit like this that makes me sympathetic to scientists who theorized that clinical autism was "extreme male brain", because there's some type of retardation inherent to men that so few ever overcome that I can only describe as "autism" sometimes.