Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[Diamond Homonculus]

Nah man, there's hating women and then there's acting like a complete violent nigger like that guy.

This is where we separate the wheat from the chaff do you hate women out of some petty grievance or do you hate women out of an appreciation for the tradition and raw art of it?

 

[Kiwiballs]

Just some old picture I snapped up long ago, that's fitting to some of the women there in the other thread circlejerking about men being emotionally stunted and complaining about social interactions being forced on them and men not getting how horrible it is.


But personally I think that this is just a few sour grapes complaining. Some of us could tone it down but the ladies could step up their own game to be honest and then it would be more on their terms anyway. Would do everyone good.

By the way do we have any gender wars thread at all? IMO we should be bale to discuss each others points in both threads, but apparently at least the other thread is like a no-go-zone, dunno about this one.

Calling it a TERF hugbox is too charitable. TERFs get censored on mainstream media so I can get behind giving them some space to air out their shit freely, however the femcel thread is full of visibly mentally ill people whose explanation for everything wrong in their lives is "men evil kill them all" but unironically. That thread has the exact same energy as incel forums, it's an echo chamber for sad people who are fucked in the head and cannot handle anyone pointing this out. It's lolcow tier shit, I mean LMAO look at Matt's banning and tell me that isn't hilarious.

I think that arbitrarily establishing portions of this website as halal and untouchable is incredibly gay but clearly Dear Feeder has some stake in this and is free to do as he pleases.

Maybe everyone should have a space to vent their feels, even batshit crazy hags. Inbetween that some pretty funny stories of men being retarded get posted followed by a feminist discussion, so its not exclusively a thread for the clinically insane.

The reason for the hugbox rules is because there's so many more men than women here, but its kinda fucked up when the occasional casual female poster goes into that thread and gets blasted the fuck away by the hugbox too. There's also the fact that the level of vitriol in that thread would get you automatic MATI-ratings anywhere else as well. Its unhinged.

 

[SuperShibuyaFighter]

This is where we separate the wheat from the chaff do you hate women out of some petty grievance or do you hate women out of an appreciation for the tradition and raw art of it?

I hate the women who deserve to be hated, which is most women (unfortunately). Most other guys are like that too.

I don't hate any women to the homosexual level you do though. No I mean really it sounds like you hate women to the level a flamming homosexual hates women.

 

[Johan Schmidt]

Just some old picture I snapped up long ago, that's fitting to some of the women there in the other thread circlejerking about men being emotionally stunted and complaining about social interactions being forced on them and men not getting how horrible it is.

They're just making it up lol. I've worked in offices, in shops, and in a university; and no one has ever 'forced' interactions on women. People just talk to them like normal, and sometimes weirdos are weird, just like with men. The femcels are just legbeards making shit up in the same way incels do about women.

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

By the way do we have any gender wars thread at all? IMO we should be bale to discuss each others points in both threads, but apparently at least the other thread is like a no-go-zone, dunno about this one.

The second a foid loses an argument, they will cry to Null and it will turn into yet another TERF hugbox, which we have already with the Halal Corral. It will never work.

 

[Ultrapenguin]

Just some old picture I snapped up long ago, that's fitting to some of the women there in the other thread circlejerking about men lacking emotions and complaining about social interactions being forced on them and men not getting how horrible it is.

But personally I think that this is just a few sour grapes complaining. Some of us could tone it down but the ladies could step up their own game to be honest and then it would be more on their terms anyway.

Oh are they on about men not having feelings now? Do they get all of their discussion points out of old women's magazines?

And the fact is if guys suddenly started ignoring women those women would be having a panic attack wondering if they aren't pretty enough or if there's something wrong with them.
They just have to dress their fantasies up as complaints since it's uncool for women to admit they care what men think nowadays.

By the way do we have any gender wars thread at all? IMO we should be bale to discuss each others points in both threads, but apparently at least the other thread is like a no-go-zone, dunno about this one.

This all started with a sort of unofficial gender wars thread (two actually), Lidl was the one who decided to act dumb and make a BP thread for attention, a bunch of other people (including Josh) were so elated and/or mortified by the groundbreaking idea of a woman saying "man bad" that they somehow turned it into a legitimate issue, then this thread got made.

