Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

I got a week-long ban for this post but I stand by what I said tbh, Josh was annoying the fuck out of me.

View attachment 5509868

I was banned for a week as well (and also can't post or react in Beauty Parlor for 3 months.)

My offense was an offhanded remark in the Man Hate thread in reply to Amberheardsupporter or some other crazy. She was chimping out and gloating about "MOIDS DYING IN WAR!" I found it quite disrespectful, but I guess this bird is incapable of understanding the virtues of sacrifice and heroism. I made an ironic joke illustrating the reality that rape, trafficking, and femicide happen in times of war too... Obviously horrible barbaric things which I do not want to "retvrn" to, and I completely disavow! Without strong heroic men, nothing will restrain the rapenigger hordes at the gates. Even the most radical Solanite misandrist should be able to acknowledge this.

I was trolling though, so I deserved it.
 
Last edited:
Mmm... Maybe an argument could be made for bisexual Shadowheart. She's also the only character who is polyarmorous (except for Halsin but he's a gay man so it doesn't count) and doesn't mind you sleeping around / gladly joins in on the foursome with the drow siblings. Meanwhile Karlach's reaction to that is "Fucking disgusting" and Lae'zel is "Fuck off I don't share what is mine and I won't be shared" (High value woman right there).
I am going to have to disagree with you about Shadowheart. She was obviously written to be the "Hot, mysterious, bisexual, goth waifu" that many men in high school lusted after and some have trooned out in trying to become. Just like how you said Gale's romance feels like it was "written by women for women" the same thing can also be said about Shadowheart in that her romance feels like it was "written by men for men". Nothing wrong with that.
Something that pisses me off about Baldur's Gate 3 is that I have NEVER seen anyone discuss the actual gameplay. Not even in this thread. They're always talking about the gay ass LGBTQP++ sucking, fucking and glucking. You can fuck a bear! Ok, is the game turn based or real time? I don't know and can't be bothered to check because it sounds like a shitty hentai game with ugly western characters.

Another red flag with the game is that I know of a lot of women who play it. They always talk about the gay-ass romance with edgy horned demon boys. Any game with a significant female playerbase is a psy op or complete shite (See Overwatch, League of Legends, that one Disney farm game)

I know there will be a ton of BG3 defenders trying to tell me why I'm wrong but this game just sounds like a shitty dating sim for women full of safe-horny ugly westoid LGBTQPC++ characters.
It is, more or less, Zoomers first turn based in terms of gameplay. Nothing wrong with that. I like that BG3 made Zoomers more open to turn based games instead of them always holding their nose up to them like they used to.
As for the romance they are completely optional and just a small part of the game. I am one of those rare women that doesn't like romance in games. However, I also acknowledge that when you put romance into something women will become interested. Many devs like Larian talk about how they want more women to play their games and of course the best way to get women interested is romance. I find this very funny and ironic as the likes of Hollywood today have made everything so sexless and believe that women today don't want a steamy heterosexual romance in their entertainment. Instead they think women want "stronk girl bosses" who are "lame and gay" and "don't need no man". Has worked out so well for Disney. :story:
As for the female player base in games, as someone who has been a fan of video games for 20+ years, most aren't too bad. It is the mentally ill porn sick yoai fangirls that are both a plague and a bane on fandoms and should be gatekeep the fuck out of any fandom they try to get themselves into. They do nothing but spam their disgusting gay porn and fanfic everywhere on fan forums and what not and also threaten the ever loving fuck out of the devs and writers to make their gay ships canon or else they will send a pipe bomb to their house. These women are, for the lack of a better word, extremely mentally ill and should be both gatekept and not taken seriously by any fandom.
 
Last edited:
F_ZWONXWIAAnQ8_.jpg
gungirl.jpg
 
This made the feminists mad. Like, wet angry cat mad.
What for. It's not like you can see what sex the people in trenches are from your artillery outpost.
This is equality, right?
If you got some nice angry rants, post them in the Russia thread, I read it occasionally.
Progressivism is truly poison. Seeing these hoes sent to the front nearly makes me puke. It's truly a dying society but at least we're laughing our ass off to the grave I guess.
BTW allegedly one of the first Hamas victims was a dual Romanian Israeli chick, and her warnings were ignored. Turns out we have quite a few of these. Or better said, they have, cause they live there after escaping us anti-Semites.
I was trolling though, so I deserved it.
I was lucky to be banned very early from that thread for this masterpiece (together with mine/janny edits cause I could no longer reply lol)
Screenshot 2023-11-22 045101.png
Thankful to the One Master Janny for doing it TBH. If she didn't threadban me then it's probable Jersh would've applied a much worse and emotion-driven correction later.
 
Last edited:
What for. It's not like you can see what sex the people in trenches are from your artillery outpost.
This is equality, right?
There was a woman dead in the trench, you can see it from the bleached blond hair (troons aren't allowed their delusions in the AFU-their military isn't quite that far gone) and the Russian going through the trench said so. Why or how she came to be there is sort of the point because once a nation decides to conscript its women of prime child bearing age into harm's way, as the Ukraine is currently doing, its dead, figuratively and literally. A nation, any nation, can't recover from population loss after a war if there aren't a lot of women around to have children.

