- Joined
- Oct 27, 2023
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
- Thread starter Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- May 24, 2023
"Do you still practice?"
"What?!"
"What?!"
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2022
Buster Scruggs
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2022
Kyle should be credited with another kill shot for this, holy shit
Best part is Nick knows he can’t do anything but cope because anything else and he’d become the laughing stock of LawTube after flipping out on Kyle.
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
OFFICAL CALL FOR COLLABORATORS ON AN UPDATED OP FOR THIS THREAD!
This interview is so boring that I have started to write an outline for an updated OP for this thread. It is a bit of a mess now, but it has what I think is a good basic structure. I wrote a lot more than I thought I would in 15 minutes.
In the very near future, I will need some help checking the outline for consistent and correct timelines; looking for gaps and errors; deleting trivialities; refining scope; and determining clips and things that MUST be included/lined due to constant asking for them. These will form the bones of the OP, and consists of Stage 1 of the drafting process.
I am putting out an official call for people who wish to help with Stage 1 in fixing the outline. Please respond here or with a PM if interested,. I am looking for 2-4 people, tops, to help at the moment, but I can see adding more for Stage 2. It is my hope that the outline will be detailed enough that it is self-explanatory and people can work independently on sections.
If you wish to help with Stage 2 of the re-write, PM me and I can add you to the list to contact later once the outline is finished.
Stage 3 help will be chosen from the pool of contributors who are not too burned out or busy when it gets to that point.
I am trying to find the best way to collaboratively share an editable version of the outline that has version tracking but will not doxx the participants. If you have an idea of a way to do this, please share it.
The final OP will credit all contributors at the end with a special thanks and their role(s) of contribution.
This interview is so boring that I have started to write an outline for an updated OP for this thread. It is a bit of a mess now, but it has what I think is a good basic structure. I wrote a lot more than I thought I would in 15 minutes.
In the very near future, I will need some help checking the outline for consistent and correct timelines; looking for gaps and errors; deleting trivialities; refining scope; and determining clips and things that MUST be included/lined due to constant asking for them. These will form the bones of the OP, and consists of Stage 1 of the drafting process.
Once we get past the first stage and have a good fleshed-out outline structure with each section listing the needful clips and content, I hope to parcel it out by section and level of responsibility (it is arranged chronologically by 'epoch' of Nick's channel) to those who have interest or specific knowledge of a specific time period of Nick's career.
I hope to have 3 kinds of volunteer roles (One person can fill more than 1 role if so desired) for Stage 2:
1. Section Leader - Writes and organises their section and submits it when complete. Responsible for writing; adding links, media, and images to their section; incorporating input and asking for help from the other 2 roles.
(Probably the most intensive role in terms of commitment and responsibility. If you do not write it, it does not get done. Feel free to form a collaboration of your own, but you own the post with your section.)
2. Researcher/Clipper/Information Locater - Finds media; creates and finds archives; creates clips; and provides these to section leaders. This is pure research role with minimal to no editorial responsibility. Section Leaders or Fact-Checkers can put in request for research they do not have time to do.
(Probably the most time-consuming or autismo powered role to sit through old streams, search archives, look back in the thread for content, and make clips, as needed.)
3. Fact-Checker - Checks internal consistency of sections and text for errors and tags them (with receipts, if possible) for correction. This is not a stylistic editorial role, but a hard fact reviewer. Not a grammar-nazi or English pedant--this is pure fact-checking: did it happen or not; or did it happen in the order or under the circumstances described.
(Probably the least intense role in terms of time and effort required, but the one who will get the most push-back and potential involvement due to difference in recollections. Check as much or as little as you like, but please stick around long enough to respond to questions about your correction and help resolve any dispute about it.)
This phase will start adding meat and muscle onto the new OP. These sections should be sized where a single person can mostly handle it, but if people do not have the time to tackle a whole section (or have a special interest) I hope to employ them in one of the other roles. This will be Stage 2, and resultant sections will be posted in PG (if allowed) for public review and comment by Fact-Checkers.
After that is all collected, I envision an executive editing group of 2-3 people to do a final polish and smooth out the style variance and make final edits to finish off the skin of the brand new OP and complete Stage 3. Fact-checkers may be employed as well on the final post. At Stage 3, the number of participants drops enough that a PM chain might be enough to coordinate with Section Leaders and the editing team.
