Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

[rusty shackleford 1]

I’m not a scientist and I ain’t got enough learnin’ to read and interpret papers published in scientific journals but I still refuse to take anyone seriously who just straight up refuses to admit that teenagers in particular are susceptible to societal trends. Especially because of all the attractive features trooning comes with: cred for the progressive stack, priority in opportunities and social issues, very little pushback allowed in spaces where trooning is accepted, blind deference, gibs and e begs, victim points, blind acceptance and endless ass kissing, righteous anger because society is bigoted/misgendering/whatever, adults arguing on your behalf that you’re more mature than your cis peers and are capable of making your own big boy/big girl decisions about your health, access to the other sex’s intimate spaces or opportunities, or maybe even just fuck you mom and dad. etc.

That Tony can just plug his ears and say no, that never happens, teenagers never do stupid shit because they see their peers do it. They never say they know exactly who they are at 15 and defiantly tell their parents that they know they’ll never change their mind. Teenage wisdom is a whole trope and Tony just denies it ever happens for troonery specifically, that’s just batshit. It don’t take a fancy education to know Tony's full of shit when he speaks on this.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

That Tony can just plug his ears and say no, that never happens, teenagers never do stupid shit because they see their peers do it.

This is the very essence of every single one of Tony's "deboonkings."

Similar to this instance where Tony tried and failed again. Whether Littman's hypothesis had been clinically validated at the time of publication is irrelvant, but Snaggle Tooth has latched onto that phrase as if it some sort of refutation or invalidation. It is nothing of the sort. Instead, Littman seems to be saying that something new appears to be going on here, she offers a hypothesis about what the new thing is, and says more research is needed.

On a side note, Turban makes a really bad argument right here. "Gender dysphoria" is the mental disorder. Whether the onset is 'fast" or "slow" would not make it a different or separate disorder.

 

[Jacques1194]

I’m not a scientist and I ain’t got enough learnin’ to read and interpret papers published in scientific journals but I still refuse to take anyone seriously who just straight up refuses to admit that teenagers in particular are susceptible to societal trends. Especially because of all the attractive features trooning comes with: cred for the progressive stack, priority in opportunities and social issues, very little pushback allowed in spaces where trooning is accepted, blind deference, gibs and e begs, victim points, blind acceptance and endless ass kissing, righteous anger because society is bigoted/misgendering/whatever, adults arguing on your behalf that you’re more mature than your cis peers and are capable of making your own big boy/big girl decisions about your health, access to the other sex’s intimate spaces or opportunities, or maybe even just fuck you mom and dad. etc.

That Tony can just plug his ears and say no, that never happens, teenagers never do stupid shit because they see their peers do it. They never say they know exactly who they are at 15 and defiantly tell their parents that they know they’ll never change their mind. Teenage wisdom is a whole trope and Tony just denies it ever happens for troonery specifically, that’s just batshit. It don’t take a fancy education to know Tony's full of shit when he speaks on this.

Even if you generally believe being trans is a real thing, that still doesn't explain how there are schools where over half the students in one class have a trans identity.Seriously, i've seen kids like my own cousin who claim a " genderfluid" identity or young girls online claiming to be non binary and have posted pictures of themselves where they're literally a young woman who's trying to be special.They haven't started HRT ,(thank god) dont have any dysphoria with their biological sex, or have ever hinted at transitioning.Yet were suppose to believe they're trans just because they said so.Show me how these attention seeking people aren't lying, and how their identity is valid without any proof?

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

Trooning is the only thing we say children are mature enough to decide as a minor.

Tattoos? No, although I think they can in some places with parental approval, but I've heard of artists still refusing to tattoo on a minor.

Piercings? With parental permission, but again I think the artists can refuse if they feel it's inappropriate. Like a belly button, probably yes. Nipples, probably no.

Smoke? No.
Drink? No.
Sex? We know it happens, but we at least supposedly try to discourage it.
Join the military? Lol, no.

