Furry Fandom and Drama General

And it's not even just Lolifaggotry/Shotafaggotry/Cubfaggotry. Didn't he outright meet up with a minor a few years ago?
First I'm hearing of it. How's he not in jail? Some of his cub shit is on E6 too. I don't see a report button so I'm guessing they allow it. I could be wrong but I skimmed the rules and can't see anything.
 
First I'm hearing of it. How's he not in jail? Some of his cub shit is on E6 too. I don't see a report button so I'm guessing they allow it. I could be wrong but I skimmed the rules and can't see anything.
Apparently cubshit is allowed on E621, but only visible to people who have registered an account. Yet for some reason 0r0ch1 seems like an exception to this rule.
As for the IRL nonce shit 0r0ch1 did, it's been mentioned here:
https://kiwifarms.hk/threads/furry-fandom-and-drama-general.1102/page-904#post-7527193
 
Last edited:
It shouldn't be there period, fur affinity isn't any good either but at least they banned it from what i can tell.
How hard is it to just say "no we don't want you to post child pornography on our website drawn or otherwise."
Don't get it, why even cater to these people?
The only reason a specific type of socially unacceptable sexual interest (zoophilia, pedophilia, etc.) is tolerated is that the administration for your website indulges in it.

That's why FurAffinity tolerates bestiality. That's why InkBunny tolerates "cub".

The fact that furries have a slang term for artistic depictions of child rape is bad enough. That it's a common word like "cub" and not borrowed from another language (i.e., lolita) sickens me.

If it weren't for the kind furries in my life, including my boyfriends, I'd have either quit the community or quit life itself a long time ago.
 
I've stopped explicitly "identifying" with the "furry community" since it's become almost a sort of confession of complacency in this, just the concept of the fandom itself is incredibly nebulous (at least ponyfags have a show and official merchandise to soy over or something).
What sucks is that these websites are a big part in representing the community in a more condensed state where it's not just random group chats and friend networks.
Resign to your own small corner of the community and observe the shitstorm from afar, the only way to win this stupid game is to not play.
 
Whatever benefit of the doubt I tried to give this guy's friend is pretty much entirely gone. Enjoy the lunacy.
View attachment 5606971 View attachment 5606973

"You seem pretty radicalized hating pedophiles like this, what if the trans folx saw this?" :story:
looks like you forgot to censor Ixrin's name out at the end there. Ultimately an odd thing to do when Ixrin willingly associates with Dogsmith, someone we have screenshots of saying they enjoy cub porn somewhere in this thread.
 
The only reason a specific type of socially unacceptable sexual interest (zoophilia, pedophilia, etc.) is tolerated is that the administration for your website indulges in it.

That's why FurAffinity tolerates bestiality. That's why InkBunny tolerates "cub".

The fact that furries have a slang term for artistic depictions of child rape is bad enough. That it's a common word like "cub" and not borrowed from another language (i.e., lolita) sickens me.

If it weren't for the kind furries in my life, including my boyfriends, I'd have either quit the community or quit life itself a long time ago.

Pretty sure Lolita didn't come from a different language. Its the name of a book (and the name of a primary character from said book) where the main character of the book has an illicit and manipulative sexual relationship with an underage girl. Because of the subject matter of the book, the title/name of the young girl in the book started to be applied as a slang term for other depictions of pedophilia/hebephilia. But it never was some other languages term for pedo/hebe shit.
 
Pretty sure Lolita didn't come from a different language. Its the name of a book (and the name of a primary character from said book) where the main character of the book has an illicit and manipulative sexual relationship with an underage girl. Because of the subject matter of the book, the title/name of the young girl in the book started to be applied as a slang term for other depictions of pedophilia/hebephilia. But it never was some other languages term for pedo/hebe shit.
Technically, it is in another language for the Japanese, which is where we got the resurgence of the term. Lolita was just the name of the book/character for a very long time, with a few cultural exceptions, and only blew up again after the Japanese latched on to the term and it circled back to the West with their cultural exports.

By the way, most people using the term have never read the book. Even with the protagonist/narrator trying to excuse everything he does, that story is grim.
 
Last edited:
Whatever benefit of the doubt I tried to give this guy's friend is pretty much entirely gone. Enjoy the lunacy.
View attachment 5606971 View attachment 5606973

"You seem pretty radicalized hating pedophiles like this, what if the trans folx saw this?" :story:
Odd how their first assumption upon hearing that you dislike pedophiles is that you also dislike trannies. I wonder how they drew that connection? Gets the noggin joggin.
 
Odd how their first assumption upon hearing that you dislike pedophiles is that you also dislike trannies. I wonder how they drew that connection? Gets the noggin joggin.
If I recall, Dogsmith became a troon and I'm assuming that Ixrin is basing their argument against this person as "you're trying to tell me that all trans people are groomers" even though that's not what the person talking to Ixrin is even trying to say.
 
The only reason a specific type of socially unacceptable sexual interest (zoophilia, pedophilia, etc.) is tolerated is that the administration for your website indulges in it.

That's why FurAffinity tolerates bestiality. That's why InkBunny tolerates "cub".

