Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 27.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 46 15.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 102 34.2%

  • Total voters
    298
Unsurprisingly he's now leaning into the equivocation of the matter. My bold below to compare with your clip.

"Basically [it was] a female-looking demon having sex with an underage female whose name was, like, Lolita or something. Very weird. Very questionable comic. Some people called it very pedophilic. I would agree with that categorization although it's-it's art so it's not actually pedophilic in the sense that it's not a kid. It's a drawing so, I guess???"

He then goes over some of the details of the case.
Yeah, that doesn't surprise me. I'm glad I posted the clip so you could all compare.

As you note, there was ZERO equivocation in the clip I posted from 2020.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geared Chris
Nick showed up late for Halloween, wearing his Nick Gillespie costume. (Nick Gillespie can’t pull off the ‘70s feathered Steve Perry hair and neither can Rekieta. Cut your hair, ya bum.) Maybe that’s why at least three creators declined to have their photo taken with him tonight.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: AirdropShitposts
He dresses like a legit "enlightened and esteemed gentleman" autist with no social awareness.
He just needs one of these to complete the look:

View attachment 5461482
View attachment 5461458
i cannot recall a photo of him without a glass of alcohol in his hand. is this now a bit with him where he will always be photoed with alcohol?

and what is with the red stain below the belt near his crotch?

'Grooming' is NOT a legal term. You cannot legally 'groom' someone. Ergo, Drexel cannot be a groomer.

CHECKMATE KAREN FARMS!

--Nick in 1 month
fake christian nick rekeita logic. the issue is not a legal one. it is a moral one.

sex with a girl you know at 12 years old, six years later is disgusting. at 18, she still sees you as an authority figure. drexel, like any grown man, knows this and did not care.

and between those years, the girl was exposed to sex talk and images of drexel. drexel claims that stuff was from her mother. i am not sure if that is true. lets say that is true, the fact that this young girl was exposed to sex talk and imagery of you, would be a automatic red flag to any grown man. but drexel did not care.
 
i cannot recall a photo of him without a glass of alcohol in his hand. is this now a bit with him where he will always be photoed with alcohol?

and what is with the red stain below the belt near his crotch?


fake christian nick rekeita logic. the issue is not a legal one. it is a moral one.

sex with a girl you know at 12 years old, six years later is disgusting. at 18, she still sees you as an authority figure. drexel, like any grown man, knows this and did not care.

and between those years, the girl was exposed to sex talk and images of drexel. drexel claims that stuff was from her mother. i am not sure if that is true. lets say that is true, the fact that this young girl was exposed to sex talk and imagery of you, would be a automatic red flag to any grown man. but drexel did not care.
Rekeita has no morals. That's why he won't disavow Drexel.
 
1698887483398.png

Damn, Viva Frei is a little manlet, isn't he? I always wondered why he shouldered so much of the child care burden when he was bringing home the bacon. I guess that's the price you have to pay for a woman when you're only 5 foot tall.

Nick looks like he's leaning in, getting ready to suck Ron Coleman off.
 
And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
-Matthew 19:24
All the talk about redemption lately, I want to remind everyone that the only redemption that truly matters is a personal one. If Nick seeks to redeem himself through the eyes of his fans and us farmers his "redemption" will by necessity be empty because he'll be doing it for self-serving purposes. Through his own power, Nick is absolutely fucked.

When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved? But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
- Matthew 19:25-26

But that's sort of the point. Nick needs to stop trying to fix his own problems and bring his ego to heel. All his solutions are retarded and will only make things worse.
 
sex with a girl you know at 12 years old, six years later is disgusting. at 18, she still sees you as an authority figure. drexel, like any grown man, knows this and did not care.

and between those years, the girl was exposed to sex talk and images of drexel. drexel claims that stuff was from her mother. i am not sure if that is true. lets say that is true, the fact that this young girl was exposed to sex talk and imagery of you, would be a automatic red flag to any grown man. but drexel did not care.
What gets me about that is a normal person would be disgusted at the thought of this scenario playing out. If appealed to Drexel, because like all groomers that power imbalance that you can only get between an adult and child is incredibly desirable to them. He enjoys that dynamic. He has admitted this. Would Nick be okay if Drexel started a BDSM relationship with his daughter when she turned 18? And the way she was exposed to Drexel‘s lifestyle was from Nicks show and not Drexel himself?