They could come here if they wanted, but what discussion is there really to have?
The people who are honestly mad have issues too severe to be reasoned with, and the people who aren't don't actually have major differences to begin with.

Plus lets face it, the best way to solve 99% of all gender wars stuff online would be by everyone getting laid more often. Can't deal with that online.

 

[SuperShibuyaFighter]

Maybe everyone should have a space to vent their feels, even batshit crazy hags. Inbetween that some pretty funny stories of men being retarded get posted followed by a feminist discussion, so its not exclusively a thread for the clinically insane.

The reason for the hugbox rules is because there's so many more men than women here, but its kinda fucked up when the occasional casual female poster goes into that thread and gets blasted the fuck away by the hugbox too. There's also the fact that the level of vitriol in that thread would get you automatic MATI-ratings anywhere else as well. Its unhinged.

>checks Kiwiballs' profile
>Joined Friday at 3:52 AM

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

They're just making it up lol. I've worked in offices, in shops, and in a university; and no one has ever 'forced' interactions on women. People just talk to them like normal, and sometimes weirdos are weird, just like with men. The femcels are just legbeards making shit up in the same way incels do about women.

I think they believe it because they are utterly insane. They glom onto hugboxes that not only validate their insanity but encourage oneupsmanship. Suddenly an awkward elevator ride that everyone experiences turns into some traumatic experience with megagigarapist. An adult woman writes erotic fanfiction of having massive, heaving breasts as a ten year old. They’re encouraged to not only make shit up but overdramatize anything that they believe advances their poorly thought out opinions and positions on life. If you question it, you’re not allowed to second guess their “lived experience,” even if it’s a violent scenario that doesn’t even exist in the bowels of Mogadishu but is omnipresent in their schizophrenic minds.

 

[Johan Schmidt]

I think they believe it because they are utterly insane. They glom onto hugboxes that not only validate their insanity but encourage oneupsmanship. Suddenly an awkward elevator ride that everyone experiences turns into some traumatic experience with megagigarapist. An adult woman writes erotic fanfiction of having massive, heaving breasts as a ten year old. They’re encouraged to not only make shit up but overdramatize anything that they believe advances their poorly thought out opinions and positions on life. If you question it, you’re not allowed to second guess their “lived experience,” even if it’s a violent scenario that doesn’t even exist in the bowels of Mogadishu but is omnipresent in their schizophrenic minds.

I can buy that. I remember asking a girl out from work once for dinner, and she sent back - paraphrased - "No, and I feel very manipulated, and attacked that you would ask this. I thought that we were simply colleagues, but you want to abuse our working relationship." Which made me laugh. I can see someone like that thinking an awkward time is a trauma.

 

[Radion_Godiva]

They're just making it up lol.

They're cross-posting from Reddit.

 

[There Is Light At The End]

>checks Kiwiballs' profile
>Joined Friday at 3:52 AM

As long as no there is no shitting up thread, it's fine

 

[Fareal]

A day or two ago on twitter some lefty wokescold lunatic posted a "feel good" story about a barista who gave a "left over hot chocolate" to an 18 year old young lady because a man approached her. Written on it was a message asking if she is ok and to lift the lid if not. She did not lift the lid. Now, there is WILD range of factual scenarios in that. But you would think if there were any details that would mitigate in favor of that, they would have been divulged. Guy was probably about her age, felt an attraction and approached her. And some barista pulled this shit. Now that I think about it, that that happened might be enough to short circuit his efforts. She may have liked him but receiving that is just enough of a negative social cue to mitigate against going on a date or what have you.

