Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Potatoherder]

An ok night on rumble but YT took the lead by a lot at $532. 190 hits for "kurt " and 153 for "megan ". Obviously some drama happened.

This must have stung:

SCMedic71

So Rob is not only a practicing lawyer, but he is still practicing becoming a Youtuber as well.

$5

------------------------
Total Rumbles: $ 206
Rumble Count: 35 ( 19 )
Conversion Rate Raw: 0.6856023506366308 ( Adjusted: 0.372% )
Peak Viewers: 5105
Peaked time: 2023-11-11 02:39:48.995356476 -0600 CST m=+24855.643169580
------------------------
Chat Messages: 5314 ( 422 unique )
Muted: 0
Deleted: 0
Unknown: 1
------------------------
StreamID: 229118215
Start: 2023-11-10 21:39:50.056337479 -0600 CST m=+6856.704150583
End: 2023-11-11 04:12:09.679039485 -0600 CST m=+30396.326852589
------------------------
StreamURL: https://rumble.com/v3v06hs-take-car...law-and-lumber-megan-fox-maybe-others-go.html
------------------------

 

[Captain Manning]

In regards to what?

The amount of money you earn for superchat equivalents, across all platforms, on MATI. You know, when you go into "shill mode." Some night's Rekieta is barely making three figures. I'm just wondering if you'll pulling in more money than him from MATI now.

 

[AnOminous]

This is an incorrect understanding of what Jesus was saying.

It's a deliberate warping of it to serve his coom-brained hedonism.

maybe i am overreacting. do real lawyers have the ability to separate their lawyer stuff in their profession and be normal in the outside world?

Some lawyers, even non-practicing ones, are unable to pick up on social cues. This is sometimes called things like "autism."

But in those days, you weren't getting through unless you mastered the material. I'm not sure universities are like that any more.

Unless it's specifically a philosophy of law type course, you don't see much Kant. You're a lot more likely to see a bunch of consequentialist ethics, like Hart, Bentham, Austin, etc.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

An ok night on rumble but YT took the lead by a lot at $532. 190 hits for "kurt " and 153 for "megan ". Obviously some drama happened.

Does this mean that Rekieta can only make money drama farming these days or that he missed out on a boatload of cash for skipping this trial until the end? Or both? The wine moms seemed to love this case.

He made $738 last night when usually these days he's at $100-200.

Did he just give up on switching to rumble? One would think a show like this would be ones he'd be switching to rumble for religiously. Seems like an ok panel from what I saw, talking about a subject that isn't old news (afaik) yet, has to do minimal work, and could be a converter.

Why would he care about converting users? He usually seems most punctual about the switch on boring last week's politics news articles shows where nobody, inclusive of the host, cares. On the large panel shows where he's having any fun he tends to forget.

 

[Null]

The amount of money you earn for superchat equivalents, across all platforms, on MATI. You know, when you go into "shill mode." Some night's Rekieta is barely making three figures. I'm just wondering if you'll pulling in more money than him from MATI now.

I don't have an opaque way to really compare incomes. I would wager I probably make more per hour streaming, but a lot of what people give me I'm pretty sure is in part because of work I do for the forum.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

YT comments on latest stream seems to imply it turned into a shitshow between kurt and megan again but I can't be arsed to look into it. Hope elb comes through.

Elb delivered fast.

 

[Not Even Twice]

I've heard this Maya case mentioned a few times, but life has been too busy lately to really watch a whole lot of coverage.

Does anyone know of a youtuber or similar that gives a good tl;dr about the whole thing? I know virtually nothing about it.

 

[Potatoherder]

Does this mean that Rekieta can only make money drama farming these days or that he missed out on a boatload of cash for skipping this trial until the end? Or both? The wine moms seemed to love this case.

He made $738 last night when usually these days he's at $100-200.

I don't think he could have covered the Maya case in a way that wouldn't make him look like a monster. His brain has been so warped by porn that it doesn't matter the girl is 17 and was abused in every way imaginable. He would have to make the jokes at her expense.

 

[sneedem&feedem]

I've heard this Maya case mentioned a few times, but life has been too busy lately to really watch a whole lot of coverage.

Does anyone know of a youtuber or similar that gives a good tl;dr about the whole thing? I know virtually nothing about it.

Potentially Criminal briefly covered it on Thursday.

 

[Niggaurd]

Elb delivered fast.

Couldn't keep watching after rob started crying about muh institutions' feelings being hurt. He seemed pretty inoffensive when Nick first started having him on, but good lord, Balldo really knows how to pick em huh? Anyone who watched the rest know if Nick gets butthurt by Rob's "practicing lawyer" comment at least?
On the last episode of Kurt V Megan I was on Kurt's side despite him giving his arguments in the worst possible way, here he just seems petty & butthurt that he has to share balldo time with her again. Megan actually has a point, but no one really looks good here.

 

[Anticipointment]

I've heard this Maya case mentioned a few times, but life has been too busy lately to really watch a whole lot of coverage.

Does anyone know of a youtuber or similar that gives a good tl;dr about the whole thing? I know virtually nothing about it.

Peter Tragos, “Lawyer You Know” on YouTube didn’t stream the whole thing but did some trial day & verdict recaps.
He’s also recently covered Charlie Adelson, & updates with Sarah Boone, Murdaugh, Kohlberger, Delphi, etc.
Check videos under “live” as well as regular videos because he does both. Most are not too long & get to the point quickly.
He’s a busy Practicing Lawyer.

 

[Honey's Dead]

I never thought I would end this year hoping for Nick to suffer due to his own stupidity and for Ethan Ralph to have a possible redemption arc....

