Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Peace Through Power]

but it has a very specific legal definition.

That is quite interesting. I wonder where Nick learned this from?

Where Nick learned this from / Do you know the Dost standard?

Spoiler: Source: Rekieta Law - Friday Stream - A Wild Null Appears! - LIVE! (November 24. 2018)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4THL17_CBU

at around 48:30

For context: Before this Nick talks about how it is better to err on the side of free expression regarding loli

Two years later

Spoiler: Source: Null Joins to Discuss the Normalization of Child Exploitation and More! (August 21. 2020)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLrruYIJpMk

at around 33:40

For context: They're talking about Cuties. After this Nick starts talking about photographs of children in warzones

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

What kind of hypothetical person would be a vocal defender of self-professed pedophiles and child groomers, and also be very upset with the idea of CSAM blocking programs? What kinds of interests might such a non-existent person have behind closed doors that such programs might interfere with? Wouldn't want to make any baseless, slanderous accusations of criminal activity about any specific individual, but just speaking purely theoretically here, there is certainly an implication.

YOU JUST DONT UNDERSTAND SOCIAL CUES!

 

[P5Fever]

Would Nick's apology look like Colleen Ballinger's ukulele song?

Goddammit, my brain now has a horrible pun of Balldoinger.

 

[Kopasea]

- Nick talked about the CSAM hash filter and the 'hypothetical programmer'. He asked if it wasn't weird to want to write a program to find and tag it. He did a lawyer question 'Isn't it true that you can tag things for good or bad purposes?' Couldn't they use it to archive and collect it!?!?! Why are you doing it if you are NOT A GOVERNMENT or big tech platform.

Wait, I thought Nick was a libertarian. Why does he want only big government to CSAM hash stuff it but not private citizens?

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Nick states that he did not say he was talking about any one person, but he then went to say that 'If this person never gave anyone the benefit of the doubt for anything, why should we give them the benefit of the doubt?' You look at their statements and history and make the decision. If you look closely at them, they get weird about things in their past. People get to draw their own conclusions. 'What if someone reached out and said that someone misunderstood something...' They are not understanding that. They think they know everything, but miss so much.

Nick really is just a seething ex-girlfriend mad that his beau realized he was a manipulative piece of shit. Null gave him the benefit of the doubt for months after the thread's opinion of Nick shifted.

 

[Captain Manning]

Wait, I thought Nick was a libertarian. Why does he want only big government to CSAM hash stuff it but not private citizens?

Because Null won't return his dunken phone calls and texts.

There's no other logic to it. He is fucking infuriated that Null won't put on the Balldo.

 

[Maraschino]

Who could've ever predicted that a borderline malignant narcissist with a clear substance abuse problem who refuses to accept any sort of responsibility, criticism, or accountability for anything ever might end up becoming a worse person when they get into the (non-practicing) law?

He's not just furious he's receiving shit, he's furious because he claimed he's "good at manipulating people" but his attempts at trying to do so with Null or anyone with enough tism to look at his publicly documented words just don't fucking buy it.

 

[Oliver Onions]

As low as my opinion already was for the Balldo man, seeing him try to smear Null as a chomo (and doing it in the most Mean Girls, 'not touching, can't get mad' bitchmade way) is especially slimy. It's funny how all these guys try the same tactic when their back's against the wall.

I think more than leaving him on read, Nick is seething that Null refuses to take his side on the Monty lawsuit, or acknowledge the brilliant 5D legal chess strategy of repeatedly doubling down on saying Monty molests kids.

TL;DR Despite being non-practicing Nick really lives up to the reputation of lawyers being slimy despicable cunts.

 

[Sewer Rat]

View attachment 5455691

remember that all the girls that get raped/fucked in redo of the healer are between 9-16 years old

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Because Null won't return his dunken phone calls and texts.

There's no other logic to it. He is fucking infuriated that Null won't put on the Balldo.

Rackets was hot shit on the Internet for a hot minute. But that fame has long passed, much like his hairline. He can take his 5head and skulk, he doesn't have the clout to bully anymore.

