Oh, I can explain this one!
People should be more vocal about babyfur shit but for some reason it's almost considered offensive to go against it, there can't be that many of them right? this must by a jewish psy op to demoralize goyim because i know there's fucked up people but this many for this specific thing?
It depends what you mean by babyfur shit.
ABDL kink stuff with adults? Weird as fuck, but not pedophilia. ABDL is a kink outside of furry. You're going to have a very tough uphill battle getting most kink/queer communities to give even half a shit about this kink, even if many of them don't like it.
(ABDL, for the untainted, stands for Adult Baby / Diaper Lover IIRC)
Sexualization of minors? Kill it with fire. You can rally any sane person to attack that, because it's pedophilia.
The problem is, when people decry "babyfur shit", it's not immediately clear if they're attacking ABDL shit or artistic CSAM.
If you're attacking both at the same time, the pedos will try to deflect by saying you're attacking ABDL kink, and people will stop listening because
most people don't give a shit about even the most degenerate kinks if they're not actually hurting anyone.
This isn't to defend ABDL furries, either. I'm trying (failing perhaps?) to describe where the communication breakdown is happening. Correcting this issue will make your campaigns more effective.
Just my 2c
There's a joke that furry cons are mostly staffed by babyfurs (as in ABDL). There's a variant that says volunteering for furry cons is the easiest way to come out as a babyfur. This is why I stopped going to cons over a decade ago.