Entering a contract? Not even with parental permission. Fun fact, if you can get your hands on a credit card as a minor, you can max it out and then never have to pay back any of the debt you acquired before you turn 18. It's considered the credit card companies fault for entering a contract with a minor.

A lot of these choices aren't permanent, but they're still considered adult choices.

A kid can't get a tattoo, but they can chop off healthy body parts, disrupt the natural process of aging, and take toxic opposite sex hormones.

It's fucked up.

 

[Positron]

The dead giveaway that neither Tony or Zac Antolak read or understand the paper is in the abstract which directly refutes the very claim they are making.

"The fact is that we don't have new cases of smallpox now, this totally contradicts the claim that smallpox is an infectious disease. Subscribe to support my work".

 

[Pube Dandruff]

Tony's milk is getting stale. Nothing but sneering haughtily at actual women and/or experts on research he has no business trying to critically analyze. He's as snooty as he is retarded, and I praise the Kiwis with the patience and fortitude to pick apart his mindless shotgun-style DEBOONKING. Truly you are among the real people at the pigeon chess tournament here. Can he hurry up and get fucking married already? I want to see the ill-fitting white dresses and the gargoyle cast of guests.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Tony's milk is getting stale. Nothing but sneering haughtily at actual women and/or experts on research he has no business trying to critically analyze. He's as snooty as he is retarded, and I praise the Kiwis with the patience and fortitude to pick apart his mindless shotgun-style DEBOONKING. Truly you are among the real people at the pigeon chess tournament here. Can he hurry up and get fucking married already? I want to see the ill-fitting white dresses and the gargoyle cast of guests.

I am starting to think that Tony only has one "good dress" because he wears it in every photoshoot. I wouldn't be surprised if he uses it as a "wedding dress" during his prison gay nuptuals. He seems unaware that it makes his growing gut stick out farther than his moobs.

 

[Cougar Pump]

I am starting to think that Tony only has one "good dress" because he wears it in every photoshoot. I wouldn't be surprised if he uses it as a "wedding dress" during his prison gay nuptuals. He seems unaware that it makes his growing gut stick out farther than his moobs.

The double AGP smirk is killing me here for some reason
Just two euphoric dudes chillin in the park.

 

[rusty shackleford 1]

oh my god

damn girl

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Tony, you left out the important qualifier *that I am willing to acknowledge. He should submit his deboonkings to a troon friendly journal for publication. The rejection letters would be a healthy reality check.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

It is a weird move for a troon to cite other troons as "authorative sources" to try and legitimize troonery.

This is actually common in shitty fields. I don't want to assign it to any source because of that BUT I will say that gender studies or queer studies or whatever the fuck we're calling it now is basically nothing but this. If they aren't citing their own feelings they're citing how some faggot said that Judith Butler said that some other faggot said something like any of this is relevant. Following the citations back just leads to the first thing. They see it in history or sociology so think that's how citation in legit fields works when there it generally leads back to some actual study or research even if that shit is terrible it's not like the guy just wrote up his opinions, he at least did some academic fraud or something. Another place this came from is legal studies that has lots of this nonsense.

They really love it if you start saying "God said" to make fun of it.

Probably never. He just babbles. He doesn't read, or understand. For example, he just put this out after seeing Zinnia Jones tweet about it. It is obvious neither one of them read it. Another dead giveaway is the paper is paywalled.

View attachment 5592920

The dead giveaway that neither Tony or Zac Antolak read or understand the paper is in the abstract which directly refutes the very claim they are making.

My idiot opponents keep claiming that MySpace was once more popular than Facebook but this graph shows the latest blow against that idea:


Why does Tony think the graph shows gender transition rates have reached an "equilibrium"? He thinks there's a natural rate of transition? And he doesn't find it problematic that rates quickly rose to the natural rate then exceeded the natural rate and now has fallen back towards the natural rate?

To steal somewhat from Positron's joke, COVID RATES REACH EQUILIBRIUM IN LATEST BLOW AGAINST CONTAGION IDEA:

A note that was forcibly added despite the paper not making any claim like that.

