Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

romancing options in rpgs are for gays and fujos, this is why SMT is better than Persona
The gay options always seem like they're written for women too, unless there's a fluke. It's why I don't go into games like that expecting much at all.
Seems to be true. But I'd say it's a distant second to their child as well.
They'll become jealous of attention that is given to the kid over them. I could go on but meh.
It goes both ways. And that's not even getting into the jealousy the children can feel as well. Weird shit honestly.
 
Saw this being shared on FB. Such an amazing point
IMG_3423.jpeg
Also it's worth noting that in a incredibly rare event, this post was actually made praising the male and it wasn't posted in a man-hating context (like how almost all viral social media posts are made). Actually a little mindblowing
 
I came across the old birth control discussion yesterday and was reminded that it's the perfect microcosm of (feminist) women having their cake, blaming men for it being the wrong size and flavor, eating it, and blaming men that it's gone.

It's fascinating how that goddamn pill can simultaneously be a god-sent human right that also came from Evil Dirty Pig Men doing Racist Eugenics testing but it's liberating the eternally-oppressed wimmins bodies but also it's an oppressive chore that the selfish men are FORCING them to do all the  work for contraception and there are life-ruining awful side-effects that we're "okay" with because we all. Love. Torturing. Poor. Women. As a favorite pasttime, but also those side effects barely happen and are propaganda from stinky men trying to scare women away from their own liberation, but also men are too weak to deal with the side-effects that women will silently soldier on with, because women are always burdened, always oppressed, always dealing with so much more pressure and attacks every day from all sides.

I'm frankly impressed that women can find a way to bitch about every single angle on a topic, including their polar opposite hypothetical mirror realities. Just letting you know that they'll be bitching about it literally no matter what you do, in any possible way, covering any possible future.
 
Just realized another thing I hate about women, my fellow young men would do well to learn this as soon as possible. As someone who's been in "the dating scene" for quite some time, there's nothing more emasculating than the humiliation ritual they call "dating." This goes beyond the usual shit-testing and talking about her exes and general disregard for boundaries. Women ACTIVELY try to longhouse men into submission. It starts out with little things like "LETS WEAR MATCHING OUTFITS!" "LETS GO TO TAYLOR SWIFT CONCERT!" "LETS GO TO THERAPY!!!" "LETS GO TO THE BLM MARCH!" "IF YOU DON'T GET THE VACCINE, WE'RE THROUGH!" Innocent enough, right? Perhaps she's just making sure her partner has high EQ, right? WRONG. As a potential mate, you have to participate in all of this shit or else she'll move on to the next guy on the carousel.

Women will never respect a weak man like this, It's simply biology. Every woman will tell you that seeing men get sensitive or emotional gives them the "ick." So why exactly are they so committed to the creation of an underclass of submissive simp cucks? I don't know, and I want no part in this stifling, dysgenic HR culture. I detest the thought of degrading myself into a softboi just for the chance to "grow old" with some stupid whore. I would rather knock up thousands of prostitutes and whores, evade child support for 50 years, and then die alone before I would ever date a foid.

Ultimately things like pornography addiction and troonyism benefit women, whether they acknowledge it or not. Everything that contributes towards the demoralization and feminization of men and larger society plays directly into the Feminist dyke hag agenda. Their vision of the future is a fat sheboon DEI'ed into institutional power, scolding and marginalizing men for being normal, forever.
 
Last edited:
Literally every woman will tell you that seeing men get sensitive or emotional gives them the "ick." So why exactly are they so committed to the creation of an underclass of submissive simp cucks?

Because it's a massive, society-wide shit test that we, as a culture, keep failing. When a woman shit-tests you, you're supposed to say "no." That's what she wants. If you say yes, she just keeps escalating the demands until you grow a pair and tell her "no." A woman will destroy everything around her and in her own life in an instinctive drive to get the man in her life to stop being such a cuck and start telling her "no."

So ultimately, the reason they keep demanding more power, and keep using that power to destroy things and make themselves increasingly unhappy is, paradoxically, they want men to stop giving them power and in fact take away the power they already have. There's an instinctive part of their brain that is hoping that, if they just make things awful enough - Perhaps having mandatory Faggot Celebration Day at work! Maybe castrating little boys to turn them into girls! - we'll realize we should be in charge and take power away from them.
 
