- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
Yeah, that doesn't surprise me. I'm glad I posted the clip so you could all compare.Unsurprisingly he's now leaning into the equivocation of the matter. My bold below to compare with your clip.
"Basically [it was] a female-looking demon having sex with an underage female whose name was, like, Lolita or something. Very weird. Very questionable comic. Some people called it very pedophilic. I would agree with that categorization although it's-it's art so it's not actually pedophilic in the sense that it's not a kid. It's a drawing so, I guess???"
He then goes over some of the details of the case.
As you note, there was ZERO equivocation in the clip I posted from 2020.