I hope to have 3 kinds of volunteer roles (One person can fill more than 1 role if so desired) for Stage 2:
1. Section Leader - Writes and organises their section and submits it when complete. Responsible for writing; adding links, media, and images to their section; incorporating input and asking for help from the other 2 roles.
(Probably the most intensive role in terms of commitment and responsibility. If you do not write it, it does not get done. Feel free to form a collaboration of your own, but you own the post with your section.)
2. Researcher/Clipper/Information Locater - Finds media; creates and finds archives; creates clips; and provides these to section leaders. This is pure research role with minimal to no editorial responsibility. Section Leaders or Fact-Checkers can put in request for research they do not have time to do.
(Probably the most time-consuming or autismo powered role to sit through old streams, search archives, look back in the thread for content, and make clips, as needed.)
3. Fact-Checker - Checks internal consistency of sections and text for errors and tags them (with receipts, if possible) for correction. This is not a stylistic editorial role, but a hard fact reviewer. Not a grammar-nazi or English pedant--this is pure fact-checking: did it happen or not; or did it happen in the order or under the circumstances described.
(Probably the least intense role in terms of time and effort required, but the one who will get the most push-back and potential involvement due to difference in recollections. Check as much or as little as you like, but please stick around long enough to respond to questions about your correction and help resolve any dispute about it.)
This phase will start adding meat and muscle onto the new OP. These sections should be sized where a single person can mostly handle it, but if people do not have the time to tackle a whole section (or have a special interest) I hope to employ them in one of the other roles. This will be Stage 2, and resultant sections will be posted in PG (if allowed) for public review and comment by Fact-Checkers.
After that is all collected, I envision an executive editing group of 2-3 people to do a final polish and smooth out the style variance and make final edits to finish off the skin of the brand new OP and complete Stage 3. Fact-checkers may be employed as well on the final post. At Stage 3, the number of participants drops enough that a PM chain might be enough to coordinate with Section Leaders and the editing team.
I am putting out an official call for people who wish to help with Stage 1 in fixing the outline. Please respond here or with a PM if interested,. I am looking for 2-4 people, tops, to help at the moment, but I can see adding more for Stage 2. It is my hope that the outline will be detailed enough that it is self-explanatory and people can work independently on sections.
If you wish to help with Stage 2 of the re-write, PM me and I can add you to the list to contact later once the outline is finished.
Stage 3 help will be chosen from the pool of contributors who are not too burned out or busy when it gets to that point.
I am trying to find the best way to collaboratively share an editable version of the outline that has version tracking but will not doxx the participants. If you have an idea of a way to do this, please share it.
The final OP will credit all contributors at the end with a special thanks and their role(s) of contribution.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2019
I almost wonder if Kyle did this on purpose for the last interview... But I don't think he's that smart.
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2023
Curious why Kyle went on after Nick giggle snorted into his glass to ask what it's like to kill someone first go around.
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2017
Any manager worth their salt could turn in a livestream and see a drunk man stopping every five minutes to give a toast to someone who stubbed their toe and realize it’s not the best show for their client to be on.
Unlike most of the lawtube nobodies, Pippa and early Rittenhouse had potential mainstream appeal, Nick did not
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
How much do you want to bet Balldo will be seething about this next stream?
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2022
Nick asked Kyle has he seen Redo of Healer. (Kyle has not)
ETA: Nick will be addressing the Maddox blackfacelawyer website tomorrow (Nick says so funny!) & will be reviewing the Maddox video. He’s not watched but people have sent him clips. He plans on talking about Maddox not just tomorrow but probably for the next few days. (Nick says bc its soo hilarious!) Might have a guest on too.
Also, he is still a Maddox fan. Always has been, still is. Maddox is great, etc. (lol, seethe)
ETA: Nick will be addressing the Maddox blackfacelawyer website tomorrow (Nick says so funny!) & will be reviewing the Maddox video. He’s not watched but people have sent him clips. He plans on talking about Maddox not just tomorrow but probably for the next few days. (Nick says bc its soo hilarious!) Might have a guest on too.
