Something that I hear a lot and that I agree with is that AI still only threatens human work that is poor quality. Even if they consider it creative work, if humans do it in a poor quality, and machines match that poor quality for cheaper, then why keep the humans?
What I add is that this is very similar to machines replacing humans on the assembly line. Humans frequently make mistakes, may steal or sabotage the product.
Except in this case using AI for creative work is generally a direct downgrade, since AI is always worse than a human's best, but you never get a human's best in those art/translation farms.