Fuck, that probably makes it way easier. How was that mission on console?
Intuitive enough thanks to the analog sticks.
Didn't the GTA controversy mostly start with GTA III? The game that ends with Claude successfully achieving his goals and then shooting his girlfriend in the head? By that metric, is that "endorsing" crime?
- GTA III's controversy was a product of, IMO, breaking into of the mainstream at a time when America had just got attacked on 9/11 and the media was hungry to moralfag about violence. III wasn't anywhere near close to being the first of it's kind to harness the reaction it did.
- The notion of Claude shooting Maria at the end is speculation. He could've shot into the air to silence her or the shotgun fire might be something only intended for the player to hear akin to Joe Pesci in the last shot of Goodfellas seconds before the credits.
- IDK, but if making a game with violence in it an endorsement of violence, then we need to hang a lot of people in Hollywood for pedophilia, Journos for treason, and basically the entire gaming industry for corruption of society. GTA III was the Houser's mashup of all the violent American crime dramas they'd watched as teens. It doesn't have anything in terms of social commentary to say nor did it want to say anything to begin with.
Would you be agreeing with Hilary and Jack at the time?
No, because GTA III wasn't really a parody of contemporary America more so than a parody of film. Liberty City in GTA III is akin to NYC in
Death Wish than it is any real city at the time of release. The animations and gameplay are also way too cartoonish to be considered threatening. And again, III doesn't have social commentary about any topic; what is it endorsing besides Goodfellas, Taxi Driver, Death Wish, Dirty Harry, and The Warriors as films to see?
Not to mention Tommy and CJ still built themselves up through organized crime, so wouldn't that be "endorsing" something immoral?
Sure, but the game never praises them for it. They are clear anti-heroes most of the time and villains when not.
The problem isn't even the protagonists, Jason and Lucia are fine enough so far.
Sounds to me like you're just making excuses for hating a particular flavor and culture of organized crime and don't want it depicted in any video game.
If that was the case I'd never have touched San Andreas because "eww icky gangbanging".
I'd have never touched Vice City Stories because I'd have assumed Victor was another black criminal like the people defending VI erroneously claimed rather than a mixed race hispanic/white.
Or V because "I'm not touching Franklin".
Spare me your frail accusations. The problem is not the crime, it's not the characters; It's Rockstar games being a very different company since the last entry and not for the better. If your theory is I don't wanna play as colored protagonists because...reasons, kill yourself and learn to read.