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

If his views on subjects like religion are anything to go on he probably has some gay definition of monogamy where it doesn't count if you're next to her holding her hand

The typical copes on sex for someone like Nick who also advances legalistic definitions of sin would be:

- The ONLY thing that counts as sex is vaginal penetration with a human penis. Anything goes otherwise.
- All gay sex isn't really sex of any kind. It also doesn't count as far as monogamy goes.

Nick has also earlier this year presented the idea that the Sermon on the Mount actually approves of married people flirting with people outside their marriage.

Nick's new innovation in storytelling tonight was claiming that all those gosh darn false stories about Nick being a swinger caused all kinds of swingers to introduce themselves to innocent Nick who had no idea of such things. And according to Nick they were all just swell people,

Nick keeps slowly moving toward public Jack Murphy territory step by step. First it was that Nick had to do degenerate things to have a healthy marriage. Then it was wine mom lewds and bottles in the ass. Then it was bragging about trips to the gay bar. THen it was how the only rational career choice for any woman (aside from his own daughters) and that woman on onlyfans all had private islands & millions of dollars. Then it was defending Vito the Pedo. Then it was cuties. Now he is finally openly talking about what great people swingers are though carefully not saying he is one himself.

I'm sure that he is convinced himself that all this slow-drip gaslighting is somehow mentally bringing his audience along into his brave new degenerate world. But its all just dumb.

Openly talking about swingers in a positive way tonight is I think a big step for him toward some sort of massive public confession that he is in an open marriage or bisexual or gay or a juju-like degenerate. He needs to just get on with it.

Somewhere in the last 50 pages, he had a cope clip where he seriously made the proposition that (paraphrased) was 'What if my definitions are different than yours?'

Yes, very Bill Clinton. Nick will say that it is important to define terms, but it is a distraction to quibble and deflect.

Simply put, it is not possible to be a Christian and deny the divinity of Christ. It would be the equivalent of being a vegan but loving a big steak with dinner.

I would tend to agree, but some people would draw a distinction on the personhood/origin of Christ. (e.g. elevated man that was deified, a human prophet, spirit brother of Lucifer, versus a part/member/aspect of God), so I would make a qualification that some would quibble.

None of this makes sense but its also clear that Craig had a weak grasp on the lore and no idea the depths that this all goes to.

He seemed to have a vague idea that Nick's show has changed and also about the swinging rumors swirling around him but the Drexel super chat clearly went right over his head. I have a feeling Craig may be kicking himself seeing a comment section where the most upvoted comments are criticizing him for being too soft.

He said at the end that he did not always want to be confrontational. DSP was the exception because he ASKED for it and he did a bunch of research in advance for Phil.

 

[Mundane Ralph]

Ethan Ralph to have a possible redemption arc....

lmao

 

[Honey's Dead]

lmao

Not happening then? I haven't kept up with Ralph since the Horse bolted from the stable.

I thought he was sober too...

 

[Not Who You Think]

"Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." Matthew 5:27-28.

Some "Christian," literally lying about the Bible.

Nick is inverting the severity of sin as described by Christ.

Christ was equivocating looking and lusting with the act of adultery to elevate the severity of looking and lusting in the eyes of His audience. This is because people tend to think they are better than others because they haven't overtly sinned. Christ's message is meant to address this by escalating/broadening their perception of sin and addressing the heart.

Nick takes this as meaning that neither are really bad because everyone does it, and if it is bad, it's okay because Christ has that covered. Predictably, Nick is being very charitable toward himself regarding the Lord's judgement. It bears repeating that repentance does not include saying "it's okay", "it's not that bad", or other weasel words to save face. Alternatively, telling someone else their sins are "okay" or "not that bad" to make them feel better and make themselves more appealing (a la cool youth pastor is isn't like those other Christians) isn't recommended if one hopes to foster a mature relationship with God.

 

[Mundane Ralph]

Not happening then? I haven't kept up with Ralph since the Horse bolted from the stable.

I thought he was sober too...

It's definitely not happening. He's just being quiet right now because he's been buck broken but just give it some time. He never actually quits xanax or alcohol, he just cuts back while he's live and pretends to be sober. I'd expect another pillstream before the end of the year.

 

[Honey's Dead]

It's definitely not happening. He's just being quiet right now because he's been buck broken but just give it some time. He never actually quits xanax or alcohol, he just cuts back while he's live and pretends to be sober. I'd expect another pillstream before the end of the year.

In other words I was too optimistic LOL.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

I would tend to agree, but some people would draw a distinction on the personhood/origin of Christ. (e.g. elevated man that was deified, a human prophet, spirit brother of Lucifer, versus a part/member/aspect of God), so I would make a qualification that some would quibble.

I promise I'm not trying to get into the weeds or derail the thread on this, but no, you cannot be a Christian in the modern Western or Eastern sense and not believe in the divinity of Christ. This was hammered out in the First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. Out of this came the Nicene Creed which explicitly states

Spoiler: Segment of the Creed

"...We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
consubstantial to the father.
Through him all things were made.
For us and for our salvation
he came down from heaven:
by the power of the Holy Spirit
he became incarnate from the Virgin Mary,
and was made man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered death and was buried.
On the third day he rose again
in accordance with the Scriptures;
he ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father..."

So no, unless you believe in Jesus Christ, who is both fully God and fully man, you cannot be a Christian. It is impossible by definition.

 

[Bowl of Ramen]

Can Kurt hatesex Megan already? He’s angry because he just wants a little crumb.

What an insufferable group of people, except maybe the elf.