hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

[Blacklight]

I did know this and it doesn't change he tried to get away with it and got caught. You are a dumb faggot and you should feel bad about being both dumb and a faggot.

He got caught and made nice with the original copyright owner. HH is just stirring shit to try and get a gotcha against IH because it's clear HH just hates IH for being a old school edgy boy who never went through the troll's remorse arc he himself went through.

Did you want IH to cry like a baby? To get on hands and knees? To suck the original owner's dick? To make endless threads on Twitter and videos on Youtube about how awful he is?

 

[Human Institute Director]

this is my introduction to the guy, and I almost finished the video as it's quite interesting, but in the end I was ground down by how fucking insufferably smug he is. he also seems salty/quip-y about the 'type' of audience someone has (IH). i don't know if the jabs are meant to be funny? but it just comes off as insecure and petty. maybe he's just jealous that IH cultivated an audience that isn't holier than thou.

Mauler (another lolcow) did a 10 hours video about Dark Souls 2 why Hbomberguy is an insufferable piece of shit and he couldn't be more right on the subject.

Imagine actually knowing the guy IRL. You'd punch him in less than a day.

 

[ChadBrazilian]

You guys should give hbomberguy more credit. He is more intelligent that he seems. Take his instance in immigration for example: He wants to mass import for the UK as much Pakistani Muslims who reproduce through incest as possible. This way you can not call him the most dysgenic looking man in Britain. 4D chess shit

 

[Mango Cobra]

And then IH took the video down, and gave proper credit? What else do you want him to do?

That would require him to have put ANY thought into why he is upset about it, but he can't because that would require him to confront how he has publicly stated that "Nobody should own anything, if you can't convince people to give you money off your creations you should just starve while people pirate it" (Heavily Paraphrased). He's engaged in doublethink about how "Intellectual Property is bad and should be stolen and you have a moral obligation to do so but also Intellectual Property is sacred and shouldn't be stolen" and any attempt at pointing it out just has him cope and sneed about people pointing out the hypocrisy are faggots.

In effect, much like how he thinks he should be able to stir shit in the Woman Hate Thread and everyone should just nod and accept what he says as fact, he is doing the same thing here. It's his Mangosteen, honestly, he can't handle being told he is wrong.

 

[Automaton Type 2B]

Gotta say, baldie really kicked IH's teeth in.

Pretty solid hit, you can tell he wanted it to hurt since he's a fag and IH hates fags.

Man I use to really like IH’s videos but now I found out that he stole a video from a Jewish journalist. IH now has my permanent respect.

Any man who profits from a jew should be given a "Get out of jail free card"

 

[Elescondido]

Is the "A measured response" thing normally part of his video titles or is that an example of MauLer continuing to live in his head rent free?

He's been using that title format since 2016 i think . way before mauler's ds2 response

 

[ColonelCadaver]

Never heard of this guy before, but YouTube keeps recommending this video to me.

---

Attention troglodytes who only visit featured threads: either watch some of the video or read some of the thread before leaving a reply. There is a 90% chance that what you want to say will already be said. The first thing that comes to mind is the first thing that gets posted after a thread is featured. Your sticker farming bullshit actively makes my website worse and makes featuring threads a painful thing for the people who routinely visit a thread. Hang yourself! Thanks.

Not only did IH rightfully steal content from a journo (they're not human), but he also did not deserve any of that smear from a god damn LEFTOID. IH's videos, while being a hit-or-miss, are very entertaining, from his main channel and all the way to Storymode and incognito mode channels. He's got a very distinct blend of quasi-journo, corporate stock image bank style, and his team is extremely inventive. Personally, i'll give him every right to rip off every piece of journo media just so that he could keep on making content. All the while these leftoid nigger types produce "takedown media" and leech off drama and crap to stay somewhat-relevant. Says you a lot about these absolute bottom-feeder niggers.

 

[Blacklight]

Remit payment to You Laughed At Something That Was On My Site Whether You Used It As A Source Or Not Fund, c/o Josh Moon, same as (still not dead yet) cancerman.

We don't know. For all we know IH did pay the original owner of the copyright for the issue.

 

[Null]

And then IH took the video down, and gave proper credit? What else do you want him to do?

If this were literally anyone else except IH you would acknowledge that trying to do this and getting caught is a bad thing.

We don't know. For all we know IH did pay the original owner of the copyright for the issue.

Uh, yeah, we can be pretty sure he did not do this because he instead redid huge chunks of his video.

He got caught and made nice with the original copyright owner

What are you basing this off of? He had to redo huge portions of his video to avoid infringement.

 

[Tablet County]

i know im putting my account on the line replying to this but fuck it null you in your own words said you hope artists starve and that copyright is fucking bullshit but now all of a sudden you changed view and are sperging out at any one who points this out

That would require him to have put ANY thought into why he is upset about it, but he can't because that would require him to confront how he has publicly stated that "Nobody should own anything, if you can't convince people to give you money off your creations you should just starve while people pirate it" (Heavily Paraphrased). He's engaged in doublethink about how "Intellectual Property is bad and should be stolen and you have a moral obligation to do so but also Intellectual Property is sacred and shouldn't be stolen" and any attempt at pointing it out just has him cope and sneed about people pointing out the hypocrisy are faggots.

