hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
That's the long and short of it. It's probably the most objective stance on this thread.
Any faggot who encodes his videos with subtext surrounding his weird ideology is always objectively wrong about everything because he cannot separate himself from his ego and his weird pathological faith long enough to attempt to make objective determinations about anything. When you live your life wearing red tinted glasses, everything you see will be red.

HBomberguy is a gay internet hall monitor. Oh good lord, someone didn't autistically cite every single source for their video essay on their channel about fucking MEMES? Whatever shall we do? Blow it entirely out your ass, Harris. The guy was asked to cite the source shortly after, so he actually changed the entire video and cited the source anyway. The problem was fixed and this faggot is still crying in his Cheerios. God how the fuck do men like him get laid? Do they run around handing out fines to women for not letting him sniff up their pussy lips?
 
People here have mentioned how he has already listed his sources in the past. He didn't follow his MO for this one. Either the guy knew what he was doing or there's gross negligence involved. Doesn't discount the fact that plagiarism was involved, whether or not that was the intent.
And it has seen been resolved. The people trying to "hold him to task" haven't given a single demand and I notice you fail to address my point about that.
Plagiarism is basically theft. People don't steal because they're motivated by malice, they steal because they want to get something for nothing. In this case, it's possible that IH or whomever copied the article did not do their due diligence. Regardless of intent, it doesn't matter because the video was still posted on his channel and therefore the person who runs the channel is to be held responsible.
I never said "theft is out of malice" and I would appreciate if you didn't rewrite what I posted. But like I also said, a mistake was made, two adults came to a conclusion, and the only people who care are flavor of the month bandwagoners.

And again: how do you want him to be "held responsible"? None of you crybullies have given a single idea of what should happen because, for the fiftieth father fucking time, him and Mental Floss have resolved it behind the scenes.
You're talking about this stuff too. You're part of this thread. If you didn't give a shit about it, you wouldn't be here either.
Yes, because when a faggot breadtuber makes an obvious hitjob of a video against someone, I take umbrage with it. It's important to call out stuff like this because if it can happen to IH, it can happen to just about anyone. Of course, if you read my posts instead of skimming through them, you'd realize the reason I "care" about this is because people are screaming "justice" for a resolved disagreement where both parties are happy. They don't actually care about a major corporation being wronged. They just want to be assholes to someone they don't like for largely political reasons.

It's a power move in it's most naked form.

Hopefully they catch Harris with his pants down.
Why, is there a school nearby?
 
Last edited:
The guy wants to be concise, but pisses almost a full hour away on nothing just so he can dunk on IH while saying "republican bad."
This was the first Hbomber guy video I genuinely tried to watch and I constantly had to take breaks because of this shit. His constant manipulative tactics and smugness are exhausting to watch even if what's he's talking about is interesting. It's also a personal pet-peeve of mine when brits talk about american politics as if they have any kind of skin in the game. Shut the fuck up and worry about your own corrupt government you pasty balding nigger.

I wish there was a bit more talk about how Harris covered Somerton.
I can only speak for myself but I had to tap out after constantly hearing harris talk about "queer creators" as if being a faggot is an admirable trait.
 
I can only speak for myself but I had to tap out after constantly hearing harris talk about "queer creators" as if being a faggot is an admirable trait.
To be fair to Harris, Somerton's videos are insufferable. He basically portrays himself as if he's gay Jesus bringing wisdom to the masses in his videos. He also portrays it as if the wisdom he's providing has been silenced for decades and is only just now being revealed to people. And he literally just copied it from somewhere else and has been passing it off on his own. I think he should've focused more of the video on this aspect of Somerton's content as his messiah complex was a near constant in his content.

When you separate the "oh and it's about gay shit" from it, he's making thousands of dollars off essentially manipulating an audience of mostly naïve leftists that will never read any of the books or articles he stole from.
 
I was taught that plagiarism is when the audience leave falsely believing that they have just heard the words of a particular speaker and it's apparent to me that the scripts written by the individuals were specifically worded to give this impression.

