Dave Brian Muscato / Danielle Tatiana Muscato / Danielle Brian Muscato - Half-Assed Trans Activist, Fully Arrested, Rape Appropriator, Currently Trying to Extort His Parents

[I'mThePatMan!]

Do you think he believes he will get an inheritance when dear daddy drops dead? Because I'm sure he got written out of the will a while ago.

Thats a good question. Any American lawyers here?

I'm asking because even though any normal person would say he's not intitled to anything, depending on the applicable law that might not be the case, even if he was written out of the will.

At least where I live, the law says if you write your child out of your will, it applies at maximum to 50% of your patrimony. The other 50% will still became their inheritance. The only way they are 100% excluded from the will is in the case of patricide.

If Dave lived here, that would mean this asshole would still get a couple million after his parents die. Thankfully, he doesn't and I can only hope American allows Dr. Joe to give all his money to his other children.

 

[Mr Snoid]

This might explain why his parents won't just book his high-maintenance ass onto a Point Barrow itinerary.

If he's not lying (yeah, I know).

 

[Bookwork]

This might explain why his parents won't just book his high-maintenance ass onto a Point Barrow itinerary.

If he's not lying (yeah, I know).

View attachment 5441713

Shit. If you weren't crazy going into group therapy with Dave, you sure as hell went crazy zooming 9 hours a week with Dave. Why are there no laws protecting people from such abuse?????

 

[monstrous bubo]

Do you think he believes he will get an inheritance when dear daddy drops dead?

I'm asking because even though any normal person would say he's not intitled to anything, depending on the applicable law that might not be the case, even if he was written out of the will.

Neither an American or a lawyer, but according to this Mo. lawyer:

1. challenges are heard by a jury (imagine how normies would react to Dave!)
2. the jury has to determine if the will is otherwise valid and the testator was aware of the „natural objects of his bounty”
3. if yes to all of these, ”then the usual remaining issue is whether there was such undue influence on the decedent as to cause the jury to conclude that the free will of the decedent was overpowered and destroyed, resulting in the decedent signing a will that otherwise would not have been signed.”
4. if a will is invalid, assets are distributed via the usual principles of intestacy.

Dave could argue he is a natural object of Joe’s or Mary’s bounty and that Jeff and Andy overpowered them, leading to his disinheritance. The cool thing is that in terrorem clauses are enforceable in Missouri - basically, you challenge, you lose whatever you would have received under the will. So any competent lawyer would advise Joe and Mary to get some proof they are mentally competent to make a will, leave him a sum of money which isn’t a large chunk of the estate but would be helpful to him (say, ten grand) and include the reasons they’re giving him only a small amount (such as the fact he’s got an arrest for stalking his parents, along with his other crazy shit), and back it up with an in terrorem clause. He challenges, he loses even the small amount. Checkmate.

I suspect that as @Nanashi no kiwi said, some trust might be set up so he isn’t annoying decent homeless people, although who would serve as trustee and become Dave’s new target is a puzzle.

 

[break these cuffs]

I suspect that as @Nanashi no kiwi said, some trust might be set up so he isn’t annoying decent homeless people, although who would serve as trustee and become Dave’s new target is a puzzle.

Just have the lawyer who set up the trust serve as the trustee or another if they chose not to. Make sure all the fees and payment structures are instructed in the trust documents and are in line with local attorneys to help take out claims of impropriety at the knees. Dave will likely rail against anyone put in charge, but probably try suing a lawyer less often than his brother or another family member. I expect him to flush a substantial amount of his inheritance taking his brother to court on principle.

 

[Bookwork]

Grandchildren - their education trusts, in particular - are nearly as big a threat to Dave's life-time coziness as his own rotten behavior.

 

[Norman B. Normal]

I for one am shocked to learn that Dave has been diagnosed with a type 2 personality disorder.

 

[Bill Evans 45]

On Oct. 20, the grand jury indicted Dave for two counts of felony harassment and one count of felony theft. Dave's arraignment is scheduled for Monday,

Even Garfield is looking forward to this particular Monday. A part of me hopes it's delayed to Tuesday for the lulz.

