IBM Diversity Efforts Targeted by Stephen Miller’s Legal Group


  • America First Legal seeks EEOC probe of IBM DEI practices
  • Legal group claims IBM discriminates against White men
Former Trump adviser Stephen Miller’s America First Legal has requested the nation’s top federal civil rights agency investigate IBM Corp. over diversity-focused employment and executive pay policies that the conservative group says comprise illegal sex and race discrimination.
In a letter to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Tuesday, AFL cited video footage of IBM’s CEO Arvind Krishna and IBM subsidiary Red Hat Inc. CEO Paul Cormier’s statements connecting executive pay to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion practices as proof for its claims of violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The complaint adds to the nearly two dozen inquiries on various companies that AFL has sent to the EEOC, which has yet to respond to the group’s allegations that DEI efforts violate Title VII’s ban against race discrimination. The AFL letters, which have often focused on DEI programs’ overall legality rather than highlighting executives’ roles, have previously targeted high profile companies and organizations including NASCAR, Macy’s Inc., Major League Baseball, Morgan Stanley, and Starbucks Corp.
The work of Miller’s AFL to challenge policies in areas from immigration to LGBTQ+ rights to DEI is widely viewed as helping to lay the groundwork for the legal work of a second Trump administration.
The video cited by AFL of Krishna and Cormier discussing diversity was posted online to X, formerly known as Twitter, on Monday by O’Keefe Media Group CEO James O’Keefe, former head of conservative media organization Project Veritas.
Krishna says in the video that corporate executives’ bonuses can be affected if they don’t meet DEI goals.
Cormier said there were “multiple leaders over the last year plus that were held accountable to the point that they’re no longer here at Red Hat because they weren’t willing to live up to the standards we set in this space.”
AFL requested that the EEOC use its discretionary powers to file a “commissioner charge” against IBM and Red Hat. Such charges can be filed by any of the five members of the agency’s leadership panel and don’t require employees or applicants to submit a discrimination charge to the agency.
Commissioner charges are still relatively unusual, though that may be changing. There were a total of 29 filed in fiscal year 2022, a jump from the three filed in 2021.
In addition to the video posted to X, AFL in its letter also pointed to IBM’s 2022 ESG report which includes an “annual incentive program” intending to “continue to include a diversity modifier” affirming management’s commitment to DEI practices to “close the gap in executive representation,” which it claims is proof of IBM’s use of illegal quotas.
“Rarely do you have such extreme, blatant statements on video documenting the extent to which this is happening everywhere. Apparently, based on the video and the publicly available material on its website, the senior leadership at IBM is wholly committed to discriminating against Americans as a matter of formal corporate policy. This cannot stand,“ Gene Hamilton, AFL’s Vice President and General Counsel said in a statement emailed to Bloomberg Law.
AFL also sent a letter to the chairman of the board and board of directors at IBM, “reminding them of their fiduciary duties and waste of corporate assets to propel this illegal, racially discriminatory agenda.”
A representative for IBM didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The video in question

 
I was an IBM employee for several years and the promotions ladder is run by human resources women who have explicitly said they didn't want to promote white men. They actually tell you they're looking to promote non-whites. IBM implemented a lot of "DEI" around the same time Microsoft did which led to a drastic change in the company culture and mood of the two offices I was in. People now walk on eggshells and the building-wide Slack channels have politics in them more often than before. The amount of childish Tump hatred in the office was staggering for being a "professional" place. There are also dedicated HR women who put on events that are geared toward women and there are "Meet your Manager" events for women only where they get to meet the higher ups explicitly to network. There were fliers taped on the men's bathroom entrances about how men don't let women speak during meetings. There are black-only Slack channels where openly racist black women complain they aren't in a higher position due to discrimination. They also would post brass ring job posts and encourage channel members to get their black friends to apply with a heavy amount of implying they wanted to hire a non-white. The "bring your kid to work" day had the HR women separate the kids by sex and give women talks about getting into the industry and networking while the boys were put into one of the large event rooms.
IBM has been overrun with despicable people in new management positions who offer no benefit to the company and are a liability. This anti-white fad has damaged IBM and they're going to be dealing with these incompetent and openly bigoted managers for years, if not decades. My business unit got a new female manager who laid off people seemingly at random which cost us essential engineers on projects reaching MVP. This selection method was unprecedented and delayed our product deployment by months. This woman had a gaggle of followers who would shield her from the consequences. The women who actually worked hated her and her followers.
We had a local DEI manager who told our managers to ask the black people if they felt safe in the office. Everyone there made $100k+ and she drove a Mercedes. It's all a scam and I've never seen open racism and sexism like this before and the swiftness of these hirings and policies. IBM isn't even the worst tech company when it comes to this, either. I don't think anything substantial will come of this and the racism will continue, especially now with all the Indians and Chinese working in the US offices. There are teams entirely of Indians and Chinese and it's obvious what's going on. I've witnessed open racism between the Chinese and Indians which led me to discover the long history both countries have killing one another. The white women in HR are likely clueless to what they're causing.

This is a small sample of what you'd see. These people are so unassailable they can ping the BU manager in their rants about how IBM is racist for not having more blacks and women in management and not get reprimanded.
blm62.png

IBM solved this challenge by decimating all their US and Europe based jobs in May and opening thousands of job openings in India instead. Not an exaggeration. They got rid of 10k jobs and put up 8000 openings on the IBM India site.

Typical pajeet CEO behavior.
Crowdstrike has done the same thing. It's been a trend. The problem is those Indians in India aren't good at their jobs and cause a lot of headaches down the road but, with how US management operates, the technical debt and legal risk from vulnerable code isn't a factor in their budgeting.
 
