Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I do wonder where Mr Stabbins gets all this extra income from to pay for all his Copyright Applications.

We know he only gets the bare pittance from his tugboat. And his You tube channel probably doesn't even bring in double digits in a month.

I wonder if he skips meals to save up that $50 bucks or even after all the shit he has put his parents through they still toss him some bucks every month. No matter how evil and stupid your child ends up it's hard for a parent to really let go.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I wonder if he skips meals to save up that $50 bucks

Have you seen him? He hasn't skipped a meal in his life. A pack of wieners are like $1.18 at Walmart anyways.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Have you seen him? He hasn't skipped a meal in his life. A pack of wieners are like $1.18 at Walmart anyways.

Its even cheaper to go into the woods and start devouring rats and other insects you find

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Its even cheaper to go into the woods and start devouring rats and other insects you find

That requires effort. Have you watched his videos? He's never put any effort into anything he's done in his life.

 

[TurboNAS]

We’re well past our 48 hour ultimatum. I wonder what Creetosis ended up doing?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

We’re well past our 48 hour ultimatum. I wonder what Creetosis ended up doing?

Probably not folding. Anyway, new vid by Sid:

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Nice of SidAlpha to give us a run down on the approximate costs.

You'd think there would be more gaming news with how much companies are currently fucking up. Hell Ark Survival Ascension is looking like a good one. It's a $60 texture pack that removed a lot of shit from the original game and has a third party server company that is the only company you can get servers from and there's are expensive as fuck and the old cosmetics will now be a cash purchase it seems. Though Snail Games would probably sue him for a video on it. Wildcard will most likely just wash their hands of it as it's not the game they wanted to originally wanted to produce but forced to do so by their Chinese overlord.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

It appears Acerthorn wasted $900 dollars attempting to serve a defendant in Stebbins v. Polano.
Adding this $900 to the $1045 I estimate he spent on copyright registrations and cash prizes for his audience, Acerthorn may have wasted close to $2000.

Docket 45 US Marshals will not serve process in Switzerland. Acerthorn asked for leave to hire a private process server. In light of his willingness to pay for service, the court ordered Acerthorn to explain why his IFP status should not be revoked.


Docket 53 Acerthorn tells the Court he will take out a loan at a 90% interest rate. He will be paying $900 in $100 monthly installments.


Docket 119 exhibit A Service was paid for.


Docket 102 Service failed.


Docket 119 Acerthorn asks for sanctions to recoup the money he wasted.


In my opinion IFP should be off the table for him. He's willing to spend his money on everything except his case's filing fee. And the way he repeatedly tries to intimidate Creetosis with the cost of litigation, while paying nothing himself, is disgusting.
From that email

1) "you'll have to spend a lot of money and since I'm judgement proof, you'll never get that money back, even if you win"
2) "if I file suit in the district court, you will be locked into having to pay through-the-nose for a copyright lawyer"
3) "You can still file a motion to dismiss, but (A) you'll have to lawyer up for that which will still cost a lot of money"
4) "So if I file suit against you, even as a John Doe defendant, you're most likely fucked."

 

[Lake Cresva Diver]

It appears Acerthorn wasted $900 dollars attempting to serve a defendant in Stebbins v. Polano.
Adding this $900 to the $1045 I estimate he spent on copyright registrations and cash prizes for his audience, Acerthorn may have wasted close to $2000.

Docket 45 US Marshals will not serve process in Switzerland. Acerthorn asked for leave to hire a private process server. In light of his willingness to pay for service, the court ordered Acerthorn to explain why his IFP status should not be revoked.
View attachment 5459652

Docket 53 Acerthorn tells the Court he will take out a loan at a 90% interest rate. He will be paying $900 in $100 monthly installments.
View attachment 5459655

Docket 119 exhibit A Service was paid for.
View attachment 5459656

Docket 102 Service failed.
View attachment 5459660

Docket 119 Acerthorn asks for sanctions to recoup the money he wasted.
View attachment 5459657

In my opinion IFP should be off the table for him. He's willing to spend his money on everything except his case's filing fee. And the way he repeatedly tries to intimidate Creetosis with the cost of litigation, while paying nothing himself, is disgusting.
From that email

going into debt when you are dirt poor because you are buttmad on at some guy on the internet is peak lolcow comedic behavior. this beats kingcobras 20 dollar loan for a pizza by a mile(approx 1 acerthorn belt length).