In effect, much like how he thinks he should be able to stir shit in the Woman Hate Thread and everyone should just nod and accept what he says as fact, he is doing the same thing here. It's his Mangosteen, honestly, he can't handle being told he is wrong.

ODD is a pattern of negative, defiant, disobedient, and hostile behavior, and it is one of the most prevalent disorders from preschool age to adulthood. This can include frequent temper tantrums, excessive arguing with adults, refusing to follow rules, purposefully upsetting others, getting easily irked, having an angry attitude, and vindictive acts.
The fourth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual states that a person must exhibit four out of the eight signs and symptoms to meet the diagnostic threshold for ODD. These symptoms include:

• Often loses temper
• Is often touchy or easily annoyed
• Is often angry and resentful
• Often argues with authority figures or, for children and adolescents, with adults
• Often actively defies or refuses to comply with requests from authority figures or with rules
• Often deliberately annoys others
• Often blames others for their mistakes or misbehavior
• Has been spiteful or vindictive at least twice within the past six months

 

[CEO of Pickles]

i know im putting my account on the line replying to this but fuck it null you in your own words said you hope artists starve and that copyright is fucking bullshit but now all of a sudden you changed view and are sperging out at any one who points this out

It's different because Null has a history of...respecting journalists and the work they do?

 

[Blacklight]

If this were literally anyone else except IH you would acknowledge that trying to do this and getting caught is a bad thing.


Uh, yeah, we can be pretty sure he did not do this because he instead redid huge chunks of his video.

If it were anyone and they didn't take the proper steps to rectify the issue (like IH clearly did since he didn't get copyright struck a second time) I would have an issue.

 

[dirt lamb]

IH is funny and isnt a metokur orbiting faggot nuff said

 

[skunt]

I've only heard of this because of a guy who sent me an email, who should definitely join the forum.

I was enjoying lurking but okay.

 

[Null]

If it were anyone and they didn't take the proper steps to rectify the issue (like IH clearly did since he didn't get copyright struck a second time) I would have an issue.

He redid huge portions of his video after making his stack, seemingly to avoid having to make any real deal with the copyright owner. You seem to think that him rewriting entire portions of his video to be more legally distinct is a sign of "making good", instead of the bare minimum to avoid being sued after having already made his money.

 

[whatever I feel like]

Excellent, thats more of enough after-the-fact justification of me never watching IH videos and I will continue never watching them because of this.

As to plagerizers, they can fuck off. I caught one in college once as a TA but the professor let him redo the paper anyway (he dropped the class instead.)

 

[Tablet County]

He redid huge portions of his video after making his stack, seemingly to avoid having to make any real deal with the copyright owner. You seem to think that him rewriting entire portions of his video to be more legally distinct is a sign of "making good", instead of the bare minimum to avoid being sued after having already made his money.

The copyright owner seems to think it's okay, otherwise I'd imagine they'd pursue legal action regardless. Unless slightly changing the content is enough to completely avoid legal consequences?

 

[Anti Snigger]

I found it really eye rolling that HBomberguy described internet historian having anti-semites in his audience as "the audience he built"
What, by being funny? Sorry Harry, not all of us are willing to be sticks in the mud to avoid attracting people who post Jew

 

[Blacklight]

He redid huge portions of his video after making his stack, seemingly to avoid having to make any real deal with the copyright owner. You seem to think that him rewriting entire portions of his video to be more legally distinct is a sign of "making good", instead of the bare minimum to avoid being sued after having already made his money.

You are assuming a lot of shit. We don't know what happened between the original copyright holder and IH. All we know is the original video got struck down by a claim.

 

[Null]

The copyright owner seems to think it's okay, otherwise I'd imagine they'd pursue legal action regardless. Unless slightly changing the content is enough to completely avoid legal consequences?

The original author whose work he copied to form the narrative structure of his video now no longer has any say in this because IH had to rewrite entire portions of the video.

Plagiarism as a tort is very hard to prove in court (as Harry explains in his video if you had watched it), which means that, yes, there is probably now enough to avoid a plagiarism claim.

My point again is that IH stole this guy's article, used it to create the foundation of his narrative structure and animations, then hid the fact he had done this until called out. His response was not to compensate this person for the success he contributed to, but rather remove the video entirely and then put out an inferior knockoff to avoid owing anything.

This isn't making things right. It's not a matter of law or copyright but rather of basic honesty. He used something, made money off of it, and then when this abuse was identified just swept it under the rug.

You are assuming a lot of shit. We don't know what happened between the original copyright holder and IH. All we know is the original video got struck down by a claim.

I know you have an anime avatar and are a dipshit in general, but do you really think that if the author of the article was OK with his use of his writing, that he would have required IH completely redo the entire fucking script to a clearly inferior version?