I am not a fan of any of these people but despite Harry deeming it necessary to constantly remind us that he is gay (likely a defense mechanism), I did enjoy the documentary. I really enjoy watching how people squirm when they are caught in a lie, James was my favorite.
 
I'm surprised somerton's youtube channel is still up. He deleted mostly everything else (twitter & discord), his website is still online.

Considering what he's been accused of, I sort of assumed he'd have gotten his three strikes within the first few days. Wonder why that's not happening.

I'd archive it if the content was worth saving. This is his co-writer too, but keep in mind it's likely sarcasm - from what i've seen the dude hasn't done anything wrong.
GAh9YtoXIAAo7Vk.jpeg
 
I'm surprised somerton's youtube channel is still up. He deleted mostly everything else (twitter & discord), his website is still online.
Money primarily. His videos still make money based on ad revenue. It's likely he's hoping to wait out the storm, then come back and pretend nothing happened. He's not going to go back to working a 9-5 job.

However it is still entirely possible someone will attempt to sue him over the film studio he made. As it's a substantial amount of money that he's done absolutely nothing with.
 
It's likely he's hoping to wait out the storm, then come back and pretend nothing happened. He's not going to go back to working a 9-5 job.
I'd agree if he hadn't unlaunched his patreon. Even if he put payments on hold for a few months he could try come back but he'd have lost a lot of patrons by then. By unlaunching though, he's back to zero. I can't see any way he comes back tbh. According to socialblade he did 460k views last month and that's gonna drop like a stone next month.

It annoys me a little. Watching these people devour each other is fun but they've no follow-through sometimes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luigismanslave
His coverage of Somerton is interesting and comes dangerously close to discussing the misogyny of gay men. Though he makes a point of saying it was his assistant 'Kat' and not him that identified it.
It's because Harris is terrified of pissing off the mob of young leftists who follow him. He has to couch his language in as politically correct way as possible. He doesn't want to address the reality that gay men especially tend to be extremely misogynistic of women and belittle them constantly.
I'd agree if he hadn't unlaunched his patreon. Even if he put payments on hold for a few months he could try come back but he'd have lost a lot of patrons by then. By unlaunching though, he's back to zero. I can't see any way he comes back tbh. According to socialblade he did 460k views last month and that's gonna drop like a stone next month.

It annoys me a little. Watching these people devour each other is fun but they've no follow-through sometimes.
He's unlaunched his patreon because he doesn't want his fanbase to still talk and discuss him. Mark my words he's going to make a comeback in a few months and try to continue business as usual. He'll probably address Haris's video and not actually address any of it.
 
if youre a man and on tinder, itll be like hitting a target from a mile away without aiming, youll miss a lot
Little off topic, but I haven't seen anybody say what needs to be said about that.

Tinder is functional for men like me. We're born very good looking, we take care of our bodies a lot to the point where it's a little unhealthy, and we can lie pretty well about the money we make. What you don't know is that these women are almost always fucking retarded parasites who have never developed any skills or any personality because they can drift through life on their looks alone. The effect of very nice tits wears off after like 6 months. You're now left with this vapid faggot woman who is dependent on you to pay for and do everything for her. I want to be really clear about that, this is not a minority of those very pretty women, this is almost exclusively who they are. You never ever ever want to be with those women.

Find a nice woman who's okay looking and give her your love. Those women have goals and can have conversations. I actively seek those women out because they are the only women who are ever worth your time. The only reason I'd ever dump one of those girls is if I found out the regularly read and commented in The Beauty Parlor, those women are retarded.
 
A lot of people have gone out of their way to contact Lucas Reilly about IH's reupload of the Man in Cave video. Attached are screenshots of a couple of email exchanges.
Here are the tweets they were attached to:
tweet 1
tweet 2
the gist for those wanting a TL;DR, as far as Lucas Reilly knows the only contact between IH and Mental Floss was when IH had to talk to their lawyers during the first take down. He is unaware of what they discussed, and suggest contacting Mental Floss for details.
The rest is him showing his displeasure at the theft of his article and how someone took the months of work he did for themselves. Worth noting that he is happy that he was at least credited in the reupload (see Tweet 1 replies).
I'm going to try contacting Mental Floss myself to see if I can get anything from them.
 