So, non-argumentative intervention, just passing comment:
I had a conversation with some young folk about this very kind of interaction very recently.
I have this feeling that young folks now - because they do so much of their partner searching via app - are not as socially aware, on either side, of how much basic dude differs from basic chick in this respect.
- Basic dude considers it fine to approach a complete stranger and ask for a high level of social interaction (a date, if you're doing it right, is a high level of social interaction/intimacy) on no basis other than that the recipient is visually appealing.
- Basic chick does not do that, doesn't think that way or feel that impulse, and is therefore generally taken aback to some level when it happens.
- Basic dude figures basic chick will probably give him the bum's rush, but there's no harm in asking, and no will be accepted as the answer.
- Basic chick is mindblown that you would cold approach a stranger for sex, as basic chick has been socialised that for her, that behaviour carries a higher level of personal risk. (not cold approaching by chicks is a powerful enough social norm that chicks who approach strangers regularly for sex IRL, depending on their psych, may still find that behaviour taken into account in determining a BPD diagnosis.)
Basics are not approaching the interaction in anything like the same mindset. One mindset is "why not" and the other is "what the fuck" and it doesn't make for a graceful interaction in many circumstances. The movies are full of the 'meet-cute', but IRL the overwhelming majority of young and youngish women do not at all like to be approached by a random on the Tube claiming she is the most beautiful woman he has ever seen so he has to follow her home or his heart will break forever etc etc. (Richard Curtis has a bit to answer for.)
When people were out trying to get laid IRL only (in the long, long ago), dudes who wanted to cold approach 100 strangers a night had to physically approach 100 strangers a night. No swiping from the couch, safely at home. They had to hit on every single chick at the bar, and be told face to face to fuck off by all of them, and probably wear a few drinks into the bargain. The expectation of rejection was confirmed by experience.
Meanwhile chicks who went anywhere in public places experienced being hit on by fairly normal people as well as the creeps, and understood that for dudes this is a normal behaviour. It's not a behaviour chicks engage in, but not every dude trying to chat to you at the bar is thinking about wearing your skin as a cape. You politely refuse the drink and "go looking for your friends" or escape into the toilet.
Now there is a newborn but growing social presumption that if you were looking for a date/romance/casual sex, you would do it only via the app and not IRL, so the whole "hi I think you are pretty and will you have sex with me" random dude proposition seems more... jarring? I have the strong impression from the young folks that they handle that interaction much worse than older folks did.

 

[Gourmet Race]

Ive been reading the man hate thread quite a bit and I try to take most of the authentic info in good faith but I really want to clarify these same two points bought up again and again. I dont think the foids there will ever respond cause all of them are incredibly salty and bad faith but I hope some of the women lurking in this thread can clear it up for me.
First thing being the porn conversation.

Had a good time catching up and saw this, and I don't know why, but this gave me a bad taste in my mouth for the man-hate thread to make the argument of porn when their side probably has a bunch of people masturbating to pre-pubescent boys fucking each other. I'm not saying what they're arguing is wrong, but rather how that group shouldn't be the one saying that. To give credit to men, I've noticed more of them at least making an attempt to stop their porn addiction, you don't see women doing that, never seen one anyway, it's like they have no post-nut clarity. Also, quite a big talk too when women dress like sluts nowadays. If you ladies were to dress up in a more formal and less revealing outfit then men would respect you more and be less misogynistic. You're adding fuel to the fire and still blame us solely for it.

Also, I might as well leave this here: If you're someone who wants to stop masturbating but can't, read EasyPeasy, it might help you out.

 

[Johan Schmidt]

masturbating to pre-pubescent boys fucking each other. I'm not saying what they're arguing is wrong, but rather how that group shouldn't be the one saying that.

It still makes me laugh that Android Raptor of all people has a porn page which is filled with Gundam porn of a twink, getting gang raped by massively jacked niggers lol. Legit funny to me.

 

[More AWS-8Q Than You]

They're just making it up lol. I've worked in offices, in shops, and in a university; and no one has ever 'forced' interactions on women. People just talk to them like normal, and sometimes weirdos are weird, just like with men. The femcels are just legbeards making shit up in the same way incels do about women.

I think this is a communication thing, like everything with men and women we use the same words but speak different languages. Men take words on the surface meaning, so you tell us we'd look better smiling, we're gonna take that literally and as a compliment. Women communicating primarily with subtext are going to look at everything but the surface meaning as the obvious one and overthink and feel themselves into knots.

If I told a guy I liked his shirt, he'd think I liked his shirt, unless my tone was sarcastic. If I tell a woman I like her shirt, she'll be looking for the subtext and/or the knife in the back. This is the root of all male/female communication issues, because men don't use subtext much in Manglish, and women don't use the surface meaning of words as much in Womanese. See the Family Guy clip I posted way back.

Also, most guys get so few compliments that a woman telling us we're cute would fuel most guys for, I don't know, years. Maybe decades if she's hot enough.