Because it's a massive, society-wide shit test that we, as a culture, keep failing. When a woman shit-tests you, you're supposed to say "no." That's what she wants. If you say yes, she just keeps escalating the demands until you grow a pair and tell her "no." A woman will destroy everything around her and in her own life in an instinctive drive to get the man in her life to stop being such a cuck and start telling her "no."
the part of Self-Made Man where Norah talked about women being unattracted to her specifically because of doing and saying things women always claim they want men to do is always a laugh
 
Yeah it's like a open public background check if your online with an active viable presence than women can scroll through all of your media collect all your very now pubic information and compile their own background check on you.
Because privacy is for serial killers and nobody lies online or some shit.
That's only for the lazy ones.
The manic ones will run a full-fledged background check on you.
These are the ones who know your parents' party affiliations and shit.
Security questions like, "what was your mom's maiden name" and, "what street did you grow up on"... Completely unsafe
 
I also found the setting really odd, in retrospect. Usually the romance developed as a result of characters bonding over their mutual plight. But in BG3, it really just came down to, "Oi! Fancy a fuck, ole' chap?"



That's the other issue I had. In BG2, at least, if you didn't romance Aerie, then Haer'Dalis would romance her instead. If your PC is choosing to shack up with Karlach, for instance, then why wouldn't Gale start dating Shadowheart? It's like it's either your PC or they're forever single. That's fucked up.
I recall that Larian stated that they will fix romances and what not down the line in a future patch so players can avoid unwanted romantic interactions with companions as that was the number one complaint they got for the game. To be fair to Larian they stated that this was the first game of theirs that they implemented romances for and with the romances they mostly relied on player feedback during Early Access. One must remember the type of "fans" that infest D&D nowadays. Porn sick troons. It has gotten to the point that even our Feeder Lord has noticed a correlation between troonism and D&D. My guess is that troons would have thrown a fit if some companions were locked out of romances due to sexual preference. It is obvious that Gale and Minthara are coded as straight but we can't have companions have their own sexual preference as Jim Sterling and other troons would have gotten ass blasted and talked about how transphobic the game is due to companions not wanting to bone their dick girl character. A reminder that these people are a pestilence to every hobby they invade.
 
Last edited:
In other news, here's a victory for men against women:


In TN, Paternity Fraud will now be actively be punished by fines and jail time.
Between this and no individual income tax I'm sorely tempted. I don't think I could handle the summers, though.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cheeseknife
Just realized another thing I hate about women, my fellow young men would do well to learn this as soon as possible. As someone who's been in "the dating scene" for quite some time, there's nothing more emasculating than the humiliation ritual they call "dating." This goes beyond the usual shit-testing and talking about her exes and general disregard for boundaries. Women ACTIVELY try to longhouse men into submission. It starts out with little things like "LETS WEAR MATCHING OUTFITS!" "LETS GO TO TAYLOR SWIFT CONCERT!" "LETS GO TO THERAPY!!!" "LETS GO TO THE BLM MARCH!" "IF YOU DON'T GET THE VACCINE, WE'RE THROUGH!" Innocent enough, right? Perhaps she's just making sure her partner has high EQ, right? WRONG. As a potential mate, you have to participate in all of this shit or else she'll move on to the next guy on the carousel.

Women will never respect a weak man like this, It's simply biology. Literally every woman will tell you that seeing men get sensitive or emotional gives them the "ick." So why exactly are they so committed to the creation of an underclass of submissive simp cucks? I don't know, and I want no part in this stifling, dysgenic HR culture. I detest the thought of degrading myself into a softboi just for the chance to "grow old" with some stupid whore. I would rather knock up thousands of prostitutes and whores, evade child support for 50 years, and then die alone before I would ever date a foid.

Ultimately things like pornography addiction and troonyism benefit women, whether they acknowledge it or not. Everything that contributes towards the demoralization and feminization of men and larger society plays directly into the Feminist dyke hag agenda. Their vision of the future is a fat sheboon DEI'ed into institutional power, scolding and marginalizing men for being normal, forever.
Can you imagine loving someone that thinks like that? I can't, which is why I couldn't ever actually love a woman.
 
It is obvious that Gale and Minthara are coded as straight but we can't have companions have their own sexual preference as Jim Sterling and other troons would have gotten ass blasted and talked about how transphobic the game is due to companions not wanting to bone their dick girl character. A reminder that these people are a pestilence to every hobby they invade.
Romances being based on the sexuality of the player is ultimately for the best in games like that. It's all immersive fiction and putting up hard walls on game mechanics as an own on the gender blobs only serves to take away from the overall player experience. It doesn't stop the blobs from doing what they always do either.

A good way to make everyone happy is to have a system in place where NPCs will only start to feel affection for you if you initiate it. Unless you pick overtly flirty or romantic gestures, they will never come on to you (unless their character is more of a whore and prone to being more outgoing/inappropriate). Maybe even pull a Sims and allow players to pick their character's sexuality in the creator so that those gestures only ever appear for the proper sex they're attracted to.
Just goes to show, even when Null is wrong, he's 100% correct. When he replies, you nod, say, "Yes massa" and move on.
It makes you wonder what his ego is gonna be like if and when he does move on from the farms. I can't imagine it'd be good for you.
 
Back