STRAWMAN.
There is no dissonance between appreciating what men have done (once upon a time we considered men- and women-created innovations simply “human” innovation, but y’all are lost, so whatever) and being a feminist/ being for that advancement of women/ acknowledging historical and current views/ positions that were or are, in design or in effect, operating to de-humanize or otherwise lower women.
Moreover, there is no dissonance between seeking to acknowledge and consider [not as a granted favor, but as reality] women as equal humans while also acknowledging unique (statistically) gender*-related characteristics/ specialties/ primacies.
*by “gender” I mean sex, which is the same thing, and excludes concepts of “identification” as one or the other or neither