Maybe Tony should add notes to his articles that "Erin Reed is not a rapist."

 

[AMHOLIO]

It is a weird move for a troon to cite other troons as "authorative sources" to try and legitimize troonery.

If I never hear Julia Serano's name again it will be too soon. Fuck that guy.

Probably never. He just babbles.

Honestly, it's hard to read his work since a lot of it is obfuscation, circular logic, and generally blowhardiness being spewed from his mouth. It makes my eyes glaze over. Being something that no one wants to read is a great defense, nobody can snip quites from your work if they can't focus hard enough to grasp how bad your writing is. He'd see this as a win and say transphobes dumb, but this thread proves over and over that people reas his crap and it doesn't make sense. I'm just a filthy fucking casual who reads for fun and have other lolcows I like to play armchair psych with, so sadly he doesn't get my love or attention as much. But Not Dr Evil, AirdropShiposts, and the rest of the thread make great substitute parents.

Teenage wisdom is a whole trope and Tony just denies it ever happens for troonery specifically, that’s just batshit. It don’t take a fancy education to know Tony's full of shit when he speaks on this.

It's like a prolong rage of not being able to come to terms with himself being powerless during his teen years, so he's using the childhood fantasy of being the Cassandra teen who's right that no one listens too but should to feel valid. He was smart then, let the history books show that his teachers saying he was wrong were in fact, wrong themselves.

I'm still just floored and saddened he never talks about being a parent and raising a kid himself in relation to kids. "My heart weeps for them", he talks like he himself is still in that phase or never had a child in the first place. I don't think he's smart enough to do that so he connects to twitter young adults who haven't had their own children yet, I think he genuinely doesn't see his son as anything but a tool. And he can't even understand that people feel things for their children, so he too could use that to manipulate people by relating to them as parents or relating struggles of parenting to trans issues - LIKE A FUCKING ADULT.

Maybe Tony should add notes to his articles that "Erin Reed is not a rapist."

Nah, he should add notes of things lik "Erin Reed is not allowed to wear her ex's clothes" and "Erin Reed allegedly looks like a serial killer", his apperance is more important and should be protected.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

This tweet was amusing to me because it was immediatly followed by bad faith misrepresenations,strawman arguments, and unsupported statements of opinion (yeah, you said X but I feel like you should have said y).

By the way, Leor was super duper clear and said it once. Tony is being an asshole here because he sees it as a threat to his "I knew i was a toon" when I was 8" narrative.

 

[Thomas Eugene Paris]

Probably never. He just babbles. He doesn't read, or understand. For example, he just put this out after seeing Zinnia Jones tweet about it. It is obvious neither one of them read it. Another dead giveaway is the paper is paywalled.

View attachment 5592920

The dead giveaway that neither Tony or Zac Antolak read or understand the paper is in the abstract which directly refutes the very claim they are making.

Abstract​

Our study examines the prevalence of gender transitions in Sweden over time and documents the sociodemographic characteristics of people transitioning in different periods. We use national administrative data covering the transgender population from 1973 to 2020 and analyze two common events in a gender transition: the earliest diagnosis of gender incongruence and the change of legal gender. We have three main findings. First, the measured prevalence of both types of events is relatively low in all periods, although it has increased substantially since the early 2010s. Second, the recent increase in transition prevalence is most pronounced among people in early adulthood; in particular, young transgender men drive an increase in overall transition rates through 2018, followed by moderate declines in 2019 and 2020. Third, transgender men and women have substantially lower socioeconomic outcomes than cisgender men and women, regardless of the age at which they transition or the historical period.

The Demography of Sweden's Transgender Population – Patterns, Changes, and Sociodemographics

What does he even think "equilibrium" means in this context? Baffling. He wants to quibble about the definition of "rapid", so I feel entitled to an answer.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

This is actually common in shitty fields. I don't want to assign it to any source because of that BUT I will say that gender studies or queer studies or whatever the fuck we're calling it now is basically nothing but this

I'm confused how queer studies is even a serious or quasi legitimate academic field. Using the Wikipedia definition, "Queer theory is the perspective that questions the perception that cisgender and heterosexual identities are in any sense standard" it seems to rest on the purported rejection of concepts that at axiomatically true. With mammals including human beings being sexually dimorphic, the only possible outcome is that "cisgender" (whatever that is) heterosexuality is standard. Am I missing something?

