Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
Gotta love the shade Gleen Greenwald is throwing at Destiny :story:

1704389055683.png
And of course the smug smiley face as a response :story:

1704389100755.png
 
This was the fastest divorce I’ve ever heard of. He literally filed the papers and she signed them the next day.
 
Gotta love the shade Gleen Greenwald is throwing at Destiny :story:

View attachment 5611569
And of course the smug smiley face as a response :story:

View attachment 5611571
He dropped that during the debate, too. Just Destiny basically being unable or unwilling to accept the reality of the Security State using the courts as a weapon. It was incredibly disingenuous by Destiny, too. They brought up modern cases where Feds force you to plea despite not believing it.
 
I don't pay much attention, but didn't Destiny get cheated on recently or something? I was reminded of it when I saw this screenshot I saved in November 2011. This was in reference to Liquid_Tyler, otherwise known as NonY (StarCraft players have weird names), at a time when Tyler was having mental health issues. I can't remember if they were caused by Tyler's relationship or not. It was a while back.
 

Attachments

  • ZyQd4.jpg
    ZyQd4.jpg
    50 KB · Views: 64
He dropped that during the debate, too. Just Destiny basically being unable or unwilling to accept the reality of the Security State using the courts as a weapon. It was incredibly disingenuous by Destiny, too. They brought up modern cases where Feds force you to plea despite not believing it.
Destiny is unwilling to accept anything that goes against what he feels or believes is correct. He hilariously got btfo by rackets of all people and STILL refuses to accept he was wrong:

1704810382123.png
 
Don't know if it's been discussed, but it seems this is Steven's new live in woman.

Steven mentioned in his stream that he watched Madoka Magicka.
View attachment 5585954
She also has the same bang-cut for her hair that was featured in the B-day photos:
View attachment 5585956
27 years old:
View attachment 5585960
Twitter. || A.
Instagram. || A.
>Date clout chasing whore
>Get cucked constantly
>Live in denial
>Get divorced
>Introspect "hmmm maybe she wasnt the best for me"
>Date clout chasing whore
 
Destiny is unwilling to accept anything that goes against what he feels or believes is correct. He hilariously got btfo by rackets of all people and STILL refuses to accept he was wrong:

View attachment 5622669
Good Lawgic did a review stream, apparently Nick had a killshot early on in that debate but he kept fumbling it. Nick needed to say “detrimental reliance” as being a pre-requisite for fraud but just didn’t.

Not like it’d change Destiny’s mind though.
 
The Imp's orbiters seem to be imploding.
ef6syj9Oqm.jpgeUq6PfLH5j.jpg

Lauren Delaguna makes a correct observation, yet completely fails to realize she's doing the exact same thing, she also seems to confirm that Farha and Destiny did indeed have a sexual relationship (which isn't surprising, it was quite obvious from the start)

Ufit8hc8JD.jpg
Nft8l8aAGo.jpgJnK0XWlbLv.jpg
Delaguna says her problem with Farha is personal, however, Melina did have a problem with Delaguna being friends with Destiny:
She says there was shit-talking behind the scenes, I think Delaguna has always disliked Melina, two weeks ago when Destiny dropped the first "nuke" about the divorce drama and he explained a little bit of the situation "jstlk" (another orbiter) hosted a stream along side Kelly Jean in which they reviewed what Destiny said, at a certain point Kelly mentions that Melina isn't the only one that has kept being friends with people that dislike the other's partner (refering to Memetix disliking Destiny), Kelly says this:

"there have been people, that Destiny has slept with, that have sent messages to Mel — fucking essays — that are really overstepping, and I think that's inappropriate. I don't think he brings this kind of stuff up, but, that's not ideal..." jstlk says that he thinks Destiny probably limits his interactions with those kinds of people, Kelly responds: "nah, he's still really good friends and like hangs out a bunch with at least one of them. Can't say who, as much as I would like to, I mean unless Destiny says it's okay, I would have to speak to him about it..."

