Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 59 16.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 138 38.7%

  • Total voters
    357
You know Nick sure loves to bitch and moan about how the farms gets things wrong. Has he ever pointed out what was wrong and corrected the record?
Not really. Nick will talk in vague terms about the farms being wrong. When pressed to be specific in public, he will claim that it would be unfair to his critics to talk specifics in the open. That it could all be handled so much better in private conversations between himself and people who matter. When he gets into those private conversations, he usually remains vague about what he is complaining about.

In Nick's famous "midnight shower" messages to null, he pointed to the idea that people on the farms would push false narratives even after they had been proven to be false. Then he used the specific example of his close friend Mr. Drexel rather than an example about himself. The problem with that example was that Nick was completely wrong on the facts rather than the farms.

There was another stream (the "Tiger Woods" Stream with Nick and Drexel) where Nick and Drexel half-ass gave their complaints.

Drexel was confused and angry that his critics on the farms had been compiling and documenting things he had said across multiple streams to come to what Drexel considered wrong conclusions. Drexel didn't agree with calling a situation where he talked at length about getting sexually involved with an of-age girl who he had known and gone on family vacations with since she was a child as "grooming". (Drexel later explained in other places that him having sex with her was her mother's fault for bragging to her daughter about Drexel's sexual exploits & gigachad muh dick powers. Therefore not grooming.)

Nick didn't like people on the farms speculating that his marriage might eventually end in divorce. Nick, "knowing" his marriage could never ever end in divorce, somehow saw this speculation as factually wrong and inappropriate. Nick compared his situation to what he saw as the mainstream media's unfair attacks on Tiger Woods. That Tiger Woods cheated on his wife and that afterward his marriage ended in divorce following a violent fight on their front lawn was somehow lost on Nick.

The Tiger Woods Stream with Drexel and Nick complaining about the farms




The Shower messages between Nick and Null from MATI

 
Last edited:
Not really. Nick will talk in vague terms about the farms being wrong. When pressed to be specific in public, he will claim that it would be unfair to his critics to talk specifics in the open. That it could all be handled so much better in private conversations between himself and people who matter. When he gets into those private conversations, he usually remains vague about what he is complaining about.

Because Nick needs the disclaimer when he reads this, this is my speculative opinion:

From what I have seen of Nick, he seems to be a very shallow person who is able to understand and somewhat articulate that he 'does not like something', but much less capable at clearly stating why or coming up with a cogent rebuttal. We all here know, I am sure, that arguments on the internet are never really won (unless you have a sex tape or felony conviction come out post facto) and trolls will be trolls, so ignoring tosspots is required. Nick seems incapable of that, and further, he appears to lack any solid principled defence of his own actions and opinions. I am not the most articulate person myself, nor skilled in conveying my thoughts--hampered by autism and other flaws--, but I suppose this REALLY bothers Nick because he has billed himself as a great communicator and writer. The fact that he cannot get people to UNDERSTAND him is frustrating him.
 
He will definitely grift on the election coverage. Or at least, attempt to do so... He will probably not take in as much as he could have had he developed into an actual commentary style channel with people to do research for him, but he will make something telling people what they want to hear and relying on the veneer of respect he gets as a barred attorney.
His brain is too rotted to competently cover the election. His midterm stream was a disaster. Only the stupidest Q boomer will follow him at this point.

Fuck. He's going to make a million dollars, isn't he?
Nicks not grinning if the meats not spinning.
I understood that reference.
Drink your Ovaltine.
I think he expected you to say you were Kayla. Or we are both Kayla. Or everyone is Kayla. If you were lurking during the Cynthia disaster you would get the reference.
 
His brain is too rotted to competently cover the election. His midterm stream was a disaster. Only the stupidest Q boomer will follow him at this point.

Fuck. He's going to make a million dollars, isn't he?

I understood that reference.

I think he expected you to say you were Kayla. Or we are both Kayla. Or everyone is Kayla. If you were lurking during the Cynthia disaster you would get the reference.