Attachments

  • GAmrGrvXEAAgna4.jpg
    GAmrGrvXEAAgna4.jpg
    148.7 KB · Views: 47
  • Screenshot_20231205_212601_Discord.png
    Screenshot_20231205_212601_Discord.png
    734.9 KB · Views: 50
Dude if you think gay men are bad, you should hear the shit lesbians say about women. The rapiest shit I've ever heard has come from lesbians talking about straight women.
A really common line they love is "They're straight? So is spaghetti until it gets wet :smug:"
Lesbians being as rapey as they are make me feel less bad when they come across their natural predator, the tranny. They love to grope unsuspecting straight women as well, even if they're taken, right in front of the men that are very clearly with that straight woman.
 
Lesbians being as rapey as they are make me feel less bad when they come across their natural predator, the tranny. They love to grope unsuspecting straight women as well, even if they're taken, right in front of the men that are very clearly with that straight woman.
have sex with the tranny or you're a transphobe bigot.
you dont want to be labeled a transphobe right?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: luigismanslave
A lot of people have gone out of their way to contact Lucas Reilly about IH's reupload of the Man in Cave video. Attached are screenshots of a couple of email exchanges.
Here are the tweets they were attached to:
tweet 1
tweet 2
the gist for those wanting a TL;DR, as far as Lucas Reilly knows the only contact between IH and Mental Floss was when IH had to talk to their lawyers during the first take down. He is unaware of what they discussed, and suggest contacting Mental Floss for details.
The rest is him showing his displeasure at the theft of his article and how someone took the months of work he did for themselves. Worth noting that he is happy that he was at least credited in the reupload (see Tweet 1 replies).
I'm going to try contacting Mental Floss myself to see if I can get anything from them.
I wonder if he's actually watched it. There's a good handful of bits that are plagarized, but there's a lot that isn't directly plagarized, he seems to be under the impression it's worse than it is. Also this doesn't really decomfirm the agreement angle, he seemingly no longer owns the article so whatever went on between IH and the lawyers is what it is because copyright law is insane
 
A lot of people have gone out of their way to contact Lucas Reilly about IH's reupload of the Man in Cave video. Attached are screenshots of a couple of email exchanges.
Here are the tweets they were attached to:
tweet 1
tweet 2
the gist for those wanting a TL;DR, as far as Lucas Reilly knows the only contact between IH and Mental Floss was when IH had to talk to their lawyers during the first take down. He is unaware of what they discussed, and suggest contacting Mental Floss for details.
The rest is him showing his displeasure at the theft of his article and how someone took the months of work he did for themselves. Worth noting that he is happy that he was at least credited in the reupload (see Tweet 1 replies).
I'm going to try contacting Mental Floss myself to see if I can get anything from them.
I will say I don't think it's worth making such a fuss about how hurt you are about 4 months of work when you then sold it to mentalfloss of all places, also not surprising that he was never contacted about the dispute if he sold the rights to them that places the entire legal dispute status onto mentalfloss not him as he no longer has any ownership of it.
 
I wonder if he's actually watched it. There's a good handful of bits that are plagarized, but there's a lot that isn't directly plagarized, he seems to be under the impression it's worse than it is. Also this doesn't really decomfirm the agreement angle, he seemingly no longer owns the article so whatever went on between IH and the lawyers is what it is because copyright law is insane
Probably also has no fucking clue about Fair Use and what "transformative work" means. If Historian just had a still JPEG and simply narrated the whole thing - yeah, that "could" ground for a strike.

But the dude had animation, voice acting, SFX, music and whatnot - that in my book is transformative enough even moreso because it's an article about a HISTORICAL EVENT, which explains the previous "could" part as since it's an accounting of a historical event, in order to be as truthful and transparent as possible you HAVE to use pre-written info.

Not to mention how Youtube itself has mountains of similar content that don't cite the source at all.

But DMCA is still a DMCA, so my opinion here is at he end of the day worthless.

On the side note, the Ooperator has been overdosing on blackpills lately hasn't he?
 
Back