The fact that furries have a slang term for artistic depictions of child rape is bad enough. That it's a common word like "cub" and not borrowed from another language (i.e., lolita) sickens me.

If it weren't for the kind furries in my life, including my boyfriends, I'd have either quit the community or quit life itself a long time ago.
Reminder: Dragoneer loves pedo art and was in fact featured in a cub art 'zine. He only changed his tune because his then-gf/wife hated it. So he had a poll about it that was somehow miraculously a dead tie so he cast the 'deciding vote' for the ban.

This then forced Inkbunny to happen ahead of schedule, and unlike every single other FA competitor, it does well because it has a built in audience of pedos.
If I recall, Dogsmith became a troon and I'm assuming that Ixrin is basing their argument against this person as "you're trying to tell me that all trans people are groomers" even though that's not what the person talking to Ixrin is even trying to say.
Trannyshielding at its best. Washed in the blood of the trans, I call it.
 
This then forced Inkbunny to happen ahead of schedule
Part of me hopes Inkbunny is just the largest honeypot ever conducted and that every pedo on that godforsaken site will be put to trial.
But we all know this isn't the case, it's just wild to me that there was a such a need for a pedo containment site that it actually stays afloat because of it (also puts into question why any other site would even consider allowing cub content, like the pedos already have their dirty corner WHY ON EARTH ARE YOU CATERING TO THEM)

People should be more vocal about babyfur shit but for some reason it's almost considered offensive to go against it, there can't be that many of them right? this must by a jewish psy op to demoralize goyim because i know there's fucked up people but this many for this specific thing?
 
Oh, I can explain this one!
People should be more vocal about babyfur shit but for some reason it's almost considered offensive to go against it, there can't be that many of them right? this must by a jewish psy op to demoralize goyim because i know there's fucked up people but this many for this specific thing?
It depends what you mean by babyfur shit.

ABDL kink stuff with adults? Weird as fuck, but not pedophilia. ABDL is a kink outside of furry. You're going to have a very tough uphill battle getting most kink/queer communities to give even half a shit about this kink, even if many of them don't like it.

(ABDL, for the untainted, stands for Adult Baby / Diaper Lover IIRC)

Sexualization of minors? Kill it with fire. You can rally any sane person to attack that, because it's pedophilia.

The problem is, when people decry "babyfur shit", it's not immediately clear if they're attacking ABDL shit or artistic CSAM.

If you're attacking both at the same time, the pedos will try to deflect by saying you're attacking ABDL kink, and people will stop listening because most people don't give a shit about even the most degenerate kinks if they're not actually hurting anyone.

This isn't to defend ABDL furries, either. I'm trying (failing perhaps?) to describe where the communication breakdown is happening. Correcting this issue will make your campaigns more effective.

Just my 2c

There's a joke that furry cons are mostly staffed by babyfurs (as in ABDL). There's a variant that says volunteering for furry cons is the easiest way to come out as a babyfur. This is why I stopped going to cons over a decade ago.
 
People should be more vocal about babyfur shit but for some reason it's almost considered offensive to go against it, there can't be that many of them right? this must by a jewish psy op to demoralize goyim because i know there's fucked up people but this many for this specific thing?
From personal experience with these sorts of Furfags, they don't even seem to understand why such content is seen as disturbing and uncomfortable to normal people.
 
This isn't to defend ABDL furries, either. I'm trying (failing perhaps?) to describe where the communication breakdown is happening. Correcting this issue will make your campaigns more effective.
Yeah i think i understand, yet i feel that there is a tangible link between the people that like to dress up like babies and think that's arousing and the people that think babies are arousing.
But it'd be grasping at straws to try and convince people of that, i think it's much easier to argue against drawn CSAM being hosted on mainstream gallery websites.
The less we normalize this shit the more people will be willing to push back against it and hopefully eradicate the pedoid from public participation altogether.
 
Yeah i think i understand, yet i feel that there is a tangible link between the people that like to dress up like babies and think that's arousing and the people that think babies are arousing.
But it'd be grasping at straws to try and convince people of that, i think it's much easier to argue against drawn CSAM being hosted on mainstream gallery websites.
The less we normalize this shit the more people will be willing to push back against it and hopefully eradicate the pedoid from public participation altogether.
I agree, but I think we need to set an example.

Consider this: If you type the Greek lowercase zeta into Twitter or BlueSky's search field, you'll find out-and-proud zoophiles with little effort. I'm sure there are similar signs for pedophiles. (I don't think "MAP" is super helpful because it's also a common English word, and I feel brain-damaged enough without punishing my curiosity further on this topic.)

And yet, Furry Twitter is constantly bickering about whether or not an anthro character having a knot on their dick is actually zoophilia or not, and trying to dox and cancel each other over that. And other such acts of idiocy.

What are our priorities?
What can we focus on today to make a difference?

These questions are lost on these rubes. Furry is very disorganized and abusers exploit this every chance they get. If we stay unfocused and disorganized because we want to just burn all degeneracy to the ground, we might as well try to boil the ocean.
 
Back