His real worry, if he's conscious of it, should be that Kayla will stop falling for this shit.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

- Nick states that he did not say he was talking about any one person, but he then went to say that 'If this person never gave anyone the benefit of the doubt for anything, why should we give them the benefit of the doubt?' You look at their statements and history and make the decision. If you look closely at them, they get weird about things in their past. People get to draw their own conclusions. 'What if someone reached out and said that someone misunderstood something...' They are not understanding that. They think they know everything, but miss so much.

Hahahahahahahaha I didn't expect him to link his seething so directly to being left on read.

"What if someone reached out"? Wouldn't you like to know, Nick?

Because Null won't return his dunken phone calls and texts.

There's no other logic to it. He is fucking infuriated that Null won't put on the Balldo.

Man it's almost as if there's becoming a pattern that when someone makes Nick sufficiently MaD aT tHe InTeRnEt - did I manage to get through his anger-sarcasm way of saying that phrase? - he tries to retaliate by making specific claims about horrible crimes against children.

Literally nobody cares. Nick has torched his platform and nobody listens to him anymore. Anyone who reads his claims will understand it's the ramblings of an alcoholic moron. The situation has been clarified publicly without anyone resorting to trying to convince said alcoholic moron of anything, and it's clear that Nick is either lying in a stupid way or doesn't understand the technical aspects of what he's talking about.

I actually tend to believe Nick is literally just lying and pretending to be concerned based on the 'What if someone reached out and said that someone misunderstood something..." quote from @Himedall All-seeing Waifu. He seems to be implicitly threatening to seed a smear out there about a person unless that person agrees to talk to him again.

If Null messaged him and said literally the same thing he posted on the thread which NICK READ AND POSTED A SCREENSHOT OF ON HIS TWITTER, I'm sure Nick would say "Wow! I'm so sorry. I misunderstood." The whole point is to get back to the "I hate everything about [insert person], but don't get me wrong, I love [insert person] and hope [insert person] makes a billion dollars" space where Nick is comfortable. However because of the whole alcoholic moron thing he's doing it in literally the worst way he could.

Nick is mad at Twitter. He is shadowbanned and no one got his joke about his Matthew Perry Halloween costume.

No, Nick isn't shadowbanned. Nobody cares about what he has to say anymore. He's irrelevant.

Nick's Twitter activity over the weekend was of the Tomlinson variety and I think that's all that's left for him on the platform.

 

[Dan of Steel]

Balldo Boy's downward spiral isn't sad to me, more that it's enraging. This dude had literally everything a man could want: a wife that loves him, kids, and the easiest job in the world. As Jim (RIP) once said, "Put on a good show, and read the superberries". That's literally all Nick had to do, and with how popular legal shit and true crime is, it's self-sustaining. But instead he wants to drink it away, wear Balldos, force his wife to fuck black guys and and do whatever damage he's doing to his kids by at best being a neglectful father and ignoring them and their needs to instead be a Ralphamale descending further into wiggerdom.
But I don't pity him, he can go fuck himself for defending pedoforks and blights on society like Vito and Riley and being buttbuddies with Juju. I feel bad for your kids, Nick, but eventually the Pied Piper comes to collect when you're in this deep in your own retardation.

 

[Captain Manning]

He's not just furious he's receiving shit, he's furious because he claimed he's "good at manipulating people" but his attempts at trying to do so with Null or anyone with enough tism to look at his publicly documented words just don't fucking buy it.

What this is, more than anything I think, is that the Hedonism II shit wasn't swept up by Null, and the Drex thread went up. I noticed he started getting especially vicious with Null after that, and Hedonism II and Drex were his two main grievances according to Null's description of the shower texts.

I don't think Nick knows how to handle "no." Maybe his parents didn't say it to him enough.

No, Nick isn't shadowbanned. Nobody cares about what he has to say anymore. He's irrelevant.

I am too lazy to try and quantify it, but I think he's overall getting less engagement across all platforms, including Twitter. From memory, I seem to recall his tweets getting way more more likes, reads, replies, and retweets than he's getting now.

