US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
They voted in a majority that is currently championing child genital mutilation, child sterilization, and aid to terror groups that cook children alive.
I'd say morality is not just lost, it's inverted.
Gotta take small victories when you can even though nowadays up is down and down is up. As far as the state House of Delegates goes for Virginia, unfortunately the northern part of the state has been colonized by D.C. and Richmond has seen better days. Everything is a big test for Youngkin as well which doesn't seem to be going well.
 
No to casinos, yes to infanticide and troon shit.
Another state that deserves everything it has coming. The contaminated water and mini-chernobyl while being forsaken by your politik-masters is only the beginning.

Don't be surprised. We live in a decaying empire populated by hedonists and halfwits. society that allowed women to vote.
FTFY, sorta. You were right originally too.
 
No to casinos, yes to infanticide and troon shit.
Let's not pretend this isn't also the GOP's utter failure.

  • They've been spitting on their base very publicly for the past 2 years(more like 6), with more than half of GOP congressmen stabbing the people's choice for speaker in the back less than a month ago.
  • They've failed to ice out marxist media and assemble their own counter-messaging system, opting instead to walk into a rigged propaganda game and play the fool.
  • They've failed to stand up for Dobbs and present a sane compromise between post-birth child murder and "sorry suzie you have to have your rapist's baby"
  • They've failed to set up a ground game to harvest ballots and early votes.
  • They've failed to finance important races for 3 cycles in a row at all levels.
They blame all the above on Trump and expect us to be stupid enough to believe them.

Anyone who is in a position to should be looking to oust their national gop committeemen for their state and find a replacement willing to oust Ronna (Romney) McDaniel, because she's been a fucking disaster.
 
Yeah they're not going to stop, common problem when people do horrid shit with no consequences.
Marines are actually still doing fine with meeting recruiting goals because of their comparatively prestigious reputation. It's the other branches that are fucked.
View attachment 5476148
:story:

Bro you realize most of their "recruitment" much like what the other branches have done, is counting people who re-enlist. They're not getting any more new blood than the rest of the armed forces as far as I'm aware.
Cannot believe my state just enshrined infanticide into its constitution. Every time I see women turn out in droves for abortion it makes me that much more misogynistic despite the fact that I am also a woman.
bigthink1 - Copy.png

I'm sure it's just a problem in PA.
Vivek actually laid out how you really purge them.
Vivek is a plastic retard, more obvious a plant even than DeSantis. Every time I've had the misfortune of hearing that cocksucker on a podcast it's clear that the guy's on the same intellectual level as MTG, just with more self-awareness.

Any "plan" he has ought to be thrown in the garbage unless he stole it wholesale from someone else and even then, double checked as a measure to see if the reason he agrees with it is due to how smooth-brained it is or not. Guy's the right-wing equivalent of that dipshit Yang.
 
Any "plan" he has ought to be thrown in the garbage
Did you ever look into that ruling?
It's something else.
It's "Chutkan" levels of judicial corruption.
Supremes appointed by the opposition party declared it "takings" for the current leadership to fire their guys.

Article 2 was nullified by that ruling.
I don't think vivek would do anything but start more fucking foreign wars like a good little neocon plant.
That doesn't change the fact that it is a good idea to relitigate that by firing a fuck ton of corrupt FBI and fighting all the way to the supreme court on this.
 
Did you ever look into that ruling?
It's something else.
It's "Chutkan" levels of judicial corruption.
Supremes appointed by the opposition party declared it "takings" for the current leadership to fire their guys.

Article 2 was nullified by that ruling.
I don't think vivek would do anything but start more fucking foreign wars like a good little neocon plant.
That doesn't change the fact that it is a good idea to relitigate that by firing a fuck ton of corrupt FBI and fighting all the way to the supreme court on this.
Fighting all the way to the supreme court and wasting a shitload of time, effort, and resources only for them to say "lol nah sorry" and set in stone that you actually can't fire them.

Great plan. A real Vivek Ramalamadingdong™ production. Consider the possibility that if he's a "good neocon plant" that his plans fall in line with what neocon interests are and what that might mean.
 