I hate this so much. The man literally cannot stop posting things that will be cited in the extortion case.

I hear Nemesis has a full schedule for 2024.

 

[Bookwork]

That a grand jury indicted him is speshulnessimo. None of that low-level county prosecutor clicks a few boxes on screen after the police report comes in shit to put our Dave on the rota of judges' dockets.

Still, after Trump got indicted, he hauled in millions in donations. Why has Dave not gotten bigly moneys????? Dave's a woman, that's why. Misogyny!

 

[Mariposa2.0 LTE]

He looks like he hasn't washed his face for a week.

View attachment 5390223

He looks like he washed his face with meth laced with Staph

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

If Dave is doing teh meth his time on earth is limited. Meth is directly contraindicated for someone with afib.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

If Dave is doing teh meth his time on earth is limited. Meth is directly contraindicated for someone with afib.

And just generally for anyone at all.

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

And just generally for anyone at all.

To an extent, yes. The dose-dependent neural toxicity of meth is well established, as are the cardiovascular effects. However, in small amounts, used with moderation, for an otherwise healthy person, it's impact, long term, shouldn't be much different than someone who drinks a few extra glasses of wine most days, or smokes moderately.

Most people need to realize that when it comes to toxicology "the dose is the poison" is the absolute truth. With a few exceptions, almost everything in small doses is not particularly harmful in moderation over time and an otherwise healthy person can handle it since the body is designed to deal with a certain amount of damage on a regular basis. The exception to the "dose" rule is anything that is NOEL (No Observable Effects Limit), which is science/medical speak for something that is absolutely harmful with no known amount being safe regardless of how small. This is a very limited category of materials and phenomena that most people would rarely if ever be exposed to.

This is why, in a very limited set of circumstances, methamphetamine is actually used in medicine. So is cocaine. Opiates are another good example. It's why some medicine are actual poisons, such as digitalis. The biggest problem in medicine is that humans each have an addictive potential and we currently have no way to know what that is for a given person, which is a major issue. So, someone can be exposed to something in a reasonable dose and they become severely addicted to it, while another person who is very similar finds it has no addictive potential for them at all. Until we know how to detect that risk, a person's addictive potential is unknown until they are exposed, and for some people that initial exposure can be all it takes.

 

[Bookwork]

To an extent, yes. The dose-dependent neural toxicity of meth is well established, as are the cardiovascular effects. However, in small amounts, used with moderation, for an otherwise healthy person, it's impact, long term, shouldn't be much different than someone who drinks a few extra glasses of wine most days, or smokes moderately.

Most people need to realize that when it comes to toxicology "the dose is the poison" is the absolute truth. With a few exceptions, almost everything in small doses is not particularly harmful in moderation over time and an otherwise healthy person can handle it since the body is designed to deal with a certain amount of damage on a regular basis. The exception to the "dose" rule is anything that is NOEL (No Observable Effects Limit), which is science/medical speak for something that is absolutely harmful with no known amount being safe regardless of how small. This is a very limited category of materials and phenomena that most people would rarely if ever be exposed to.

This is why, in a very limited set of circumstances, methamphetamine is actually used in medicine. So is cocaine. Opiates are another good example. It's why some medicine are actual poisons, such as digitalis. The biggest problem in medicine is that humans each have an addictive potential and we currently have no way to know what that is for a given person, which is a major issue. So, someone can be exposed to something in a reasonable dose and they become severely addicted to it, while another person who is very similar finds it has no addictive potential for them at all. Until we know how to detect that risk, a person's addictive potential is unknown until they are exposed, and for some people that initial exposure can be all it takes.

I for one have avoided robbing a number of gas stations while nude by choosing Malbec instead of meth.

We must ask ourselves whether the Dave problem has been caused by winemakers using those frustratingly difficult synthetic corks. If so, screw tops are indicated.

