Jackie Singh / Jacqueline Singh / Jacqueline Anne Stokes / Jax / @find_evil / HackingButLegal / @HackingButLegal / piggytomlinson - Cybersecurity "expert," wannabe journoscum, former "hacker"; gunt guards Patrick Tomlinson, currently picking a fight with ONA Forums, GNAA Groupie

Alright Kiwis, I give a lot of presentations for work and I’m gonna sperg about this atrocity. Consider me triggered. What a dogshit “keynote” presentation.

1) I do not know how long her presentation was supposed to be, but this is too fucking long even for one lasting an hour. You should only spend about 2 minutes on average per slide, and I’m being generous here for counting 37 slides with actual content on them. Usually you want to spend a minute or two on the intro, and that atrocious “credentials” slide should have been her second or third, not towards the fucking middle. There isn’t really a logical, progressive narrative either, just a bunch of word salads strung together. She is so fucking dumb omg.

2) Others have also pointed out that there is too much text here and they are right. Too much text tells me the speaker is not confident about what they are saying and havent prepared enough to hit the takeaways from any given slide and then wrap it up at the end. Basically, it’s all bullshit and you’re just reading off of slide because you don’t actually know your material. Worse, it is boring as hell. No one wants to sit through that.

3) The layout is inconsistent and ugly. I could use crayons to create more attractive slides, especially the ones with the matrices she just pulled straight from Excel. I’m surprised she even knew how to use conditional formatting.

4) It’s all obviously bullshit. No sources, and the definitions are all made up by her. She’s neither an expert in psychology nor tech, and so lacks any credibilty when it comes to forming new ideas or theses. If this presentation was about changing a tire on a military vehicle maybe this would be alright.

In conclusion (which Jackie does not have) Jackie’s slides are too long for even a lengthy keynote address and, much like her, they are ugly and boring. She lacks any credibility in this field and shits in the street.
 
exercise.png
no child.png
 
Alright Kiwis, I give a lot of presentations for work and I’m gonna sperg about this atrocity. Consider me triggered. What a dogshit “keynote” presentation.

1) I do not know how long her presentation was supposed to be, but this is too fucking long even for one lasting an hour. You should only spend about 2 minutes on average per slide, and I’m being generous here for counting 37 slides with actual content on them. Usually you want to spend a minute or two on the intro, and that atrocious “credentials” slide should have been her second or third, not towards the fucking middle. There isn’t really a logical, progressive narrative either, just a bunch of word salads strung together. She is so fucking dumb omg.

2) Others have also pointed out that there is too much text here and they are right. Too much text tells me the speaker is not confident about what they are saying and havent prepared enough to hit the takeaways from any given slide and then wrap it up at the end. Basically, it’s all bullshit and you’re just reading off of slide because you don’t actually know your material. Worse, it is boring as hell. No one wants to sit through that.

3) The layout is inconsistent and ugly. I could use crayons to create more attractive slides, especially the ones with the matrices she just pulled straight from Excel. I’m surprised she even knew how to use conditional formatting.

4) It’s all obviously bullshit. No sources, and the definitions are all made up by her. She’s neither an expert in psychology nor tech, and so lacks any credibilty when it comes to forming new ideas or theses. If this presentation was about changing a tire on a military vehicle maybe this would be alright.

In conclusion (which Jackie does not have) Jackie’s slides are too long for even a lengthy keynote address and, much like her, they are ugly and boring. She lacks any credibility in this field and shits in the street.
Great breakdown. I'm a wordy mutha and had to learn fast that business and science people can't read more than two sentences without their eyes glazing over. I used freelance presentation services for some of my more important decks, you'd think Snacky would have dropped a little money for help on these since she's been hyping it up for so long.

That copy/paste from Excel that still had the gridlines in it was brilliant, along with the totally rational 1 to 16 scale for Risk Value. It's like she's trying not to be taken seriously. I'd rate her a 4 on a scale of 1 to 38 for Seriousness Value.
 
You can request a person's redacted dd214. It's usually what journos do when they want to see your claim as a veteran
You aren't going to get a lot. It's just name, rank, date of birth, date of discharge, and type of discharge of the person.

In Jackie's case, it's just going to show she got an honorable discharge and she was an e5 when she got out. That is standard for folks getting forced out at their 8 year point.
 
I think we should also consider that despite her posturing on Twitter she was completely forgettable and meek and timid in person when a structure of real authority existed with real consequences.

