@zrm's favorite website became faster, user-friendlier, and five times more popular under FBI control.
This is too terrible for words.
This is too terrible for words.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@zrm's favorite website became faster, user-friendlier, and five times more popular under FBI control.
This is too terrible for words.
No.Counterpoint: they weren't actively producing it, just using it as bait. But yeah, usually stings are not allowed to break laws. At this point, I'd leave it to the courts to settle this.
Counterpoint: they weren't actively producing it, just using it as bait. But yeah, usually stings are not allowed to break laws. At this point, I'd leave it to the courts to settle this.
Yeah, the FBI thinks we should just "trust them". Nevermind with shit like this, and how they would rather drop cases rather than discuss their use of Stingrays.This kind of shit is still happening even after the total PR disaster over the DEA's cartel gunrunning operation?
You're supposed to do this in another post.Sorry for double post.
Some more articles on the matter:
http://www.govtech.com/public-safet...Sparks-Controversy-Over-Internet-Privacy.html
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle...orn-sting-puts-internet-privacy-in-crossfire/
I hate VICE and despise Alternet, but these next two pieces are still worth your time:
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/la...-ran-better-when-it-was-taken-over-by-the-fbi
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liber...-weeks-and-what-does-it-mean-internet-privacy
This is some Winter-Hill-Gang shit.
Just like the stingray cases. In the stingray case, they let a drug dealer go, here they let a pedophile walk free because their hacking techniques are more precious.Last month, U.S. District Judge Robert Bryan in Tacoma threw out the evidence in one of the first “Operation Pacifier” prosecutions, involving a Vancouver school employee named Jay Michaud. The reason: The FBI has refused a court order to reveal to Michaud’s defense attorneys the nature of the Tor vulnerability or how the NIT works.
No, they're smiling because entrapment can be grounds to dismiss a case.Lol, so a bunch of pedos are whining that they shouldn't go to jail because "we didn't know we were getting our kiddy porn from the FBI".
It doesn't matter how nasty the bastards in blatant entrapment cases are. The FBI could've busted R. Kelly in this sting and even a lobotomised DA would render the whole case worthless.Lol, so a bunch of pedos are whining that they shouldn't go to jail because "we didn't know we were getting our kiddy porn from the FBI".
Just like the stingray cases. In the stingray case, they let a drug dealer go, here they let a pedophile walk free because their hacking techniques are more precious.
What the fuck use is their hacking technique if they can't actually convict anyone with it?
Are they just addicted to their shiny toy?