I fully believe Kelly is talking about Delaguna here, she's the only one of all of Destiny's orbiters that's relatively close him has this kind of autistic energy to directly message Melina and criticize her to her face.
Sa28KerUIb.jpg

I can't remember if Melina and Delaguna ever followed each other in social media, but, at least by November (which was when things were going on in the background) they didn't follow each other, so: they either unfollowed each other for some reason around November, or never liked each other enough to follow one another in social media, you might think this is insignificant to point out, but, Melina ALWAYS used to follow the women that Destiny was fucking and was growing close to or were recurrent orbiters.

Why I'm mentioning all this Melina-Delaguna drama is because I don't see Delaguna and Farha to be connected in anyway, which topic could Farha could have been trying to undermine Delaguna about? Law? Redpill? Politics? it has to be personal and the biggest connection between them is their "friendship" with Destiny, and as we can see from Kelly Jean ( who is Melina's #1 arse licker) the pro-Melina camp has very bad opinions about Delaguna and like all women they discuss it and gossip behind the scenes, and the easiest way to ruin Destiny's relationship with another woman was to tell him that this person (in this case Delaguna) is trying to ruin their marriage or is being too mean towards Melina. (however, this is all speculation from my part)

In other news, after the Alex Jones debate the Imp seems to have stayed in TX for a couple days, probably visiting a girl and filming Turkey Tom's interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LSiHPskUbo&t=32555s ( Tom is doing a similar one to the one he did about Vegan Gains https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkU6aLiQbMc) , and yesterday he seems to have travelled with Turkey Tom to Louisiana https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LSiHPskUbo&t=32572s to shoot guns and film more for the video
418374980_783938786843369_6797137720389532583_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Destiny is just an embarrassing human being like seriously why did Glenn Greenwald who is a respected journalist as well as a prominent civil rights lawyer even remotely think debating a literal cock
Was a good idea the reason Destiny couldn't have a one-on-one debate with Glenn it's because he would lose cuz Glenn actually had to deal with the security State because he actually worked on one of the most high-profile cases involving the far right for the defense it was Aryan Nation specifically involving Matthew Hale and how the FBI basically entrapped him
He lost but he still worked on the case pro bono because Glenn as much as he is a Russian c********* and makes excuses for Putin is principled on the ideas that the FBI should not abuse people and surveillance is bad.
And you can see during the debate when Alex Jones puts his hand on his shoulder he's basically shaking
Because he knows Alex Jones can snap him like a twig
People should not be debating this boat Mexican
 
Destiny is just an embarrassing human being like seriously why did Glenn Greenwald who is a respected journalist as well as a prominent civil rights lawyer even remotely think debating a literal cock
Was a good idea the reason Destiny couldn't have a one-on-one debate with Glenn it's because he would lose cuz Glenn actually had to deal with the security State because he actually worked on one of the most high-profile cases involving the far right for the defense it was Aryan Nation specifically involving Matthew Hale and how the FBI basically entrapped him
He lost but he still worked on the case pro bono because Glenn as much as he is a Russian c********* and makes excuses for Putin is principled on the ideas that the FBI should not abuse people and surveillance is bad.
And you can see during the debate when Alex Jones puts his hand on his shoulder he's basically shaking
Because he knows Alex Jones can snap him like a twig
People should not be debating this boat Mexican
Glenn seems like a huge sperg who has been living from his past fame and was never able to surpass it, as it was a fluke and he's a hack, and he's a faggot, which is why he was unable to actually engage with any of Destiny's arguments except for calling the Imp naive. Rob Noerr did a far better job at arguing for the Trump side, but still was unable to make a better argument than Pisco.
Glenn is a good 110 IQ who plays to his 90 IQ populist audience, nothing more.
 