Also, he is still a Maddox fan. Always has been, still is. Maddox is great, etc. (lol, seethe)
Last edited:
Binary Code
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
Well that was boring as shit. Just feeling like a fogey because Kyle didn't know who Stone Temple Pilots were
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
Oh good, he can just copy the shit Dax spouts about Maddox. Fucking gonna be riveting content, surely.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2022
If you peer at the MX records you can see that he is using bluehost.com; you can't really see the actual host from the A record, this is because his main website (wordpress) is being piped through Cloudflare.
His WHOIS info. reflects this, showing that the domain was registered on 2023-11-04, so at this point, a month has passed since he got the website.
If you look at the options on bluehost you can see for "shared" hosting
It is most likely that he is using the second option, as it allows for "Malware Scanning" which I'm guessing could be just a buzzword for cloudflare, as well the Domain Privacy.
His nameservers also show bluehost so I'm pretty confident this is what he is using.
Though it seems you get a FREE Domain for the first year, as well as mail routing, which probably means that our boy Maddox is paying at minimum, $5.45/mo
TheSoutherStar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
interesting bit in nick's stream yesterday, 9 mins in and he's already brainfarting (presumably sober)
Potatoherder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2020
It started off slow but he ended up having a good night. JasonOfTGA accounted for 50% of all rants. YT did way better than rumble at $480, it did not beat the Megan/Kurt sperg session. It also was a big show in terms of viewership on YT with 2789. Rumble was super low on viewers. Muted user was MAGAChoade12(193744332) and was spamming stuff like: "KYLE = LAND MANATEE!" Nick said nothing in chat.
It doesn't make sense why tonight had so few viewers on Rumble. Saturday's stream peaked at over 8k. He even got front page placement.
It doesn't make sense why tonight had so few viewers on Rumble. Saturday's stream peaked at over 8k. He even got front page placement.
Attachments
TheTimeWizard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2023
for a moment thought this was the KOP thread
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2023
I tried to look into the Mandy situation. I found this comment archived on some Japanese blogsite. The original comment was apparently on the Paul Joseph Watson video "The Truth About the Israel Attack", which has since been removed from youtube. The blog had comments that seemed to be the top comments on the video. I couldn't find an archive of the page with comments on any of the usual archive sites.
Archive of the blog
That is Mandy's youtube account
Wayback machine had several archives of the video URL, but none of them would properly load the comments. If you want to try for yourself, the video URL is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUSgHBtNnNs
A bit of Mandy's history on Nick's channel
She superchatted for the first time in September 2020. Back then she had a pink panther avatar.
Her last name is apparently of Lithuanian origin
She is not that concerned about the pronounciation
She claims that her birthday is the 8th of August
Archive of the blog
That is Mandy's youtube account
Wayback machine had several archives of the video URL, but none of them would properly load the comments. If you want to try for yourself, the video URL is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUSgHBtNnNs
A bit of Mandy's history on Nick's channel
She superchatted for the first time in September 2020. Back then she had a pink panther avatar.
Drama Drama Drama, Ronspergations, Arguing with Idiots, Probably more! (September 15th. 2020)
at around 3:30:10
at around 3:30:10
Her last name is apparently of Lithuanian origin
LIVE: Ahmaud Arbery, Chrystul Kizer, Ghislaine Maxwell, & Jon Gruden | LATEST IN THE LAW (November 24th. 2021)
at around 13:50
at around 13:50
She is not that concerned about the pronounciation
She claims that her birthday is the 8th of August
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2022
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It was the opposite, the "law firm" that basically didn't even exist was to advertise his channel.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2019
I was not a Nick fan prior to the Vic Lasagna case. I think I saw maybe one or two of his videos / streams prior to that, so I was not living the lore. That said, I was a BPITU and Maddox fan prior to the dissolution of the podcast. (I'm old and the Best Page in the Universe and Maddox's first book were both comedy gold, in the day.)
Trying to piece this together (look, I've been busy), it feels like there were signs of Balldoman being a scumbag back in the day, but heis was a lawyer. Is this Maddox stuff with Rackets a big deal, or is it a nothingburger but Maddox being butthurt and trying to clown 5 years too late?
Trying to piece this together (look, I've been busy), it feels like there were signs of Balldoman being a scumbag back in the day, but he