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Hmmmm I wonder if that email could be used by Creetosis to show bad faith on Stabbins part. He seems to revel in the fact he can fuck over people by dragging them through court all while being immune to anything other than yet another Vexatious Litigator label.

Save those emails Cree, your lawyer will want them.

 

[AnOminous]

Docket 45 US Marshals will not serve process in Switzerland. Acerthorn asked for leave to hire a private process server. In light of his willingness to pay for service, the court ordered Acerthorn to explain why his IFP status should not be revoked.

About time a judge took note of this fat turkey-gobbling faggot's abuse of the IFP process.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

About time a judge took note of this fat turkey-gobbling faggot's abuse of the IFP process.

As I have stated before, vexatious litigants shouldn't be able to use in forma pauperis. Dave here shows us why.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

As I have stated before, vexatious litigants shouldn't be able to use in forma pauperis. Dave here shows us why.

in forma pauperis should automatically have to go through a certain form of vexatious litigation. Prove to a judge that this case actually has merit before dragging people into a court who have to spend money to defend themselves

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

About time a judge took note of this fat turkey-gobbling faggot's abuse of the IFP process.

One would think since he got slapped in the same court with the Vexatious title it would trigger a review for all the cases in that courthouse.

 

[AnOminous]

in forma pauperis should automatically have to go through a certain form of vexatious litigation. Prove to a judge that this case actually has merit before dragging people into a court who have to spend money to defend themselves

Courts are actually supposed to do exactly that under 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii), but they often fail to do their jobs.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Update:
Stebbins v. Doe - Hearing canceled

David Stebbins v. Karl Polano, et al (appeal) - Acerthorn submitted his reply brief

 

[TurboNAS]

Stebbins loves his arguments and analogies and desperately wants to feel persecuted when a ruling doesn’t go his way.

He also admits things in his argument that make his copyright registration fraudulent and continues to prove the case against himself. I’m looking forward to reading the response to this.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Old Stabby is really starting to lose it I think.

Several of his "responses" are outright insulting and overly aggressive. For example his rebuttal to the judge allowing You Tube's council to intervene consists of...

5. What part of absolute do you not understand? It's not rocket science. Once dismissed they ARE DISMISSED.

Yeah winning argument there Stabby.

His rebuttal seems to have three points.

1. When voluntary dismissed a party cannot reenter the litigation. Why? Because Stabby says so.

2. When I said it was a "accidental" livestream that happened because the software turned itself on what I really meant was that I don't recall turning on the software. The judge and defendant council are taking my words out of context and thus the work is 100% copyrightable.

3. The judge is an evil bastard who hates me and is just doing this to punish me for my past deeds, thus all his ruling should be thrown out and I should win everything forever.

Really typical Stabbins stuff here but just a wee bit more unhinged then in the past. I think he's starting his downward spiral into psychosis and mental instability...well even more so.

 

[TurboNAS]

When I said it was a "accidental" livestream that happened because the software turned itself on what I really meant was that I don't recall turning on the software.

Here, let me give you an analogy.

I accidentally hit some keys when I was trying to do something else and my recording software turned on but I was in front of the computer working on something else, not this livestream mind you since that was entirely accidental, and then it recorded for over an hour without my knowledge or intent.

I ask you judge, why do you hate me and refuse my copyright when this was clearly a creative work made with intent???

(Sitcom laugh track)
That’s our Stebbins!

(More laughter)

 

[AnOminous]

Really typical Stabbins stuff here but just a wee bit more unhinged then in the past. I think he's starting his downward spiral into psychosis and mental instability...well even more so.

He's realized he's getting shut down soon and is tard raging, getting in his last insane rantings before it's all over.