Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 85 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 49 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 110 35.3%

  • Total voters
    312
Just watched the clip of him railing into Schneider. It's probably the most insane thing I've heard from him in a while. If you take every single thing he says at face value all that means is Schneider is actually an extremely nice and generous person who offered resources and support at no charge to a man he had absolutely no connection to.

Yet Nick says all of this with a smug look on his face and pauses to emphasize as if he is crucifying him. This is terminal brain damage for him to think he is making Schneider look at all bad.

The worst thing he said is implying he violated some ethics rule and didn't lend his services to a criminal drug addict that probably wouldn't be reliably able to pay for services anyway. But based on what Nick said he doesn't know WHO this potential client was. He doesn't know what they look like. He doesn't know anything about them. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like that wouldn't be any different than a lawyer saying "I had this client once", same as Nick has done multiple times. Nick was in an entirely different room when the conversation happened and he's acting like he was given full details of this persons identity and issues.
 
Holy fuck this lying sack of shit lies about everything else but not the one thing he should lie about.
>Catholic Bishops decide not to destroy Roman holiday and incorporate it as a feast to Jesus Christ
>centuries later they don’t destroy a gift giving festivities of Pagan beliefs and unify them under St. Nicholas of Myra, known for gift giving and punching out Arius at the Council of Nicaea for his heresy
>prior to the 2000’s most people besides faggot psychologists and really annoying non-religious Jews like the tradition of a jolly fat man giving gifts

No wonder Nick hates Christmas. Good Saint Nick is his exact opposite. Santa is literally just a cool tradition that’s tacked onto the birth of Christ.
 
Yet Nick says all of this with a smug look on his face and pauses to emphasize as if he is crucifying him. This is terminal brain damage for him to think he is making Schneider look at all bad.

The worst thing he said is implying he violated some ethics rule and didn't lend his services to a criminal drug addict that probably wouldn't be reliably able to pay for services anyway. But based on what Nick said he doesn't know WHO this potential client was.
This is the best part. It's subtle, and he doesn't really talk coherently anymore, so I'm going to highlight this with a timestamp.

Nick Rekieta implies that Schneider was acting unethical because he suggested he was going to refer potential clients who came to his office to an "unexperienced [sic], unqualified attorney". Who is the "unexperienced [sic], unqualified attorney" Nick Rekieta is talking about? That would be Nick Rekieta himself.

 
The worst thing he said is implying he violated some ethics rule and didn't lend his services to a criminal drug addict that probably wouldn't be reliably able to pay for services anyway. But based on what Nick said he doesn't know WHO this potential client was. He doesn't know what they look like. He doesn't know anything about them. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like that wouldn't be any different than a lawyer saying "I had this client once", same as Nick has done multiple times. Nick was in an entirely different room when the conversation happened and he's acting like he was given full details of this persons identity and issues.
Nick hates Schneider that much that he'd rather take the side of some random degenerate crack head he's never met. It's hilarious.
 
Nick hates Schneider that much that he'd rather take the side of some random degenerate crack head he's never met. It's hilarious.
It's his attempt to seem just so high and mighty and benevolent. When in reality a first year lawyer is the exact type of attorney that should be handling cases like that.

Some crackhead gets high and vandalizes a car or something and Nick is acting like they deserve to be represented by Robert Barnes or some shit.

ETA: I think this really highlights how little understanding Nick had of money and finances from an early age. In the beginning he was spoiled and idealistic and "Everyone deserves representation, I'll do it pro bono" and couldn't fathom the idea of "This crackheads case isn't going to bring in cash even IF they paid us". Now he's just spoiled and hedonistic, the idealistic side being consumed by alcoholism.
 
>centuries later they don’t destroy a gift giving festivities of Pagan beliefs and unify them under St. Nicholas of Myra, known for gift giving and punching out Arius at the Council of Nicaea for his heresy
Fun idea on how to use a time machine: send Rackets back in time to the Council of Nicaea with an interpreter that can do a passable job of translating English to contemporary Greek and Latin. Arius would no longer be a heretic because Nick would represent a new gold Balldo standard for what it is to be a heretic. You'd probably see it written down that St. Nick and other notable religious thinkers of the time said something to the effect of "If he were a pagan strict to his ways I would find it more probable that he could find salvation"
 
Imagine trying to have sex with Our Wife
No. I will not have sex with the Baldoess.