Glenn seems like a huge sperg who has been living from his past fame and was never able to surpass it, as it was a fluke and he's a hack, and he's a faggot, which is why he was unable to actually engage with any of Destiny's arguments except for calling the Imp naive. Rob Noerr did a far better job at arguing for the Trump side, but still was unable to make a better argument than Pisco.
Glenn is a good 110 IQ who plays to his 90 IQ populist audience, nothing more.
I see the destiny defense squad has been activated Glen is a lawyer
Who destroyed almost every single one of Destiny's points when he was actually allowed to speak over him and Alex Jones screaming match screaming no you no you
I'm sorry that intelligent people on convinced by screaming fallacy fallacy fallacy
1. There are two teams, each consisting of two or three speakers.

2. Each team has two or three constructive speeches, and two to three rebuttal speeches. The affirmative gives the first constructive speech, and the rebuttals alternate: negative, affirmative, negative, affirmative. The affirmative has both the first and last speeches of the debate.

3. When worded as a proposition of policy, the topic requires the affirmative to support some specified action by some particular individual or group. The affirmative has the right to make any reasonable definition of each of the terms of the proposition. If the negative challenges the reasonableness of a definition by the affirmative, the judge must accept the definition of the team that shows better grounds for its interpretation of the term.

4. The affirmative must advocate everything required by the topic itself. No revision of position of a team is permitted during the debate.

5. He who asserts must prove. In order to establish an assertion, the team must support it with enough evidence and logic to convince an intelligent but previously uninformed person that it is more reasonable to believe the assertion than to disbelieve it. Facts must be accurate. Visual materials are permissible, and once introduced, they become available for the opponents' use if desired.

6. In the questioning period, the questioner may ask any fair, clear question that has a direct bearing on the debate. The questioner may use the period to build up any part of his own case, to tear down any part of his opposition's case, or to ascertain facts, such as the opposition's position on a certain issue, that can be used later in the debate. The questioner must confine himself to questions and not make statements, comments, or ask rhetorical questions.

7. Each speaker is questioned as soon as he concludes his constructive speech. The witness must answer the questions without consulting his colleagues.

8. No new constructive arguments may be introduced in the rebuttal period. The affirmative must, if possible, reply to the major negative arguments before the last rebuttal.

9. The judge must base his decision entirely on the material presented, without regard for other material which he may happen to possess.

10. Any gains made outside of the established procedure are disallowed.

I could go over every single one of Destiny's debates and point out how he violates basically every rule of debate and those are just the 10 basic rules of debate there's also 50 basic rules of etiquette one of which is you do not scream fallacy at people or talk about fallacies or even talk about people in a negative light

Destiny is not a good debater by the basic standards of actual debate Destiny is just the epitome of Dunning Kruger affect
If Destiny had to debate people from a country that has serious intellectual debates which you're not really going to find outside of Eastern European universities or Japan or Southeast Asian universities Destiny would be laughed out of the room for being an intellectual midget as well as a regular midget
 
I see the destiny defense squad has been activated Glen is a lawyer
Who destroyed almost every single one of Destiny's points when he was actually allowed to speak over him and Alex Jones screaming match screaming no you no you
I'm sorry that intelligent people on convinced by screaming fallacy fallacy fallacy
1. There are two teams, each consisting of two or three speakers.

2. Each team has two or three constructive speeches, and two to three rebuttal speeches. The affirmative gives the first constructive speech, and the rebuttals alternate: negative, affirmative, negative, affirmative. The affirmative has both the first and last speeches of the debate.

3. When worded as a proposition of policy, the topic requires the affirmative to support some specified action by some particular individual or group. The affirmative has the right to make any reasonable definition of each of the terms of the proposition. If the negative challenges the reasonableness of a definition by the affirmative, the judge must accept the definition of the team that shows better grounds for its interpretation of the term.

4. The affirmative must advocate everything required by the topic itself. No revision of position of a team is permitted during the debate.

5. He who asserts must prove. In order to establish an assertion, the team must support it with enough evidence and logic to convince an intelligent but previously uninformed person that it is more reasonable to believe the assertion than to disbelieve it. Facts must be accurate. Visual materials are permissible, and once introduced, they become available for the opponents' use if desired.

