Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 129 37.7%

  • Total voters
    342
"No guys, you don't understand, swingers are everywhere! At your church, the grocery store, the doctor's office, you'd be surprised!"

How would you know, Nicky? How would you know about this ubiquitous and plentiful cabal of swingers? You being such a monogamous man who for some reason wants to build a sex dungeon in your house?

Also what the fuck is he doing on a podcast called sidescrollers? Nick doesn't play games anymore, he can't even muster the energy to fake being into video games nowadays.
I don't know man, maybe I haven't dug deep enough but to me, the sidescrollers podcast talks about very surface level video game stuff. Nothing really deep or niche.
 
Nick's new innovation in storytelling tonight was claiming that all those gosh darn false stories about Nick being a swinger caused all kinds of swingers to introduce themselves to innocent Nick who had no idea of such things. And according to Nick they were all just swell people,
It was so extremely transparent and I'm sure he thought he was being such a clever gaslighter. Watching Craig's face while he says some of this stuff was a treat.

The most amazing way this could go would be be if he ends up claiming that the evil lying detractors were wrong when they claimed he was a swinger before but after being accused of it he met a ton of swingers and they were all so nice they decided to try it.

I'm sure that he is convinced himself that all this slow-drip gaslighting is somehow mentally bringing his audience along into his brave new degenerate world. But its all just dumb.

Openly talking about swingers in a positive way tonight is I think a big step for him toward some sort of massive public confession that he is in an open marriage or bisexual or gay or a juju-like degenerate. He needs to just get on with it.
I think it's a big fucking deal.

This is the most positive he's been about swingers or swinging that I can recall, and by a big margin.
 
Did he just give up on switching to rumble? One would think a show like this would be ones he'd be switching to rumble for religiously. Seems like an ok panel from what I saw, talking about a subject that isn't old news (afaik) yet, has to do minimal work, and could be a converter.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Peace Through Power
What's new is his explicit defense of how swingers are normal people and complaining that the idea of swinging is taken too harshly because of incorrect religious doctrine.
If being a cuck is so normal and good, then why does he deny it so strenuously?
Nick has also earlier this year presented the idea that the Sermon on the Mount actually approves of married people flirting with people outside their marriage.
"Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." Matthew 5:27-28.

Some "Christian," literally lying about the Bible.
 
Last edited:
Once I said "Balldo-Bros" I knew I had to do it. This took an uncomfortable amount of time to complete for how simple it is. This was actually fun to do, I might do more of other funny game parodies if I find time.

SuperBalldoBros.jpg

Shoutout to Chibitzen for the sweet Balldo vector, it was extremely helpful for this creation, and I'm sure many more to come.
 
"Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." Matthew 5:27-28.
Nick brings this up in his 30 minute diatribe about religion. He uses it as an excuse to say basically everyone will immediately fail when they look at a beautiful woman. This is an incorrect understanding of what Jesus was saying. My understanding of 'lust' in terms of the sin, is that it isn't simply sexual desire, but a mindset/thought process leading to something akin to sexual obsession. For example, I believe Aquinas even says you can lust after your wife in a harmful way. Sexual desire itself isn't a sin, as that is a natural subconscious response of the body. Same with hunger, you can't help but feel hunger as a living being. But hunger can lead to gluttony, which is a pattern of behavior that is abusive to the body. Same with sexual desire leading to lust.
 
Openly talking about swingers in a positive way tonight is I think a big step for him toward some sort of massive public confession that he is in an open marriage or bisexual or gay or a juju-like degenerate. He needs to just get on with it.
Agreed 100%. Fully expecting him to become one of those people who calls it "ethical non-monogamy".
 
View attachment 5482548

Saw this on twitter and thought of Nick lol
I'll believe it when I can actually see the study and not a press pre-proof. (particularly because they don't have much relevant data such as age, gender and the degree of recovery we're talking about elaborated on, or any way to check how age affects this, if at all)

And even that pre-proof says the return is heavily diminished in patients with co-morbidities such as cigarrette use history, psychiatric disorders (Nick) and substance abuse disorders (Nick).