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

We must ask ourselves whether the Dave problem has been caused by winemakers using those frustratingly difficult synthetic corks. If so, screw tops are indicated.

I really hate those synthetic corks. Of course, anyone that has had a bottle ruined by a dried out cork has probably cursed true corks as well. However, that should only happen if someone stores the bottle incorrectly because they are retarded.

 

[Bookwork]

I really hate those synthetic corks. Of course, anyone that has had a bottle ruined by a dried out cork has probably cursed true corks as well. However, that should only happen if someone stores the bottle incorrectly because they are retarded.

Nipples. The bottles should come with nipples. Dave would agree.

Edit: People put a box of wine on their kitchen counters right next to the sink like a second faucet specifically BECAUSE they can fill sippy cups more easily that way. Time for bottlers to address that reality.

 

[eggs_over_easy]

Warning: Incoming dump.

On Oct. 24, Dave posted an image showing his mother follows him on Instagram. Unless I'm missing something, it doesn't show when Mary started following him. Is the implication that she started following him after their rupture? After the confrontations in the parking lot and at the dentist's office? After the restraining order?


Link | Archive

ETA: If the above is supposed to indicate that Mary's account is new, according to the "about" info on Mary's (private) Instagram account, she's had this account since September 2022, so well before the Thanksgiving incident



On Oct 26, Dave began posting additional AI-generated images of himself as a woman (full gallery spoilered at bottom of post, with comments as of Oct 27). He posted the same thing to Instagram.


Link | Archive

Spoiler: Facebook Post Text

Some AI generated avatars of what I might look like after medical transition. I'm thinking of making one my profile pic.... It's so gender affirming. It's gender euphoria, is what it is. I can't stop looking at these and just beaming. I don't want to patronize art for profit that doesn't get proper copyrights... But at the same time, I'm disabled and I'm not working, and I'm still in the years-long process of applying for benefits, so it's hardly like I'm creating these images INSTEAD of spending money commissioning an artist to do it.


It gives me gender euphoria and the alternative isn't really hiring indie artists to make these instead. It would be not having images like this whatsoever. If I weren't struggling to afford food... I'm literally just selling off guitars each month to pay rent.... I would be so happy to hire someone, you know? But it's not money I have.... Is this hurting anyone? Is it worth it to steal copyright permissions, if it makes a disabled trans woman smile for a minute? I don't know.


Which one do you like the best? Do any of them look anything like me? It's hard to get the software to do what you want it to do.... You say what you want, it generates an image. You tell it to change X, Y, and Z, and it half-asses all 3 changes and then also changes 2 other things you didn't ask it to change at all. It's surprisingly difficult to get Dall-e3 to render what you want it to, using only text. I think at some point I'm gonna try to make it happen...I would love to commission an indie artist to do a proper version of this, with your favorite as a guide. What do you think?


I need one more heart surgery, and then I can start hormones. I hope that's all done by the end of the year. I turn 40 in January, and I really want to start hormones before then. That would be a dream come true.

Link | Archive

Dave then updated his Facebook profile, first with the Black Lives Matter banner, then (for whatever reason) without:


Link | Archive


Link | Archive


Full Gallery of AI portraits, with comments as of Oct 27

Spoiler: AI Portrait Gallery with Comments (as of 10/27)

 

[Particle Bored]

Can Dave even play an upright bass?

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

On Oct. 24, Dave posted an image showing his mother follows him on Instagram. Unless I'm missing something, it doesn't show when Mary started following him. Is the implication that she started following him after their rupture? After the confrontations in the parking lot and at the dentist's office? After the restraining order?

Notice she is showing up under the "Suggested For You" section, that is just the algorithm saying "You might know this person, but they aren't linked to you, so maybe you want to link them?" she isn't following Dave, and Dave isn't following them. It's basically the algorithm that tries to show you people that you might know on the platform trying to say to Dave "Why aren't you linked to your mother, what happened with that relationship, Dave?"

 

[ScooterL]

Can Dave even play an upright bass?

He can barely play a guitar.