Fighting all the way to the supreme court and wasting a shitload of time, effort, and resources only for them to say "lol nah sorry" and set in stone that you actually can't fire them.
100 year old ruling by commies facing the court that overturned roe.
I like my chances.
Or you could just not even try fighting back because you might lose.
 
100 year old ruling by commies facing the court that overturned roe.
I like my chances.
Or you could just not even try fighting back because you might lose.
Or you could stop being a one-step thinker and consider the possibility that plans that sound great on their face might have unintended consequences worse than the problem being faced to begin with.

You seem to misunderstand, I get the appeal of "fire every unelected three-letter agency faggot with seniority greater than a year on the first day of office, and fight each and every asshole trying to claw their way back into position in the courts" and I've even said shit similar as a meme answer to the corrupt feds issue myself.

There's layers of problems that would cause though and the realistic consequence is that the USSC just tells him to go fuck himself to save face. They'd probably react to such shenanigans no better than they have any of Biden's similar bullshit and frankly I couldn't blame them given the headache that would cause.

Trying it with the heads of each branch would be a simpler and easier way to go about it if that's what was being attempted, but the cold reality of the situation shows that you're not going to "fix" that problem any more than the RINO problem can be fixed via voting in new replacements.

If I were somehow to get a word into Trump's team the first thing I'd want him to do as a "plan" is go on a "releasing unredacted documents to the public that were created/classified during the Biden admin" spree before any of that shit.
 
here's layers of problems that would cause though and the realistic consequence is that the USSC just tells him to go fuck himself to save face. They'd probably react to such shenanigans no better than they have any of Biden's similar bullshit and frankly I couldn't blame them given the headache that would cause.
Biden has been writing laws via bureaucrats, violating entire articles of the constitution, which is why he gets his ass handed to him.
The argument for firing corrupt feds is simple: you either have an article 2 presidential authority over the executive or you do not.

Trying it with the heads of each branch would be a simpler
The heads are not the problem, the corruption is root and branch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bland Crumbs
Biden has been writing laws via bureaucrats, violating entire articles of the constitution, which is why he gets his ass handed to him.
The argument for firing corrupt feds is simple: you either have an article 2 presidential authority over the executive or you do not.
Yeah and the USSC would tell him "you don't", because:
the corruption is root and branch.
 
And we're back to "we just should stop trying and just lay down for the boot because it might be harrrd"
Let me explain the point for you.

If your goal was to get the unilateral ability to fire anyone and/or everyone in, say, the FBI you'd not want to approach it by literally announcing on day 1 that you're going to fire everyone in the FBI. In fact you'd want to make it clear as crystal that you want to fire specific high-ranking people or even just the director and nobody else.

That way you'd waste a lot less time and taxpayer dollars in the courts, if it goes south you've accomplished the same outcome you would've if you had gone about it the retarded way without making nearly as much an ass of yourself and without doing your part to Zimbabwe-ify the dollar.

If it actually starts to go somewhere and the argument being used in front of the USSC is that the president has complete control over the executive including the highest non-president members, the USSC is more likely to agree with this if the consequence of entire branches of the federal government being fired simultaneously, and them being the reason it was allowed to happen, isn't on their mind when making the decision.

When I quoted your "root and branch" comment that's what I meant. They're not going to give Trump the unilateral capacity to fire anyone he wants because they damn well know that he'd fire everybody to thunderous applause, and they (the USSC) wouldn't be invited to any fancy dinners or kid-fucking pool parties anymore. The people there aren't that damn stupid.

And even if he had the capacity to do that, or won it in the courts, the only people who would be 'qualified' for the position would be cut from the same cloth, and the only people signing up to be feds would also be of the same ilk, and we' be right back to square one but possibly billions more dollars in the hole as a country.

Fucking think. Think more than one step and in more than one direction when considering shit like this, holy fucking shit.
 
Pollster Rich Baris angrilly pointing out he said this was going to happen will never not be funny.

Everyone going ‘Trump’s fault’ never listens to every sane person saying ‘you only win the Trump voter if you support Trump and/or he’s on the ballot and/or he is the face of your platform’ and then they are always shocked when they do none of that why they lose.

Everybody was telling the GOP they’d lose if they went silly on abortion, which they did.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back