She's an internet tough guy through and through. The more "popular" or "followed" someone is on pozzed social media, the more forgettable they'll be when you see them in person.
Security fags are so pozzed oh my god

itssoover.png
 
I would recommend anyone interested look into that Michael Nuccitelli person Jackie references - I've glanced over his online footprint before and he is an absolutely mentally disabled charlatan who's been at this grift of pseudo-pathologizing people he doesn't like online as psychopaths for the better part of a decade. It's a pretty sizeable rabbithole of complete and utter lunacy, and it is unbelievably embarassing that Jackie would cite this retard for what is supposed to be a professional presentation about actual threat actors.
 
But responding to literally every single anon on Twitter (now know as X) who just wants to fuck with you for shits and giggles does. Fatrick knows 🙂
Yet somehow, trolls don't relentlessly fuck with someone who never responds to them, because they're no fun.
Seems like she jumped on the Fatrick crusade in an attempt to make a name for herself. When did the swattings start in relation to her appearance?
Good point. She may be the leading suspect after Pat for who commissioned those.

Still, I'm not sure how she'd know exactly when Pat would be various places. She's a complete retard, after all.
 
So she just tossed together a bunch of shitty slides that look like her kid made them combined with some tech and buzzwords she doesn't full understand. What a fucking clown
Thats how you build your CV if you have no skills. Women can get into cyber sec easier because the barrier entry is very low. Some of the kiwi archivists can probably make these presentations.

It also looks like she took research from KF and slapped on her slides.
 
I want to start with the first thing she tells everyone:
1700626752218.png

This doesn't make you sound smarter, it makes you sound dumber.

Then there's the very core of Jackie's talk, which I'll illustrate from slides at the start and end of the "actual" presentation:
1700626856974.png
1700626888512.png
1700626911075.png

This tells you absolutely nothing at all. It's beyond horrible advice into abject stupidity. She literally says that you should recognize unpredictable and chaotic actors by what they do before they do anything. The rest of her shit is just a convoluted argument that you should be deplatforming anyone on your services who may share one or more traits with her "psychological profile" that hilariously applies to Rick more than it does, for example since I can't use anyone else, myself. Her whole profile would catch Pat a million times before pinging once on me. Of the three of us (Patirck, Jackie and myself) only one of us has the technical competence to use Tor and not go in the ocean with my cellphone. By any fake scale I just made up I am the bigger threat to anyone's cybersecurity yet using Jackie's advice they would have deplatformed Jackie and Rick who they ostensibly want to protect for being on the right side of history.

And her final two pieces of advice completely contradict unless she wants government backdoors installed which would be VERY VERY BAD CYBERSECURITY:
1700627464351.png

The fact that she wants the state to be prosecuting non-crimes before they happen by profiling minorities is just par for the course for a piece of shit like Jackie. Something I'll note by itself adds "Power & Control", "Thrill-seeking", "Potential Personal Vendetta", "Lack of Empathy", "Possible Racial Bias" and "Predictable Actions" to Jackie's own profile from her list of warning traits. (Jackie marks all three traits of the Identity section in her persona, but the High Technical Proficiency one is obviously a lie. She further argues that everyone should have the Strong Need for Anonymity supplied by the government.) So... @FBI @DOJ @ICC @JohnCena
 
Of the three of us (Patirck, Jackie and myself) only one of us has the technical competence to use Tor and not go in the ocean with my cellphone. By any fake scale I just made up I am the bigger threat to anyone's cybersecurity yet using Jackie's advice they would have deplatformed Jackie and Rick who they ostensibly want to protect for being on the right side of history.
You are talking about the pajeet avatar of Dunning-Kruger. As a friendly reminder, she flailed for weeks trying to find Torswats and to this day believes he's connected to ONA. Our Really Energetic, Totally Awesome Radical Doxing Squadron (RETARDS) found him and his merry men around two months after learning he was connected to Patrick's SWATing. She can't think through her arguments logically, and she knows jack shit about her topics.

One thing that she's at least smart enough to do is not interact with us directly. I guess ONA really kicked her metaphorical shit in.
 
Risk Management Choice: Respect?

Research shows when people stop being utter assholes to every single person they come across, it doesn't stop the attacks. In fact, our victim reports being a nice respectful person is the main reason he's been targeted online.

What a fucking capital c Crazy bitch.
 
Back