That twitter monetization might have come too damn late.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

No, Nick isn't shadowbanned. Nobody cares about what he has to say anymore. He's irrelevant.

Yup.

If this tool is accurate at all:

https://shadowban.yuzurisa.com/RekietaLaw

Or this one:

Twitter Shadowban Test

Are you shadowbanned on Twitter?

hisubway.online

 

[PixarsTedKennedy]

Hmmmm

 

[AnOminous]

Yes, Nick's personality (at least, the one he was putting up) and legal knowledge was enough in unison to carry him from case to case and foster a growing audience.

His problem is not just having a pickled brain, but actively lying about the law or making sleazy, irrelevant legal defenses of what are moral issues. He's now more dishonest than LawTwitter ever was, and that's fucking sad. He could have a completely functional brain (which he doesn't) and still be an utterly useless source of legal information just because of his constant lying about it.

What kind of hypothetical person would be a vocal defender of self-professed pedophiles and child groomers, and also be very upset with the idea of CSAM blocking programs?

He wasn't really. He was just slimily trying to imply they involve having some collection of CP, and clearly too dumb to understand what a hash is or look it up before babbling like a boomer sped about it.

Hahahahahahahaha I didn't expect him to link his seething so directly to being left on read.

He couldn't be more blatant without literally coming out and saying "yes I am a completely narcissistic piece of shit."

Funny how the "autist" Null understands narcissists and Cluster B nightmares like Nick are just not worth dealing with at all. Just engaging with them feeds their vampiric need for attention. Not even quitting drinking would fix him. Dude needs some Jesus.

 

[Captain Manning]

As low as my opinion already was for the Balldo man, seeing him try to smear Null as a chomo (and doing it in the most Mean Girls, 'not touching, can't get mad' bitchmade way) is especially slimy. It's funny how all these guys try the same tactic when their back's against the wall.

I'd be more infuriated by this, but for the fact Null has been through this many times before and seems largely desensitized to it. It's disgusting, but I don't think any of it is gonna hurt Null. Nick isn't the first person to make pedo accusations against Null when they get mad at him.

In fact, what Nick is doing here is gonna have the opposite than intended effect. Null has said on MATI that anybody who ardently thinks he's a pedo is somebody he doesn't want to have anything to do with. Going this route is just gonna ensure Nick doesn't get what he wants. Null is not Eric July. He's not gonna spasmodically agree to go on Nick's show to "defend himself" against Nick's drunken accusations.

It's something I think Dick hasn't figured out either. From time to time he tries to bait Null on his show too.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I actually tend to believe Nick is literally just lying and pretending to be concerned based on the 'What if someone reached out and said that someone misunderstood something..." quote from @Himedall All-seeing Waifu. He seems to be implicitly threatening to seed a smear out there about a person unless that person agrees to talk to him again.

I read this as a call back to his messages to Null about the Monty pedo claims when the Farms started pick up on what was happening in the lawsuit. These were the ones where Nick said there were people doing line-crossing harassment, and when Null asked, 'Who?' Nick said that what Null meant was, 'Who do you want me to ban?', in his twisted mind

 

[Tubby Aardvark]

What kind of hypothetical person would be a vocal defender of self-professed pedophiles and child groomers, and also be very upset with the idea of CSAM blocking programs

I feel like you almost need something like that running a forum that people don't like, look at soyjack party and 8 chan thats all you need to do to shut down a forum is to spam enough of that shit to break a nigga. It seems like thats the go to for shutting things down.

Same, she even looked pretty good for a middle aged mom, better than the leathery women in the chat, plus she had a fuckload of morals and didn't mind being the whipping boy for the rest of the fandom for calling out Nick on his hypocracy. She was like Jesse PS for boomers

The only thing that annoyed me with Cynthia was she would always insist she had receipts but never thought to just post them, I still don't think she should have been thread banned though.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

The real question is monty a pedo? Or he's a kooky fuck.