Even in the miraculous case he stops drinking (lol) he's got better odds at winning the powerball than his brain returning to what it was.

tl;dr Nick has BROKEN BRAIN, unfixable.
I just assume Lady Gollum has a huge stretched out snatch from all the weird sextoys/swinging/kids/getting fisted/whatever. It's the only way I could imagine the balldo not being excruciatingly painful to use.

I mean, othrwise? Putting your nuts in a truss thing to force them to say parallel and then shoving all that into your wife and stimulating her to orgasm - that doesn't sound like fun. A ruptured testicle is what it sounds like.
 
Last edited:
Kant would beg to differ at rather extensive length.

When I first saw that comment, it was the first thing that struck me. I was like, "Do they not teach Kant at law schools any more these days?"

I did my masters at a faculty of law and spent many hours painfully grappling with the categorical imperative in jurisprudence/epistimology class. But in those days, you weren't getting through unless you mastered the material. I'm not sure universities are like that any more.
 
I miss when heresy was novel, like with Catharism. Nick's brand of "if you read the Bible with one hand over your eyes and one hand on your dick, it actually supports total degeneracy" is so low-effort and self-serving that it's unnecessary to make a counterargument, since it's clear he hasn't seriously thought about the texts in question except as vehicles for his beliefs. Kind of like CWC, come to think of it...dear God, Nick really is the final boss of all lolcows.
 
"me and my wife are monogamous".
this reminds me of bill clinton's definition of sex.
The typical copes on sex for someone like Nick who also advances legalistic definitions of sin would be:

- The ONLY thing that counts as sex is vaginal penetration with a human penis. Anything goes otherwise.
- All gay sex isn't really sex of any kind. It also doesn't count as far as monogamy goes.
i hate these lawyers. why can you motherfuckers keep your lawyer logic and language in the court room and have a normal conversation in real life?

maybe i am overreacting. do real lawyers have the ability to separate their lawyer stuff in their profession and be normal in the outside world? maybe rekieta, the non-practicing "lawyer", is imitating what he thinks a lawyer should act like.
I don't know man, maybe I haven't dug deep enough but to me, the sidescrollers podcast talks about very surface level video game stuff. Nothing really deep or niche.
i did not watch the podcast, but, judging from the response here, it appears the host did a surface level interview and the only research he did was through twitter replies and the first page of googling rekiteta's name.

i think most podcast start off as fans of their subject matter. when they do interviews of the subject matter in their wheel house, their interviews will come across as knowledgeable and insightful. outside of their subject matter, i am resigned to the fact that these podcast interviews will come across as amateurish or surface level. most of the hosts are not trained journalist or investigators, so they don't know how to do the deep research required to do an insightful interview outside the podcast's field of expertise. you would think these podcast would want to improve the quality of their content, but "good enough" is now the standard because quantity if more profitable than quality.
 
He's now literally everything he used to profess to despise, and maybe always was.
I think that is the issue, He seemed like this genuine trad religious guy with the nice family etc.

But then the mask slipped, and for quite a while I used to deny it, hell I disliked the farms for being assholes... But then I started to see all the things people on here would point out and I was like I can't defend it anymore. Now I am part of the assholes on KF's :D.

I ignored the heavy drinking (Something that affected my childhood), I ignored the over sharing etc... While I can't say what was the exact moment that I went fuck Nick.

But I am glad I have. So fuck you Nick, my regret is ever giving you a penny.
 
Yeah, just over $150. Ralph numbers, maybe sub-Ralph numbers actually, not sure. Nobody in his audience cares or maybe even knows who the guy is nor cares about the topics they were discussing. He told people who wanted "serious" law or politics discussion to fuck off.
It is possible Null is earning more donation comments from MATI now than Nick is from his own show?

It sure feels like it.

@Null, would it be okay to ask what your take was from yesterday's show or the show before?
 
Back