 

[The Heartthrob]

Finally, the thing that really grinds my gears when I think about it is the positively semitic level of nickel-and-dime'ing that goes on in these dating apps. Everything needs to be a subscription these days. Honestly if they just set up a forum for people to meet and hook up, and had it user funded like the Kiwifarms, things would be much better. But that's not profitable, as if a dating app was ever supposed to be. You want love and profit, run a whore racket.

It's some of the worst. Tinder charges $40 per month for QOL changes to the app. I think Match charges similarly to even communicate with people. Someone can send you a message and you can't even read it without paying. It's incredibly predatory toward lonely people. If people wanna get fucked, they either go for a hookup-specific app or they leave their Instagram in their Tinder bio. The people shelling out typically want something more.

The reason for the hugbox rules is because there's so many more men than women here, but its kinda fucked up when the occasional casual female poster goes into that thread and gets blasted the fuck away by the hugbox too. There's also the fact that the level of vitriol in that thread would get you automatic MATI-ratings anywhere else as well. Its unhinged.

A women's space is different from a feminist space. All they've managed to do is take a play out of the sand nigger refugee handbook.

Now there is a newborn but growing social presumption that if you were looking for a date/romance/casual sex, you would do it only via the app and not IRL, so the whole "hi I think you are pretty and will you have sex with me" random dude proposition seems more... jarring? I have the strong impression from the young folks that they handle that interaction much worse than older folks did.

On an app, it is a constant feed being sent to your phone which most people have on their person throughout the day. While that might seem more invasive, it does give you the option to check whenever you want. It makes dating a lot more hands-off and leisurely for the most part. Especially when you consider apps that make it so you can't even contact a woman without her manually approving it. Being asked out in a public setting is the opposite of that. They still have control over the outcome of the situation (saying yes or no to the date), but it's not about that for them. It's about not having approved of the interaction itself. It's uncomfortable, and therefore scary, and therefore assault.

It still makes me laugh that Android Raptor of all people has a porn page which is filled with Gundam porn of a twink, getting gang raped by massively jacked niggers lol. Legit funny to me.

It always jogs the noggin how closely the interests of those types tend to align with pedos and trannies. I think it's because they're all attracted to the destruction of innocence.

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

It always jogs the noggin how closely the interests of those types tend to align with pedos and trannies. I think it's because they're all attracted to the destruction of innocence.

They’re degenerated coomers, that’s the overlap on the Venn diagram.

Being asked out in a public setting is the opposite of that. They still have control over the outcome of the situation (saying yes or no to the date), but it's not about that for them. It's about not having approved of the interaction itself. It's uncomfortable, and therefore scary, and therefore assault.

I agree, girls are no longer used to any situation that is not controllable entirely with a smart phone. There are millions of people who have never not used a dating app. I grew up at a time where it was IRL, then dating sites, and then dating apps. None of this has ever resulted in an improvement for either sex. I’m just glad I’m married because the dating scene is an utter disaster now.

 

[Diamond Homonculus]

I hate the women who deserve to be hated, which is most women (unfortunately).

Stop crying about the women you can't get. You're just a simp who doesn't realize it.

Oh no don't say mean things about women in the women hate thread. Thanks captain-save-a-ho.

 

[JamusActimus]

Me too.
I was really rooting for Hillary, even though she was kinda scandal-ridden and tabloid fodder after the whole BJ with Monica Lewinski scandal. To some extent I thought it made her a stronger woman: yes, I'm in a power marriage with Bill. Now make me the junior Senator for New York or the Secretary of State.

Hillary was smart. Resourceful. Tough. Cute? (I think so.) Gimme hats and cans but I jhoped she was going to restore some of the peace and prosperity Americans enjoyed in the 90's, which happened mostly during the two Clinton administrations. However no man I knew voted for her, and they liked Trump's rank sexism and chants to "lock her up." It was sickening and disappointing, but the men really do screw you over politically.

Lol liking Hillary is such a red flag.

It's the liking Tate/Bateman/Jp red flag but for woman.
Thatcher is also on that list.

 

[Wally Paulnuts]

MADONN! On a fuckin tech blog site for crypto retards and NodeJS babies! Can't even make this shit up! Women are the biggest coombrains I swear to fuck.