I'm not sure if this was covered in the video or not, but here are the Red Hat's "Allyship Commandments" where everything is basically whitey's fault and responsibility.


OMG obtained an internal document from IBM's Red Hat that reads like a religious text: The "Allyship Commandments" are 10 race-based rules employees must observe.

One commandment states “only white people can be racist”

Another states, “Accepts that WHITE people are responsible for dismantling racism"

From a different section: “Whiteness constructs the game, hides the rules, then rigs the game, over and over again.”
 
They're likely to double, triple and qaudruple down now that the shit is getting fed and judicial challenges. shovel as much die coal into the grifter boiler before its regulated away. grift baby grift full steam!

In the 2023 tech layoffs, it seems like a lot of the lower and mid level DEI people got laid off and are low priority to be replaced. The execs are still getting paid for now at least. Academia and the arts are probably permanently pozzed.

When you hire pajeets in management or hiring positions, they only hire other pajeets. Same situation is happening or beginning to happen with every other tech company.

Anecdotally, a white person I know recently started working at a Big Tech firm - when we were making small talk about our coworkers they got a bit sheepish and said "I'm the only white person on a team of about 30, literally everyone else is Indian" and showed me a photo of the team. They have wild stories so far.
 
Anecdotally, a white person I know recently started working at a Big Tech firm - when we were making small talk about our coworkers they got a bit sheepish and said "I'm the only white person on a team of about 30, literally everyone else is Indian" and showed me a photo of the team. They have wild stories so far.
How did he get the job? An office that Indianised would probably only "recommend friends" back home
 
Today's IBM is nothing more than a Indian consulting firm. It's hard to imagine that it's the same company that popularized both the mainframe and the personal computer.
They spun off a company recently for their IT managed services that is basically 100% pajeets. I loath ever having to interact with Kyndryl.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Buttigieg2020
When you hire pajeets in management or hiring positions, they only hire other pajeets. Same situation is happening or beginning to happen with every other tech company.
There are 2 exceptions ive seen for this.

If you are an attractive white woman male pajeet manager will hire you.

If you are attractive white male female pajeet manager will hire you.
 
Yeah, they could have said about DEI what Elon Musk said: "Go fuck yourselves".

And now the feds are crawling up the asshole of every Musk company, trying to find ways to sue them or deny them federal contracts (like suing SpaceX for not hiring enough asylum seekers). The reason this has gotten completely out of hand is it began as defensive moves against the EEOC filing Civil Rights Act lawsuits against you. The fundamental problem is the way the law is written, you can be sued in the future for things you did today that aren't considered discriminatory now, but will be some day. So your best defense is to hire people who are on the cutting edge of evolving standards of what is and isn't racist or sexist, which means finding the most hyper-aggressive shitlibs coming out of the Woke Studies departments to run your HR.
 
IBM has been overrun with despicable people in new management positions who offer no benefit to the company and are a liability. This anti-white fad has damaged IBM and they're going to be dealing with these incompetent and openly bigoted managers for years, if not decades.
IBM has become the worst IT vendor I have to deal with, by far. Their product support has degraded so badly that I finally gotten my management on board with removing and replacing all IBM products in our environment. The institutional infestation of wokeness has destroyed that company. It will not recover.
 
In the 2023 tech layoffs, it seems like a lot of the lower and mid level DEI people got laid off and are low priority to be replaced. The execs are still getting paid for now at least. Academia and the arts are probably permanently pozzed.
This is what happened at my company. They also got rid of all the high level Indians in the same cut. So I'm guessing they caught on to the trend you guys are talking about here. I'm glad I work in an industry full of white males, it's headed off a ton of this crap.
 
How did he get the job? An office that Indianised would probably only "recommend friends" back home

He was the one person on the team hired by an outside recruiter and started as a contractor. Now I'm wondering if that's how companies are getting around "pajeets only hire pajeets" these days, with the bonus of not having to pay for benefits.
 
IBM has become the worst IT vendor I have to deal with, by far. Their product support has degraded so badly that I finally gotten my management on board with removing and replacing all IBM products in our environment. The institutional infestation of wokeness has destroyed that company. It will not recover.
Not surprised. Only their mainframe division is competent and it's their cash cow. IBM still has cultural issues that prevent it from making a modern product. The product I helped a team out on had no self serve feature. It was always "contact sales" and they had a sales guy attached to the team from the business services BU, which kept rotating due to business services consisting of salesmen.
Ginni and pajeet don't seem to understand how IBM is run below them.... or they do and are letting the ship sink.

Doesn't half of reddit's population dedicate hours on the day to posting justifications for the same thing online?
There is a pseudoanonymous social network app called "Blind". It puts your company next to your username and the terminally online posters are usually at woke companies.

I forgot to mention that, when Ginni was visiting, we had to put everything away off our desks and make ourselves scarce. One woman ambushed Ginni in the elevator and asked her a current events political question.



This was one of the fliers posted to the men's bathroom door.
bathroom-door.jpg
 
Last edited:
Not surprised. Only their mainframe division is competent and it's their cash cow. IBM still has cultural issues that prevent it from making a modern product.
That matches my experience with supporting several IBM software suites. What frustrates me the most is that after the tier 1 and 2 pajeets completely shit on their SLAs* they eventually escalate me to the grebeard support tier, and some 60 year old dude with a ponytail hops on the call and fixes my problem with an hour or two of work. It makes me see red to know that I've wasted weeks of time, and that I'll have to do it again the next time.

* Sometimes my tickets stay open and unresolved for months, but the pajeets game the system by constantly requesting more log capture packages so the ball is always in my court. When I ask them what they expect to find in my 14th log upload that they did not find in the 13th, they don't answer.
 
Back