Cows are resilient. It gives them te ability to be properly milked. Look at DSP.

RE: trial streaming content:

People will watch him. His core fanatics and the new ones who stumble upon him.

If he wanted to do regular trials, it is a shame he alientated these people who could do some heavy lifting on his show if they collaborated:

Screenshot_20231105_233350.jpg


Archive
 
Last edited:
If he wanted to do regular trials, it is a shame he alientated these people who could do some heavy lifting on his show if they collaborated:
Lol what’s the story there? I’ve watched and liked a few of their videos and didn’t realize they’d had the misfortune to cross paths with Rekieta.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scout Trooper
Because Nick needs the disclaimer when he reads this, this is my speculative opinion:

From what I have seen of Nick, he seems to be a very shallow person who is able to understand and somewhat articulate that he 'does not like something', but much less capable at clearly stating why or coming up with a cogent rebuttal. We all here know, I am sure, that arguments on the internet are never really won (unless you have a sex tape or felony conviction come out post facto) and trolls will be trolls, so ignoring tosspots is required. Nick seems incapable of that, and further, he appears to lack any solid principled defence of his own actions and opinions. I am not the most articulate person myself, nor skilled in conveying my thoughts--hampered by autism and other flaws--, but I suppose this REALLY bothers Nick because he has billed himself as a great communicator and writer. The fact that he cannot get people to UNDERSTAND him is frustrating him.
I was recently talking in real time to a current streamer who is approximately in this space.

The question on the table: What is a win? This person is very frustrated by Nick.

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu you are a win. @elb is a win. Null is a win. Supporting actors like Sean, Hydro PX, Bernie, Cynthia, Claire, PepsiMan - lots of this thread - an absolute win.

He's a mess, he's in decline. YET, he'll muddle through and rage at critcs. Failing up and all that.

Failing up is hardly new. See the next candidates (both parties) for President.

But, if nothing in the last year proves anything, it is some kind of victory.
 
I think he expected you to say you were Kayla. Or we are both Kayla. Or everyone is Kayla. If you were lurking during the Cynthia disaster you would get the reference.
I understood the reference.
RE: trial streaming content:

People will watch him. His core fanatics and the new ones who stumble upon him.
I don't think the question is if people would watch him. It's if he could make it through it. Every vacation he comes back with new ideas, passions, vigor, etc. But they all whimper out in exponentially shorter intervals. But perhaps there might be enough pressure to force him to. If you believe him and his sycophants, he has a great income and doesn't need to change anything.
 
I understood the reference.

I don't think the question is if people would watch him. It's if he could make it through it. Every vacation he comes back with new ideas, passions, vigor, etc. But they all whimper out in exponentially shorter intervals. But perhaps there might be enough pressure to force him to. If you believe him and his sycophants, he has a great income and doesn't need to change anything.
Welcome! How was Halloween? Who's Kalea? I forget.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Post Reply
Ooooo shit, i just read the title of the thread the first time. he's Minnesotan everything about him makes so much more sense. His nose. His tactics.

If he was from anywhere else he'd just get into real fights that concluded instead of this gay shit.
 
(3) The pearl clutching about not posting publicly available pictures of children is getting old. You forget where you are.
Tbh I'd rather not see the kids here. Anyone else is fair game. Not going to throw a tard tantrum about it, though, I'd just rather not.
Not really. Nick will talk in vague terms about the farms being wrong. When pressed to be specific in public, he will claim that it would be unfair to his critics to talk specifics in the open.
Which is absolute bullshit. Also like he has critics. No, I am not a "critic." The rest of us aren't either. We're just people calling a fucking retard a fucking retard. It's not criticism. It's just a statement of the absolutely fucking obvious.

So just say whatever the fuck you think is wrong you cringing little pussy. Nobody is intimidated by it at all. Because you are the wrong one. About everything.

