𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

the u.s. is the largest and most effective state sponsor of terrorism in the history of humankind. we've been funding and encouraging terrorists for the better part of a century. should be illegal for these hypocrites to hide behind that excuse
Shrug. America made their choices on the basis of geopolitical reality.

The actual problem is how incompetent the Americans typically are on coups. Like just because you should coup this random third world retard dictator doesn’t mean you toss the cost/benefit analysis in the trash.
 
Democrats usually defend censorship by saying the 1st Amendment only protects speech from government intrusion; a corporation censoring the people is just fine. I wonder what their defense will be now that the government is blatantly interfering with free speech.
Why the fuck are Federal representatives violating the First Amendment?

their intention is not to violate the first amendment directly; they intend to pressure x to do it for them.

the signatories, and those who drafted this letter on their behalf, apparently did not read x's policies in their entirety, because they cite "what is in violation of this policy", while ignoring "what is not a violation of this policy" ...

from the violent and hateful entities policy (archive):

1700877337660.png

from the perpetrators of violent attacks policy (archive):

1700877596978.png

so, the "posts or accounts associated with, related to, or connected to hamas" that are referenced in the letter may not be in violation of x's policies at all. whether there are violations or not, the range of enforcement options page (archive) lists a number of actions that x may take. in all likelihood though, the posts and accounts that were "identified" in the letter had already been restricted, and were only found after a determined and specific search.

1700879063804.png1700878124557.png

And what about documenting propaganda? Dont people have a right to preserve rhetoric and historically cultural materials so they can be studied in the future?

from the public-interests exceptions page (archive):

1700879364576.png

Something tells me this is related to the lawsuit against media matters

while i agree with the notion that this is related to x corp. v media matters for america, it would appear that this letter was being drafted in mid-october, while the lawsuit wasn't filed until mid-november.

1700879584115.png
1700879710536.png
 
Here are the names and states of the Congressmen that signed this letter.
This it what interests me. This wasn't the usual Democrat hivemind unanimous concent everyone signs the letter type deal. Only 27 out of the 200 and change dem house members put their names on it. A lot of these people I don't know but who I recognize are radicals. And their are people missing. The Squad. This feels like it was a split decision even writing this.
 
This it what interests me. This wasn't the usual Democrat hivemind unanimous concent everyone signs the letter type deal. Only 27 out of the 200 and change dem house members put their names on it. A lot of these people I don't know but who I recognize are radicals. And their are people missing. The Squad. This feels like it was a split decision even writing this.
Some Democrats are more equal than others. I'd wager the people signing this are the real power behind the throne or are screeching retards who want their old toys back.
Both are possible likelihoods.
 
Some Democrats are more equal than others. I'd wager the people signing this are the real power behind the throne or are screeching retards who want their old toys back.
Both are possible likelihoods.
Honestly could be either. Either A. The power brokers are coming out of the shadows or B. The most idiotic hair trigger members got so butt hurt about mean tweets they signed a letter when even their own party won't do anything about it because they know they've burnt a lot of political capital in the last few years
 
Some Democrats are more equal than others. I'd wager the people signing this are the real power behind the throne or are screeching retards who want their old toys back.
Both are possible likelihoods.
It looks to be primarily the Clinton faction.

I think they are also all very safe D’s.
 
Anyone who votes democrat in 2024 is legit a fucking retard all trolling aside. You’re basically voting to have all your freedoms taken away and to get completely cucked by the government for the rest of your wage cage life. Nikki Hayley and establishment republicans are no better though. she is calling for anonymity to end online and for everyone to have their IDs linked to their IP. Trump (maybe Vivek) is literally the only person to vote for now on both sides. That must make normal democrats seethe it’s gotten that bad on the left and the right as well.
 
Anyone who votes democrat in 2024 is legit a fucking retard all trolling aside. You’re basically voting to have all your freedoms taken away and to get completely cucked by the government for the rest of your wage cage life. Nikki Hayley and establishment republicans are no better though. she is calling for anonymity to end online and for everyone to have their IDs linked to their IP. Trump (maybe Vivek) is literally the only person to vote for now on both sides. That must make normal democrats seethe it’s gotten that bad on the left and the right as well.
And the Republicans are different? Nikki Hailey is calling for total loss of privacy online for everyone

 
Last edited:
Thanks for reassuring me about my already decided vote in 2024 being the right choice.

"The one where former democrats who are really just liberals refuse to vote for tyrants".

I guess that is too long for a friends episode title but whatever. How fucking disgustingly openly these fuckers flaunt the constitution.
 
Back