 

[Tragi-Chan]

And I'll just leave this here as a way of wishing merry christmas to everyone:

Tony always looks like he doesn’t really want to be there, but this is the best example yet. He’s not looking at Zac, he’s not looking at the camera. It looks like he’s looking at the door. “Hahaha, I *gag* love you so much!”

I want to see the ill-fitting white dresses and the gargoyle cast of guests.

Fuck yes. Zac looking the happiest he’s ever been, Tony with his rictus grin and eyes on the verge of tears.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Tony still does not understand the heirachy of the judicial branch. making the nonsensical assertion that a trial court judge somehow "rebuked" a panel of appellate justices. Tony's tom foolery is compounded by the fact that the 11th circuit and 6th circuit DESTROYED the very same faulty logic that Tony is now fawning over.

"Against this backdrop, and without any historical analysis specifically tied to the medications at issue, Plaintiffs have not shown it to be likely that the Due Process Clause of the Constitution guarantees a fundamental “right to treat [one's] children with transitioning medications subject to medically accepted standards.”18 See L.W. v. Skrmetti, 73 F.4th 408, 416–17 (6th Cir. 2023) (recognizing that parents “have a substantive due process right ‘to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children’ ” but noting that “[n]o Supreme Court case extends it to a general right to receive new medical or experimental drug treatments” (quoting Troxel, 530 U.S. at 66, 120 S.Ct. 2054)).

Eknes-Tucker v. Governor of Alabama (11th Cir. 2023) 80 F.4th 1205, 1224.

Parental rights do not alter this conclusion because parents do not have a constitutional right to obtain reasonably banned treatments for their children. Plaintiffs counter that, as parents, they have a substantive due process right “to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children.” Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66, 120 S.Ct. 2054, 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (plurality opinion). At one level of generality, they are right. Parents usually do know what's best for their children and in most matters (where to live, how to live, what to eat, how to learn, when to be exposed to mature subject matter) their decisions govern until the child reaches 18. But becoming a parent does not create a right to reject democratically enacted laws. The key problem is that the claimants overstate the parental right by climbing up the ladder of generality to a perch—in which parents control all drug and other medical treatments for their children—that the case law and our traditions simply do not support. Level of generality is everything in constitutional law, which is why the Court requires “a ‘careful description’ of the asserted fundamental liberty interest.” Glucksberg, 521 U.S. at 721 (quotation omitted).

L. W. by and through Williams v. Skrmetti (6th Cir. 2023) 83 F.4th 460, 475, cert. dismissed in part sub nom. Doe v. Kentucky (U.S., Dec. 14, 2023, No. 23-492) 2023 WL 8656101

Again, Snaggle Tooth doesn't understand how conlicts of interest actually work.

I am not sure why these two halfwit troons think that either of these two things are a sound argument. The idea organizations are not allowed to have religious views or have contact with lawmakers who share those views is absurd. So is Snaggle Tooth's idea that experts are supposed to work and consult for free or their opinions should be rejected.

They are the same two mouth breathers who think that the "wait and see" model makes SEGM a hate group.

I would note that the emails that Tony and "Florence" are sperging over don't really support the claims that they are making.

This is the most polite version of "nobody cares about your malformed opinion and you can fuck right off" that I have ever seen.

 

[AnOminous]

I am starting to think that Tony only has one "good dress" because he wears it in every photoshoot. I wouldn't be surprised if he uses it as a "wedding dress" during his prison gay nuptuals. He seems unaware that it makes his growing gut stick out farther than his moobs.

Yet another thing these men lack that real women have: an actual wardrobe and not just one cum-stained heavily worn dress.