And I'll just list a half dozen off the top of my head because I am not a complete faggot. Your moronic take on grave desecration being groovy. Your idea that vandalizing someone's property is totally awesome. Your lame, fagged-up Balldo shit. Thinking that accusing someone of the literal crime of sucking little boys' dicks is not obviously defamation per se. Thinking you are remotely the kind of person who should be driving a Mustang home in the winter with summer tires. Literally everything you said about relationships and women, I mean every bit of that shit was what a homosexual cocksucker would say.

And I could spend a day coming up with these all day long while barely even thinking because "shit Rekieta is wrong about" is almost coterminous with the list of "literally anything Rekieta says at all ever" these days.
 
Last edited:
Ooooo shit, i just read the title of the thread the first time. he's Minnesotan everything about him makes so much more sense. His nose. His tactics.

If he was from anywhere else he'd just get into real fights that concluded instead of this gay shit.
He's actually a Texan. He was born and raised in a Houston ghetto and had to endure seeing the racisms daily. He remains emotionally impacted by hearing fellow youths called "nigger" by frightening white supremacist bus drivers. He had to flee to the other side of the country just to stop the night terrors.
 
I don't know if I agree with you that the daytime slot was key, though it was certainly half of it. I don't think he would have been as successful without the fact there were trials going. His success came down to, in large part, to the fact you could either watch him, or watch some shitty bias MSM coverage that painted Heard as a victim, and Rittenhouse as a murderer. Moreover, I think he realized (correctly) that assembling a panel to review the day's footage at night time wouldn't have worked as well because it's a subject where you need to strike while the iron is white hot. The audience that watched him was the audience that wanted up-to-the-minute coverage. That means doing it live. If he didn't do it, the true crime wine moms would have gone elsewhere and skipped him entirely.

I think this is one of these things where he wants the world to revolve around him, and he honestly felt that his personality played a big role in his success. That if he did something else, people would keep flocking to him no matter what he did. He's overestimating his own abilities, and underestimating the interest people had in the subject matter he used to cover. Maddox is interesting. Weebwars is interesting (some people on the Farms found it lame, but the numbers don't lie). Amber Heard and Rittenhouse were very interesting. Balldos, cooming, and Dick's ridiculous obsession with Eric July, not so much. The numbers aren't lying there either.
I'm so fucking behind so I apologize, what exactly were the weeb wars anyway? I never really looked into detail and don't remember anything about it.


Oh right, he'd taken that case because he was friends with the guilty party and wanted to help her get a lighter sentence. Her excuse was that she was so upset when she found out her husband was secretly gay that she was forced to become a white collar criminal to save her marriage. Utter nonsense.
This literally goes against some of the base principals of legal shit.
Fuck. In collections, you aren't allowed to handle anything to do with people you are close to or have a grudge against. Attourneys are not allowed to help family or friends under any circumstance. What an utter retard.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
what exactly were the weeb wars anyway?

Like alot of different areas of culture, english-language anime fandom started fracturing along political lines in the mid-2010s. Mutual contempt and hostility turned into open warfare in January 16, 2019 when a nobody named Allison Cooke made a bunch of serious accusations against anime voice actor Vic Mignogna on twitter. In particular that he was a "homophobe" and that he was "creepy to underage fans".
The political situation was so toxic and stupid that the tweet led to just about everyone in the anime community choosing a side and going to war. Within about two weeks, Vic Mignogna was banned from appearing at a long list of anime related events and effectively blacklisted by the major english language anime studios.
Things eventually ended up in a lawsuit between Vic Mignogna and a number of people. Nick Rekieta attached himself to the drama and milked it for all it was worth. So did any number of other e-celebrities on youtube. Fighting in the weeb wars opened on all sorts of different fronts with all sorts of different groups of people. Some were fighting over politics. Others were fighting over long-term grudges and drama within the extended weeb community. There were also opportunists and the usual selection of just plain mentally unstable weebs taking advantage of the situation to act out. Things eventually descended into total insanity.
Everyone eventually reached a point of mutual exhaustion (IMO), they forgot why they were fighting each other and the weeb wars came to an merciful end.
 
Back