Glenn seems like a huge sperg who has been living from his past fame and was never able to surpass it, as it was a fluke and he's a hack, and he's a faggot, which is why he was unable to actually engage with any of Destiny's arguments except for calling the Imp naive. Rob Noerr did a far better job at arguing for the Trump side, but still was unable to make a better argument than Pisco.
Glenn is a good 110 IQ who plays to his 90 IQ populist audience, nothing more.
I see the destiny defense squad has been activated Glen is a lawyer
Who destroyed almost every single one of Destiny's points when he was actually allowed to speak over him and Alex Jones screaming match screaming no you no you
I'm sorry that intelligent people on convinced by screaming fallacy fallacy fallacy
1. There are two teams, each consisting of two or three speakers.
2. Each team has two or three constructive speeches, and two to three rebuttal speeches. The affirmative gives the first constructive speech, and the rebuttals alternate: negative, affirmative, negative, affirmative. The affirmative has both the first and last speeches of the debate.
3. When worded as a proposition of policy, the topic requires the affirmative to support some specified action by some particular individual or group. The affirmative has the right to make any reasonable definition of each of the terms of the proposition. If the negative challenges the reasonableness of a definition by the affirmative, the judge must accept the definition of the team that shows better grounds for its interpretation of the term.
4. The affirmative must advocate everything required by the topic itself. No revision of position of a team is permitted during the debate.
5. He who asserts must prove. In order to establish an assertion, the team must support it with enough evidence and logic to convince an intelligent but previously uninformed person that it is more reasonable to believe the assertion than to disbelieve it. Facts must be accurate. Visual materials are permissible, and once introduced, they become available for the opponents' use if desired.
6. In the questioning period, the questioner may ask any fair, clear question that has a direct bearing on the debate. The questioner may use the period to build up any part of his own case, to tear down any part of his opposition's case, or to ascertain facts, such as the opposition's position on a certain issue, that can be used later in the debate. The questioner must confine himself to questions and not make statements, comments, or ask rhetorical questions.
7. Each speaker is questioned as soon as he concludes his constructive speech. The witness must answer the questions without consulting his colleagues.
8. No new constructive arguments may be introduced in the rebuttal period. The affirmative must, if possible, reply to the major negative arguments before the last rebuttal.
9. The judge must base his decision entirely on the material presented, without regard for other material which he may happen to possess.
10. Any gains made outside of the established procedure are disallowed.
I could go over every single one of Destiny's debates and point out how he violates basically every rule of debate and those are just the 10 basic rules of debate there's also 50 basic rules of etiquette one of which is you do not scream fallacy at people or talk about fallacies or even talk about people in a negative light
Destiny is not a good debater by the basic standards of actual debate Destiny is just the epitome of Dunning Kruger affect
If Destiny had to debate people from a country that has serious intellectual debates which you're not really going to find outside of Eastern European universities or Japan or Southeast Asian universities Destiny would be laughed out of the room for being an intellectual midget as well as a regular midget