This is actually common in shitty fields. I don't want to assign it to any source because of that BUT I will say that gender studies or queer studies or whatever the fuck we're calling it now is basically nothing but this. If they aren't citing their own feelings they're citing how some faggot said that Judith Butler said that some other faggot said something like any of this is relevant.

Ex-professor Rhys McKinnon would often literally cite himself.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

What does he even think "equilibrium" means in this context? Baffling. He wants to quibble about the definition of "rapid", so I feel entitled to an answer.

Hold on, I need proof he knows what equilibrium means in any context before we can ask him to explain it in this context. I'm not sure he doesn't think it means the x-axis on a graph.

I'm confused how queer studies is even a serious or quasi legitimate academic field. Using the Wikipedia definition, "Queer theory is the perspective that questions the perception that cisgender and heterosexual identities are in any sense standard" it seems to rest on the purported rejection of concepts that at axiomatically true. With mammals including human beings being sexually dimorphic, the only possible outcome is that "cisgender" (whatever that is) heterosexuality is standard. Am I missing something?

Short version is that queer studies goes back to literary criticism and this is everything spawned from that field. Much of African American Studies, Latino Studies, Critical Legal Studies (which spawned the more well known CRT which is barely any different just race-obsessed), etc. is mocked and disrespected because this is the bulk of what these fields produce. If you want actual useful research on say, Black history or whatever, it's available in more rigorous and less ideologically captured fields so the creation of these departments is to "juke the stats" with highly paid lower performing morons based on fleeting trends on the academic-adjacent money complex with extensive ties to the state and/or political organizations.

Women's studies is one of the few of these fields* that seems to have legitimate academics in it, partly because of its history that involved (and still involves) lots of cross-pollination across fields. If you were a feminist and wanted to do some kind of history-sociology-something else mesh it was easier to shift into women's studies (especially when money and professorships were being thrown at it) than try to publish within the existing fields that would request you limit the scope of the work to just their part. Hopefully the troons will help drive them out to finally liberate it.

However bad you think the field you're most familiar with is too focused on "star power" rather than quality of output, these are even worse because it's almost zero quality and 100% politking/fundraising/etc. This as much as narcissism is one reason they cite themselves so much, they don't want to give any power to anyone else in the field.

*I do want to note that there are some respected and more rigorous Latino Studies departments for similar hybrid nature reasons but most of the field is the nonsense version.

Tony still does not understand the heirachy of the judicial branch. making the nonsensical assertion that a trial court judge somehow "rebuked" a panel of appellate justices. Tony's tom foolery is compounded by the fact that the 11th circuit and 6th circuit DESTROYED the very same faulty logic that Tony is now fawning over.

Tony should check out that one part he highlighted of that incredible paragraph: "that is generally available and accepted in the medical community."

This can change. Fast.

"an organization operating internationally to oppose ... has been discovered to be part of a secret fundamentalist email group in 2019 that stated 'gods will'"

Is this about the Zionists again, Tony?

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

However bad you think the field you're most familiar with is too focused on "star power" rather than quality of output, these are even worse because it's almost zero quality and 100% politking/fundraising/etc. This as much as narcissism is one reason they cite themselves so much, they don't want to give any power to anyone else in the field.

Seems like a similar situation to what is presented here. Tony is all excited about a new publication from the SPLC which is an organization that nobody should ever take as a serious or credible source.

The first dead giveaway that the paper is absolute rubbish is the fact that the paper is organized as a series of bad faith ad-hominem attacks.

The second dead giveaway that the publication is not even fit to be used as emergency toilet paper is the fact that not a single contributor has a degree in a relevant field and none of them have a degree in a hard science. This is bizarre because the paper posits that it is battling "pseudoscience" which is troon speak for anything critical of the fetish.

R. G. Cravens - Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Tennessee
Quinnehtukqut Mclamaore - PhD in Social Psychology from the Psychology of Peace and Violence Program at the University of Massachusetts Amherst
Lee Leveille - "s a Jewish, disabled, trans androgynos, Lee has been a self- and professional health liberation advocate"
Sophie Wunderlich - B.A. History, Williams College, 2018