Well hey, a
bank statement that the money is still there would do wonders.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but the longer this goes on...
I'm not a lawyer but I don't know why a legal professional (assuming he has one and is not just venting to 3 therapists every day) would not just advise him to procure a statement that the money is still there and they're looking into a proper charity. Charity fraud is fairly common (as we can see from this thread, hah!

), so I think that angle is absolutely workable, if still dishonest after what transpired in the Discord call with Karl and Mutahar. Maybe he feels he dug himself too deep and is thinking how to come out of the situation absolutely clean?