6. In the questioning period, the questioner may ask any fair, clear question that has a direct bearing on the debate. The questioner may use the period to build up any part of his own case, to tear down any part of his opposition's case, or to ascertain facts, such as the opposition's position on a certain issue, that can be used later in the debate. The questioner must confine himself to questions and not make statements, comments, or ask rhetorical questions.

7. Each speaker is questioned as soon as he concludes his constructive speech. The witness must answer the questions without consulting his colleagues.

8. No new constructive arguments may be introduced in the rebuttal period. The affirmative must, if possible, reply to the major negative arguments before the last rebuttal.

9. The judge must base his decision entirely on the material presented, without regard for other material which he may happen to possess.

10. Any gains made outside of the established procedure are disallowed.

I could go over every single one of Destiny's debates and point out how he violates basically every rule of debate and those are just the 10 basic rules of debate there's also 50 basic rules of etiquette one of which is you do not scream fallacy at people or talk about fallacies or even talk about people in a negative light

Destiny is not a good debater by the basic standards of actual debate Destiny is just the epitome of Dunning Kruger affect
If Destiny had to debate people from a country that has serious intellectual debates which you're not really going to find outside of Eastern European universities or Japan or Southeast Asian universities Destiny would be laughed out of the room for being an intellectual midget as well as a regular midget
That's a lot of words to just say you went to the debate club in HS ( and probably didn't lose your virginity until your 20s), this isn't how humans communicate and following debate etiquette doesn't mean you are right, it just means you are autistic.
Also never defended Destiny, nor did I say he's as smart as he thinks he is or smart at all, for my assertions to be true (which they are) Destiny only needs to be smarter than Glenn (and he is).
Glenn is a faggot, that tells you all you know, and he continued to try to run from the actual topic that could prove Jan 6th as an attempted coup, which were Trump's and his allies' actions before, during and after Jan 6, by only focusing in the "rioting" and doing whataboutism about what the democrats did Glenn proved he knows what Trump did was either morally grey or outright wrong, which could also be noticed by how unconfortable he (and his debate partners) got when Destiny continued to reframe the conversation to the actual relevant topic, and sometimes even outright ignoring points Destiny brought, instead of talking about whether the Trump's fanatics broke enough windows that day to deem it a riot.
Either way they are going to debate again one-on-one soon so we will be able to see Glenn flesh out his arguments more.
(won't respond again until the next Glenn debate, since I don't want to derail the thread into whether or not Jan 6 was an attempted coup)
 
Glenn lost all his credibility a good while ago and once you find yourself arguing the same side as Alex Jones you pretty much are worth not much more than a lolcow.
As Sam Harris said, Glenn is just a retard who won the journalistic lottery because Snowden liked his politics
 
Glenn lost all his credibility a good while ago and once you find yourself arguing the same side as Alex Jones you pretty much are worth not much more than a lolcow.
As Sam Harris said, Glenn is just a retard who won the journalistic lottery because Snowden liked his politics
Sam Harris is pretty much a lolcow himself, I personally don’t really hold his opinions on anything in a high regard.

One of the War Mode guys said it best; Sam Harris seems like the type of guy who was told he’s a “genius” ever since he was a kid and he’s lived his whole life with such an inflated ego that he can’t ever be open to the possibility that he’s incorrect about anything. Just like Tiny, actually.
 
Sam Harris is pretty much a lolcow himself, I personally don’t really hold his opinions on anything in a high regard.

One of the War Mode guys said it best; Sam Harris seems like the type of guy who was told he’s a “genius” ever since he was a kid and he’s lived his whole life with such an inflated ego that he can’t ever be open to the possibility that he’s incorrect about anything. Just like Tiny, actually.

I give Sam a lot of credit for being pretty much the only one of the "intellectual dark web" who didn't turn grifter and even called them out by name. He could have made a lot more money had he jumped on the bandwagon.
 
Back