And then Nick randomly comes out with his takes on ‘pegging’. He’s talked about it twice now from what I’ve seen and has said you should never do it because the woman will never see you as a man afterwards really highlighted that it means the woman can’t respect you. People can think whatever they want about that, it’s just funny he has these hardline stances (his recent take had him say you do you, but we all know from his dealings with Eric and Null he’s lying when he does that) about stuff that harms no one but all of a sudden has all the fabricated nuance in the world for pedos.
 
Last edited:
He dresses like a legit "enlightened and esteemed gentleman" autist with no social awareness.
He just needs one of these to complete the look:

View attachment 5461482
View attachment 5461458

With that hat and the belt, he would look like a cross between an anaemic Indiana Jones and Crocodile Dundee.

Nick showed up late for Halloween, wearing his Nick Gillespie costume. (Nick Gillespie can’t pull off the ‘70s feathered Steve Perry hair and neither can Rekieta. Cut your hair, ya bum.) Maybe that’s why at least three creators declined to have their photo taken with him tonight.

Source on which 3 'creators' (I loathe the prpfessional euphemism for 'streamer') these were?
 
Nick “I was diagnosed with ODD as a kid but as an adult that’s called sociopathy” Rekieta will never disavow Drexel. He’d sooner do a whole show about how he loves having Drexel babysit his daughters alone and hopes when they turn 18 and want to get into BDSM, he’ll take them each under his wing and show them the ropes (then tie the girls up with them).
 
You know Nick is midlife crisising because he's dressed in an outfit that would be super sharp when he was 20. Midlife crisis and drug induced brain damage is a hell of a combo.

Start carrying your pistol all the time Nick, no holster, right in the front wasteland like a cool 80s action guy. It'll make you look even cooler. Could never go wrong when you're loaded to the gills and raged out 24/7.
 
and between those years, the girl was exposed to sex talk and images of drexel. drexel claims that stuff was from her mother. i am not sure if that is true. lets say that is true, the fact that this young girl was exposed to sex talk and imagery of you, would be a automatic red flag to any grown man. but drexel did not care.
Drexel is also the one who keeps a record of his own sexual encounters on his phone as proof of consent and to convince women to have sex with him.

Why/how the mother would have these things is questionable, but there is no question about Drexel possessing a catalogue of sexual content of himself with the intent of showing them to others.

the only reason he would need to be careful with his Modafinil is if he's drinking to excess, because, like all hardcore stimulants and alcohol, it masks a lot of the effects of being shithoused. This is specifically why they warn you away from binge drinking on it, because just like the old four lokos, mixing Modafinil with liquor basically makes blackout juice.

Can't remember his birthday stream:


Can't remember if he's monogamous some days:


He just... can't remember:


It is very important to Nick that he not remember incriminating things, and his persistent emphasis on personal belief/perception over reality/actual events complements this.

If Nick can't clearly recall being unfaithful in his marriage then any shred of doubt exonerates him because he isn't 100% sure (and no one else can be either). If Nick can't clearly recall what he said to Montagraph, Null, or anyone else (and doesn't go back to check) then Nick thinks that he can justifiably remain unconvinced of any calls to accountability. Then it's all "Yeah, I dunno man, it's weird, think what you want."

Nick has projected this onto others wherein he can leverage any doubt in favor of (as in Juju/Vito) or against (as in Null) these people depending on his own bias. No point in dialoguing with disingenuous dolts like Nick who actively cultivate plausible deniability by destroying their credibility with hypocrisy, blackout juice, and obvious personal bias.
 
And then Nick randomly comes out with his takes on ‘pegging’. He’s talked about it twice now from what I’ve seen and has said you should never do it because the woman will never see you as a man afterwards really highlighted that it means the woman can’t respect you

Letting a woman peg you is much less effeminate than obsessing over Null, sending him mash notes in the shower and devoting a segment of every show that you do to the reasons why Null is wrong for withdrawing his affection from you.

I'll happily concede that pegging is really weird and I've never understood how it was possible to get pleasure from having your prostate stimulated. But I know it's a thing. And I know it's physiological, so not necessarily gay.

But publicly obsessing about why the boy with the soft eyes is ignoring you? That's as gay as anything I can imagine.
 
Where's Balldo?

nickevent4.png
(Archive)

There he is!

nickevent5.jpg

Was Rekieta hanging around Ron Coleman at the time of this photo, too? Looks to be who he's standing beside. Kayla is definitely visible, standing across from Nick.

Except it sure seems that whoever Ron's interlocutor was has turned his body diagonally to avoid dealing with them, as he looks to be standing close to parallel to Kayla (see photo below where I try to highlight where their legs would be).

I'm guessing this guy wanted to talk to an actual respected, practicing lawyer rather than someone who plays one on stream.

nickevent6.jpg
 
Back