Nick hates Schneider that much that he'd rather take the side of some random degenerate crack head he's never met. It's hilarious.
There has got to be an actually good reason Nick hates Schneider so much. Like, I get it the comment about unprofessional in shorts and probably drunk from his whiskey parties, and that he's Monty's lawyer, but Nick seethes about the man like he does talking about Eric July. Did Nick go into Schneider's office in a Dick Show t-shirt, only for Schneider (a clear Maddox superfan) to start berating him for supporting a cretin like Dax? That's one of the only things that really causes Nick to go all in on a person.
Yes I know the Lolsuit happened well after Nick and Schneider tussled but still.
 
The baldo man sure is getting a good reputation as a degenerate person.
But for the baldo man we are just seething, you see? A public figure getting the reputation as a degenerate freak it's just f-u-n-n-y. Why are you so serious about it? What?! The baldo man main income comes from his public persona?? What?! Nooooo. Wrong. It's just f-u-n-n-y.
Your streaming network getting to know you as a degenerate sure will pay dividends right? Every big streamer wants to associate with degeneracy right? Because it's f-u-n-n-y. Don't be weird about it.

The worst part about him not understanding anything is that the baldo is funny. There’s a reason Jim laughing like a maniac at it and likening it to training middle aged women how to take the knot is funny, and there’s a reason why him signing Josh up for the emails was funny. It’s funny to mock the existence of such a degenerate piece of garbage.
But it ceases being funny when you join in on the degeneracy. And it definitely stops being funny when you accept money from them and admit to using it.
This is a very basic principle of comedy. Exaggeration is funny, mocking participation is funny, actual participation is disturbing
 
That said, in this case, MANdy likely derived sexual gratification from your post.



Unsure why it matters if Mandy does(n't) get what they want. Wasn't under the impression that how Mandy feels about what is written on this thread should inform one's posts (unless I'm missing something?). In this particular case, whatever is written just causes Mandy to schizopost in comment sections, which is content for us as evidenced by all the posts from those updating us on what Mandy's doing.

If there's more information on who Mandy could be pretending to be then I'm interested. Plus, now there's another picture to compare Mandy's other dad photo with:

5567915-484bc9974a76f80b1a4e4688224a622a.png1685499686352.png

In any case, there's no reason for anyone to be personally invested in Mandy_K beyond cataloguing their online activity as it relates to/reflects on Nick. Mandy has proven that they aren't to be taken seriously a long time ago, and whatever their intentions they aren't doing anything illegal unless their catfishing results in legitimate fraud with criminal charges. As it stands, the most interesting thing Mandy has done is catfish an e-celeb, Nick Rekieta, and pretend Kiwi Farms is out to get them. Funny stuff, but nothing for people to be sensitive about.

Speaking of Nick, if there's a rule about not talking about certain people in ways that gratify them, then I have bad news for people who made statements taking issue with Nick's offensive jokes:



Nick "I have ODD as an adult" Rekieta likes offending certain people and is emboldened by their disapproval because he's a petty and spiteful excuse for a man who puts his own happiness and comfort before anyone else's. Nick is an attention whore which is why he keeps telling his dumb jokes. That said, people should absolutely document and call Nick out on his idiocy and social retardation. It's what happens here, no matter how he feels.

TLDR: I don't care how the (negative) attention whores Mandy and Nick feel about what's posted here. If I should care, someone please tell me why since worst/best case scenario they continue to escalate things and bring in more content.
 
Literally no one said that. It just makes a lot more sense that Nick is a perpetual child and proud day drinker when you see who raised him. As others have said, it’s the very textbook dysfunction of second and third generation people who enjoy all the benefits of wealth they never had to work for and will never be able to appreciate.
The easiest explanation: Borrowed prestige. See below!...
Nick knows this is a lawsuit right? He's acting like this is just another Internet slap fight that he can gossip/argue/insult his way through. Does he ever actually address any of the merits (or lack thereof) or is it just about how much he hates Schneider?

Anyway, the irony of Nick talking about addiction while being a drunk himself, not being lost on him is pretty funny.
It's really quite something. He's a raging alcoholic trying to tell an actual lawyer who actually does the job for a living how to go about such things. And notice, suddenly objective morality is a thing again. I'm artificially overjoyed for him!

Meanwhile, he can only talk about doing real work. It's no coincidence he's suddenly developed a savior complex for this random addict. He's simply projecting onto others what he'd himself would like to be seen doing, but can't get himself together enough to even fathom doing the work. Hmm, sounds like jealousy. Prime example: Eric July

If any of his targets so much as slip up or shift their behavior towards any conclusion that remotely resembles something he's said on stream, we know he'll be there in a heartbeat to take credit with a "I told you so!". Because his life of immense pleasure has always been built off the success of others. And precisely because he's not worked hard enough and he expects shortcuts, his own efforts to make things happen will never feel sufficient. The only way he can compensate for his loss in ego and poor character is to star in his own movie, where he is the literal superhero saving marriages, while the rest of us are just lowlifes who suffer every second we don't hear him spew some alcoholic nonsense.
 
