- Joined
- Apr 19, 2022
I'll die on this hillGuarantee they'll make it so you can't shoot unarmed blacks or something and singlehandedly ruin their game.
Also as a degenerate lover of black women, I appreciate the beach environ and it's denizens
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll die on this hillGuarantee they'll make it so you can't shoot unarmed blacks or something and singlehandedly ruin their game.
Also as a degenerate lover of black women, I appreciate the beach environ and it's denizens
That takes me back. I doubt many people had a computer or Internet access back then. I was fortunate to have a computer room in the household when I had GTA3/VC 20 or so years ago. How did I even beat GTA III back then? Most of my time was looking up cheats just to fool around.kek, it was 22 years ago or whatever so probably not. I remember he took pictures of his TV, blew them up on paper and glued them to a poster board to walk everyone through step-by-step on how to beat it.
Doubtful. The 3D era lore and the HD era lore are two separate universes. Ray Liotta and R* ended on amicable terms. They even gave a farewell to him after his death. I feel it's more of him not understanding video games as a respectable medium. It went better than Burt Reynolds and VC.I really wouldnt put it above them killing Tommy just to piss off the classic fans (doesnt help Tommy's VA and Rockstar werent in the best of terms, right up to his death)
Because GTA: Vice City and Scarface: The World Is Yours are 22 and 18 years old respectively and play and looks as such. Two decades ago is hardly modern.Again, why would there be when Vice City exists lol? What a weird response. That said, I can think of a few examples. Scarface: The World is Yours was surprisingly good considering the reputation of games based on movies. Although it has a totally different gameplay style, the Hotline Miami franchise also uses the setting of Miami in the 1980s. Even within the GTA franchise there was Vice City Stories, meaning Rockstar has already re-explored the setting once before.
People betraying you is the only story Rockstar can tell, been that way since GTA IThen our couple inevitably falls out (seriously, its so obvious this will happen sooner or later) and turns on each other, leading into no choice at all who comes out on top (cuz it IS modern Rockstar in the modern gaming industry)
I'm sure something like that happened in the HD universe, just differently. Or they could be stories in that timeline. Brands, cities and vehicles "cross over" universes. Just not one to one, Lazlow being an exception.GTA V mentioned "Grove Street" as a vague gang war thing that happened a long time ago, I'm sticking with at best there will be a vague mention of a Liberty City monster causing havok and taking over Vice City for a time in the 80's but never mentioning Tommy by name or anything.
Intuitive enough thanks to the analog sticks.Fuck, that probably makes it way easier. How was that mission on console?
- GTA III's controversy was a product of, IMO, breaking into of the mainstream at a time when America had just got attacked on 9/11 and the media was hungry to moralfag about violence. III wasn't anywhere near close to being the first of it's kind to harness the reaction it did.Didn't the GTA controversy mostly start with GTA III? The game that ends with Claude successfully achieving his goals and then shooting his girlfriend in the head? By that metric, is that "endorsing" crime?
No, because GTA III wasn't really a parody of contemporary America more so than a parody of film. Liberty City in GTA III is akin to NYC in Death Wish than it is any real city at the time of release. The animations and gameplay are also way too cartoonish to be considered threatening. And again, III doesn't have social commentary about any topic; what is it endorsing besides Goodfellas, Taxi Driver, Death Wish, Dirty Harry, and The Warriors as films to see?Would you be agreeing with Hilary and Jack at the time?
Sure, but the game never praises them for it. They are clear anti-heroes most of the time and villains when not.Not to mention Tommy and CJ still built themselves up through organized crime, so wouldn't that be "endorsing" something immoral?
If that was the case I'd never have touched San Andreas because "eww icky gangbanging".Sounds to me like you're just making excuses for hating a particular flavor and culture of organized crime and don't want it depicted in any video game.
Globohomo buying fake likes in ching chong land faster than allowed.
I heard from my friend who's uncle works at grand theft auto that they will have a realistic menstrual cycle and tampon mini game mechanics for the Latina protagonist you play as
GTA gas fallen. Billions of Shark Cards must be snapped in half.
Tell that to the western gaming industry.So far, this thread consists of:
>"NIGGERS"
>that twerking lady
>"modern gaming"
Jesus Christ, people, come up with new material.
It'll be funny if you do get some kind of choice on who to support, only for them to go, "Haha, we tricked you, whoever you picked is the one that dies," or whatever, like how GTA4 kills off whoever you listen to at the end. The Bonnie and Clyde bit makes it sound like you'd both go out together, maybe in a blaze of glory or whatever, but then how would you have free play after? Would you just cut that and have it be game over, with the credits telling you to go play online? I figure it'll probably be some rehash of the GTA5 stuff where you can choose one or the other, or just take The Third Way and have them both survive, which makes you wonder why you'd even bother with the other options.Then our couple inevitably falls out (seriously, its so obvious this will happen sooner or later) and turns on each other, leading into no choice at all who comes out on top (cuz it IS modern Rockstar in the modern gaming industry) as you control the girl of course.
Tell me you never played games like Quarantine without saying so. GTA III, as much as I love it, was not a pioneer in much unless you only played mainstream titles.Nothing like GTA III was ever experienced in that media at that time. That freedom of causing mayhem came at a cost of consequence and progression. Nothing stops you from utilizing that sandbox in a simulated city to JUST be reckless, yet the formula encourages you TO progress into the story to get the most out of that sandbox.
Oh, exactly. That's why I'm saying it will be vague at best. Enough that people who give a shit can be like "OMG they said it!" without breaking the precious different universes.I'm sure something like that happened in the HD universe, just differently.