Feminists are fine with this because they never really thought about female soldiers dying in huge numbers in a war. Babies are nasty, dirty and inconvenient things the lower classes want to have for weird reasons they can't fathom. Its also the reason they don't understand why abortion as birth control is a bad thing. Thus the whole "immigrants are our strength" levels of cope, failing to realize they are literally replacements who bring their beliefs and customs with them, which are definitely not supportive of this tard wave feminism in any way, sowing the seeds of their destruction. Literally.
 
View attachment 5511144
Remember guys: Women hate women more than you do.
To quote Jack Donaghy, of course women hate each other. They're "genetically predisposed to compete with other women for the attention of strong, powerful men like myself, or others very similar to me, for example, Hercules, the Highlander, or, uh, God."
 
which are definitely not supportive of this tard wave feminism in any way, sowing the seeds of their destruction. Literally
I mostly agree, but when I was in college, my philo class was taught by a femoid who gave quite a detailed lecture on foidism, among the contents were things like troonsbianism, social construct this and that, and a literal flow chart on how we got from wave 1 to queer theory.

Many years before the curent one. It was like zoo animals unleashed.

Sure, migrants will culturally enrich them, but when they deconstructeverything else, the only thing that was left was themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Heartthrob
It is, more or less, Zoomers first turn based in terms of gameplay. Nothing wrong with that. I like that BG3 made Zoomers more open to turn based games instead of them always holding their nose up to them like they used to.
As for the romance they are completely optional and just a small part of the game. I am one of those rare women that doesn't like romance in games. However, I also acknowledge that when you put romance into something women will become interested. Many devs like Larian talk about how they want more women to play their games and of course the best way to get women interested is romance. I find this very funny and ironic as the likes of Hollywood today have made everything so sexless and believe that women today don't want a steamy heterosexual romance in their entertainment. Instead they think women want "stronk girl bosses" who are "lame and gay" and "don't need no man". Has worked out so well for Disney. :story:
As for the female player base in games, as someone who has been a fan of video games for 20+ years, most aren't too bad. It is the mentally ill porn sick yoai fangirls that are both a plague and a bane on fandoms and should be gatekeep the fuck out of any fandom they try to get themselves into. They do nothing but spam their disgusting gay porn and fanfic everywhere on fan forums and what not and also threaten the ever loving fuck out of the devs and writers to make their gay ships canon or else they will send a pipe bomb to their house. These women are, for the lack of a better word, extremely mentally ill and should be both gatekept and not taken seriously by any fandom.

Modern video games don't teach players enough about lateral thinking and the Rule of Cool. It's what largely separates Dota 2 from League of Legends. Larian was incredibly observant of the Rule of Cool. It goes something like this:

If a player discovers something he can do that's really awesome and hasn't really been taken into consideration by the rules, then the DM has two choices.

#1 Say it's against the rules (not fun)
#2 Say, "Roll it" (FUN!!)

Needless to say, #2 enforces the Rule of Cool. There's plenty of things you can do in Baldur's Gate 3 where you ask yourself the question, "Is this cheating?" But over and over again, the answer seems to be no. Here's a great example:


I think most modern game devs would look at this and say, "No, this is clearly not allowed and players shouldn't be allowed to do this." Larian seems to understand players want the freedom to experiment and see what they can get away with. More often than not, Larian's response to outrageous ways of bending the rules is, if it's cool, let it happen.
 
Last edited:
I mostly agree, but when I was in college, my philo class was taught by a femoid who gave quite a detailed lecture on foidism, among the contents were things like troonsbianism, social construct this and that, and a literal flow chart on how we got from wave 1 to queer theory.

Many years before the curent one. It was like zoo animals unleashed.

Sure, migrants will culturally enrich them, but when they deconstructeverything else, the only thing that was left was themselves.
Agreed, and horse shit like John Rawls and the like. Modern academia is a wonderful propaganda tool: Those that buy the propaganda get told they are the one thing they crave: being smart.
 
I think most modern game devs would look at this and say, "No, this is clearly not allowed and players shouldn't be allowed to do this." Larian seems to understand players want the freedom to experiment and see what they can get away with. More often than not, Larian's response to outrageous ways of bending the rules is, if it's cool, let it happen.
Absolutely. There was a pretty interesting post I found a while ago that I unfortunately lost that talked about how important player choice is in games. Simply giving the player the ability to jump significantly improves player engagement. While I can get the appeal of super hard ball crushing games or incredibly strict competitive games on the surface, there's nothing more rewarding than a game with variables and surprises that allows you to curate your own experience. And you don't even need an open world to do it.
 
Lae'zel is "Fuck off I don't share and I won't be shared" (High value woman right there).
She's indeed that
While I can get the appeal of super hard ball crushing games or incredibly strict competitive games on the surface, there's nothing more rewarding than a game with variables and surprises that allows you to curate your own experience. And you don't even need an open world to do it.
Especially, single player games. Play however you want, no matter what other people are saying
 
Back