Last edited:
It's funny, one of the barbs the Vic haters lobbed at weebwars fans of Vic, was that Balldoman was a trust fund kid. They were correct, it turns out, although there wasn't much public evidence of it at the time. I still don't know that the status alone is the own they thought it was, but Nick has proven kickvic correct in Balldoman being almost every stereotype of a spoiled (3rd gen) trust fund shit there is.
I think everyone knew. I think nick even admitted to it while still couching it as "he can't touch it". Most just didn't think he was so reliant on it that it'd eventually shape his behavior like this (not giving a fuck about his own career and spiraling cause he knows he has the trust fund).

I am absolutely 100% confident that the person behind the "Mandy K'/MANdy account is not the real Amanda K. MANdy is very familiar with the Dallas-Fort Worth area, which Amanda K. has no ties to, and was able to discuss in real time local landmarks in the area with people who also said they lived there. I was also able to find public social media comments by the real Amanda K. and they demonstrated specific typing tics which MANdy does not.

I am roughly 50% confident that the person behind the MANdy account knew the real Amanda K when she lived in Shreveport, LA (so about 20 years ago) and has stolen her name online since 2008. MANdy occasionally referenced places in Shreveport in Locals and you found a comment where there was talk about going to a concert in Shreveport. It would help if we could know the previous usernames of a YT account, but AFAIK this is not possible. That said, in this case, MANdy likely derived sexual gratification from your post. I do think this is a really weird situation on the level of Metokur Fembot.

EDIT: This post likely comes across as more aggressive than intended which is more because I am really put off by the possibility of someone LARPing as someone else for 16 years
Is it possible that it's the brother mentioned in @Peace Through Power 's post? It's actually Aaron Karevicus, not Mandy Karevicus that Nick has been simping to?
 
Last edited:
CGoody is either retarded or Mandy.
My money is on him just being retarded.

Earlier in the thread, @Balldo's Gate brought up the point that the EXIF data suggested "her pictures" were taken on a phone synched to the central time zone. GGoody is eastern time. CGoody doesn't seem smart enough to spoof that. I also think the story of him hooking up with MANdy is bullshit meant to make him sound like some epic pussy slayer, and it never happened.

I know the central time zone thing might be red meat for people who think MANdy could be Farran (Chicago is central time) but, as I've said before, MANdy showed up in 2020. I can't wrap my head around her running a gay op against Rekieta that early on. After the famous drunken camel-toe stream... sure... but not 2020. That would involve some amazing pre-planning.
 
There has got to be an actually good reason Nick hates Schneider so much. Like, I get it the comment about unprofessional in shorts and probably drunk from his whiskey parties, and that he's Monty's lawyer, but Nick seethes about the man like he does talking about Eric July. Did Nick go into Schneider's office in a Dick Show t-shirt, only for Schneider (a clear Maddox superfan) to start berating him for supporting a cretin like Dax? That's one of the only things that really causes Nick to go all in on a person.
Yes I know the Lolsuit happened well after Nick and Schneider tussled but still.
I know another drunk perv POS from Texas who met GWB in high school when his marching band played at some event for then-Governor Bush. Bush shook his hand and smiled while telling him “Time to get a haircut, buddy.” Literally 40 years later that guy still visits Bush family graves to piss and shit on them over this. I mean it’s not hard to find Dubya or his family worth hating, but this was triggered by good-matured ribbing rather than signing off on mass death.

In other words, I totally believe Nick’s tard jihad could be because of a comment about shorts.
 
Oh, Nick is deciding to Scrooge it up this Christmas by soapboxing about "muh artificial joy" and "muh consumerism" and "muh Santa is a lie" which just reeks of edgy fedora pseudointellectualism.

Absolutely zero people are shocked by this. Maybe Balldo should consider that alcohol is an artificial joy.

If you don’t have a family, sure, I can understand why you don’t like Christmas.

But fuck, you gotta be a real miser to pull the “Muh consooomerism” this time of the year.

Ffs, get you loved ones something nice, focus on making others happy. Watch some sappy Christmas movies if you have to put yourself in the mood.

Not sure if he really can’t think of anything better to do this time of the year than being at some hedonist resort watching boomers fuck, but those kids aren’t going to remain kids for long. When you reach a certain age, every Christmas may be the last one you spend with some of your older family members.

Maybe I’m a naive consooomer faggot, but I just can’t understand that Scrooge mindset.
 
Back