hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

What surprises me about the plagiarism is not the fact it happened, but how blatant it was.

Lifting the "hour-by-hour" narrative framing of the article is one thing but he'd be able to get away with that. The problem is the script actually copied segments of the article verbatim. That is so extremely blatant that if he was the one who wrote the script and he thought this was totally OK, similar occurrences would probably surface in a ton of different videos he's done. It wouldn't be hard to figure out. Type parts of his scripts into Google and see if anything comes up. I don't care enough to to try, but it's safe to say people are trying it.

If no other plagiarism is out there, then my guess is that he's started outsourcing scriptwriting and whoever he hired to ghostwrite the cave video was lazy and lifted someone else's work in a really obvious way. I don't know enough about him to know if he's confirmed that people help him with the writing or research. If he hasn't that's my guess why there's been silence.
Yeah, it wasn't hard to see, and once again. Nobody would have given a fuck if he just said he was adapting the article. Not a single solitary fucking soul would have been upset.
 
You're forgetting that he also sourced the original article in the new reupload?
I would not be surprised at all if IH didn't even realize the article were plagiarized
you're giving an anglo faggot with an axe to grind a lot of leeway
(:_("Not IH man, not him man..." (:_(
:cringe:But he gave them credit afterwards. :cringe:
:\ And I bet it wasn't him, probably someone on his team did it! :\
:mad: And Hbomber is a brit faggot anyways! :mad:

If there was a moment to use the word COPE.
 
I really have no idea why he would let a dipshit like hbomberguy, who he knows is a dipshit, play him like this other than a pre-existing grudge against IH for one of his old videos or something, like someone told him IH was just reading KF posts for videos.
Has IH even ever really covered lolcow content? I'm sure he's brushed up on it, He will not divide us was based around the mental breakdown of Shia Lebeouf, but he's not really done anything directly on that from memory.
 
(:_("Not IH man, not him man..." (:_(
:cringe:But he gave them credit afterwards. :cringe:
:\ And I bet it wasn't him, probably someone on his team did it! :\
:mad: And Hbomber is a brit faggot anyways! :mad:

If there was a moment to use the word COPE.

Generally plagiarists have a pattern of behavior, IH has made a multitude of videos on historical events, he has an entire team he delegates to, with some of these people showing up directly on his other channels. Hbomber has an axe to grind with IH because he's friends with Jontron and other edgy content creators, if the only thing that Hbomber can find on IH is a single video that had to be reuploaded because of some of the most obvious plagiarism imaginable, that isn't represented in any of his other content, I'm going to make the assumption his scriptwriter for that video fucked up.
 
If IH had not plagiarized the article, he would have fought it. But he didn't. He took it down. The video went up changed. This means he knows he plagiarized the article.
Nobody's arguing that he didn't plagiarize the article and if they are they're retarded. I think everyone's gotten past the denial stage at this point.
If the author had come to an agreement with him to allow this copy, he would have restored the video unedited. But he didn't. That means their compromise is that he'd rewrite everything and credit him, but would not actually purchase rights to the writing he copied.
If I have this right, you're saying because he didn't cite his source in the original version of the video the only way he could possibly make up for it would be if he paid the original author for use of his article?
I don't follow this reasoning. If he came to a compromise with the author then he clearly did come to some sort of agreement, even if that agreement was just to change the script as opposed to paying the original author.
So it's not a moral problem it's just that he should've bought a content loicense?

Not that it changes anything, but my 'tism compels me to clear things up. You seem to be under the impression that he rewrote the entire script, and he only rewrote parts of it. I've seen both Man In Cave videos and they aren't all that different.
 
Standard Harry breadtube affair, take down other tubers to build himself up, conflate the extreme and stupid sections of communities with the normies. Alright video, didn't like it that much although I want a method to watch it without giving him views.
But at the say time, it's a blatant hit against someone Harry disagrees with, in typical breadtube fashion. He deliberately conflates the extremist sections of IH's fans with his base in order to rile up his own turbo-SJW base.
o u
 
Man, between Stephen Crowder, illuminaughti, Boogie, nickisnotgreen, The Completionist, the whole react drama with xQc, Hasan and other reactions to the Israel-Gaza War, and now this. 2023 has been quite a wild ride in exposing to the masses YTers are no better than celebrities and mainstream entertainment we the internet has come to despise.
 
To be fair, asking me to watch an Hbomb video is like asking me to listen to an audiobook read by DSP.
4 hours of a smug bald soyfag talking about youtuber plagiarism. CBT is also a viable alternative.
There is a certain commentary/critique subset of youtubers who have to make shit long form (usually Brits). Should not be taking 4 hours to break something down.
 
Back